M67854-17-R-5005-01.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to:

1. Address questions received in response to the solicitation.

2. Amend PWS (changes are bold and underlined).

3. Amend Section 4 of the PWS for travel to local areas.

4. Add clause 52.228-3 and 252.225-7043.

5. Amend CDRLs in accordance with questions and answers (numbers 90, 91, 92, 93, and 94).

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

Y 1 54

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 01-Mar-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X M67854-17-R-5005

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

08-Feb-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

13-Feb-2017

CODE

M67854 - MARCORSYSCOM

ATTN: KIMBERLY STONE

2200 LESTER STREET

QUANTICO VA 22134

M67854 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

M67854-17-R-5005

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

CLIN 0002

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

The contractor shall provide Programmatic Support for the Automatic Test Systems (ATS) Team in accordance with the Performance Work Statement, Section 2.5, inclusive of sections 2.5.1 through 2.5.16, plus 2.4.6.

To:

The contractor shall provide Programmatic Support for the Automatic Test Systems (ATS) Team in accordance with the Performance Work Statement, Section 2.5, inclusive of sections 2.5.1 through 2.5.9, plus 2.4.6

CLIN 0003

The contractor shall provide Programmatic Support for the General Purpose Tools/Calibration (GPT/C) Team in accordance with the Performance Work Statement, Section 2.5, inclusive of sections 2.5.1 through 2.5.16, plus 2.4.6.

The contractor shall provide Programmatic Support for the General Purpose Tools/Calibration (GPT/C) Team in accordance with the Performance Work Statement, Section 2.5, inclusive of sections 2.5.1 through 2.5.9, plus 2.4.6

CLIN 0006

The contractor shall provide Program Management Support for the ATS Team in accordance with the Performance Work Statement, Section 3.1, inclusive of sections 3.1.1 through 3.1.17.

The contractor shall provide Program Management Support for the ATS Team in accordance with the Performance Work Statement, Section 3.1, inclusive of sections 3.1.1 through 3.1.12

CLIN 0007

The contractor shall provide Program Management Support for the GPT/C Team in accordance with the Performance Work Statement, Section 3.1, inclusive of sections 3.1.1 through 3.1.17.

Performance Work Statement, Section 3.1, inclusive of sections 3.1.1 through 3.1.12

CLIN 0009

The contractor shall provide Integrated Logistics Support for the ATS Team in accordance with the Performance Work Statement, Section 3.2, specifically and only for sections 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.2.4, 3.2.5, 3.2.10 and 3.2.14.

The contractor shall provide Integrated Logistics Support for the ATS Team in accordance with the Performance Work Statement, Section 3.2, inclusive of sections 3.2.1 through 3.2.6

CLIN 0010

The contractor shall provide Integrated Logistics Support for the GPT/C Team in accordance with the Performance Work Statement, Section 3.2, specifically and only for sections 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.2.4, 3.2.5, 3.2.10 and 3.2.14.

The contractor shall provide Integrated Logistics Support for the GPT/C Team in accordance with the Performance

CLIN 0016

Travel, non-profit bearing to locations contained in paragraph 4.2 of the Performance Work Statement in support of

PM SMS

Travel, non-profit bearing to locations contained in paragraph 4.2 of the Performance Work Statement in support of PM SMS. Not to exceed $87,000.00

CLIN 0017

Travel, non-profit bearing to locations contained in paragraph 4.2 of the Performance Work Statement in support of

Travel, non-profit bearing to locations contained in paragraph 4.2 of the Performance Work Statement in support of PM SMS. Not to exceed $22,000.00

CLIN 0018

Travel, non-profit bearing to locations contained in paragraph 4.2 of the Performance

Travel, non-profit bearing to locations contained in paragraph 4.2 of the Performance. Not to exceed $22,000.00

CLIN 1002

The contractor shall provide Programmatic Support for the Automatic Test Systems (ATS) Team in accordance with

The contractor shall provide Programmatic Support for the Automatic Test Systems (ATS) Team in accordance with

CLIN 1003

The contractor shall provide Programmatic Support for the General Purpose Tools/Calibration (GPT/C) Team in accordance with the Performance Work Statement, Section 2.5, inclusive of sections 2.5.1 through 2.5.16, plus

The contractor shall provide Programmatic Support for the General Purpose Tools/Calibration (GPT/C) Team in accordance with the Performance Work Statement, Section 2.5, inclusive of sections 2.5.1 through 2.5.9, plus 2.4.6

CLIN 1006

The contractor shall provide Program Management Support for the ATS Team in accordance with the Performance

The contractor shall provide Program Management Support for the ATS Team in accordance with the Performance

CLIN 1007

CLIN 1009

The contractor shall provide Integrated Logistics Support for the ATS Team in accordance with the Performance Work Statement, Section 3.2, specifically and only for sections 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.2.4, 3.2.5, 3.2.10 and 3.2.14.

The contractor shall provide Integrated Logistics Support for the ATS Team in accordance with the Performance

CLIN 1010

The contractor shall provide Integrated Logistics Support for the GPT/C Team in accordance with the Performance Work Statement, Section 3.2, specifically and only for sections 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.2.4, 3.2.5, 3.2.10 and 3.2.14.

The contractor shall provide Integrated Logistics Support for the GPT/C Team in accordance with the Performance

CLIN 1016

Travel, non-profit bearing to locations contained in paragraph 4.2 of the Performance Work Statement in support of

Travel, non-profit bearing to locations contained in paragraph 4.2 of the Performance Work Statement in support of PM SMS. Not to exceed $120,000.00

CLIN 1017

Travel, non-profit bearing to locations contained in paragraph 4.2 of the Performance Work Statement in support of

Travel, non-profit bearing to locations contained in paragraph 4.2 of the Performance Work Statement in support of PM SMS. Not to exceed $30,000.00

CLIN 1018

Travel, non-profit bearing to locations contained in paragraph 4.2 of the Performance. Not to exceed $30,000.00

CLIN 2002

The contractor shall provide Programmatic Support for the Automatic Test Systems (ATS) Team in accordance with

The contractor shall provide Programmatic Support for the Automatic Test Systems (ATS) Team in accordance with

CLIN 2003

The contractor shall provide Programmatic Support for the General Purpose Tools/Calibration (GPT/C) Team in accordance with the Performance Work Statement, Section 2.5, inclusive of sections 2.5.1 through 2.5.16, plus

The contractor shall provide Programmatic Support for the General Purpose Tools/Calibration (GPT/C) Team in accordance with the Performance Work Statement, Section 2.5, inclusive of sections 2.5.1 through 2.5.9, plus 2.4.6

CLIN 2006

The contractor shall provide Program Management Support for the ATS Team in accordance with the Performance

The contractor shall provide Program Management Support for the ATS Team in accordance with the Performance

CLIN 2007

CLIN 2009

The contractor shall provide Integrated Logistics Support for the ATS Team in accordance with the Performance Work Statement, Section 3.2, specifically and only for sections 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.2.4, 3.2.5, 3.2.10 and 3.2.14.

The contractor shall provide Integrated Logistics Support for the ATS Team in accordance with the Performance

CLIN 2010

The contractor shall provide Integrated Logistics Support for the GPT/C Team in accordance with the Performance Work Statement, Section 3.2, specifically and only for sections 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.2.4, 3.2.5, 3.2.10 and 3.2.14.

The contractor shall provide Integrated Logistics Support for the GPT/C Team in accordance with the Performance

CLIN 2016

Travel, non-profit bearing to locations contained in paragraph 4.2 of the Performance Work Statement in support of

Travel, non-profit bearing to locations contained in paragraph 4.2 of the Performance Work Statement in support of PM SMS. Not to exceed $120,000.00

CLIN 2017

Travel, non-profit bearing to locations contained in paragraph 4.2 of the Performance Work Statement in support of

Travel, non-profit bearing to locations contained in paragraph 4.2 of the Performance Work Statement in support of PM SMS. Not to exceed $30,000.00

CLIN 2018

Travel, non-profit bearing to locations contained in paragraph 4.2 of the Performance. Not to exceed $30,000.00

The following have been added by full text:

QUESTION AND ANSWERS

PM SMS Support Services

Questions and Answers

Q1: What is the organizational structure of Government Office being supported?

A1: Program Manager: Supply & Maintenance

Assistant PM for Programs Assistant PM for Logistics Assistant PM for Finance Assistant PM for Engineering Staff Member for Cyber Security Staff Member for Safety Lead Equipment Specialist @ Albany

- Acquisition Team – Family of Field Medical Equipment (includes Family of Shelters and Shelter Equipment)

- Acquisition Team – Automatic Test Systems & EMSS

- Acquisition Team – General Purpose Tools & Test Systems and Calibration Programs

Q2: For the Integrated Master Schedule (PWS) tasks (PWS pars. 3.1.11 and 3.1.12), how many Full Time

Employees (FTEs) are currently being used to provide the required services?

A2: Currently, there are two full-time schedulers. Offerors are not required to propose the same number of personnel as provided in the incumbent contracts. Offerors must make their own independent business determination as to how best to meet the government’s requirements.

Q3: What are the minimum qualifications that the IMS schedulers must have?

A3: The only qualification for the IMS schedulers is that they have sufficient experience and ability to satisfactorily complete PWS paragraphs 3.1.1 and 3.1.12. While there is no standard set of qualifications, a Staffing Approach that failed to provide personnel with Microsoft Project proficiency would most likely be evaluated as a weakness or deficiency. Experience maintaining DoD acquisition program schedules would most likely be evaluated as strength.

Q4: Will the number of IMS’s be limited to 20 for the length of the contract?

A4: No. PWS paragraph 3.1.11 states that there are currently 20 active IMS’s. Over the performance period of the planned contract, it is expected that new IMS’S will need to be created as new programs are established. There could be as many as one IMS per program to include those programs in sustainment.

Updates to program IMS’s will be at the direction of the individual project teams.

Q5: What is the purpose of the Marine Expeditionary Force- Knowledgebase (MEF- KB) (2.5.12)?

A5: MEF-KB - The site was set up by the Family of Field Medical Equipment (FFME) Team in an effort to communicate with the MEFs regarding medical materiel management for the Marine Corps Enterprise through one single site.

Medical Logistics Online (MLO) SharePoint site is the system of record for Class VIII data and provides the Family of Field Medical Equipment (FFME) the ability to use online delivery channels to stream line assemblage life cycle management and to timely and effectively deliver component and materiel data crucial to the medical needs of the war fighter. Line and packing lists are created, maintained and distributed to the Medical Logistics Companies. The site provides up-to-date, necessary changes to Authorize Medical Allowance Lists (AMALs) that allows users to reconcile the current AMAL equipment, supplies and medication lists. It also provides the information end users need to maintain items and make purchases when preparing for deployment. The MLO database allows for data transformations between the MLO and the Defense Medical Logistics Standard Support (DMLSS) for consistency and standardization.

Q6: What is the purpose of Defense Medical Logistics Standard Support (DMLSS)?

A6: DMLSS contains a medical maintenance tracking capability that generates reports on all maintenance due and completed on the Med Log Company’s medical equipment. These reports are utilized to conduct trend analysis and provide readiness status of onsite AMALs.

Q7: What level of effort will be required to conduct updates and data reconciliation within the Government

Structured Query Language SQL Server database?

A7: Fedlog reports are published every month by the SharePoint Administrator and posted on the MEF KB so that the MedLog Officers and the Project Officers/AMAL Managers can view the Acquisition Advice Code (AAC), Shelf Life Code (SLC), Cognizance Symbols (COG) that identify the inventory manager/Inventory, Control Point (ICP, Major Organizational Entity (MOE) and Unit Price changes to the National Stock Number (NSN) data. The numbers of changes are different every month and the changes require extensive research by the AMAL Managers, SharePoint Administrators and Logisticians. The research is conducted to identify suitable substitutes, active contract vehicles, submission of PSRs requirement and validation of packing/line list/potential configuration changes to the affected AMALs/ADAL, kits and sets.

Q8: What level of effort is required to prepare testing packages for submission to U.S. Army Aeronautical

Research Laboratory USAARL?

A8: All medical equipment that has the potential to be used on any airframes must undergo air worthiness testing. USAARL is the organization responsible for testing the equipment and Naval Air Systems Command is the approving authority.

Q9: What are Medical Prime Vendor and Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Distribution and Pricing Agreement

(DAPA) Prime Vendor Buy Lists?

A9: Family of Field Medical Equipment’s primary source of supply is the Defense Logistics Agency’s Prime

Vendor contract. In order for a company’s product to be available on the Prime Vendor contract they must have entered into a Distribution and Pricing Agreement (DAPA) with DLA. The submitted buy lists are separated by those items that are available through the Prime Vendor and those that are not.

Q10: What is a DMLSS Inventory Manager?

A10: DMLSS Equipment Maintenance is accomplished within the Equipment Maintenance Module The following can be performed in the Equipment Maintenance module within DMLSS: programmed preventive maintenance of medical equipment, management by life cycle coding of medical equipment, process medical materiel complaints, medical maintenance man-hour accounting, emergency work orders, scheduled services and calibration, preventive maintenance training, and review of potential purchases for new equipment requirements. Equipment Management is accomplished with the Assemblage Management (AM) module and provides a comprehensive program that supports a smooth transition from peacetime to wartime or other contingency, using automation to create a seamless, efficient process. AM provides the user the capability to manage standard and non-standard assemblages, including standard procedures such as assemblage sales, quality assurance, and identifying items to be ordered, replenished, transferred or received.

Q11: What is the level of effort expected at the Joint Defense Medical Logistic Center (JDMLC), Fort Detrick, MD?

A11: JDMLC is the lead Medical Logistics center for all services and falls under the Defense Health Agency.

All services Medical Logistics HQs are currently represented at Fort Detrick by government personnel with the exception of the Marine Corps. While the Navy can represent us on certain issues our liaison there serves as a conduit to the issues onsite, allowing government personnel at FFME to stay abreast of the issues and provide input when needed.

Q12: What is the level of effort expected at Camp Lejeune, NC?

A12: Camp Lejeune, NC is where FFME completes the configuration management of the AMALs upon completion of modernization reviews, as well as on an as needed basis dependent on product availability and any other changes in current line lists. This includes the updating of FFME SharePoint databases (MLO/MEF KB) used by our customers.

Q13: Do you have any reference manuals on your portfolio of equipment (like MT Characteristics Manual)?

A13: Yes, The TMDE team published “TMDE Listing” under TM #10510-OR/1

Q14: How many support personnel do you anticipate to be working in Government spaces at Albany?

A14: The anticipated number of four (4) support personnel to be located at MCSC Albany and to reside in

Government spaces next to PM S&M Equipment Specialists.

Q15: Will support personnel be able to sit in Government spaces at Quantico?

A15: The vendor should anticipate 4 personnel to reside in Government spaces (if space available) in the

Quantico area. Support personnel will be provided access hot seats with Government computers in order to access government e-mail accounts and Government web sites. On occasion additional support personnel will be able to sit in available hot seats for short periods. Support personnel will need to provide laptop and cell phone while in these seats as no government equipment will be provided.

Q16: Once a Document is Delivered, will support personnel be involved in (responsible for) revisions and rewrites based on the staffing/review process?

A16: Yes, support personnel will be required to make changes/revisions to delivered documents until they are signed.

Q17: What is the average number of active Programs of Record (PORs) does the Automatic Test Systems (ATS)

Family of Systems (FoS) manage each FY?

A17: The number of active programs is five (5).

Q18: What is the average number of systems (TAMCNS) does the ATS FoS manage is the Operation and

Support phase each FY?

A18: The average number of systems is twenty five (25).

Q19: What is the average number of new PoRs initiated in each FY in the ATS FoS?

A19: The average number of new PoRs is one (1).

Q20: What is the average number of PoRs that are fielded each FY in the ATS FoS?

A20: The average number of PoRs fielded is one (1).

Q21: What is the average length of time per PoR from initiation to fielding in the ATS FoS ?

A21: The average length of time per PoR is two and half (2.5) years.

Q22: Is this requirement a new effort or a follow-on to a current contract. If it is a follow-on, what is the contract number of the current contract?

A22: This requirement will be a consolidation of two current contracts. N00178-10-D-6179-MU64 awarded to

MLT Systems, LLC, 56 Brittany Lane, Stafford, VA 22554; and N00178-12-D-6883-MU63 awarded to Get It Done Solutions, LLC, 10908 Courthouse Road, Fredericksburg, VA 22408.

Q23: Is there any particular format that the Government desires for the staffing table listed in Part II - Staffing

Approach on page 92 of the RFP?

A23: The Government requests that the offerors align their staffing table in CLIN order. For CLINs 0001 through 0015, CLINs 1001 through 1015, and CLINs 2001 through 2015, the staffing table should list the total number of FTE's proposed for each CLIN. The table must also provide a breakdown of this total FTE amount by labor category.

Q24: How much detail is required in the various labor category definitions?

A24: It is a business decision for the offeror to determine how much detail to include in the labor category definitions. Please note that the Instructions to Offerors provide the following warning: "The Government will not assume that an Offeror possesses any capability, understanding, and/or commitment that is not specifically delineated and supported in its respective proposal." Offerors should include enough detail in the labor category definitions to fully describe the experience level and qualifications being proposed.

Q25: CLINs 0016 – 0018; Will the Government provide the dollar amount for travel that bidders are to list in the model contract as the NTE figure, or should bidders leave that section (price figure) blank?

A25: Yes, see amended travel CLINs for NTE amounts.

Q26: CLIN 0019; This CLIN is for ODC costs. Is it the Government’s intent to allow contractors to bid DBA insurance as a reimbursable cost? Are there any other items that the Government expects contractors to bid as ODCs?

A26: The cost of DBA insurance is considered to be a typical business expense and not reimbursable under ODC costs. All ODCs must be approved by the COR prior to request for payment.

Q27: PWS Section 2.0; This paragraph lists several locations where support is required at Government-site, to include Indian Head, MD. However, Indian Head, MD is not listed anywhere else in the PWS. Can the Government please confirm if support is required at this location and if so, should Indian Head, MD have been include in para 2.4.6 and what is the quantity of Govt-provided seats at Indian Head?

A27: Currently the government does not have a full time government provided seat on-site at Indian Head, MD.

This may be a requirement in the future.

Q28: PWS Section 2.4.6; For the Government provided “seat spaces” listed in this paragraph, will the

Government be responsible for providing the computers, phones, email accounts, printer access, and connectivity, or does the Contractor need to provide those items?

A28: Support personnel will be provided access hot seats with Government computers in order to access government e-mail accounts and Government web sites. On occasion additional support personnel will be able to sit in available hot seats for short periods. Support personnel will need to provide laptop and cell phone while in these seats as no government equipment will be provided.

Q29: PWS Sections 2.0, 2.2, and 2.4.6; Regarding the requirement to provide on-site support in Okinawa, there is no reference made in the solicitation to the Government providing SOFA status for overseas contractor personnel. For the required contractor position to be located in Okinawa, Japan, can the Government please confirm that SOFA status will be included upon award of the task order?

A29: Assistance will be provided to obtain SOFA status for contractor employees working in Okinawa.

Q30: PWS Section 2.4.2; Is the “senior Contractor analyst” a particular position that the Government is requiring

(or a labor category that must be bid) and if so, what are the required tasks for “senior Contractor analyst”?

A30: The Government is not requiring a particular position; it is the Offeror’s responsibility to propose the labor categories. The Government’s expectation that anywhere the PWS references “senior” requirements, the qualifications will be equivalent to a DAWIA level III certification.

Q31: PWS Section 2.4.2; Does the Government accept a PMP certification as being the equivalent knowledge and experience of a DAWIA Level 3 program management certification?

A31: No, PMP certification does not meet any fulfillment requirements for DAWIA Level III Program

Management certification.

Q32: PWS Section 2.5.14; How is the virtual library solution identified in this paragraph expected to differ from the SharePoint site and SQL server identified elsewhere in the PWS (e.g.: 2.5.13, 2.5.16)?

A32: The virtual library identified in this paragraph is similar to the SharePoint site and SQL server but they are managed separately.

Q33: PWS Section 3.1; This paragraph states that program support is divided into three sections. However, it seems as though four sections are listed. 1. Enterprise Level Support, 2. Family of Field Medical Team Support, 3. Family of Shelters and Shelter Equipment Support, and 4. Family of Automated Test Systems and Family of General Purpose Tools and Test Systems. Can the Government please provide clarification?

A33: Refer to PWS Section 2.5 for the definition of Enterprise Level Support.

Q34: PWS Section 3.2.8; This paragraph requires monthly audit of backup tapes. Are tapes still being used at the local level for maintenance of medical records, or will some other method of backup be utilized?

A34: Yes, tapes are being used at the local level for maintenance of medical records.

Q35: PWS Section 3.2.8; What operating systems does the DMLSS utilize?

A35: DMLSS utilizes Oracle 12c.

Q36: PWS Section 3.2.8; Are there any IT, security, or network certifications required of the contractors serving at the MEDLOGCOs?

A36: The certifications a requirement is Security Plus Certification as listed in Appendix C – Tools, Item 4.

Q37: PWS Section 3.3.9; This section states the Contractor shall access the PDREP. Should the PWS be amended to specifically state the requirement is part of the job?

A37: Yes. See section 3.3.9 amendment as well as Appendix C-Tools.

Q38: PWS Section 3.5.9; Does the Hazard Tracking Database required in this paragraph already exist, or will the database need to be newly created?

A38: The database will need to be created.

Q39: PWS Appendix C, Item 4; Could the Government provide additional clarification regarding the statement:

“Must have Security Plus Certification”? Is this referring to CompTIA or some other certification?

A39: Yes this item is referring to CompTIA certification.

Q40: RFP, Contract Summary; Can the Government provide the anticipated start date for the base period of performance?

A40: The anticipated start date of the period of performance is dependent on award of the contract resulting from this solicitation. It is the Governments expectation the period of performance will begin around July 2017.

Q41: RFP, Instructions to Offerors; Regarding the Technical Volume, Part III (Past Performance), is there a maximum number of references that offerors may submit?

A41: No, there is no maximum number of references, however the proposal must adhere to section 2.0

Preparation of Proposals and be within the 10 pages limit listed in the Volume Content table.

Q42: RFP, Evaluation Factor 1; Can the Government provide details as to how contractor Full-Time Equivalent positons it considers to be an unreasonably low estimate?

A42: It is the Offeror’s responsibility to propose adequate resources to perform the functions as outlined in the

RFP.

Q43: How many contractor FTEs (full-time equivalents) currently support the four teams comprising PM SMS?

A43: The current organizational structure is changing and the current structure is not relevant. It is the Offeror’s responsibility to propose adequate resources to perform the functions as outlined in the RFP.

Q44: PWS Section 2.4.2; Can the Government clarify whether the Program Manager must have the DAIWA

Level III Certification or does equivalency suffice?

A44: The Government is not requiring a particular position; it is the Offeror’s responsibility to propose the labor categories. Equivalent knowledge and experience will suffice.

Q45: PWS Section 2.4.6; Will the Kaneohe Bay Hawaii seat be assigned as a stand-alone DMLSS administrator or will the government be managing this assignment under III MEF in Okinawa Japan MEDLOGCO?

A45: Yes the seat located at Kaneohe Bay Hawaii will be a stand-alone DMLSS administrator.

Q46: PWS Section 2.5.12; Trends analysis- is there a requirement to provide trends analysis from other logistics software other than DMLSS?

A46: Trend analysis will be required from data derived from multiple sources.

Q47: PWS Section 3.1.12, and CDRL B00F; PWS Paragraph 3.1.12 states: “The Contractor shall document all schedules using Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) format IAW CDRL B00F.” Review of CDRL B00F indicates we are to use IMS templates provided by PM SMS. Further, it mentions that PM uses only Microsoft Office Products. Please advise what Microsoft format the PMSMS IMS templates are in e.g.

excel, project, etc.

A47: Microsoft Office 2010 and forward are used.

Q48: PWS Section 3.1.13; How will this training be delivered or conducted? Is there a requirement to travel to each MEDLOG location to deliver and update changes and improvements in DMLSS or will the documents be provided to users to conduct self-paced training?

A48: Travel is discussed in section 4 of the PWS. Section 3.1.13 is in reference to the updates to the training modules only.

Q49: PWS Section 3.2.8; Will the DMLSS administrator be required to have specialized certifications to perform these tasks?

A49: Yes the requirement is to have CompTIA Security Plus certification.

Q50: PWS Sections 2.4.6 and 3.2.8; Is there a requirement for an onsite contractor representative, at MCSC location to be a DMLSS Administrator to conduct the actions required?

A50: DMLSS administration is part of the requirement for the MCSC on-site location.

Q51: PWS Section 3.2.9; Are all medical related TAMCNs accounted for in GCSS-MC or other programs?

A51: Yes the medical related TAMCNs are accounted for in GCSS-MC.

Q52: PWS Section 3.2.12; Will the work supporting this requirement be located at the MEDLOG Company aboard Camp Lejeune or in another location?

A52: There are no on-site facilities provided for the contractor located at Camp Lejeune.

Q53: PWS Section 3.3.3; Is there a requirement to support the Inventory stockage level (ISL) Working Group and Prepositioning Objectives (PO) Working group, Annual or Bi annual works shops? If so, to what locations and for how long?

A53: Yes:

Okinawa Japan – Two (2) Weeks Camp Lejeune, NC – One (1) Week Camp Pendleton, CA – One (1) Week MARFORRES Charleston, SC – One (1) Week

Q54: For staffing purposes, how many hours does the Government consider to be a Full Time Equivalent?

A54: The Government considers a Full Time Equivalent to be 1920 hours.

Q55: Will the Government reimburse as an ODC for any commercial standards the Contractor must comply with?

A55: The cost of any commercial standards is considered to be a typical business expense and will not be reimbursed as an ODC. All ODCs must be preapproved by the COR prior to request for payment.

Q56: Will the Government confirm whether the current PdM TMDE Financial Analyst support will continue to be fulfilled at the PfM LCES level?

A56: Currently PdM TMDE does not have direct contractor financial analyst support.

Q57: Is it the Government's intent for the Administrative Support Personnel to sit on base/on-site?

A57: Support personnel will be provided access hot seats with Government computers in order to access government e-mail accounts and Government web sites. On occasion additional support personnel will be able to sit in available hot seats for short periods. Support personnel will need to provide laptop and cell phone while in these seats as no government equipment will be provided.

Q58: Are administrative support services previously procured under the ICEBERG contract shifting to the PM level?

A58: The RFP list the administrative support services that will be required for this effort.

Q59: Will the Government please define what positions require Defense Base Act (DBA) insurance?

A59: Any contractor deployed outside the United States must have DBA insurance prior to deployment.

Q60: CDRL A003; Of the 42 programs listed in Appendix E (note that CASEVAC is listed twice) how many safety assessment reports have been initiated and how many have been completed?

A60: The Offerors should plan on developing up to 42 safety assessment reports.

Q61: CDRL A005; Of the 42 programs listed in Appendix E, how many PESHES has the government initiated, and how many are complete?

A61: The Offerors should plan on developing up to 42 PESHEs.

Q62: CDRL A00A; Of the 42 Programs listed in Appendix E, how many OSH&S reports has the government initiated, and how many are completed?

A62: The Offerors should plan on developing up to 42 OSH&S reports.

Q63: CDRLs A00c and A00E; Of the 42 Programs listed in Appendix E, how many System Requirements

Hazard Analysis (SRHA) and System of System (SOS) Hazard Analysis Reports has the government initiated, and how many did they complete?

A63: The Offerors should plan on developing up to 42 reports.

Q64: PWS Section 4.2.2; What is the Government's definition of Local travel (travel distance, duration and time)?

A64: Local travel is in accordance with the Joint Travel Regulations. See amended section 4.2.

Q65: PWS Sections 3.5.3 and 3.5.4; Will the Government please clarify if the contractor can consolidate the

SSHAR into one report as opposed to separate Hazard Analysis Reports for the System and Subsystems?

A65: Yes the contractor can consolidate the reports.

Q66: PWS Section 2.5.14; Will the Government please clarify if the virtual library is a new requirement to be planned with a Government IPT?

A66: The contractor will work with the Government to develop the virtual library. Final approval resides with the Government.

Q67: PWS Section 3.2.14; Will the Government please confirm the name of the DLA Online Application to request new National Stock Numbers (NSNs) is called DMLIIS (Defense Medical Logistics Item Identification System)?

A67: Yes the name should be DMLIIS. See amended section 3.2.14.

Q68: PWS Section 2.6; Is it the Government's intent for the Administrative Support Person to provide administrative support solely to the Program Manager, or PM SMS across the enterprise?

A68: Administrative support is required at the Enterprise Level.

Q69: PWS Section 2.2; Will the Government please confirm "Charlestown, SC" is intended to be "Charleston, SC"?

A69: The location should be Charleston, SC.

Q70: PWS Section 2.5.2; Are the LCES PfM documentation templates available for Offerors to review and reference?

A70: The templates will not be provided at this time.

Q71: PWS Section 2.5.7; Paragraph 2.5.7 states the Contractor is required to "manage PM SMS MS SharePoint

2013 portal architecture and design, configuration, and implementation", but then is called on to do the same for "one or more versions of SharePoint". Would the Government please clarify what other versions the Contractor is required to manage, design, configure and implement?

A71: The current version PM SMS uses is 2013. If the SharePoint version is updated the contractor will be expected to manage the updated version(s) as well.

Q72: PWS Section 3.5; Paragraph 3.5 states "not every item will be required for every program"; however, many of the A CDRLs state "X [deliverable] required per program." Will the Government please clarify if deliverables are required for all supported programs?

A72: Program(s) will require deliverables as dictated by their maturity of the lifecycle.

Q73: PWS Section 2.4.6; Will the Government please confirm seat allocation will remain the same if the PM office relocates?

A73: Seats will be assigned as available.

Q74: PWS Section 2.5.1; Paragraph 2.5.1 states "the Contractor shall perform quality assurance to documentation in support of the acquisition milestone cycles." Is it the Government's intent for the Contractor to review documents written by others? Or is this statement meant to reinforce the Contractor's own internal QA process?

A74: The Contractor will be expected to provide quality assurance for documents written by others as well as have an internal QA process.

Q75: PWS Section 4.2.3; Paragraph 4.2.3 lists NAVSUP Mechanicsburg, VA under TRIPS. Would the

Government please confirm the travel point should be NAVSUP WSS Mechanicsburg, PA?

A75: Yes the travel point is NAVSUP WSS Mechanicsburg, PA.

Q76: PWS Section 3.0; There are no Specific Support parameters for ATS or GPTTS under Paragraph 3.0, with the exception of Paragraph 3.4.1, or Paragraph 3.2. Appendix A lists numerous Family of Test, Measurement and Diagnostic Equipment TAMCNs. Will the Government please clarify the lack of support requirements for TMDE?

A76: Please see question and answer #33 regarding Enterprise Level support. Support specified in the RFP under Enterprise Level is expected to be for all Portfolios.

Q77: PWS Sections 1.3 and 3.1.4; In the two paragraphs cited, Family of General Purpose Tools and Test

Systems (GPTTS) is listed; however, the CDRLs refer to General Purpose Tools/Calibration (GPT/C) Team. Are these separate teams or is one team incorrect/obsolete? Will the Government please clarify which team is currently in use?

A77: The General Purpose Tools and Test Systems (GPTTS) is the same as General Purpose Tools/Calibration (GPT/C) Team.

Q78: PWS Section 3.0; There are no Specific Support parameters for FSSE, FCFF, FOCC in Paragraph 3.0, with the exception of Paragraph 3.1.17. Appendix A lists numerous TAMCNs. Will the Government please clarify the lack of support requirements for these portfolios?

A78: Please see question and answer #33 regarding Enterprise Level support. Support specified in the RFP under Enterprise Level is expected to be for all Portfolios.

Q79: The RFP does not show a requirement for the contractor to develop the POM estimates. Does the

Government intend to task the Contractor to produce the POMFY20 estimates?

A79: No, the Government does not intend to task the Contractor to produce the POMFY20 estimates.

Q80: A CDRLs; CDRL A008 reads "Contractor format, compatible with MCSC computer systems acceptable";

however, CDRLs A00B - A00J read "Contractor format, compatible with SMC computer systems acceptable”. Will the Government please confirm if these are identical requirements?

A80: Yes these are identical requirements.

Q81: CDRL B002; The 2nd Phase of CDRL B002 reads "(1) Training Package, (1) Data Dictionary,(1) within 45 business days within of implementation of solution per approved project schedule". Will the Government please clarify if there is a missing deliverable after the third (1)?

A81: The requirement is for (1) Training package and (1) Data Dictionary. The last “(1)” is a typo.

Q82: CDRL B00G; DI-ILSS-81523 was superseded by DI-ILSS-81523A which was superseded by DI-SESS-

81523B. Will the Government please clarify the appropriate Data Item Description?

A82: The appropriated Data Item Description should have been MIL HDBK – 29612. CDRL has been amended.

Q83: CDRL B00J; Did the Government intend to annotate DI-SAFT-81905 as the Data Item Description for

CDRL B00J instead of DI-SAFI-81905?

A83: The Government intended to annotate DI-SAFT-81905. CDRL has been amended.

Q84: CDRL B00N; Will the Government please clarify what is meant by "365" in "Block 10. Frequency" of

CDRL B00N?

A84: The frequency of this requirement is daily, see amended CDRL.

Q85: CDRL D003 states "The Contractor shall write and/or update an estimate of 20 IUID plans per year. The

Contractor shall submit Fielding Plans and/or updates within 30 business days of task receipt." Will the Government please confirm Fielding Plans are not included in this particular CDRL?

A85: The requirement is for IUID Plans, not Fielding Plans. See amended CDRL.

Q86: CLIN 0014 lists Financial Management support for eight months. This period does not align with any other CLIN durations. Is there a separate contract for Financial Management?

A86: The base period of performance for this CLIN is 8 months. See amended Period of Performance under the Contract Summary.

Q87: The Contract Summary states the contract will be comprised of a base and two option years. Is there a compelling reason why this contract isn't structured as a base and four options like many other MCSC contracts in the recent past?

A87: The contract resulting from this solicitation will be a base with two option years based on the Government’s current need.

Q88: Many CDRLs annotate deliverables "per year". Should Offerors assume that since the base PoP is not a complete year, the number of deliverables would be proportionally less?

A88: Yes the deliverables for the base will be proportional with the period of performance.

Q89: CDRLs A007 and A003; The CDRLs states "Contractor format acceptable"; however, the cited DIDs contain specific content and format instructions. Will the Government please clarify the required format for this deliverable?

A89: Where there is a discrepancy, the DID takes precedence.

Q90: FSSE, FCFF, FOCC PoPs are missing from this section. Will the Government please confirm these PoPs align with the Field Medical Team PoP?

A90: Yes, the PoPs for FSSE, FCFF, and FOCC aligns with Field Medical Team.

Q91: CLIN 0003 indicates the GPT/C Team is responsible for tasks 2.5.1 - 2.5.16, which includes SharePoint administration support. Will the Government please confirm whether SharePoint administration support is a new requirement for the GPT/C Team?

A91: CLIN 0003 description has been amended for tasks 2.5.1 through 2.5.9.

Q92: Is it the Government's intent for the Contractor to provide one Risk Recon Administrator and one

SharePoint Administrator each for ATS and GPTTS?

A92: Risk Recon and SharePoint administration is a requirement for Enterprise Level Support.

Q93: CLIN 0003 indicates the GPT/C Team is responsible for tasks 2.5.1 - 2.5.16; however, in the PWS, tasks

2.5.10 - 2.5.16 are listed as specific to the Family of Field Medical Equipment. Will the Government please clarify?

A93: CLIN 0003 description has been amended for tasks 2.5.1 through 2.5.9.

Q94: CLIN 0007 indicates the GPT/C Team is responsible for tasks 3.1.1 - 3.1.17; however, in the PWS, tasks

3.1.13 - 3.1.17 are listed as specific to Family of Field Medical Equipment and Family of Shelters and Shelter Equipment. Will the Government please clarify?

A94: CLIN 0007 description has been amended for tasks 3.1.1 through 3.1.12.

Q95: CLIN 0010 indicates the GPT/C Team is responsible for tasks 3.2.10 and 3.2.14; however, in the PWS, these tasks are listed as specific to Family of Field Medical Equipment. Will the Government please clarify?

A95: CLIN 0010 description has been amended for tasks 3.2.1 through 3.2.6.

Q96: CLIN 0013 indicates the GPT/C is responsible for tasks 3.3.1 - 3.3.19; however, in the PWS, task 3.3.7 seems to lean toward Family of Field Medical Equipment (i.e. "The contractor shall review medical recall information..."). Will the Government please clarify?

A96: CLIN 0013 description has been amended for tasks 3.3.1 through 3.3.19.

Q97: Section L indicates PPQs should be sent to the appropriate Government point of contact to correspond with each past performance referenced. What is the Government's recommendation if Government Past Performance POCs do not wish to fill out a PPQ?

A97: It is the responsibility of the Offeror to obtain completed PPQs.

Q98: Is it the Government's intent to issue proposal delivery receipts to Offerors?

A98: Proposal delivery receipts are given at time of delivery. If using FedEX or other delivery services, the

Offeror should retain the receipt from the service being used.

Q99: If hand carrying the proposal to the referenced address, should Offerors coordinate a time to deliver proposals to ensure the appropriate Government personnel are available to receive?

A99: Hand delivered proposals should be delivered to:

Marine Corps Systems Command Materiel Management 2201A Willis Street Quantico, VA 22134-6050 Attn: Kimberly A. Stone, 703-432-5302 No coordination is required.

Q100: If hand carrying the proposal to the referenced address, and pre-coordination with the appropriate

Government personnel is not required, during what hours are Offerors able to deliver proposal submissions?

A100: The hours of operation are: 0730- 1130 and 1300 – 1630.

52.228-3 WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE (DEFENSE BASE ACT) (JUL 2014)

(a) The Contractor shall--

(1) Before commencing performance under this contract, establish provisions to provide for the payment of disability compensation and medical benefits to covered employees and death benefits to their eligible survivors, by purchasing workers' compensation insurance or qualifying as a self-insurer under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (33 U.S.C. 932) as extended by the Defense Base Act (42 U.S.C. 1651, et seq.), and continue to maintain provisions to provide such Defense Base Act benefits until contract performance is completed;

(2) Within ten days of an employee's injury or death or from the date the Contractor has knowledge of the injury or death, submit Form LS-202 (Employee's First Report of Injury or Occupational Illness) to the Department of Labor in accordance with the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (33 U.S.C. 930(a), 20 CFR

702.201 to 702.203);

(3) Pay all compensation due for disability or death within the time frames required by the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (33 U.S.C. 914, 20 CFR 702.231 and 703.232);

(4) Provide for medical care as required by the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (33 U.S.C. 907, 20 CFR 702.402 and 702.419);

(5) If controverting the right to compensation, submit Form LS-207 (Notice of Controversion of Right to Compensation) to the Department of Labor in accordance with the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (33 U.S.C. 914(d), 20 CFR 702.251);

(6) Immediately upon making the first payment of compensation in any case, submit Form LS-206 (Payment Of Compensation Without Award) to the Department of Labor in accordance with the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (33 U.S.C. 914(c), 20 CFR 702.234);

(7) When payments are suspended or when making the final payment, submit Form LS-208 (Notice of Final Payment or Suspension of Compensation Payments) to the Department of Labor in accordance with the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (33 U.S.C. 914(c) and (g), 20 CFR 702.234 and 702.235); and

(8) Adhere to all other provisions of the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act as extended by the Defense Base Act, and Department of Labor regulations at 20 CFR Parts 701 to 704.

(b) For additional information on the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act requirements see http://www.dol.gov/owcp/dlhwc/lsdba.htm.

(c) The Contractor shall insert the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (c), in all subcontracts to which the Defense Base Act applies.

(End of clause)

252.225-7043 ANTITERRORISM/FORCE PROTECTION POLICY FOR DEFENSE CONTRACTORS

OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES (JUN 2015)

(a) Definition. United States, as used in this clause, means, the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and outlying areas.

(b) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this clause, the Contractor and its subcontractors, if performing or traveling outside the United States under this contract, shall--

(1) Affiliate with the Overseas Security Advisory Council, if the Contractor or subcontractor is a U.S. entity;

(2) Ensure that Contractor and subcontractor personnel who are U.S. nationals and are in-country on a non-transitory basis, register with the U.S. Embassy, and that Contractor and subcontractor personnel who are third country nationals comply with any security related requirements of the Embassy of their nationality;

(3) Provide, to Contractor and subcontractor personnel, antiterrorism/force protection awareness information commensurate with that which the Department of Defense (DoD) provides to its military and civilian personnel and their families, to the extent such information can be made available prior to travel outside the United States; and

(4) Obtain and comply with the most current antiterrorism/force protection guidance for Contractor and subcontractor personnel.

(c) The requirements of this clause do not apply to any subcontractor that is--

(1) A foreign government;

(2) A representative of a foreign government; or

(3) A foreign corporation wholly owned by a foreign government.

(d) Information and guidance pertaining to DoD antiterrorism/force protection can be obtained from CMC Code POS-10; telephone, DSN 224-4177 or commercial (703) 614-4177.

(End of clause)

The following have been modified:

CONTRACT SUMMARY

Contract Summary

CONTRACT TYPE: Commercial, Firm Fixed Price…