Att_5_SSDS-IM_PPQ_15-T-1017.docx

M67854-15-T-1017 Scout Sniper Day Scope (SSDS) Improved Mount Attachment 5

Past Performance Questionnaire Instructions:

· The offeror/major subcontractor shall complete Sections I and II and provide the sections to the assessor (Government/customer personnel that had experience with the offeror/major subcontractor on a previous relevant contract). The assessor, in turn, should verify Section II, complete the questionnaire, and submit the completed questionnaire to the Contracting Officer. The offeror shall submit copies of Sections I and II of all questionnaires as provided to assessors with its proposal (by the closing date of the solicitation).

· The assessor should validate Section II by checking the appropriate box, annotating any incorrect information and providing correct or additional information, as applicable.

· The assessor should complete Sections III through VII in their entirety.

Message to the assessor: The Marine Corps Systems Command, Program Manager Marine, Infantry Weapons Systems (PMM-113), Product Manager (PdM) Optical and Non-Lethal Systems (ONS) Contracting Office requests your assistance with establishing the performance history for the Contractor named below. In an effort to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting Office respectfully requests that you do not mail hard copies. Instead, please e-mail the completed questionnaire(s) to: kathryn.hurd@usmc.mil and suzanne.blagg@usmc.mil.

I. Solicitation Data (for the proposed effort)

II. Current or Historical Contract Information

Assessor: The performance data submitted by the offeror is |_| correct or |_| incorrect.

CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS:

Contract No

Type of Contract

Contract Value

Period of Performance/Delivery Schedule

Project/Requirement Description(including scope and complexity)

Please select from the following as it applies to this contract:

III. Assessor Information

Assessor Name

Title

Phone Number/Email Address

Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.

Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)

Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)

Contract Specialist

Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)

Technical Project Lead/Project Officer

Quality Assurance Specialist

Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) Auditor

Other:

IV. Evaluation Definitions Use the following definitions in your assessment of Contractor performance.

OR

Otherwise unable to provide assessment.

V. Performance Evaluation

1. Technical Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet the technical requirements?

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory N/A

Technical Performance

Please provide rationale for the assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s technical performance in the following areas.

Satisfactory

N/A

Design

Integration

Testing

Training

Documentation

Provide any additional comments; however, at a minimum, provide rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

2. Schedule Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet the schedule?

Satisfactory

N/A

Schedule Performance

Please provide rationale for assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s schedule performance in the following areas.

Hardware

Assess the Contractor’s ability to resolve Schedule Problems

Provide any additional comments; however, at a minimum, provide rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the technical problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain.

3. Management

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s management performance?

Management

Please provide rationale for assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s management performance in the following areas.

MANAGEMENT RESPONSIVENESS—Timeliness, completeness, and quality of problem identification, proposal submittal, history of cooperative behavior, effective business relations, teamwork AND Customer satisfaction.

SUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT—Timely award and management of subcontracts and meeting subcontracting goals for small business, small disadvantaged business, etc.

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT—Effectiveness of integration and coordination of all activities required to execute the contract, use of resources, assignment of responsibility, internal coordination and communication, and risk management practices.

MANAGEMENT OF PERSONNEL—Ability to select, retain, support, and replace personnel with the experience and expertise necessary to accomplish the Government’s requirements within schedule and budget.

INTEGRATED PRODUCT TEAM MANAGEMENT—Commitment and participation to the IPT process.

All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, rationale must be provided for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the technical problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain.

VI. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (technical, schedule, and management) on contract being assessed.

VII. General Comments: