Contractor Evaluation.docx

DOCX document 17 KB Posted

Attached to
Hybrid Single Stream Refuse and Recycling Management
Solicitation number
HQ0034-12-R-3087
Issued by

About this file

J-L3 Contractor Evaluation Survey

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
J-2 Ash Analysis.pdf PDF
J-C1 PWS Revision dtd 02 August 2012.docx DOCX document
HQ0034-12-R-3087 Amendment 0004.pdf PDF
RFIs- Pentagon Refuse and Recycling_Final dtd 20120802.docx DOCX document
RFIs- Pentagon Refuse and Recycling_Final dtd 20120731_JK.pdf PDF
HQ0034-12-R-3087 Amendment 0003.pdf PDF
HQ0034-12-R-3087 Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
J-C1 PWS Revision dtd 23 July 2012.docx DOCX document
HQ0034-12-R-3087 Modification 01.pdf PDF
Past Performance Questionnaiare.docx DOCX document
Past Performance Data Sheet.docx DOCX document
WD 05-2104.pdf PDF
PWS.docx DOCX document
Recycling Pulls.pdf PDF
2011 Trash Pull Data.docx DOCX document
HQ0034-12-R-3087.pdf PDF
Sample Program Report.pdf PDF
Show all 17

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 3 HQ0034-12-R-3087

ATTACHMENT J-L3

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE

See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

EVALUATION PERIOD: CONTRACT VALUE: $ _

1. Please describe the service/supply provided by the Contractor for your firm (please submit as a separate Microsoft Word document).

2. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Outstanding (A), Very Good (B), Satisfactory (C), Poor (D), or Unacceptable (F). See next page for definition of ratings. For all ratings EXCEPT “Satisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.

Outstanding
Very Good
Satisfactory
Poor
Unacceptable

OVERALL PAST PERFORMANCE RATING

Please provide an overall rating of the contractor’s past performance for the referenced contract/delivery order.

a.) Quality of Service:

Conformance to contract requirements, appropriateness of personnel, accuracy of reports, and technical excellence.

b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Service/Deliveries:

Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction as to scheduling.

c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction

Effective management, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, proactive, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small business/small disadvantaged business d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors)

Quality of key personnel and how well key personnel managed their portion of the contract.

3. Would you hire this contractor to provide services for your organization in the future? _____ Please provide comments using additional pages, if desired.

Signed:__________________________________

Print Name: ______________________________

PAST PERFORMANCE DEFINITIONS

The following definitions are to be used when assessing past performance:

OUTSTANDING/VERY LOW PERFORMANCE RISK (A)

No doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

VERY GOOD/LOW PERFORMANCE RISK (B)

Little doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

SATISFACTORY/MODERATE PERFORMANCE RISK (C)

Some doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

POOR/HIGH PERFORMANCE RISK (D)

Substantial doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

UNACCEPTABLE/VERY HIGH PERFORMANCE RISK (F)

Extreme doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

NEUTRAL (N)

The offeror, its subcontractors or team members and/or its key personnel have no significant performance record relevant or identifiable to the services to be performed.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .