AMD0002Question_and_Answers_-_HC108419R0013.pdf
PDF 99 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Cisco JELA II
- Solicitation number
- HC108419R0013
- Issued by
-
Defense Information Systems Agency
About this file
This document contains questions and answers regarding an amendment to a solicitation for Cisco Smart Net Total Care support and optional software support services. The amendment clarifies that the correct part number referenced is "OPTIONAL CONNCFT1MIBP". It also removes the requirement to submit past performance information, as past performance is not an evaluation factor for award. The solicitation seeks fixed-price orders for monthly Cisco support services across the Department of Defense. Proposals were due on May 29, 2019 and questions were to be submitted by May 24, 2019 to the identified contracting officers. The Defense Information Systems Agency is the issuing agency.
AMD 0002 Question and Answer
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| AMD0003_-_HC108419R0013.docx | DOCX document | |
| AMD0003Question_and_Answers_-_HC108419R0013.pdf | ||
| AMD0002_-_HC108419R0013.docx | DOCX document | |
| AMD0001_-_HC108419R0013.docx | DOCX document | |
| Question_and_Answers_-_HC108419R0013.pdf | ||
| HC108419R0013.docx | DOCX document | |
| REDACTED_JA.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Amendment 0001
Number Question Answer
On Page 3 of 66, CLIN 0001 & 1001 includes the following:
“**This clin could be ordered in quantities greater than 1. If the mission partner has an IV range greater than $1,200,000 and less than $50,000,000 multiple quantities will be ordered to meet their installed base.**” Did the Government intend for that statement to be associated with CLIN 0006 and not
CLIN 0001?
This was an error. This wording will/has been removed from CLIN 0001 & 1001 as illustrated in Amendment 0001 ‐ SF30.
In validating Cisco Commercial Part Numbers, is it possible that the Government intended for the part number to be
“OPTIONAL CON-NCFT-1MIB-P”?
Yes, the correct Part number shall be OPTIONAL CON‐NCFT‐1MIB‐P.
Amendment 0001 ‐ SF30 has been updated.
Amendment 0002
We wanted to seek some clarification around what is required for the Past Performance section of the proposal We were not able to access theCaution‐ https://www.ppirssrng.csd.disa.mil/ < Caution‐ https://www.ppirssrng.csd.disa.mil/ > site. Please clarify how we should address our past performance for this requirement.
RFP updated to remove DFARs 252.213‐7000. FAR Clause 52.212‐2 was updated to read, "by the Contracting Officer" highlighted in red. Past Performance is not an evaluation factor for award that would require an offeror to submit further information.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .