Contractor Evaluation.docx
DOCX document 17 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- HQ0034-12-R-3087
- Issued by
-
DOD Washington Headquarters Service
About this file
J-L3 Contractor Evaluation Survey
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| J-2 Ash Analysis.pdf | ||
| J-C1 PWS Revision dtd 02 August 2012.docx | DOCX document | |
| HQ0034-12-R-3087 Amendment 0004.pdf | ||
| RFIs- Pentagon Refuse and Recycling_Final dtd 20120802.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFIs- Pentagon Refuse and Recycling_Final dtd 20120731_JK.pdf | ||
| HQ0034-12-R-3087 Amendment 0003.pdf | ||
| HQ0034-12-R-3087 Amendment 0002.pdf | ||
| J-C1 PWS Revision dtd 23 July 2012.docx | DOCX document | |
| HQ0034-12-R-3087 Modification 01.pdf | ||
| Past Performance Questionnaiare.docx | DOCX document | |
| Past Performance Data Sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| WD 05-2104.pdf | ||
| PWS.docx | DOCX document | |
| Recycling Pulls.pdf | ||
| 2011 Trash Pull Data.docx | DOCX document | |
| HQ0034-12-R-3087.pdf | ||
| Sample Program Report.pdf |
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 3 HQ0034-12-R-3087
ATTACHMENT J-L3
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE
See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY
CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:
EVALUATION PERIOD: CONTRACT VALUE: $ _
1. Please describe the service/supply provided by the Contractor for your firm (please submit as a separate Microsoft Word document).
2. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Outstanding (A), Very Good (B), Satisfactory (C), Poor (D), or Unacceptable (F). See next page for definition of ratings. For all ratings EXCEPT “Satisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.
| Outstanding |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Poor |
| Unacceptable |
OVERALL PAST PERFORMANCE RATING
Please provide an overall rating of the contractor’s past performance for the referenced contract/delivery order.
a.) Quality of Service:
Conformance to contract requirements, appropriateness of personnel, accuracy of reports, and technical excellence.
b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Service/Deliveries:
Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction as to scheduling.
c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction
Effective management, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, proactive, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small business/small disadvantaged business d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors)
Quality of key personnel and how well key personnel managed their portion of the contract.
3. Would you hire this contractor to provide services for your organization in the future? _____ Please provide comments using additional pages, if desired.
Signed:__________________________________
Print Name: ______________________________
PAST PERFORMANCE DEFINITIONS
The following definitions are to be used when assessing past performance:
OUTSTANDING/VERY LOW PERFORMANCE RISK (A)
No doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
VERY GOOD/LOW PERFORMANCE RISK (B)
Little doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
SATISFACTORY/MODERATE PERFORMANCE RISK (C)
Some doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
POOR/HIGH PERFORMANCE RISK (D)
Substantial doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
UNACCEPTABLE/VERY HIGH PERFORMANCE RISK (F)
Extreme doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
NEUTRAL (N)
The offeror, its subcontractors or team members and/or its key personnel have no significant performance record relevant or identifiable to the services to be performed.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .