Attachment_10_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

HTC711-14-R-D018

Source Selection Sensitive When Filled In – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

ATTACHMENT 10

RECENT AND RELEVANT PAST PERFORMANCE

TRANSPORTATION GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION SYSTEM (TGIS)

Please provide concise comments regarding your overall assessment of the contractor’s performance on the contract or workload identified below. Your ratings (i.e. Satisfactory, Exceptional, etc.) should include comments for any question rated exceptional or lower than satisfactory.

Definitions for ratings are provided on page 5. Please respond by sending the entire completed questionnaire, including these instructions, via e-mail to the address below. Please complete and submit no later than 2:00 pm Central Time on 15 January 2015.

USTRANSCOM/TCAQ-D

ATTN: Beth Ruckwardt

E-mail: elizabeth.m.ruckwardt.civ@mail.mil and belfield.c.collymore.civ@mail.mil

Phone: 618-220-7075 DSN : 770-7054

Index Number _____________________ (To be completed by USTC/TCAQ upon receipt of completed questionnaire.)

I. WORK PERFORMED IDENTIFICATION

Contractor (Company/Division):

Contract Number/Type (FFP, CPFF, etc):

Work Performed Title:____________________________________________________________________

Brief Description of Work Performed:________________________________________________________

Dollar value:____________________________________________________________________________

Period of Performance:____________________________________________________________________

II. RESPONDENT(S) TO QUESTIONNAIRE

Name:____________________________________________________________________________

Position/Title:______________________________________________________________________

Business Address:___________________________________________________________________

Relation to Program:_________________________________________________________________

Phone:(DSN)__________________________(Commercial)__________________________________

FAX:(DSN)__________________________(Commercial)__________________________________

Email Address:______________________________________________________________________

Other suggested points of contact:___________________________________________________________ mailto:elizabeth.m.ruckwardt.civ@mail.mil mailto:belfield.c.collymore.civ@mail.mil

Give a brief, general description of what the contractor was required to provide/deliver. Please note that if your response indicates a weakness in the contractor’s performance, a notification may be submitted to the contractor, and they may be made aware of the comment. The contractor will not be made aware of the commenter’s name or office.

REMARKS:___________________________________________________________________________

III. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

NOTE: Remarks may be continued on separate pages. Please identify category and question number.

1. Staffing

a. How effective was overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, control and deliver on-time)?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:____________________________________________________________________________

b. How effective were the types of personnel (skill and expertise) used by the contractor in accomplishing the effort without Government intervention?

c. Did the contractor provide replacement personnel of the same quality and skills of vacancies with minimum disruption to the support effort?

d. How effective was the contractor in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel?

e. Were the types of personnel (skill, expertise, and certification level) the contractor used adequate to accomplish the effort without Government intervention?

2. Technical Approach

a. How would you rate the contractor's ability to sustain, maintain, modify and develop enhancements for a geospatial data catalog, geospatial services and web mapping services software, map viewer software and ESRI ArcGIS applications?

b. How effective was the contractor in accomplishing quality checks to ensure that the final deliverables met the Performance Work Statement requirements?

c. How would you rate the contractor’s experience providing geospatial analytic capability, using industry standard geospatial software in the practice of geospatial analysis, and presenting information and analysis using clear, concise language and professional geospatial products?

d. How would you rate the contractor’s experience developing the code and services required to meet the information needs for transportation engineering, mission management, security, and analysis?

e. How would you rate the contractor’s phase-in actions required to organize its resources to meet the contract schedule for full performance?

f. Were there any penalties for non-performance assessed against the contractor and if so, to what extent?

i. How would you rate the contractor’s overall technical approach and ability to meet the

Performance Work Statement/Statement of Work requirements?

3. Cost Control.

a. How accurately did the contractor forecast contract costs?

b. . How well did the contractor meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs?

ci. How successfully did the contractor alert the Government of unforeseen costs before they occurred?

dj. . How sufficient and timely was the contractor’s cost reporting?

4. Contractor’s Overall performance

5. Would you award to this contractor in the future?

Yes___________ No_________

If “no”, why?_____________________________________________________________________________

Any additional comments:

6. Small Business Subcontracting Utilization?

REMARKS:___________________________________________________________________________

SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING UTILIZATION

U n sa ti sf a ct o ry

M a rg in a l

S a ti sf a ct ry

V er y G o d

E x ce p ti o n a l

U n k n o w n

A.

Compliance with requirements of the clauses at FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small

Business Concerns.

B.

Compliance with requirements of the clauses at FAR 52.219-9, Small Business

Subcontracting Plan.

C. Contractor met small business subcontracting goals as established in the contract.

DOD uses a common DOD assessment rating system to evaluate a contractor’s past performance. Ratings range from “Unsatisfactory” to “Exceptional”.

Rating Definition

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the governments benefit.

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the government’s benefit.

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements.

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet implemented satisfactory corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. Contractor’s corrective actions to date are ineffective.