Attch_3_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

Attachment #3

AF/PAK Logistics Monitoring Support (LMS)

SOLICITATION: HTC711-16-R-R008

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection

Information IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: (To be completed by Offeror)

Contractor’s Name:

Address:

Telephone Number:

Email:

Point of Contact:

Project Title and Brief but Detailed Description of Work (including workload estimates):

Contract Number:

Total Contract Value (Base & Option Years):

Place of Performance:

Period of Performance:

Contractor Performed as a Prime or Sub-contractor:

SOLICITATION: HTC711-16-R-R008

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION: (To be completed by Respondent)

Name of Respondent:

Title:

Address:

Telephone Number:

Fax Number:

Email Address:

Note: If any of the information in Section A is incorrect, please make necessary changes.

C. E-MAIL COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO: (To be completed by Respondent)

Please email the completed survey to the below address no later than 3:00pm Central Time on 23 November 2016 to:

USTRANSCOM/TCAQ-R

ATTN: Dave Hoag and Cynthia Turner

Email: david.m.hoag.civ@mail.mil

Email: cynthia.c.turner.civ@mail.mil

Direct questionnaire completion questions/comments to the above address/individual(s)

NOTE: Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) may be reviewed. Although you may have filed a

Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPARS) for the contract listed, we would appreciate your response to this survey because some of the questions relate to areas not covered by CPARS.

mailto:denise.e.cameron.civ@mail.mil mailto:cynthia.c.turner.civ@mail.mil

SOLICITATION: HTC711-16-R-R008

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: (To be completed by Respondent) Rate the contractor in each of the areas of contract performance listed belowby placing an “X” in the block which represents your rating. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF

UNSATISFACTORY OR MARGINAL.

EXCEPTIONAL Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

VERY GOOOD Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.

SATISFACTORY Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

MARGINAL Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

UNSATISFACTORY Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Areas of Contract Performance: U n sa ti sf ac to ry

M ar g in al

S at is fa ct o ry

V er y G o d

E x ce p ti o n al

N t A p p li ca b le

1 Tracking and tracing cargo from origin to the final destination (to include in-transit visibility)

2 Tallying cargo/trucks, scanning cargo labels, and uploading information into data systems

3 Processing and verifying cargo shipping and customs documentation with customs officials

4 Familiarization with customs and courtesies within the countries of

Afghanistan and Pakistan

5 Timeliness of compiling and submitting reports

6 Compliance with security and access requirements

7 Conducting RFID/CIDD/Satellite tag scanning

GENERAL:

8 How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance? Please address any performance issues in the Remarks section below.

9 Would you award another contract to this contractor? Please provide support for your answer in the Remarks section below.

YES NO

SOLICITATION: HTC711-16-R-R008

REMARKS:

PLEASE PROVIDE A PARAGRAPH SUPPORTING YOUR ABOVE RATINGS. EXPLAIN THE

CONTRACTOR’S GREATEST STRENGTHS AND/OR WEAKNESSES AND YOUR RATIONALE FOR

WHY YOU WOULD OR WOULD NOT AWARD A FUTURE CONTRACT TO THEM.

Survey Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!