Attachment L-03 - Past Performance Questionnaire 23R5108 03OCT2022.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 30 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Solicitation for Electronic Warfare Training Systems (EWTS) II Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N00024-23-R-5108
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for contractors bidding on solicitation N00024-23-R-5108 from the Department of the Navy Naval Sea Systems Command for Electronic Warfare Training Systems (EWTS) II. The questionnaire asks the government technical representative to evaluate the past performance of the contractor named on factors such as conforming to requirements, submitting accurate reports, utilizing appropriate personnel, timely performance, responsiveness, cost and schedule control, subcontract management, and communication. The representative is asked to indicate their level of confidence in the contractor successfully performing the required effort as substantial, satisfactory, limited, no confidence, or unknown. Additionally, narrative explanations can be provided for no confidence ratings or other issues.
The related solicitation provides additional context, as it identifies solicitation N00024-23-R-5108 as being for Electronic Warfare Training Systems (EWTS) II from the Department of the Navy Naval Sea Systems Command. No other details are included regarding the required products or services, pricing terms, response dates, or other salient information.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 32
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1 CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY N00024-23-R-5108 Attachment L-03
| CONTRACTOR NAME: | CONTRACT NUMBER: | ||
| EVALUATION PERIOD: | DELIVERY ORDER NO.: N | ||
| GOVERNMENT TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE: | |||
| Name | Code | Date |
Please read the statements below, indicating your relative level of agreement in the box provided. Please insert a ‘X’ in the box that most closely reflects your opinion. Past Performance Factors are defined on page 4: NOTE: For statements indicating No Confidence or for any additional narratives, explanation may be provided on the attached page.
| Substantial Confidence | Satisfactory | Limited | No Confidence | Unknown | |
| (a) The Contractor provided a product or service that conformed to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship |
(b) The Contractor submitted accurate reports.
(c) The Contractor utilized personnel that were appropriate to the effort performed.
(d) The tasks required under this effort were performed in a timely manner and in accordance with the period of performance of the contract.
(e) The Contractor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction.
(f) The Contractor performed the effort within the estimated cost/price.
(g) The Contractor submitted accurate invoices on a timely basis.
(h) The Contractor demonstrated cost efficiencies in performing the required effort.
(i) The actual costs/rates realized closely reflected the negotiated costs/rates.
(j) The Contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed.
(k) The Contractor maintained an open line of communication so that the COR and/or Technical Point of Contact were apprised of technical, cost, and schedule issues.
(l) The Contractor presented information and correspondence in a clear, concise, and businesslike manner.
(m) The Contractor promptly notified the Contracting Officer’s Representative, Technical Point of Contact, and/or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent issues.
(n) The Contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive, and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues.
(f) The Contractor made timely award to, and demonstrated effective management of, its subcontractors.
| Total: | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rating Description |
Substantial Confidence - Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Satisfactory Confidence -Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
Unknown Confidence (Neutral) No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.
| CONTRACTOR NAME: | CONTRACT NUMBER: |
| NARRATIVE EXPLANATION: |
Attachment L-22 - Past Performance Questionnaire
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .