21_RFP_USC-9_Exhibit_4_Ordering_Procedure.pdf

PDF 66 KB Posted

Attached to
Universal Service Contract (USC)-9 Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
HTC71119RW001
Issued by
Department of Defense United States Transportation Command

About this file

This document outlines the ordering procedures for the Universal Service Contract-9 (USC-9) multiple award contract. The USC-9 is administered by the United States Transportation Command and provides for cargo bookings based on best value determination. Ordering officers will evaluate potential contractors on technical requirements and flag of service priority to determine compliance. For bookings incorporating readiness factors, selection will be based on strategic mobility capabilities. One-time bookings will be solicited via Request for Quote considering technical compliance, flag of service, Voluntary Intermodal Sealift Agreement priority, and lowest Best Value Number. Comments on the draft performance work statement were due by August 3, 2018 to help further refine requirements.

RFP USC-9 Exhibit 4, Ordering Procedure

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Universal Service Contract (USC)-9, newest first.
File Type Posted
HTC71119RW001-0002.pdf PDF
HTC711-19-R-W001-0001.pdf PDF
USC9_BAF-FAF-CAF.pdf PDF
12_RFP_USC-9_PWS_Att_6_Inv_and_Pay.pdf PDF
18_RFP_USC-9_PWS_Att_12_Trade_zones.pdf PDF
14_RFP_USC-9_PWS_Att_8_DLA_PV.pdf PDF
17_RFP_USC-9_PWS_Att_11_Definitions.pdf PDF
04_RFP_USC-9_Exhibit_2_Additional_USC-9_Info.pdf PDF
15_RFP_USC-9_PWS_Att_9_NIST.SP.800-171_POAM_Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
16_RFP_USC-9_Att_10_Yubikey.pdf PDF
22_RFP_Exhibit_5_Wage_Determination.pdf PDF
07_RFP_USC-9_PWS_Att_1_EDI.pdf PDF
06_RFP_USC-9_Exigency_Annex.pdf PDF
05_RFP_USC-9_Exhibit_3_PWS.pdf PDF
19_RFP_USC-9_PWS_Att_13,_Domestic_Shipyard_Report.pdf PDF
Pre-Proposal_Posting.pdf PDF
USC-9_Draft_RFP_Comment_Matrix.pdf PDF
USC-9_Synopsis.pdf PDF
02_USC-9_Exhibit_3_PWS.pdf PDF
06_USC-9_PWS_Att_3_Rate_Rules.pdf PDF
USC-9_PWS_Att_8_DLA_PV_(Clean_Version).pdf PDF
USC-9_PWS_Att_8_DLA_PV_(Tracked_Changes).pdf PDF
02_USC-9_Exhibit_3_PWSDRAFT.pdf PDF
04_USC-9_PWS_Att_1_EDIDRAFT.pdf PDF
08_USC-9_PWS_Att_5_Route_InfoDRAFT.pdf PDF
00_a_USC-9_1449_and_Clauses_Draft.pdf PDF
00_b_USC-9_Exhibit_1_Instructions_and_Eval_CriteriaDRAFT.pdf PDF
15_USC-9_PWS_Att_12_Trade_zonesDRAFT.pdf PDF
11_USC-9_PWS_Att_8_DLA_Prime_Vendor_DRAFT.pdf PDF
14_USC-9_PWS_Att_11_DefinitionsDRAFT.pdf PDF
01_USC-9_Exhibit_2_Additional_ClausesDRAFT.pdf PDF
06_USC-9_PWS_Att_3_Rate_RulesDRAFT.pdf PDF
16_USC-9_Exhibit_4_Ordering_ProceduresDRAFT.pdf PDF
03_USC-9_Exigency_AnnexDRAFT.pdf PDF
10_USC-9_PWS_Att_7_EPAsDRAFT.pdf PDF
07_USC-9_PWS_Att_4_City_GroupsDRAFT.pdf PDF
12_USC-9_PWS_Att_9_NIST.SP.800-171-POAMDRAFT.pdf PDF
00_c_USC-9_Att_1_to_Exhibit_1,_Small_Business_SubcontractingPlan_TemplateDRAFT.pdf PDF
USC-9_Pre-Sol_Mtg_Summary.pdf PDF
Pre_Sol_Conf_Slides_FBO.pdf PDF
USC-9_Draft_PWS_Feedback_Matrix_(FBO).pdf PDF
5__USC-9_PWS_Att_5_Route_Info_DRAFT.pdf PDF
1__USC-9_PWS_Att_1_EDI_DRAFT.pdf PDF
3__USC-9_PWS_Att_3_Rate_Rules_DRAFT.pdf PDF
2__USC-9_PWS_Att_2_Operational_Reports_DRAFT.pdf PDF
14__USC-9_Exhibit_4_Ordering_Procedure_DRAFT.pdf PDF
8__USC-9_PWS_Att_8_DLA_Prime_Vendor_DRAFT.pdf PDF
0__Exhibit_3_PWS_USC9_DRAFT.pdf PDF
12__USC-9_PWS_Att_12_Trade_zones_DRAFT.pdf PDF
7__USC-9_PWS_Att_7_EPAs_DRAFT.pdf PDF
Show all 50

Universal Service Contract (USC)-9 has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

HTC711-19-R-W001

Universal Service Contract - 9

Exhibit 4

ORDERING PROCEDURES

CONTRACTOR SELECTION

“FAIR OPPORTUNITY PROCESS”

1. Fair Opportunity to Compete

1.1. Fair Opportunity to Compete for Task Order (booking) Awards: Under the USC-9 multiple award contracts, fair opportunity for booking awards is provided through a “best value” booking process detailed below. Only appointed Ordering Officers are authorized to book orders. The ordering officers are responsible for evaluating shipment requirements and for making independent best value booking decisions.

1.2. Ordering: IAW FAR 16.505, Ordering, all multiple award contractors shall be provided a fair opportunity to be considered for each order in excess of $3,000 pursuant to the procedures established in this section, unless the Contracting Officer (or Ordering Officer) determines that:

a. The agency’s need for the services or supplies is of such urgency that providing such opportunity to all such contractors would result in unacceptable delays.

b. Only one such contractor is capable of providing the services or supplies at the level of quality required because the services or supplies ordered are unique or highly specialized.

c. The task/delivery order should be issued on a sole source basis in the interest of economy or efficiency because it is a logical follow-on to an order already issued under the contract, provided that all awardees were given a fair opportunity pursuant to the procedures in this clause to be considered for the original order.

d. It is necessary to place an order to satisfy a minimum guarantee.

1.3. All bookings will be awarded in accordance with the Cargo Preference Act of 1904, with a priority given to contractors enrolled in Voluntary Intermodal Sealift Agreement (VISA).

2. Ordering Process for Cargo Bookings:

2.1. USC-9 allows for cargo bookings based on a “best value” concept.

2.2. The best value analysis will consider the following factors and sub-factors:

a. Technical—the Ordering Officer first evaluates potential contractors on a pass/fail basis to determine which contractors can meet the following technical requirements for the shipment or group of shipments that the Ordering Officer requires to move together:

(1) Can meet or exceed RDD based on contractor submitted vessel schedules in IBS.

(2) Has awarded rates for all required services and accessorials

(3) Has required equipment and vessel type

(4) Meets international, national, local and DoD statutory and regulatory requirements for the commodity, hazard and security classification, category or threat

b. U.S. Flag and VISA Priorities – Contractors offering a higher U.S. Flag priority and (if equal U.S. Flag priorities) are a VISA participant will be given priority. The order of service priority is U.S. Flag service (P1), combination of U.S. Flag and foreign flag service (P2), and foreign flag service (P3).

c. In accordance with DFARS 252.247-7026, the Government must provide an evaluation criterion that considers the extent to which the offeror has had overhaul, repair, and maintenance work for covered vessels performed in U.S. shipyards. U.S. Domestic Shipyard preferences and evaluation will be applied at the task order (booking) level.

The preference applied at the Task Order (booking) level will be applied as follows:

(1) Offerors will be evaluated as “1” (highest) or “2” (lowest) based on the formula below:

(Repair Money Spent in US/Total Repair Money Spent) + (Days of Repair in US/Total Days of Repair)/2 = Preference Category “1” or “2.”

(i) All calculations are based on total number of ships owned by the carrier – whether used on this contract or not.

(ii) Calculation will NOT include any days or money falling under the exceptions listed at

PGI 247.573(b)(2)(iii)(C)(1) and (2) – this means excluding the amount from the “total” as well as from the “in US” numbers.

(iii) The calculation will be rounded to the nearest tenth (i.e. – 38.7%)

(2) The following will be the criteria followed in determining carrier evaluation under the Jones Act:

(i) 15% or more of vessels serviced within US Shipyards would receive a preference of “1” and 14.9% and below would receive a preference of “2.”

d. Best Value Determination – if two or more contractors meet above criteria (a) (b) and (c) (as applicable), bookings shall be awarded based on the best (lowest) Best Value Number (BVN). BVN is calculated as the numerical value of the total dollar cost of the task order (to include accessorials) divided by the Composite Score.

The Composite score (except for certain low volume lanes as described in Exhibit 3, PWS, Section 3) consists of two scores: a Lane Score (LS) weighted at 90%, typically COCOM to COCOM, and a Worldwide Score (WS) weighted at 10%. The score is a number ranging from 0 to 1; for example, it would be 0.84 (=84%) if carrier’s worldwide score were 75%, and score on the lane in question were 85%. (.9*.85) + (.1*.75) = .84

e. The Ordering Officer reserves the right to book orders to other than the lowest BVN carrier.

3. Ordering Process for Cargo Bookings Incorporating Readiness Evaluation Factors:

3.1. Enclosure E5.3 of Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 4500.57, Transportation and Traffic Management (March 18, 2008) states: "The Department of Defense relies on the private sector for transport of a significant portion of its wartime and peacetime cargo. The relationship between the Department and the private sector is critical to mobilization, deployment, and sustainment of military forces. The goal of VISA is to provide assured access to the U.S. flag ocean transportation industry through the contractual pledges by carriers of their vessels and intermodal systems capacities, in return for priority for DoD peacetime business."

3.2. In accordance with DoD Directive 5158.4, the Commander, U.S. Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM) is responsible for sealift and airlift readiness and assigned the mission to "Provide effective and efficient air, land and sea transportation for the Department of Defense (DoD), in times of peace and war”. In support of the assigned readiness requirement, USTRANSCOM, may include an additional strategic readiness evaluation factor on individual task orders. The strategic readiness evaluation factor will evaluate the capability a carrier brings in support of the USTRANSCOM readiness mission to provide commercial sea transportation and terminal capability to support the global deployment, employment, sustainment, and redeployment of U.S. forces pursuant to the Unified Command Plan.

3.3. Cargo bookings which include a readiness evaluation factor will not be booked in accordance with Exhibit 4, Section 2. A Best Value determination will be made based on the criteria identified at the time the readiness evaluation factor is incorporated.

4. Ordering Process for One-Time-Only Task Order/Bookings:

4.1. If no one contractor has all required rates or meets the technical requirements listed in para 2.2(a) to receive a task order (booking), a one-time-only rate shall be solicited via a Request for Quote (RFQ). The RFQ shall be sent to all contractors for quote. Contractors shall return the RFQ by the closing date specified in the RFQ. Failure to provide all required information will result in a contractor’s proposal to be invalid. Contractor shall furnish a vessel sharing agreement or equivalent document, if the quote includes a vessel owned/operated by another USC-9 contractor. Failure to provide information with the quote may cause the quote to be invalid.

4.2. One-Time-Only Task Orders, at a minimum, are based on the following criteria:

a. Technical:

• RDD

• Has required equipment and vessel type

• Vessel schedule feasibility

• Other requirements listed in the RFQ

• Meets international, national, local and DoD statutory and regulatory requirements for the commodity, hazard and security classification, category or threat

b. Flag of Service (P1, P2, P3)

c. VISA priority

d. Domestic Shipyard Preference (when applicable)

e. Best Value Number (BVN)

4.3 Upon notification of award, contractor shall submit a vessel schedule in IBS, and provide VOYDOC to Government along with signed award modification.

4.4 Upon award of the One-Time-Only Task Order/Booking, notification will be sent to all Contractors stating contractor received the Task Order, flag of service, and total awarded price.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .