Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 16 KB Posted

Attached to
CGC THETIS Dry Dock
Solicitation number
HSCG80-17-Q-P45025
Issued by

About this file

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
AMENDMENT_00003.pdf PDF
Blank_Schedule_B_for_THETIS_(WMEC_270B)_DDL_FY17.xls XLS spreadsheet
AMENDMENT_00002.pdf PDF
CGC_THETIS_DRY_DOCK_SPECIFICATION.pdf PDF
AMENDMENT_00001.pdf PDF
HSCG80-17-Q-P45025.pdf PDF
Blank_Schedule_B_for_THETIS_(WMEC_270B)_DDL_FY17.xls XLS spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTONNAIRE

The same ratings used in the Contractor Performance Assessment Review System shall be used to evaluate Past Performance in this questionnaire.

A common five level assessment rating system is used to evaluate a contractor’s performance. Ratings range from Unsatisfactory to Exceptional. Here is a breakdown of each category:

0 = Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

1 = Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

2 = Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

3 = Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Governments benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

4 = Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Governments benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Categories to be rated include:

Quality of Products or Service Schedule Business Relations Management of Key Personnel

The ratings used in the Contractor Performance Assessment Review System shall be used to evaluate Past Performance.

Company:

Contract #/Description:

0 1 2 3 4 N/A

1. Quality of Product or Service – please rate Comments:

2. Schedule - Timeliness of Performance – please rate

3. Business Relations – please rate

4. Management of Key Personnel – please rate

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .