Attachment_5_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc

DOC document 48 KB Posted

Attached to
Tactical Driving Instruction
Solicitation number
H92240-14-Q-0012
Issued by

About this file

Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
H92240-14-Q-0012-0004.pdf PDF
H92240-14-Q-0012-0003.pdf PDF
H92240-14-Q-0012-0002_Extend_Closing_Date.doc DOC document
Attachment_3_QASP.doc DOC document
H92240-14-Q-0012.pdf PDF
Attachment_2-_Pricing_Section_B.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_4_-_Past_Performance_Information_Form.doc DOC document
H92240-14-Q-0012-0001.pdf PDF
Attachment_5_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc DOC document
H92240-14-Q-0012.doc DOC document
Attachment_3_QASP.doc DOC document
Attachment_2-_Pricing_Section_B.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_4_-_Past_Performance_Information_Form.doc DOC document
Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

H92240-14-R-0012 Attachment 5

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY

Please return directly to: WARCOM-contracts@navsoc.socom.mil with “Past Perf. for H92240-14-R-0003, Tactical Driving IDIQ” in the subject line.

CONTRACTOR NAME:

EVALUATOR:

Name (print)

COMPANY

Phone

Brief Description of Product or Service received from Contractor:

Please read the statements below, indicating your satisfaction or not in the box provided:

YES
NO

a.) QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:

(1) The Contractor provided a product or service that conformed to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship and quality.

(2) The Contractor conducted all required quality control tests/checks and submitted accurate reports.

(3) The Contractor utilized personnel that were appropriate to the effort performed to maintain acceptable quality.

b.) COST CONTROL:

(1) The Contractor performed the work within the estimated or negotiated cost/price to the customer’s satisfaction.

(2) The Contractor submitted accurate invoices.

c.) SCHEDULE:

(1) The tasks required under this effort were performed in a timely manner in accordance with the period of performance of the contract, or were acceptable to customers needs.

(2) The Contractor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction.

YES
NO

d.) BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS:

(1) The Contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed, and proved cooperative, reasonable and responsive to the customer’s needs.

(2) The Contractor kept COR and/or Technical Point of Contact appraised of any technical, cost, and schedule issues in a timely manner to the customer’s satisfaction.

(3) The Contractor’s communications/correspondences, and interactions were conducted in a clear, concise, professional businesslike manner.

f.) OVERALL CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

(1) The products/services provided adequately met the needs of the customer.

(2) I am satisfied with the performance of the Contractor under this effort and would have no hesitation using them again for future work.

NOTE: For statements indicating “NO” please provide a brief explanation on the attached page.

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY CONTINUED

CONTRACTOR NAME:

CONTRACT NUMBER:

NARRATIVE EXPLANATION:

1 Source Selection Information

See FAR 3.104

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .