ATTACHMENT_2_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 59 KB Posted

Attached to
SWRFT Motor Vehicle Operator Support
Solicitation number
M00681-17-T-0004
Issued by

About this file

Past Performance questionnaire

View the file

Other files

Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 2

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Instructions:

◊ Sections I through III are to be completed by the Offeror/Major Subcontractor and provided to the assessor (Government personnel who had experience with the Offeror/Major Subcontractor on a previous relevant contract). The assessor, in turn, to verify Sections I through III, complete the questionnaire, and submit to the Contracting Office.

◊ Section II to be validated by the assessor. If any information is incorrect herein, please annotate and provide the correct information accordingly.

◊ Sections III through VII are to be completed in their entirety by the assessor.

Message to the assessor: Your assistance is requested by the USMC to assist with establishing the performance history for the Contractor named below. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting Office respectfully requests that you do not mail hard copies. Instead, please e-mail the completed questionnaire(s) to: Diana Lynch-Maldonado, Diana.Lynch-Maldona@usmc.mil by January 12, 2017 at 1100PST.

I. Solicitation Data (for the proposed effort)

Solicitation Number Project/Requirement Customer/Agency Project/Requirement Description

II. Current or Historical Contract Information

Assessor: The information listed below is Correct Incorrect.

CONTRACTOR

NAME & ADDRESS:

Contract Number Type of Contract Initial Final Contract Value

Performance Period Delivery Schedule

Project/Requirement Description

Please select from the following as it applies to this contract:

Contracting Role PRIME SUBCONTRACTOR Termination History Convenience Default N/A

III. Assessor Information

Assessor Name Title mailto:Diana.Lynch-Maldona@usmc.mil

Phone Number/Email Address Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.

Role Period of Involvement Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO) Contract Specialist Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) Technical Project Lead/Project Officer Quality Assurance Specialist Prime Contract Holder Other (Specify)

IV. Evaluation Definitions

Use the following definitions in your assessment of contractor performance.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets or exceeds contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element may have contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

V. Performance Evaluation

1. Quality of Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the quality of the contractor’s performance?

Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A Quality of Performance

Please provide rationale for assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s quality of performance in the following areas.

Conformance to Contract Requirements

Conformance to Specifications

Standards of Workmanship *

* Standards of Workmanship: Technical, professional, environmental, safety, etc.

While all comments are appreciated, please explain below your rationale for ratings of unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to problems associated with quality as identified in the above assessment? If yes, please explain.

2. Schedule Performance (Timeliness)

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet the schedule?

b. Assess the Contractor’s Schedule Performance in the following areas.

Schedule Performance Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

Completion of Contract/Task

Order/Delivery Schedule

Meeting Milestones and Schedules

Submitting Deliverables

While all comments are appreciated, please explain below your rationale for ratings of unsatisfactory.

Schedule Performance

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any Schedule problems identified in the above assessment?

If yes, please explain.

3. Management Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s management performance?

Management Performance

b. Assess the Contractor’s management performance in the following areas.

Management Performance Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

Management Responsiveness

Subcontract

Program Management

Management Of Personnel

Integrated Product Team Management

Management Responsiveness: Timeliness, completeness, and quality of problem identification, proposal submittal, history of cooperative behavior, effective business relations, teamwork AND customer satisfaction.

Subcontract Management: Timely award and management of subcontracts and meeting subcontracting goals for small business, small disadvantaged business, etc.

Program Management: Effectiveness of integration and coordination of all activities required to execute the contract, use of resources, assignment of responsibility, internal coordination and communication, and risk management practices Management Of Personnel: Ability to select, retain, support, and replace personnel with the experience and expertise necessary to accomplish the Government’s requirements within schedule and budget

Integrated Product Team Management: Commitment and participation in the Integrated Product Team process

While all comments are appreciated, please explain below your rationale for ratings of unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the management problems identified in the above assessment? If yes, please explain.

VI. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (technical, schedule, management, and cost) on contract being assessed.

Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

VII. General Comments:

Assessor’s Signature Date

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .