Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 139 KB Posted
- Attached to
- SPS-PD2 Functional Support Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HE1254-19-Q-8039
- Issued by
- Department of Defense Education Activity
About this file
Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| PWS_-_PD2_Functional_Support_(23JUL19).pdf | ||
| Combined_Synopsis_HE1254-19-Q-8039_(23JUL19).pdf | ||
| Amendment_2_RFQ_HE1254-19-Q-8039_(23JUL19).pdf | ||
| Amendment_Combined_Synopsis_-_PD2_Functional_Support_(FBO).pdf | ||
| Combined_Synopsis_Solicitation_-_PD2_Functional_Support.pdf | ||
| PWS_-_PD2_Functional_Support_(FBO).pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY
PRESENT AND PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Please complete the following questionnaire and return via email to the attention of:
Department of Defense Education Activity
Attn: Tresa Goodwin and Michelle Reaves
Tresa.Goodwin@hq.dodea.edu and Michelle.Reaves@hq.dodea.edu
4800 Mark Center Drive, 05F09
Alexandria, VA 22350
This Questionnaire Pertains to: SPS-PD2 Functional Support Services
Reference Information Table
Business Name of
Reference & Address:
Point of Contact:
Phone number:
E-mail address:
Contract Number:
Type:
Contract Value:
Period of Performance:
Brief Description of Effort:
Explain any problems and resolutions:
Evaluation KEY: Please use the following abbreviations to assign an applicable rating for questions 1 thru 6 below:
mailto:Tresa.Goodwin@hq.dodea.edu mailto:Michelle.Reaves@hq.dodea.edu
P/U S G VG E N
Poor/Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Very Good Excellent Neutral
Does not meet minimum acceptable standards in one or more areas; remedial action required in one or more areas; deficiencies in one or more areas which adversely affect overall performance.
Meets or slightly exceeds minimum acceptable standards;
adequate results;
reportable deficiencies with identifiable, but not substantial, effects on overall
Effective performance;
fully responsive to contract requirements;
reportable deficiencies, but with little identifiable effect on overall
Very effective performance;
fully responsive to contract requirements;
contract requirements accomplished in a timely, efficient, and economical manner for the most part; only minor deficiencies with minimal effect on overall
Of exceptional merit; exemplary performance in a timely, efficient, and economical manner; very minor (if any) deficiencies with no adverse effect on overall
No record of relevant past performance or past performance information is not available
1. How would you rate the contractor’s compliance with the delivery schedule/ performance milestones?
Comments:
2. How would you rate the contractor’s business practices (e.g. maintaining a positive working relationship, business ethics, timely and effectively resolution of any problems etc.)?
3. How would you rate the contractor’s record of conforming to contract requirements and to standards of good workmanship/quality of the product or service/timeliness of performance/report submission?
4. How would you rate the contractor’s overall compliance with the terms and conditions of your purchase order /contract?
5. How would you rate the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior and commitment to customer satisfaction; and generally, the contractor’s business-like concern for the interest of the customer?
6. How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance?
7. Would you purchase services from this contractor again?
YES NO
Please provide any additional comments applicable to the contractor’s past performance:
PAGE LEFT BLANK
File details come from the government source that posted it.