1_Attachment14-PPSurvey.doc

DOC document 111 KB Posted

Attached to
DeCA Broadband/VSAT
Solicitation number
HC1013-08-R-2004
Issued by

About this file

Revised Attachment 14

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Questions 139-154.doc DOC document
DSL-VSAT PWS 20080520.doc DOC document
DSL-VSAT Attachment 8B NOC Acceptance Amended 20080520.doc DOC document
SF 30 A0007.doc DOC document
Updated Draft Attachment 13- Section B 20 May 08.xls XLS spreadsheet
DeCA VSAT RFP Amendment 0007.doc DOC document
Pricing pages per site.xls XLS spreadsheet
DSL-VSAT Attachment 4B Store WAN-Amended2.pdf PDF
Pricing pages per site.xls XLS spreadsheet
Updated Draft Attachment 13- Section B 12 May 08.xls XLS spreadsheet
DSL-VSAT Attachment 2 OCD Test Plan-Amended.xls XLS spreadsheet
SF 30 A0006.doc DOC document
Pre-Proposal attendance sheet.doc DOC document
DSL-VSAT Attachment 3 HQ CARTS TB Amended2.pdf PDF
DSL-VSAT PWS 13 May 08.doc DOC document
Amendment A0006 Questions 114-138 Final.doc DOC document
Pre-proposal minutes-DeCA.doc DOC document
DeCA VSAT RFP Amendment 0006.doc DOC document
DSL-VSAT Attachment 12 Candidate Sites-Amended 20080513-2rw.xls XLS spreadsheet
Questions 93-113.doc DOC document
Amendment A0004 SF30.doc DOC document
DSL-VSAT Attachment 4B Store WAN-Amended.pdf PDF
Attachment 13- Section B-A0003.xls XLS spreadsheet
DeCA VSAT RFP Amendment 0003.doc DOC document
Vendor questions 76-92.doc DOC document
SF 30 Amendment A0003.doc DOC document
Amendment A0002 questions 40 -75.doc DOC document
Amendment A0002 SF 30.doc DOC document
Attachment 1 DeCA PWS-A0002.doc DOC document
DeCA VSAT RFP Amendment 0002.doc DOC document
DSL-VSAT Attachment 3 HQ CARTS TB Amended.pdf PDF
DeCA VSAT RFP Amendment 0001.doc DOC document
Amended DSL-VSAT Attachment 7 Traffic Profile 20080401.pdf PDF
Attachment 13- Section B-040108.xls XLS spreadsheet
Vendor Questions 1-39.doc DOC document
Amendment 0001 SF30.doc DOC document
Amended DSL-VSAT Attachment 4A Store WAN.pdf PDF
DeCAVSATRFP032608.doc DOC document
DSL-VSATAttachment10SampleFloorPlans.pdf PDF
Attachment13-SectionB.xls XLS spreadsheet
DSL-VSATAttachment3HQCARTSTB.doc DOC document
DSL-VSATAttachment11ATInfo.pdf PDF
DSL-VSATAttachment5DeCANetwork.doc DOC document
DSL-VSATAttachment9Samples.pdf PDF
DSL-VSATAttachment7TrafficProfile20071212.doc DOC document
DSL-VSATAttachment12CandidateSites20071212-1jh.xls XLS spreadsheet
DSL-VSATAttachment4AStoreWAN.doc DOC document
DSL-VSATAttachment8BNOCAcceptance.doc DOC document
DSL-VSATAttachment4BStoreWAN.doc DOC document
Attachment14-PPSurvey.doc DOC document
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 54 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SOLICITATION NO. HC1013-08-R-2004

DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY

DEFENSE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CONTRACTING ORGANIZATION

2300 EAST DRIVE

SCOTT AIR FORCE BASE, ILLINOIS 62225-5406

FROM:

DISA/DITCO-SCOTT

2300 East Drive

Scott AFB IL 62225-5406

SUBJECT: Past Performance Survey for Request for Proposal HC1013-08-R-2004

The Defense Information Technology Contracting Organization (DITCO) is in the process of selecting a contractor to provide a turn-key commercial Managed Broadband/Very Small Aperture Terminal (VSAT) network for the Defense Commissary Agency (DeCA). The successful contractor will provide DeCA a network that augments the existing terrestrial network and provides data communications to commissaries worldwide.

One of the significant considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offeror’s past performance on contracts, which reflect the offeror’s ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from sources such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with an offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts. If information on this particular contractor has been entered into the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), please annotate that on the front of the survey in the appropriate block. We will use this information, as well as the specific information obtained from this survey, to complete our analysis of an offeror’s past performance.

Our areas of interest in the offeror are summarized in the enclosed survey. In order to maintain our schedule we will need your written response no later than 10 Apr 08. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of negotiations.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the survey may be typed or handwritten and faxed to 618-229-9508 (DSN 779-9508), Attention: Brenda Leonard, or emailed to brenda.leonard@disa.mil . Please call my office at 618-229-9667 prior to transmission or if you have any questions. Your completed survey will become a part of the official records.

Your help is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this award.

BRENDA K. LEONARD

Contracting Officer

Attachment:

Survey Attachment 14

PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY

When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive

Information IAW FAR 3.104 & 2.101

A. GENERAL INFORMATION (to be completed by offeror) Contractor’s Name:

Address:

Telephone Number:

Point of Contact:

Project Title and Brief but Detailed Description of Work (including workload estimates):

Contract Number Provided by Offeror:

Dollar Amount: $

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror:

Contractor Performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION (to be completed by respondent)

Name of Respondent:

Title:_______________________________

Address:

Telephone Number:

Fax Number:___________________________ Email Address:

Note: If any of the information in Section A is incorrect, please make necessary changes. Also, if offeror holds or has held other relevant contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

C. FAX OR E-MAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO:

Brenda Leonard- Fax (618) 229-9508 or DSN 779-9508 or E-mail brenda.leonard@disa.mil Is information on this contract contained in the Contractor Performance Reporting System (CPARS)?

Yes

No

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 5 or N/A, that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ALL RATINGS.

1
2
3
4
5
N/A
No Confidence
Little Confidence
Satisfactory

Confidence

Significant Confidence
High Confidence
Unknown Confidence
Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective.
Performance met contract requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the customer’s benefit. There were a few minor problems which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the customer’s benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner.
No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive
1
Quality of Product/Service
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
2
Integrated product with existing systems
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
3
Business relations
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
4
Responsiveness to performance problems
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
5
Satisfactory record of integrity and business ethics
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
6
Response to technical direction
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
7
Schedule/Ability to comply with proposed delivery schedule
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
8
Timeliness of Performance
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
9
Management of Key Personnel
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
10
Effectiveness of Management
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
11
Customer satisfaction
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
12
Initiative in meeting requirements
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
13
Overall Performance
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
14
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome below.
Yes
No
15
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain below.
Yes
No

REMARKS: PLEASE PROVIDE A PARAGRAPH SUPPORTING YOUR ABOVE RATINGS. EXPLAIN THE CONTRACTOR’S GREATEST STRENGTHS AND/OR WEAKNESSES AND YOUR RATIONALE FOR WHY YOU WOULD OR WOULD NOT AWARD A FUTURE CONTRACT TO THEM.

Evaluator’s Signature

Date

Attachment 14

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .