Attachment_L-2_PPPQ.doc
DOC document 66 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Creative Services
- Solicitation number
- HQ0516-16-R-0002
- Issued by
-
Defense Media Activity
About this file
L-2
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| AFPIMS-SOPs-DGOV-June-2016.pdf | ||
| AFPIMS-SOPs-Pressops-June-2016.pdf | ||
| DOD_Creative_Services_RFP_QandA_rev_1.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| AFPIMS-SOPs-DGOV-NEWFINAL-4-20-16.pdf | ||
| HQ0516-16-R-0002-0002.pdf | ||
| AFPIMS-SOPS-Pressops-FINAL-4-18-16.pdf | ||
| HQ0516-16-R-0002-0001.pdf | ||
| DOD_Creative_Services_RFP_QandA.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Past_Performance_Reference_Sheet.pdf | ||
| HQ0516-16-R-0002.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT L.2
ORGANIZATION’S PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
ORGANIZATION’S PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection
Please complete this questionnaire and email to:
Michael D. Jackson, Contracting Officer michael.d.Jackson119.civ@mail.mil Defense Media Activity Response Date:
6700 Taylor Ave Fort Meade, MD 20755
When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.
TO BE COMPLETED BY CONTRACTOR
1. CONTRACTOR’S NAME AND ADDRESS
4. CONTRACT NO.:
5. CONTRACT INITIATION DATE:
6. COMPLETION DATE:
7. CONTRACT VALUE $
2. PROJECT NAME:
8. TYPE OF CONTRACT:
9. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT’S KEY CHARACTERISTICS:
Please add a continuation page if additional space is necessary.
TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATING ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE
10. EVALUATION
a. EVALUATOR’S NAME, POSITION DURING PROJECT EXECUTION (Project Manager/COR/Other) AND ORGANIZATION
b. EVALUATOR’S PHONE NUMBER
c. MONTHS PERFORMANCE MONITORED BY EVALUATOR:
Please check the response code for each topic that best reflects your experience with this contractor:
EX = Exceptional VG = Very Good S = Satisfactory MG = Marginal US = Unsatisfactory N/O = Not Observed
A. Quality of Products and Services- Assess the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements.
FORMCHECKBOX
EX
FORMCHECKBOX
VG
FORMCHECKBOX
S
FORMCHECKBOX
MG
FORMCHECKBOX
US
FORMCHECKBOX
N/O
B. Overall Performance- Assess the contractor’s overall performance for the project.
FORMCHECKBOX
VG
FORMCHECKBOX
S
FORMCHECKBOX
MG
FORMCHECKBOX
US
FORMCHECKBOX
C. Schedule- Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the schedule of activities (as appropriate).
FORMCHECKBOX
VG
FORMCHECKBOX
S
FORMCHECKBOX
MG
FORMCHECKBOX
US
FORMCHECKBOX
D. Technical Requirements- Assess the contractor’s ability and capacity to fulfill the technical requirements of the contract.
FORMCHECKBOX
VG
FORMCHECKBOX
S
FORMCHECKBOX
MG
FORMCHECKBOX
US
FORMCHECKBOX
E. Cost Control- Assess the contractor’s willingness and ability to manage the contract budget and control costs.
FORMCHECKBOX
VG
FORMCHECKBOX
S
FORMCHECKBOX
MG
FORMCHECKBOX
US
FORMCHECKBOX
N/O
F. Subcontracting- Assess the contractor’s success at complying with subcontracting goals.
FORMCHECKBOX
EX
FORMCHECKBOX
VG
FORMCHECKBOX
S
FORMCHECKBOX
MG
FORMCHECKBOX
US
FORMCHECKBOX
G. Customer Satisfaction- Assess the contractor’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness” in ROUTINE matters.
FORMCHECKBOX
VG
FORMCHECKBOX
S
FORMCHECKBOX
MG
FORMCHECKBOX
US
FORMCHECKBOX
H. Customer Satisfaction- Assess the contractor’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness” in UNEXPECTED DIFFICULTIES.
FORMCHECKBOX
VG
FORMCHECKBOX
S
FORMCHECKBOX
MG
FORMCHECKBOX
US
FORMCHECKBOX
I. Repeat Business- Assess the likelihood that you would want this contractor to perform another contract for you in the near future.
FORMCHECKBOX
VG
FORMCHECKBOX
S
FORMCHECKBOX
MG
FORMCHECKBOX
US
FORMCHECKBOX
N/O
J. List Contractor’s Weak Points:
K.
List Contractor’s Strong Points:
L.
List any other projects this contractor has completed for you:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .