clarificationnew.docx
DOCX document 14 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Operation and Maintenance Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- GS-11-P-17-YE-C-0009
About this file
clarification
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| amendment0001.pdf | ||
| amendment0005.pdf | ||
| amendment0004.pdf | ||
| GS-11-P-17-YE-C-0009__Formnew1.pdf | ||
| amendment0002.pdf | ||
| amendment0003.pdf | ||
| CBA_addendum_one_page_(1).pdf | ||
| Instructions_to_Offerors_and_Evaluation_Factors_(1)_(3).docx | DOCX document | |
| additionalquestionsNAC.docx | DOCX document | |
| recentCBA.pdf | ||
| sims_response_to_last_4_questions.docx | DOCX document | |
| fridayafternoonquestions.pdf | ||
| Collective_Bargining_Agreement.pdf | ||
| ocidocument.doc | DOC document | |
| AppendixH_RefrigMng_Guide_(2).pdf | ||
| AppendixI_UST_Guide_(3).pdf | ||
| GSA_PM_Guide_Final_Oct_2012_rev_3.pdf | ||
| TOTAL_EQUIPMENT_COUNT_NO8.pdf | ||
| AppendixG_Universal_Waste_Guide_(4).pdf | ||
| Links_for_O&M_Documents.docx | DOCX document | |
| O&M_Template__vr4-20-17_Final_Final_Final_(3).pdf | ||
| Instructions_to_Offerors_and_Evaluation_Factors_(1).docx | DOCX document | |
| Access_blank_form_full_SSAN.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| GS-11-P-17-YE-C-0009__Form1449.pdf |
Show all 24
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Under the directive of the “Performance Work Statement” of the SOO, offerors are directed that “To be acceptable for award, offerors must submit a performance work statement that meets all of the objectives reflected in Exhibit J-1”(emphasis added). This is clearly and important submission, but it does not appear in the “Instructions to Offerors,” nor is it mentioned in the “Evaluation” narrative.
Response: See the revised Instructions to Offerors
Under Tab C: Technical Approach, we are directed to “provide a written narrative describing the Quality Control Plan used for the contract submitted for consideration in Factor 1A.” The term “Factor” does not appear in the “Instructions” discussion, save for this mention. The described contents are designated only in terms of “Tabs,” while the “Evaluation” discussion is conducted in terms of “Factors” and “Tabs.”
If we are guided by “Factor 1A” of the “Evaluation “ discussion, this would appear to lead us to “Factor 1: Corporate Experience – TAB A.”
Are you requesting that our “Corporate Experience” (alternately listed as “TAB A” and “Factor 1 – TAB A”) discussion be focused on our “Experience” with Quality Control Plans?
The “Instructions” are listed in terms of “Volumes” (I and II) and TABs, while the “Evaluation” discussion lists items in terms of “Factors” (4 in total) and TABS (A, B, C & D). Since “Factor 4:
Pricing” is listed as TAB D in the “Evaluation” discussion, does this mean the TAB D is actually “Volume I – Price Proposal” as discussed in the “Instructions?” If so, which would you prefer we designate the Price proposal – Volume I or Tab D or both? ?
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .