Amendment_0001_Summary_of_Changes_Document.pdf
PDF 569 KB Posted
- Attached to
- DIILS Education Support Services
- Solicitation number
- HQ0013-15-R-0001
- Issued by
-
Defense Security Cooperation Agency
About this file
Amendment 0001 Summary Of Changes document. This document lists changes to the original solicitation.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Solicitation.pdf | ||
| Amendment_0001_Conformed_Solicitation_Document.pdf | ||
| HQ001315R0001_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc | DOC document | |
| CLAUSES.doc | DOC document | |
| Performance_Work_Statement.doc | DOC document | |
| CLIN_Information.docx | DOCX document | |
| SF1449.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DLAC57002
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30
APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84
STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)
Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
Under the authority cited above, the purpose of this modif ication is to respond to industry questions and incorporate associated revisions into the solicitation.
1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES
J 1 16
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
BY 21-Nov-2014
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X HQ0013-15-R-0001
X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
14-Nov-2014
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.
Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE
RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN
REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE
CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)
6. ISSUED BY
3. EFFECTIVE DATE
21-Nov-2014
CODE
DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY-CON
JANET SZATMARY
201 12TH STREET SOUTH
SUITE 203
ARLINGTON VA 22202
HQ0013 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.
CODE
See Item 6
FACILITY CODECODE
EMAIL:TEL:
HQ0013-15-R-0001
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
The following have been added by reference:
52.222-17 Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers MAY 2014
The following have been added by full text:
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESIONNAIRE
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
DUE: NLT 2PM ON 01 DECEMBER 2014
(Note: Complete questionnaire and email to Janet D’Angelo at janet.dangelo@dsca.mil)
I. EVALUATION OF OFFEROR:
Company/Division Providing Services:
Address:
Description of Project:
Contract Number: Dollar Value (Annual):
Performance Period: Performance Location:
Type of Contract:
Check One:
Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Time & Material Other (Please Specify):
Type & Extent of Subcontracting:
II. EVALUATED BY:
Company/Organization/Address:
Name & Title:
Signature: Date:
Telephone: FAX:
III. EVALUATION CRITERIA:
Please answer questions 1 through 13 using the following criteria. Circle only one response per question.
Rating Definition Note
Exceptional (4)
Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
To justify an “exceptional” rating, identify multiple significant events and state how they were of benefit to the government. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone merits an “exceptional” rating. Also, there should have been no significant weaknesses identified.
Very Good (3)
Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
To justify a “very good” rating, identify a significant event and state how it was a benefit to the government. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.
Satisfactory (2)
Performance met contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub element contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appeared to be or were satisfactory.
To justify a “satisfactory” rating, there should have been only minor problems, or major problems the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract/order. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified. A fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be evaluated with a rating lower than “satisfactory” solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract/order.
Marginal (1)
Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub element being evaluated reflected a serious problem for which the contractor did not identify corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions were only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
To justify a “marginal” performance rating, identify a significant event in each category that the contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it affected the government. A “marginal” rating should be supported by referencing the management tool that notified the contractor of the contractual deficiency (e.g., management, quality, safety, or environmental deficiency report or letter).
Unsatisfactory (0)
Performance did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery was not accomplished in a timely manner.
The contractual performance of the element or sub element contained a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
To justify an “unsatisfactory” rating, identify multiple significant events in each category that the contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it affected the government. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone merits an “unsatisfactory” rating. An “unsatisfactory” rating should be supported by referencing the management tools used to notify the contractor of the contractual deficiencies (e.g., management, quality, safety, or environmental deficiency report or letter.
IV. QUESTIONS:
Question Response
1. Evaluate the contractor's overall commitment to quality performance and customer satisfaction.
Comment:
4 – Exceptional 3 – Very Good 2 – Satisfactory 1 – Marginal 0 – Unsatisfactory N/A
2. Evaluate the contractor's overall technical competence.
2 – Satisfactory 1 – Marginal 0 – Unsatisfactory N/A
3. Evaluate the contractor's cooperation and willingness to work as a team (with your personnel, other contractors, etc.).
2 – Satisfactory 1 – Marginal 0 – Unsatisfactory
4. Evaluate the contractor's compliance with contractual requirements.
2 – Satisfactory 1 – Marginal 0 – Unsatisfactory
5. Evaluate the contractor's responsiveness to contract, program and/or schedule changes.
2 – Satisfactory 1 – Marginal 0 – Unsatisfactory
6. Evaluate the effectiveness of the contractor's overall quality control procedures.
2 – Satisfactory 1 – Marginal 0 – Unsatisfactory N/A
7. Evaluate the effectiveness of the contractor's safety program or efforts.
2 – Satisfactory 1 – Marginal 0 – Unsatisfactory
Question Response
8. Evaluate the effectiveness of the contractor's management and supervision.
2 – Satisfactory 1 – Marginal 0 – Unsatisfactory N/A
9. Evaluate the contractor's ability to overcome technical problems, labor issues, and/or other performance difficulties.
2 – Satisfactory 1 – Marginal 0 – Unsatisfactory N/A
10. Evaluate the contractor's ability to plan and conduct operations in the most effective manner.
2 – Satisfactory 1 – Marginal 0 – Unsatisfactory N/A
11. Evaluate the contractor's ability to adhere to schedules and complete work on time.
2 – Satisfactory 1 – Marginal 0 – Unsatisfactory N/A
12. Evaluate the quality and stability of the contractor's workforce and continuity of services.
2 – Satisfactory 1 – Marginal 0 – Unsatisfactory N/A
13. Evaluate the availability, adequacy, and suitability of the contractor's staffing for the work required.
2 – Satisfactory 1 – Marginal 0 – Unsatisfactory
RESPONSES TO INDUSTRY QUESTION
SOLICITATION HQ0013-15-R-0001
Questions and Answers
Question 1.
We did not find pricing information pertaining to CLINs 000401 and 000402? What costs are included for CLINs 000401 and 000402?
Response:
CLINs 000401 and 000402 are informational CLINs established to facilitate funding by separate appropriations. The pricing information or “costs” for CLIN 0004 apply to SubCLINs 000401 and 000402.
Question 2.
Has a contractor performed similar work to this for the government in the past?
If available, please provide the incumbent contract number.
If you are unable to provide a contract number, is it safe to assume this is a new requirement for the government?
DIILS education support services are currently being performed under HQ0013-14-C-0002 by X
Corp Solutions, Inc. This is not a new requirement.
Question 3.
Can the government please explain why it is not exercising the option period(s) on the current contract awarded in January 2014 which had a base period of 1 year and two option periods of 1 year each (per the following FBO notice:
https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=5f80cead1725f36d0aecef4fc7404f9 f&tab=core&_cview=1 ). This information is of particular importance to 8(a) firms that are contemplating whether to pursue the new contract since knowing whether the new contract will be for 1 year or 3 impacts our decision to invest in pursuing this new contract, as well as our pricing.
DSCA assessed that the contract as awarded did not sufficiently ensure that the Government would receive its required level of services. Therefore, the government made corrections to the
PWS which are included in HQ0013-15-R-0001.
Question 4.
Please update the CLIN descriptions. For example:
a. Several include language such as the following: CLIN 0001 - "Contractor shall perform services in accordance with Section 5.XX of the Performance Work Statement (PWS)". Please clearly identify appropriate sections (i.e., replace XX with specific Section identifiers) of the
PWS in these CLIN descriptions.
Complete paragraph references have been incorporated into the CLIN description.
https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=5f80cead1725f36d0aecef4fc7404f9f&tab=core&_cview=1 https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=5f80cead1725f36d0aecef4fc7404f9f&tab=core&_cview=1
b. Please explain what is meant by the following CLIN description: 00004 - Admin. Assistance
120x/DRC.
As indicated in the response to Question 1, CLINs 000401 and 000402 are informational CLINs established to facilitate funding by separate appropriations. The pricing information under CLIN
0004 applies to SubCLINs 000401 and 000402.
120X/DRC refers to DIILS Programs as described in the Performance Work Statement.
- 120X refers to the Global Train and Equip 1206/1207/120X/GSCF Human Rights
Training (Global T&E). NOTE “120X” has been changed to “Global T&E”.
- DRC refers to the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
c. Please explain the following CLINs: 000401 - 120X Funding and 000402 - DRC Funding.
As indicated in the response to Question 1, CLINs 000401 and 000402 are informational CLINs established to facilitate funding by separate appropriations. The pricing information under CLIN
0004 applies. NOTE “120X” has been changed to “Global T&E”.
Question 5.
The "CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE" include: 52.222-41 Service Contract
Labor Standards. In this context, requiring Offerors to submit resumes of candidates (with very specific DIILS experience) for various positions appears to contradict the Service Contract Act and the associated "Non Displacement of Qualified Workers" requirement. In other words, if incumbent qualified workers cannot be displaced, what is the point of requiring offerors to submit resumes of candidates who cannot be hired in the first place since incumbents will have to be offered the right of first refusal? It appears that this requirement benefits only the incumbent contractor. Please clarify.
Service Contract Act applies to Administrative Assistance positions, Occupation Code 1020, only. FAR 52.222-17 “Non Displacement of Qualified Workers” is incorporated under this amendment. As indicated in paragraph (b) of the clause, “The Contractor and its subcontractors shall, except as otherwise provided herein, in good faith offer those service employees employed under the predecessor contract whose employment will be terminated as a result of award of this contract or the expiration of the contract under which the service employees were hired, a right of first refusal of employment under this contract in positions for which the service employees are qualified”. Right of first refusal does not guarantee acceptance by the service employees. In accordance with the Addendum to FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors – Commercial Items
(page 37 of 115 “Original Solicitation”) and 52.212-2, Evaluation Offerors – Commercial Items
(page 41 of 115 “Original Solicitation”), Offeror shall provide resumes of proposed personnel.
Question 6.
The Past Performance Questionnaires are due NLT 2PM ON 24 November 2014 while proposals are due NLT than 2PM (EST) 01 December 2014. Can the government please make the Past
Performance Questionnaires also due NLT than 2PM (EST) 01 December 2014 to provide adequate time for Offerors to contact references and request their inputs.
The submission date for the Past Performance Questionnaires has been revised to 2PM (EST) 01
December 2014.
Question 7.
Regarding the DIILS education support services requirement, HQ0013-15-R-0001: Is this related to the requirement that was just awarded last December to X-Corp Solutions, HQ0013-14-C-
0002? I am assuming it is being re-competed early? If they are not related, can you please provide the name of the previous contractor and the contract number associated with this work?
DIILS education support services are currently being performed under HQ0013-14-C-0002 by X
Corp Solutions, Inc. Solicitation HQ0013-15-R-0001 is a recompete of the existing contract.
WAGE DETERMINATION
Wage Determination WD 2005-2467 (Rev. -14) dated 7/25/2014 (Occupation Code 1020) is incorporated by reference.
SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET
SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES
CLIN 0002
The CLIN extended description has changed from Contractor shall perform services in accordance with Section 5.XX of the Performance Work Statement (PWS) to Contractor shall perform services in accordance with Section 5.3 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).
CLIN 0003
perform services in accordance with Section 5.4 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).
CLIN 0004
The CLIN description has changed from Admin. Assistance 120x/DRC to Admin.
Assistance Global T&E.
The CLIN extended description has changed from Contractor shall perform services in perform services in accordance with Section 5.5 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).
SUBCLIN 000401
The CLIN description has changed from 120X Funding to Global T&E Funding.
The CLIN extended description INFORMATIONAL CLIN for funding purposes only has been added.
SUBCLIN 000402
CLIN 0005
perform services in accordance with Section 5.6 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).
CLIN 0006
The CLIN description has changed from Instruction Preparation to Instruction
Preparation: Resident Course.
The CLIN extended description has changed from Contractor shall perform services in perform services in accordance with Section 5.9 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).
CLIN 0007
perform services in accordance with Section 5.7 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).
CLIN 0008
The CLIN description has changed from Distinguished Instruction - Preparation to
Distinguished Instruction: Preparation.
The CLIN extended description has changed from Contractor shall perform services in
CLIN 0009
The CLIN description has changed from Distinguished Instruction - Resident to
Distinguished Instruction: Resident Cour.
The CLIN extended description has changed from Contractor shall perform services in perform services in accordance with Section 5.8 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).
CLIN 0010
accordance with Section 5.XX of the Performance Work Statement (PWS). to Contractor shall perform services in accordance with Section 5.2 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS)..
CLIN 0011
The CLIN description has changed from Training Coordinator - 120X OT to Training
Coordinator - Global T&E OT.
The CLIN extended description has changed from Contractor shall perform services in
CLIN 0012
CLIN 1002
CLIN 1003
CLIN 1004
Assistance Global T&E.
The CLIN extended description has changed from Contractor shall perform services in
SUBCLIN 100401
SUBCLIN 100402
CLIN 1005
CLIN 1006
Preparation: Resident Course.
The CLIN extended description has changed from Contractor shall perform services in
CLIN 1007
CLIN 1008
Distinguished Instruction: Preparation.
The CLIN extended description has changed from Contractor shall perform services in
CLIN 1009
Distinguished Instruction: Resident Cour.
The CLIN extended description has changed from Contractor shall perform services in
CLIN 1010
CLIN 1011
Coordinator - Global T&E OT.
The CLIN extended description has changed from Contractor shall perform services in
CLIN 1012
CLIN 2002
CLIN 2003
CLIN 2004
Assistance Global T&E.
The CLIN extended description has changed from Contractor shall perform services in
SUBCLIN 200401
SUBCLIN 200402
CLIN 2005
CLIN 2006
Preparation: Resident Course.
The CLIN extended description has changed from Contractor shall perform services in
CLIN 2007
CLIN 2008
Distinguished Instruction: Preparation.
The CLIN extended description has changed from Contractor shall perform services in
CLIN 2009
Distinguished Instruction: Resident Cour.
The CLIN extended description has changed from Contractor shall perform services in
CLIN 2010
CLIN 2011
Coordinator - Global T&E OT.
CLIN 2012
(End of Summary of Changes)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .