Owner Reference Evaluation - GS-03P-12-AZ-D-0023.docx

DOCX document 23 KB Posted Mar 8, 2012

Attached to: Multiple Award IDIQ Large Construction Contract for Pennsylvania
Solicitation number: GS-03P-12-AZ-D-0023
Issued by: General Services Administration Public Buildings Service Region 3

About this file

From the source

Amendment 001 - Owner Reference Evaluation Form

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
Amendment 003.pdf	PDF	Apr 5, 2012
Amendment 0002.pdf	PDF	Mar 23, 2012
GS-03P-12-AZ-D-0023 - Amendment 001.pdf	PDF	Mar 8, 2012
Form SF 24.pdf	PDF	Mar 6, 2012
C101-Solicitation GS-03P-12-AZ-D-0023.pdf	PDF	Mar 6, 2012
Form GSA 527.pdf	PDF	Mar 6, 2012
C301-Solicitation GS-03P-12-AZ-D-0023.doc	DOC document	Mar 6, 2012
C201-Solicitation GS-03P-12-AZ-D-0023.pdf	PDF	Mar 6, 2012
Specifications-Solicitation GS-03P-12-AZ-D-0023.pdf	PDF	Mar 6, 2012
Form SF 1442-Solicitation GS-03P-12-AZ-D-0023.pdf	PDF	Mar 6, 2012

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

ATTACHMENT TO MODIFICATION 001

Owner Reference / Evaluation for IDIQ Multiple Award Large Project Construction Term Contract(s) with Design Build Capabilities

Solicitation No.: GS-03P-12-AZ-D-0023

You have been identified as a reference for the above solicitation by the contractor listed below. GSA is committed to awarding contracts to high performing, quality contractors. Please provide the past performance information requested on this questionnaire as openly and honestly as possible in order to help us achieve this goal.

Please email this form directly from the evaluator to the contract specialist, Jim Morris (jim.morris@gsa.gov), no later than Tuesday, April 10, 2012, 2:00 PM Eastern Time. Thank you.

CONTRACTOR NAME: ____________________________________________________________________

PROJECT TITLE: ________________________________________________________________________

PROJECT LOCATION: ____________________________________________________________________

Interview Questions for Company Level Past Performance

a.	Timeliness of performance
b.	Cost Control
c.	Quality product
d.	Project Management

A. Timeliness of Performance –

1. Did the contractor complete the project on schedule?

_____ Contractor completed project prior to approved scheduled completion date.

_____ Contractor completed project by original scheduled completion date.

_____ Contractor failed to meet project completion date.

Comments: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2. To what extent did the contractor adhere to contract delivery schedules at significant milestones?

____ Contractor exceeded scheduled milestone requirements.
____ Contractor typically delivered as scheduled but occasionally missed milestone
	dates.
____ Contractor rarely met scheduled milestone requirements.

3. How responsive was the contractor in addressing unforeseen/unanticipated conditions?

____ Contractor consistently exercised a pro-active approach.

____ Contractor demonstrated some initiative in exercising a pro-active approach.

____ Contractor never demonstrated a pro-active approach.

B. Cost Control –

1. Did the contractor submit reasonably priced change proposals?

____ Contractor consistently submitted fair and reasonably priced change proposals.

____ Contractor typically submitted fair and reasonably priced change proposals.

____ Contractor submitted fair and reasonably priced proposals some of the time.

____ Contractor rarely submitted fair and reasonably priced change proposals.

2. How responsive was contractor in submitting proposals for owner initiated changes?

____ Contractor was extremely responsive in expediting proposal submissions.

____ Contractor was generally responsive in expediting proposal submissions ____ Contractor was sometimes responsive in timely submissions of change Proposals.

____ Contractor was nonresponsive in timely submissions of change proposals.

3. How reasonable were contractor initiated changes?

____ Contractor initiated changes were extremely reasonable.

____ Contractor initiated changes were typically reasonable.

____ Contractor initiated changes were reasonable some of the time.

____ Contractor initiated changes were not reasonable.

C. Quality product

1. How well has the contractor complied with contract requirements?

____ Contractor exceeded contract requirements.

____ Contractor met the minimum requirements.

____ Contractor did not meet the minimum requirements.

2. Did they conform to standards of good workmanship?

____ Contractor exceeded standards of good workmanship.

____ Contractor met the standards of good workmanship.

____ Contractor did not meet standards of good workmanship.

3. Does the contractor have the ability to adapt to changing requirements while maintaining a desired level of quality?

____ Contractor was extremely effective in adapting to changing requirements.

____ Contractor was effective in adapting to changing requirements.

____ Contractor was ineffective in adapting to changing requirements.

D. Project Management

1. How well did the contractor work with the owner and the owner’s technical advisors?

____ Contractor worked extremely well with the owner and the owner’s technical advisors)

____ Contractor was generally cooperative with the owner and the owner’s technical advisors.

____ Contractor did not work well with the owner and the owner’s technical advisors.

2. Was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of project related third party entities (i.e. tenants)?

____ Contractor was very cooperative.

____ Contractor was generally cooperative.

____ Contractor was not cooperative.

_____________________________________________________________________________

3. Did the contractor maintain a consistent on site management/project team throughout the duration of the project?

____ No adjustments were made: contractor maintained the same team throughout

the duration of the project.

____ Minor adjustments to the support team were made during the project.

____ Significant changes to the key personnel of the project team were made during

the project.

____ Contractor maintained no consistency in key personnel during the project.

Do you have any additional comments regarding this contractor’s performance?

Evaluated By: __________________________________________ (Signature)

Name and Title: _________________________________________________________________

Organization: _________________________________________________________________

Telephone: __________________________________________

Email: __________________________________________

Date: __________________________________________

May the source selection team contact you for additional information if it is deemed necessary?

YES_________ ` NO__________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Nov 14, 2017.