Attachment_L-2,_Past_and_Present_Performance_Questionnaire_FSSII.pdf

PDF 267 KB Posted

Attached to
Facility Support Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA9101-18-R-1000
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Test Center

About this file

Attachment L-2, Past and Present Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Facility Support Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
Amendment_0001_SF30.pdf PDF
QandA_No._9.pdf PDF
QandA_No._7.pdf PDF
Exhibit_A_CDRLs.pdf PDF
Attachment_9,_Section_M_FRFP.pdf PDF
Attachment_2,_DD_254.pdf PDF
FSS_II_SF33.pdf PDF
Attachment_L-7,_Cross_Reference_Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit_D,_ASO_and_PSI_and_IGUA_CBA.pdf PDF
Attachment_L-1,_PPI_Tool.pdf PDF
Attachment_L-5,_Subcontractor_Consent_Letter.pdf PDF
Attachment_8,_Section_L_FRFP.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_PWS_9_Nov_18.pdf PDF
Attachment_3,_SCA_and_CBA_WDs.pdf PDF
Exhibit_C,_ASO_and_AEMTC_CBA.pdf PDF
QandA_No._6.pdf PDF
FSS_II_Notional_Acquisition_Schedule_-_Sep_2018.pdf PDF
Industry_Day_3_Panel_Cancellation.pdf PDF
Draft_Attachment_8,_Section_L_(UPDATE).pdf PDF
QandA_No._5.pdf PDF
Industry_Day_No._3_Agenda.pdf PDF
Industry_Day_No._3_Announcement.pdf PDF
QandA_No._4.pdf PDF
Attachment_2,_DD254.pdf PDF
Attachment_7,_USAF_Owned_Registered_Vehicles.pdf PDF
Attachment_3,_SCA_and_CBA_WDs.pdf PDF
Attachment_L-6,_Relevancy_Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_L-5,_Subcontractor_Consent_Letter.pdf PDF
Attachment_L-8,_Cost_Model.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_L-3,_PPQ_Cover_Letter.pdf PDF
FSS_II_dRFP_SF33.pdf PDF
Attachment_L-7,_Cross_Reference_Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_5,_ACES_FD_Property_Listing.pdf PDF
Exhibit_B_Data_Item_Descriptions.pdf PDF
Attachment_L-4_Past_Performance_Client_Authorization_Letter.pdf PDF
Exhibit_D,_ASO_and_PSI_and_IGUA_CBA.pdf PDF
Exhibit_E,_ASO_and_URS_and_AEMTC_CBA.pdf PDF
FSS_II_dRFP_Cover_Letter.pdf PDF
Attachment_9,_Section_M.pdf PDF
FSS_II_Draft_Exhibit_A_Contract_Data_Requirements_List.pdf PDF
FSS_II_Draft_PWS_20_Jul_18.pdf PDF
Questions_and_Answers_No._2.pdf PDF
Request_for_Information_No._1.pdf PDF
Attachment_8_-_Industry_Day_No._2_Registration_Form.docx DOCX document
Attachment_7_-_Industry_Day_No._2_Agenda.pdf PDF
Attachment_8_-_Industry_Day_No._2_Registration_Form.pdf PDF
Attachment_6_FSS_II_Draft_PWS_13_Apr_18.pdf PDF
Sources_Sought_QandA_No._1.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_(Update)_-_Industry_Day_No._1_Announcement.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_-_Industry_Day_No._1_Announcement.pdf PDF
Show all 50

Facility Support Services has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FSS II

FA9101-18-R-1000

Attachment 8

ATTACHMENT L-2

PAST / PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

I. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION : Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate :

A. Contractor (Company / Division): ___________________________________________________

B. Point of Contact (Program Manager and Contracting Officer):

C. Telephone Number:

D. CAGE Code:

E. Contract Number:

F. Contract Dollar Value:

1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $_______________

2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $________________

3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

G. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, CPAF):

H. Contract Period of Performance:

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________________ through ______________________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________________ through ______________________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable):

I. Program Title:

J. Brief Program Description:

K. Program Phase: (e.g., Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD))

L. Contractor Performed as the Prime Contractor Joint Venture Partner

Subcontractor (If Joint Venture Partner, specifically identify the managing partner and other partners; if Subcontractor, identify Prime Contractor).

II. RESPONDENT(S) TO QUESTIONNAIRE

A. Name(s):

B. Address:

C. Phone Number(s):

D. Fax Number:

E. Email Address:

F. Position (e.g., Program Manager, PCO / ACO):

G. Other suggested points of contact:

III. GENERAL COMMENTS

IV. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Please indicate your performance rating for the Contractor’s by circling or place an “X” over the appropriate code using the performance evaluation scale below. Ratings are defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE RATING

B BLUE / EXCEPTIONAL - During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting

(or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) many. Very few, if any, minor problems encountered. Contractor took immediate and highly effective corrective action.

P PURPLE / VERY GOOD - During the contract period, contractor is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) some. Some minor problems encountered. Contractor took timely corrective action

G GREEN / SATISFACTORY - During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements. For any problems encountered, contractor took satisfactory corrective action.

Y YELLOW / MARGINAL - During the contract period, contractor performance is not meeting (or did not meet) some contract requirements. For problems encountered, corrective action appeared only marginally effective, not effective, or not fully implemented. Customer involvement was required.

R RED / UNSATISFACTORY - During the contract period, contractor performance is failing (or failed) to meet most contract requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. Serious problems encountered. Corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect. Do not know.

Respondents should explain their rating in the remarks section for any rating of Yellow or Red and ratings that might contradict official Past Performance documentation (e.g., Contractor Performance

Assessment Reports (CPARs)). If more space is needed, remarks may be continued on separate pages.

Please identify Factor and Subfactor and question number.

A. TECHNICAL FACTOR - Rate the Offeror’s performance for the following subfactors:

Management Approach B P G Y R N/A

M1) How well did the Contractor ensure each employee had an appropriate security clearance before performing services on this contract?

M2) How well did the Contractor identify and manage interfaces in a multi-contractor environment in support of contract requirements?

M3) How well did the Contractor execute a sound resource management approach to recruiting and hiring, minimizing turnover, and ensuring qualified employees are in place to perform contract requirements prior to the contract period?

M4) How well did the Contractor execute a sound resource management approach to recruiting and hiring, minimizing turnover, and ensuring qualified employees are in place to perform contract requirements throughout the contract?

M5) How well did the Contractor react to workload fluctuations to ensure continuity of operations and meet requirements without mission degradation?

M6) How well did the Contractor demonstrate an effective quality management system?

M7) How well did the Contractor demonstrate a comprehensive risk management process / program that adequately identified and addressed risks?

M8) How well did the Contractor do on their last two Industrial

Security Program Reviews performed by Defense Security Services

(DSS) or the Installation Security Office?

M9) If the Contractor had any security incidents during contract performance that may have compromised classified information, how well did they resolve the incident(s)?

M10) How good was the Contractor's process for reporting potential adverse behavior during contract performance?

Transition Management B P G Y R N/A

TM1) How well did the Contractor seamlessly transition resources to accomplish phase-in activities to ensure full continuity of mission requirements by the performance start date?

TM2) How well did the Contractor seamlessly transition resources to accomplish phase-in / phase-out activities to prevent mission degradation?

Technical Operations and Compliance B P G Y R N/A

TO1) How well did the Contractor accomplish the contract requirements?

TO2) How well did the Contractor perform timely operations by establishing and adhering to schedules?

TO3) How well did the Contractor provide deliverables in accordance with contract requirements?

TO4) How well did the Contractor comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and governing documents?

TO5) How well did the Contractor identify and correct performance deficiencies?

TO6) How well did the Contractor implement a property management system that conformed with FAR 52.245-1(f)?

Mission-Essential Contractor Services B P G Y R N/A

ME1): How well did the Contractor provide continual mission essential services during crises (if experienced)?

Cost Performance B P G Y R N/A

C1) How well did the Contractor provide satisfactory or above services or deliverables within the constraints of a firm-fixed-price contract?

C2) How well did the Contractor submit timely proposals for additional or unscheduled requirements and perform within proposed prices?

C3) How effective was the Contractor’s accounting system for management and tracking of cost (if cost contract line item numbers

[CLINs] included in contract)?

B. NARRATIVE SUMMARY

Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated Y / M (Yellow / Marginal) or R / U (Red

/ Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

C. GENERAL COMMENT (Choose one of the following and explain your choice in the remarks)

Given what I know today about the Contractor’s ability to execute what they promised in their proposal, I definitely would probably would might or might not probably would not definitely would not

ME2) How well did the Contractor use plans, procedures, and foresight in preparedness of providing continuity of mission essential services during crises?

ME3) How well did the Contractor establish and adhere to schedules which prevented little disruption during emergencies (if experienced)?

ME4) How well did the Contractor plan for or prevent increased costs, impacts to normal ops schedules, or degradation to normal mission ops during crises?

award to them today given that I had a choice.

REMARKS:

D. GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS ONLY: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes Default Convenience Pending Termination

No

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please email this completed questionnaire to: aedc.sso@us.af.mil

File details come from the government source that posted it.