HSHQE3-13-R-00007_-_A000002.pdf

(x)

HSHQE3-13-R-00007

x x

1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT

THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

x

Philadelphia PA 19106 Attn: Gregory Blaszko

OPO/FPS/EAST CCG/R3

701 Market Street, Suite 3200 Ofc of Procurement Operations - FPS U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security NPPD/FPS/East CCG/Region 3

Philadelphia PA 19106 701 Market Street, Suite 3200

OPO/FPS/EAST CCG/R3

Office of Procurement Operations Federal Protective Service U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security NPPD/FPS/East CCG/Region 3

08/03/2013000002

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) is not extended.is extended, Items 8 and 15, and returning

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods: (a) By completing

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

FACILITY CODE CODE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)CODE 6. ISSUED BY

PAGE OF PAGES

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.3. EFFECTIVE DATE2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

08/01/2013

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority) appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return __________________ copies to the issuing office.

ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

This request for proposal (RFP) HSHQE3-13-R-00007 is for Protective Security Officer (PSO) services at the Social Security Administration (SSA) Wabash Street and Metro West locations within Baltimore, Maryland.

Amendment 000002 is hereby provided and includes responses to vendor submitted questions and solicitation changes associated with the subject RFP HSHQE3-13-R-00007 as further detailed in the continuation pages to this standard form (SF) 30.

DO/DPAS Rating: NONE

Period of Performance: 01/31/2014 to 07/30/2019

Contracting Officer (CO)

Continued ...

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 16C. DATE SIGNED

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

ITEM NO. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

NAME OF OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR

2 14

CONTINUATION SHEET

REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED PAGE OF

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F)

HSHQE3-13-R-00007/000002

Annmarie Bartholomeo 215-521-2260 annmarie.bartholomeo@hq.dhs.gov

Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) Louis M. Mount 410-786-3583 Louis.M.Mount@hq.dhs.gov

NSN 7540-01-152-8067 OPTIONAL FORM 336 (4-86)

Sponsored by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.110

DHS, Federal Protective Service PSO Services, SSA Wabash & Metro West Locations Solicitation HSHQE3-13-R-00007; Amendment 000002

Included herein is the continuation to the Standard Form (SF) 30, Amendment 000002 to solicitation HSHQE3-13-R-00007.

PART I. Solicitation Questions & Responses

Question 1: Might you know the incumbent contractor, contract value, and/or contract # for this opportunity?

Response 1: PSO services supporting the Metro West location are provided for by Basic Contracting Services, Inc. contract SS00-11-60018. The requested information is further detailed within the Pre-Proposal Slide Presentation currently posted on the FedBizOpps (FBO) announcement associated with the subject solicitation. The Wabash Street location is a new requirement, the actual site is currently being constructed.

Question 2: Are you able to provide the Past Performance Questionnaire and the Past Project Form for this opportunity as Word documents rather than PDFs for ease of data entry?

Response 2: Word versions of the Past Performance Questionnaire and the Past Project Form are not being provided at this time.

Question 3: Is there a minimum requirement for the number of Site Supervisors (SS)?

Response 3: There is no minimum requirement for the number of site supervisors under the subject solicitation.

Question 4: In the post exhibit, are post #1 and Post #22 the same rank or is one of higher authority than the other?

Response 4: The contractor will determine and designate rankings for the posts.

Question 5: In the event of large and small-scale events such natural disasters, civil disturbances, or other unanticipated events, is the Emergency Surge Security Force (ESS) expected by DHS to have the same qualifications (Firearms training, DHS training, etc) as the PSO’s that normally work the Basic Service outlined in this contract. If not what are the minimum requirements required for employment in the Emergency Surge Security Force?

Response 5: Under the subject solicitation the Emergency Surge Security Force (ESS) are required to have the same qualifications as the Basic Service PSO’s.

Question 6: Will DHS issue the seniority list for all PSO’s that are currently working on this project?

Response 6: A redacted seniority list is hereby provided as an attachment to this solicitation amendment.

Question 7: Will DHS issue an amendment that lists all the current qualifications and training for each PSO that is currently working on the project?

Response 7: DHS will not issue an amendment that lists all of the current qualifications training for each PSO currently working on the project.

Question 8: In order to be compliant with FAR 52.222-17 “Non-displacement of Qualified Workers (JAN 2013) (E.O. 13495),” will DHS issue a list of all current PSO’s qualifications and training anniversaries so we can price training costs accurately?

Response 8: A redacted seniority list is hereby provided as an attachment to this solicitation amendment.

Question 9: Are there any insurance or performance bond requirements for this contract?

Response 9: Yes, solicitation is clear on its face, see ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-4 CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS —COMMERCIAL ITEMS (Alternate I) (FEB 2012), paragraph 11, Insurance, page 31.

Question 10: Is there a requirement for roving supervisors or any supervisors to be armed if they will not stand post under any circumstances?

Response 10: All supervisors and PSOs will meet the training/certification requirements of the contract. Specifically, all PSO, to include supervisory PSO, shall be armed.

Question 11: How many different rates can we propose? Basic Services? TAS? ESS?

Response 11: Basic, TAS and ESS CLINs shall be separately priced, see Standard Form (SF) 1449. The prices to be proposed for each CLIN are at the discretion of the offeror.

Question 12: How many ESS hours were conducted in the past year of this contract, 2012?

Response 12: As detailed within the Pre-Proposal Slide Presentation currently posted on the FedBizOpps (FBO) announcement associated with the subject solicitation, there is currently no contract in place providing for support to both the Wabash Street and Metro West locations. The Wabash Street is a new location currently under construction.

Question 13: Is there a requirement for an indirect burden rate in regards to the COOP?

Response 13: Yes, solicitation is clear on its face, see FAR 52.212-2 EVALUATION – COMMERCIAL ITEMS (JAN 1999)(Tailored), Price Proposal, paragraph 7, page 67.

Additionally, it is further noted that any ODC Indirect Burden rate proposed shall be included within the Standard Form (SF) 1449 schedule.

Question 14: Exhibit 8E dictates that the Contractor Provided Communications Equipment is the Contractor’s Plan. What communication devices are currently being used on the contract?

Response 14: Current communications devices currently being used on the Basic Contracting Services, Inc. contract providing security services in support of the SSA Metro West location will not be provided. As detailed within the Pre-Proposal Slide Presentation currently posted on the FedBizOpps (FBO) announcement associated with the subject solicitation, there is currently no contract in place providing for support to both the Wabash Street and Metro West locations.

The Wabash Street is a new location currently under construction.

Question 15: Exhibit 8F- States that there is no requirement for vehicles throughout this project, but later describes the standards for vehicles on the project. How many vehicles does the current provider use throughout their management of the project?

Response 15: Exhibit 8F erroneously references vehicle detail. There is NO requirement herein for vehicles under the subject solicitation. An updated Exhibit 8F is provided with this solicitation amendment 000002.

Question 16: Which scenario is technically evaluated higher? A large firm submits a proposal where they utilize a small business that they have no joint experience with, or a large firm submits a proposal where they propose to work all posts on the contract?

Response 16: Technical proposal responses shall be evaluated at the time of submission and in accordance with the Solicitation Provisions, ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS (FEB 2012) and FAR 52.212-2 EVALUATION – COMMERCIAL ITEMS (JAN 1999)(Tailored) starting page 57.

Question 17: How long does approval take for a DHS Mentor-Protégé Program to be completed?

Response 17: This question should be directed to the DHS Small Business Specialist (SBS) and the Small Business Administration (SBA).

Question 18: Who is the current security provider on this contract? The CBA states Basic Contracting Services, Inc. but they are not found in the GSA library? Do they perform work under another name? Is that company owned by a parent company that holds government contracts?

Response 18: Basic Contracting Services, Inc. currently provides security services in support of the SSA Metro West location. Please note, as detailed within the Pre-Proposal Slide Presentation currently posted on the FedBizOpps (FBO) announcement associated with the subject solicitation, there is currently no contract in place providing for support to both the Wabash Street and Metro West locations. The Wabash Street is a new location currently under construction.

Question 19: What is the contract number for the current contract in us.spending.gov?

Response 19: PSO services supporting the Metro West location are provided for by Basic Contracting Services, Inc. contract SS00-11-60018. Please note, as detailed within the Pre- Proposal Slide Presentation currently posted on the FedBizOpps (FBO) announcement associated with the subject solicitation, there is currently no contract in place providing for support to both the Wabash Street and Metro West locations. The Wabash Street is a new location currently under construction.

Question 20: What is the current contract number?

Response 20: PSO services supporting the Metro West location are provided for by Basic Contracting Services, Inc. contract SS00-11-60018. Please note, as detailed within the Pre- Proposal Slide Presentation currently posted on the FedBizOpps (FBO) announcement associated with the subject solicitation, there is currently no contract in place providing for support to both the Wabash Street and Metro West locations. The Wabash Street is a new location currently under construction.

Question 21: Was the current contract awarded 5 years ago with a 6-month extension option?

Response 21: The current Metro West contract with Basic Contracting Services, Inc. includes a performance period of July 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015. As detailed within the Pre- Proposal Slide Presentation currently posted on the FedBizOpps (FBO) announcement associated with the subject solicitation, there is currently no contract in place providing for support to both the Wabash Street and Metro West locations. The Wabash Street is a new location currently under construction.

Question 22: How many options have been used on the current contract?

Response 22: The current Metro West contract with Basic Contracting Services, Inc. is in the second option period. As detailed within the Pre-Proposal Slide Presentation currently posted on the FedBizOpps (FBO) announcement associated with the subject solicitation, there is currently no contract in place providing for support to both the Wabash Street and Metro West locations.

The Wabash Street is a new location currently under construction.

Question 23: What was the BPA number for 2013? How much was the BPA for in 2013?

Response 23: There is currently no Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) in place. The current Metro West contract with Basic Contracting Services, Inc. is an Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite- Quantity (IDIQ) type contract. Total ceiling values associated with the aforementioned effort shall not be provided. As detailed within the Pre-Proposal Slide Presentation currently posted on the FedBizOpps (FBO) announcement associated with the subject solicitation, there is currently no contract in place providing for support to both the Wabash Street and Metro West locations.

The Wabash Street is a new location currently under construction.

Question 24: What was the total cost to the Government on this project in 2012?

Response 24: The current Metro West contract with Basic Contracting Services, Inc. is an Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) type contract. Total costs to the Government associated with the aforementioned effort shall not be provided. As detailed within the Pre- Proposal Slide Presentation currently posted on the FedBizOpps (FBO) announcement associated with the subject solicitation, there is currently no contract in place providing for support to both the Wabash Street and Metro West locations. The Wabash Street is a new location currently under construction.

Question 25: In order to provide accurate pricing, we will need any current PSO’s training certifications list. Will the Government provide the list?

Response 25: DHS shall not provide a list of all of the current qualifications training for each PSO currently providing services under the referenced Metro West contract through Basic Contracting Services, Inc.

Question 26: Exhibit 8E does not show any Contractor required communications. Will the Government provide the communications equipment?

Response 26: No, the Government will not provide the communication equipment. Contractors will provide their own communications equipment for its internal operations and, radios (to be used among the PSO force at the Wabash site) in accordance with Exhibit 8B (Contractor Provided Supplementary Equipment).

Question 27: What is the current practice regarding, and time allotted for, how PSOs gear-up?

Response 27: The offeror is responsible for developing its plans for meeting the contract requirements.

Question 28: What is the current practice regarding, and time allotted for, how PSOs travel to and from post?

Response 28: The offeror is responsible for developing its plans for meeting the contract requirements.

Question 29: What is the current practice regarding, and time allotted for, how PSOs gear-down?

Response 29: The offeror is responsible for developing its plans for meeting the contract requirements.

Question 30: How are the PSOs compensated for this time presently?

Response 30: It is unknown how guards are presently compensated for on the SSA Metro West guard contract. Under this requirement the contractor shall be required to compensate its employees in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.

Question 31: Is it permissible to price Supervisory and Overhead positions at a 5 year average instead of escalating wages each period?

Response 31: Rates and/or pricing information shall be provided for in accordance with the pricing schedule set forth within the Standard Form (SF) 1449 and Attachment 6, Price Element Breakdown. Pricing is at the discretion of the offeror.

Question 32: Are the physical/medical examination standards in this RFP different from the physical/medical examination standards currently applied to incumbent personnel? If yes, will incumbent PSOs with physical/medical examination records that meet the requirements of the current contract be required to undergo physical/medical examination during transition?

Response 32: Yes, the medical/ physical requirements are different. All incumbent and new hire PSOs shall meet the Medical Exam and Physical Abilities Testing (PAT) requirements mandated by the FPS Statement of Work.

Question 33: Are the drug screening standards in this RFP different from the drug screening standards currently applied to incumbent personnel? If the answer is yes, will incumbent PSOs with drug screening records that meet the requirements of the current contract be required to undergo drug screening during transition?

Response 33: The drug screening requirement in the existing SSA Metro West guard contract is the same at the drug screening requirement in the FPS SOW. As a result, if incumbent PSOs (who transfer over to the Wabash contract) have current, valid drug screenings, then they will not need to be rescreened until their next screening renewal date.

Question 34: Do incumbent personnel have active PIV Cards?

Response 34: Yes, the incumbent guards (at the SSA Metro West site) have HSPD-12 credentials.

Question 35: Do incumbent personnel need to repeat the PIV process if a new Contractor is selected?

Response 35: The incumbent guards will be able to use the credentials they currently have at the Wabash site.

Question 36: Please confirm that the amount of time required per PSO to complete the issuance process for a PIV card is 20 minutes as indicated in section C.5 of Exhibit 9E, Government- Provided Property HSPD-12 Personal Identity Verification (PIV) Card Employee Application Process.

Response 36: Yes, solicitation is clear on its face, see Section C.5 of Exhibit 9E, Government- Provided Property HSPD-12 Personal Identity Verification (PIV) Card Employee Application Process, the estimated processing time is 20 minutes.

Question 37: Please identify the enrollment station for this contract and provide the physical address.

Response 37: The PIV enrollment station for the will be in the Parking & Credentialing Office at the Wabash Building, 6100 Wabash Street, Baltimore, MD.

Question 38: Will the Government provide reimbursement for any travel required?

Response 38: If travel is required in support of the PIV requirement, it will not be separately priced or reimbursed. Offerors shall include all expected costs of performing the statement of work into its proposed price.

Question 39: How are weapons being stored under the current contract?

Response 39: For the SSA Metro West guard contract, the guards store weapons on site. The guards use two weapon safes (one owed by SSA and the other owned by the contractor).

Question 40: Is the contractor or FPS providing the safe?

Response 40: FPS will not provide a safe.

Question 41: Is the contractor or FPS providing the clearing barrel?

Response 41: The contractor shall provide the clearing barrel.

Question 42: Is the requirement for employee respirator fit testing in this RFP different from the employee respirator fit testing requirement in the current contract?

Response 42: Yes, the requirement for employee respirator fit testing in this RFP is different from the employee respirator fit testing requirement in the current contract.

Question 43: Please state the type of respirator protection required for the fit testing.

Response 43: Reference section Exhibit 8D; the N95 respirator shall be used.

Question 44: Will incumbent PSOs’ current respiratory protection clearances be grandfathered into the contract resulting from this RFP or will a new respiratory protection examination be required for these officers during transition?

Response 44: No, incumbent PSOs’ current respiratory protection clearances will not be grandfathered into the contract resulting from this RFP. Reference section 14.5.3 of the SOW.

Question 45: What is the make/model of the weapon that officers are currently utilizing?

Response 45: The guards use Glock 17, 9MM firearms on the existing SSA Metro West guard contract.

Question 46: If a successful new contractor provides the same type of weapon (make and model) as the incumbent contractor, will PSOs still be required to undergo the 3 hours of transitional weapons training provided in Exhibit 4C?

Response 46: No, if the firearm is an identical make and model, then the PSOs would only need to attend and pass a firearms qualification monitored by an FPS Law Enforcement Inspector/Officer.

Question 47: Do incumbent personnel possess training in OC spray (pepper spray)? If yes, will they require retraining under the new contract?

Response 47: Yes, guards receive OC training under the existing SSA Metro West contract.

Yes, guards are required to receive annual OC training under the new contract.

Question 48: Please confirm that the 40 hour course identified in Exhibit 4C (4 hours Use of OC Spray, 4 hours Use of Baton, 8 hours Firearms Maintenance, Safety and Handling, and 24 hours Initial Firearms Familiarization Fire) is required for both incumbent and new personnel.

Response 48: Reference section 6.6.2.2 of the FPS SOW. If incumbent guards have received previous basic firearms training, then it may be accepted if verified (written documentation) against the requirements outlined in this requirement. If incumbent guards possess current valid OC and Baton training certifications, then they would not need to re-train until their OC and Baton training expiration dates. Additionally, under this requirement all firearms qualifications must be monitored by FPS Law Enforcement personnel.

Question 49: The Post Exhibit indicates that all posts require relief. Please confirm that all posts, to include those which are "roving" posts, require relief to be provided by a contractor-provided dedicated relief officer that is not assigned to any post listed on the post exhibit.

Response 49: All posts require relief.

Question 50: The Post Exhibit includes Supervisor posts. Are these considered to be the only supervisor posts necessary to support this statement of work?

Response 50: Yes. The supervisor posts referenced within the post exhibit are the only supervisor posts necessary to support this statement of work.

Question 51: If the contract stipulated supervisor posts are considered to be the only supervisor posts necessary to support this statement of work, how do they conduct inspections at the Metro West location?

Response 51: The identified supervisor posts on the exhibit are customer specific requirements for the site; however, the contractor determines the amount of additional supervision (to assign to the Wabash site) for inspection and quality assurance.

Question 52: Will incumbent personnel be required to complete any type of "Other Special" training that the government identifies as one-time training courses?

Response 52: There are no “Other Special” training requirements.

Question 53: Have all of the incumbent officers successfully completed the one-time only courses listed in this section?

Response 53: The one-time courses: Basic Contract training, FPS Orientation, PSO Written Exam have not been completed. FPS personnel must monitor the basic training, conduct the orientation class and administer the exam. Since the 40-hour initial weapons training are considered 3rd party, many incumbents may have completed basic firearms training under the existing contract.

Question 54: Is the Corporate Security Officer required to be on site?

Response 54: No, the Corporate Security Officer is not required to be on site.

Question 55: Is the Corporate Security Officer required to be an FTE on this contract?

Response 55: No, the Corporate Security Officer is not required to be an FTE on this contract.

Question 56: Attachment 11 was not provided with the RFP documents. Please provide Attachment 11.

Response 56: Attachment 11 was erroneously referenced within the subject solicitation. There is no Attachment 11, the form referenced in the above statement and required to be completed and included within Package #2 is Attachment 10 to the subject solicitation, Extent of Participation by Small Disadvantaged Business Concerns.

Question 57: Are the two supervisor posts listed on the Post Exhibit the only supervisors required on this contract? If yes, does the Government still require submittal of the Field Level Supervision Exhibit (Attachment 8)?

Response 57: Yes. However offerors may propose additional supervision to successfully perform the contract. It is additionally noted that under this solicitation a supervisory plan will be evaluated. Yes, the Government still requires the submittal of the Field Level Supervision Exhibit.

Question 58: What is the current weapon being utilized on this contract?

Response 58: Guards on the SSA Metro West contract use 9MM firearms.

Question 59: Does the required weapon constitute a “platform change”?

Response 59: No Weapons Platform change

Question 60: Is Transitional Weapon Training or Weapon Platform Change Training required during transition?

Response 60: Transitional weapons training only if a different make and model are to be used.

However, if contractor purchases an identical make and model, then the PSOs will just need to attend and pass firearms qualification monitored by FPS Law Enforcement.

Question 61: SOW 14.2 Communications Equipment, page 54 / SOW Exhibit 8E – Contractor- Provided Communications Equipment, page 91. The SOW states: “Contractor shall obtain applicable permits in accordance with Federal Regulations for operation of such radio equipment. Contractor shall provide a copy of such permits to COTR prior to utilization of designated frequencies. Government may identify radio frequencies for use by Contractor.”

What is the required frequencies and will the Government assists the Contractor in obtaining the required FCC license?

Response 61: No, see section 4.1.2 of the FPS SOW.

Question 62: Exhibit 8C: Will the Government accept the Berretta Model 92F as an alternative weapon to those listed in the exhibit?

Response 62: The firearms listed on Exhibit 8C are the authorized firearms to use.

Question 63: Exhibit 8A: This exhibit specifies a flashlight, 2-D cell. Will FPS allow a mini-mag light and case?

Response 63: No. 2-D cell flashlight is required as detailed within the exhibit.

Question 64: SF 1449 vs. Post Exhibit Hours. The Post Exhibit hours appears to be more than the number of hours shown on the OF1449. Are the OF1449 hours correct?

Response 64: The hours represented on the standard form (SF) 1449 are correct. Additionally, please note ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-4 CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS — COMMERCIAL ITEMS (Alternate I) (FEB 2012), 03. Maximum Quantities (page 22), which further explains the variance between the hours in the schedule and the hours in the post exhibit.

Question 65: Please confirm that the Attachment 2 provided via e-mail response to the provided signed Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) is the correct Post Exhibit for this solicitation.

Response 65: The Post Exhibit Attachment provided for in response to the provided, signed NDAs is the correct version.

THE REMAINDER OF THE PAGE IS LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK.

PART II. Solicitation Changes

1. Solicitation Provisions, FAR 52.212-2 EVALUATION – COMMERCIAL ITEMS (JAN

1999)(Tailored), paragraph 3. Socio Economic Factor, pages 64-65 are updated to remove the reference to Attachment 11 which was erroneously included within the subject solicitation. There is no Attachment 11, the form referenced in the above section and required to be completed and included within Package #2 is Attachment 10 to the subject solicitation, Extent of Participation by Small Disadvantaged Business Concerns.

2. Statement of Work (SOW) Exhibit 8F, Contractor-Provided Vehicles erroneously references vehicle detail. There is NO requirement herein for vehicles under the subject solicitation. An updated Exhibit 8F Contractor-Provided Vehicles exhibit is provided with this solicitation amendment 000002.

With the exception of the changes made via amendments 000001 and 000002, all other terms and conditions of the subject RFP HSHQE3-13-R-00007 shall remain in full effect.

Please Note: No Further Questions shall be submitted. In accordance with solicitation HSHQE3- 13-R-00007 published on August 1, 2013, all RFP questions shall have been submitted no later than 4:00 p.m. EST on August 14, 2013 to allow for appropriate responses to be prepared.

Additionally, Proposals are due no later than 4:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time (EST) on September 17, 2013. Submissions shall be made in accordance with RFP HSHQE3-13-R-00007, page 57, Solicitation Provisions, Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors (FEB 2012).

THE REMAINDER OF THE PAGE IS LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK.

Name Seniority Date 5/13/2008 1/29/2013 1/24/2013 8/13/2012 5/31/2011 6/17/1982 6/1/2006

8/30/2009 4/19/2012 6/9/2011

10/24/2005 10/7/2011

10/18/2001 1/29/2013 1/22/2013 7/25/2006 8/7/2007 6/1/2011

11/15/2008 8/14/2012 8/10/2011 3/28/2012 2/4/2005

7/28/2011 9/10/2003 2/22/2011 8/7/2009

3/20/2012 2/20/2009 6/17/2013 4/21/2011 6/1/2006

9/13/2004 5/19/2011 4/20/2011

10/13/2009 6/21/2001 5/31/2013 1/2/2007

5/19/2011 5/23/2013 9/25/2011

Seniority List

9/21/2011 6/1/2006

1/24/1989 9/21/2011 2/15/2013 4/16/2012 2/22/2011 2/27/2009 2/19/2009 8/15/2012 6/1/2006

1/22/2013 10/9/2009 6/1/2006 6/1/2006 6/2/2011

5/22/2013 9/3/2009 8/7/2012 6/9/2011

5/23/2013 7/1/2009

8/17/2007 1/2/2007

5/31/2011 9/2/2006

3/15/2004 6/9/2011

5/23/2013 3/24/2012 11/1/1991 5/19/2011 5/20/2011

12/10/2008 6/24/2009 6/9/2011