16T_C1_Blade_Design_SOW_14424-002-17.pdf

14424-16-002

Distribution A - Public Release Distribution Unlimited

IRA-2620, PA-AEDC2016-195

SPEC NO. 14424-16-002

30 SEPTEMBER 2016

STATEMENT OF WORK

FOR

16T C-1 COMPRESSOR ROTOR BLADE STRUCTURAL DESIGN, TOOLING, AND

MANUFACTURING

ARNOLD ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT CENTER

ARNOLD AIR FORCE BASE, TN 37389-9998

Distribution A Public Release Distribution

Unlimited

Table of Contents-1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. SCOPE

2. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

2.1. Government Documents

2.2. Non-Government Documents

3. REQUIREMENTS

3.1. General

4. Verification and Acceptance

5. Packaging

6. Submittals

Appendix A – Submittal Procedure

IRA-2620, PA-AEDC2016-195

Page-1

1. SCOPE AND BACKGROUND

1.1. The Contractor shall furnish structural and tooling design drawings, structural analysis, fabricated tooling, manufacturing process development, a limited initial production run of blades for structural and thermal testing, and the full production run of blades to Arnold Engineering Development Center (AEDC), Arnold Air Force Base, Tennessee.

1.2. ITEM DESCRIPTION. The C1 Compressor provides airflow for the 16T wind tunnel. The C1 compressor accomplishes this through standard axial flow technology. The compressor is a large three-stage axial flow machine with a rotor blade tip-to-tip diameter of 30.2 ft. Each stage is composed of rotating blades separated by variable pitch stator blades. The composite blades are designed with an offset center of gravity (CG) which limits the bending stress in the blade by resisting aerodynamic loading. In addition the blades are attached using a pin connection which allows them to rotate which reduces further reduces the blade stresses and the load which is transferred into the composite spacers which are installed between the blades.

2. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

2.1. Government Documents:

2.1.1. Specification Number 14424-16-001 16T C-1 COMPRESSOR BLADE

STRUCTURAL DESIGN/ANALYSIS,

TOOLING, AND TESTING UNITS.

3. REQUIREMENTS

3.1. General:

3.1.1. The contractor shall design, fabricate and inspect (both dimensional and NDI) the following quantities per the requirements detailed within this specification. (These quantities include the three row A LRIP (Low Rate Initial Production) blades, the three row B LRIP blades, and the three row C LRIP blades). The first three row C production blades will be qualified by the Contractor and Government as applicable with the same test as the pre-production LRIP blades.

Sixty-seven (65) Row A blades with installed blade cuff and disc/blade interface bushings

Seventy-one (69) Row B blades with installed blade cuff and disc/blade interface

Seventy-three (70) Row C blades with installed blade cuff and disc/blade interface

IRA-2620, PA-AEDC2016-195

Page-2

3.1.2. Blade assemblies and related components shall be designed, fabricated and shipped to AEDC in accordance with Section 2 Applicable Documents.

3.1.3. The contractor shall hold the following meetings at the Government facility. These meetings shall include the blade, blade cuff, and blade tooling. The Government shall be supplied with all information the contractor plans to discuss three weeks prior (farther in advance would be beneficial) to the meeting. Two weeks prior to the Preliminary Design Review, the Critical Design Review, and the Final Design Review the Government will send representatives to the contractor facility. The purpose of this visit is to assist the Government in understanding the relationship between what the contractor plans to present at each review and the equipment, processes and procedures the contractor will use during production. Each visit shall include a walk through of all steps the contractor is proposing to use in blade fabrication (from material delivery to final dimensional and NDI Inspection).

A. Concept Review - The contractor shall at a minimum present a high level overview of the chosen concept and the trade-off analysis (cost, schedule, performance, risk, manufacturability, etc.) used to arrive at this concept.

B. Preliminary Design Review - (30% design complete) – The contractor shall at a minimum present a detailed presentation of their concept/design. The contractor shall have drawings and calculations on hand for a technical review. Exit criteria for the Preliminary Design Review are:

• Initial Program Management Plan (addressing preliminary design – cost, schedule, milestones, baselines)

• Traceability document for sections 3.2 through 3.8 and section 4 of the specification

• Engineering Change Proposals

• Risk analysis and risk management strategy

• Interface Control documentation

• Initial production plan (including tooling and NDI)

• Preliminary accept/reject criteria overview

• Preliminary repair considerations in blade design

C. Critical Design Review (80% design complete) – This review shall also include review of tooling and proposed Non Destructive Inspection (NDI) method and fabrication procedures. The contractor shall at a minimum present a detailed presentation of their design. The contractor shall have drawings and calculations on hand for a technical review. Exit criteria for the Critical Design Review are:

• Updated Program Management Plan (addressing preliminary design – cost, schedule, milestones, baselines)

IRA-2620, PA-AEDC2016-195

Page-3

• Updated Traceability document for sections 3.2 through 3.8 and section 4 of this specification

• Engineering Change Proposals

• Updated Risk analysis and risk management strategy

• Updated Interface Control documentation

• Draft of service life analysis (see section 3.1.1)

• Updated production plan (including tooling and NDI)

• Updated accept/reject criteria overview

• Updated repair considerations in blade design

• Preliminary blade repair procedures

D. Final Design Review (all design complete and include accept/reject criteria described in section 3.8.1) - This review shall also include tooling and NDI method. The contractor shall present a detailed presentation of their design;

this presentation shall also include production and quality assurance procedures as well as accept/reject criteria. The contractor shall have complete drawings, solid models, geometric inspection plan, and calculations to AEDC 2 weeks before FDR for technical review. Exit criteria for the Final Design Review are:

• Final Program Management Plan (addressing preliminary design – cost, schedule, milestones, baselines)

• Final Traceability document for sections 3.2 through 3.8 and section 4 of the specification

• Final Engineering Change Proposals

• Final Risk analysis and risk management strategy

• Final Interface Control documentation

• Final service life analysis (see section 3.1.1)

• Final production plan (including tooling and NDI)

• Final SSHA

• Geometric Inspection Plan

• Final accept/reject criteria overview

• Final repair procedures

3.1.4. References in the specification to equipment, material, articles, or patented processes by trade name, make or catalog number, shall be regarded as establishing a standard of quality and shall not be construed as limiting competition

3.1.5. The contractor shall supply full scale rapid prototype models (stereolithography, selective laser sintering, or other process whose material properties allows for handling without damage) of their blade and cuff design. One models for each row shall be provided. The contractor shall supply a dimensional inspection report verifying that these models accurately represent their blade design. The Government will use these models for an air off check fit in the wind tunnel compressor.

IRA-2620, PA-AEDC2016-195

Page-4

4. Verification and Acceptance:

4.1.1. Technical Surveillance: Government reserves the right to visit the Contractor and manufacturer facilities to assess manufacturing capability, readiness and/or progress.

4.1.2. Testing Responsibilities: The Contractor/manufacturer shall be responsible for all material testing to qualify the material for design of the blade structure.

4.1.2.1. Material testing shall include characterization of tensile, compressive, and shear properties of the composite materials used including ultimate strength and stiffness moduli. This testing shall be in accordance with the appropriate testing standard from ASTM or SACMA as shown in section 2.2 of specification 14424-16-001.

4.1.2.2. Material testing shall also include impact testing of an panels and an LRIP blade to determine damage levels for impact energies seen in the compressor. After impact the blade shall be load tested in the same manner as described in section 4.1.2.4.

4.1.2.3. The Contractor/manufacturer shall be responsible for dimensional checks and ultrasonic NDI inspection of the limited production blade assemblies prior to delivery as listed in the specification 14424-16-001.

4.1.2.4. Structural and thermal testing shall be performed by the contractor.

At a minimum combined bending, torsional, and centripetal load testing shall be performed at room temperature and at the maximum compressor temperature from specification 14424-001-16 section 3. These tests shall be run on all LRIP blades (initial and first production). The contractor shall not substitute sub-scale (e.g. blade root section only, aero section only, etc.) for full scale testing.

4.1.2.5. Following successful completion of the structrual/thermal testing of the LRIP blades (initial and first manufacture run) will be installed in the C-1 compressor for final acceptance testing. If the initial LRIP blades pass qualification then production authorization will be given for the first three C-Row blades. If the initial three pre-production LRIP blades pass qualification testing they will be will be considered to be the first three production blades, if not the Contractor shall produce three blades from each row at the Contractor’s expense. These blades will then be put through the entire LRIP qualification testing procedure. This will continue until the blades produced pass qualification testing. The final set will then be considered the first production units.

4.1.2.6. Successful structural testing is defined as follows:

1.) The blade shall show no permanent deformations which would put them out of geometric spec.

IRA-2620, PA-AEDC2016-195

Page-5

2.) No strain measurements show unacceptable factor of safety

3.) The strain measurements shall not exceed the FEA predictions by more than 15%.

4.) The blades pass post-test NDI inspection with no new rejectable indications.

4.1.3. Test plans shall be submitted and approved by the Government two weeks prior to the test dates.

4.1.4. The Government reserves the right to witness all tests. The Contractor shall notify the Government at least two weeks prior to all test dates.

4.1.5. The Contractor shall submit all test reports (as specified in Specification 14224- 16-001, Section 4) signed by personnel conducting the test and those approving the results. Do not ship blade assemblies until test reports have been approved by Contracting Officer.

4.1.6. Accept/reject criteria to determine suitability for blade delivery to the Government and reject/repair used by the Government during blade operation (reference specification sections 3.8.1 and 3.8.2) shall be provided.

4.1.7. One set of master NDI calibration standards shall be provided. The calibration standards shall employ built-in NDI calibration targets embedded in the standards to facilitate calibration of the NDI equipment. These flaws shall at a minimum represent the smallest flaw that will affect serviceability of the blade (see specification section 3.8.1 and 3.8.2)

4.1.8. A baseline NDI inspection (per the requirements set forth in specification section 3.8.4) of each blade manufactured shall be provided in electronic format, preferable in JPEG format for imaging NDI’s. The NDI inspection document shall be identified so it is traceable to the unique serial number marked on each blade per specification section 3.2.6 as well as the date the NDI occurred.

4.1.9. The contractor shall provide additional NDI inspections of the nine initial production blades the Government will use for verification testing. This NDI inspection shall occur after acceptance testing (as performed by the Government).

4.1.10. The contractor shall supply a log recording, at a minimum, the blade serial number, weight (per specification section 3.5.1), corresponding date of manufacture and lot # of all items used in that blade.

4.1.11. Acceptance: The Government will accept the blade assemblies, upon successful tests, within 30 days of delivery to AEDC.

IRA-2620, PA-AEDC2016-195

Page-6

5. Submittals: The Contractor shall submit all documentation in accordance with Appendix A – Submittal Procedure. A summary table of required submittals is listed in Table 1 – Required Submittal List.

5.1. Project Plan and Schedule with Milestones: At a minimum the plan and schedule shall include:

A. PDR (30% Design) Meeting

B. CDR (90% Design) Meeting.

C. FDR (100% Design) Meeting.

D. Tooling fabrication complete date.

E. Test unit production complete date.

6 Engineering Analysis and Calculations for blades:

A. Structural analysis shall consist of Finite Element Analysis (FEA) to include max stress/strain and Tsai Wu first ply failure criteria as well as backup hand calculations of blade bending and twisting stresses.

B. Structural analysis shall be performed assuming a damaged blade condition equal to that shown in specification section 3 and assessment of proposed repairs.

C. All FEA analysis shall be submitted both in report form (.pdf file format) and in a digital format compatible with ANSYS FEA software version 14.0 and newer. The FEA model submitted shall be fully functional and all analysis shall become property of the Government on contract completion.

6.2 Blade Drawings:

6.2.1 Final assembly design drawings shall be supplied for the blade and blade cuff including ply cutting definitions, ply layup definitions, and fully dimensioned 2-D drawings. Drawing shall be in accordance with ANSI Y14.5 1994 or 2009. Drawings and 3-D CAD models shall be delivered in a format compatible with Autodesk Inventor 2015 and newer as well as in PDF format (2-D Drawings only). The dimensional drawings and solid models shall be in English imperial units. All models and drawings shall become property of the Government upon contract completion.

6.2.2 Bills of material, details, and assembly information shall be provided.

6.2.3 Certified blade assembly weight and center of gravity diagram shall be provided.

Page-7

6.2.4 All special tooling, jigs, and fixtures manufactured under this contract shall become property of the Government after contract completion.

All drawings and CAD models of this tooling shall become property of the Government on contract completion.

6.2.5 Contractor shall provide a summarized submittal listing with delivery dates 14 days after contract(or contract modification) award.

6.2.6 Manufacturing process development and production documentation shall be provided in order to fully document the critical manufacturing, processing and disassembly steps in laying up, assembling, curing and post-processing the blades.

6.2.7 Submittal Table:

Table 1 - Required Submittal List No. Section Reference Submittal Description Due 1 3.1.20 Summarized Submittal listing and project schedule with delivery dates

14 days after contract(or contract modification) award

2 3.1.2.2 PDR Meeting and Design Presentation

21 Days prior to PDR Meeting

3 3.1.2.2 Preliminary design drawings and calculations

21 Days prior to PDR Meeting

4 3.1.2.2 Initial Program Management Plan

21 Days prior to PDR Meeting

5 3.1.2.2 Initial Traceability Documentation

21 Days prior to PDR Meeting

6 3.1.2.2 Initial Engineering Change Proposals

21 Days prior to PDR Meeting

7 3.1.2.2 Initial Risk Analysis and Risk Management Strategy

21 Days prior to PDR Meeting

8 3.1.2.2 Initial Interface Control Documentation

21 Days prior to PDR Meeting

9 3.1.2.2 Initial Production Plan (including tooling and NDI)

21 Days prior to PDR Meeting

10 3.1.2.2 Draft SSHA 21 Days prior to PDR Meeting

11 3.1.2.3 Updated design drawings and calculations

21 Days prior to CDR Meeting

12 3.1.2.3 CDR Meeting and Updated Presentation of Design

21 Days prior to CDR Meeting

IRA-2620, PA-AEDC2016-195

Page-8

13 3.1.2.3 Updated Program Management Plan

21 Days prior to CDR Meeting

14 3.1.2.3 Updated Traceability Documentation

21 Days prior to CDR Meeting

15 3.1.2.3 Updated Engineering Change Proposals

21 Days prior to CDR Meeting

16 3.1.2.3 Updated Risk Analysis and Risk Management Strategy

21 Days prior to CDR Meeting

17 3.1.2.3 Updated Interface Control Documentation

21 Days prior to CDR Meeting

18 3.1.2.3 Updated Production Plan (including tooling and NDI)

21 Days prior to CDR Meeting

19 3.1.2.3 Updated SSHA 21 Days prior to CDR Meeting

20 3.1.2.4 3.1.3

Final Drawings and Calculations including FEA files and report

21 Days Prior to FDR

21 3.1.2.4 Geometric Inspection Plan

21 Days Prior to FDR

No. Section Reference Submittal Description Due 23 3.1.2.4 Final Traceability

Documentation 21 Days Prior to FDR

24 3.1.2.4 Final Engineering Change Proposals

21 Days Prior to FDR

25 3.1.2.4 Final Risk Analysis and Risk Management Strategy

21 Days Prior to FDR

26 3.1.2.4 Final Interface Control Documentation

21 Days Prior to FDR

27 3.1.2.4 Final Production Plan (including tooling and NDI)

21 Days Prior to FDR

28 3.1.2.4 Final SSHA 21 Days Prior to FDR 29 3.1.4 Final Service Life Analysis 21 Days Prior to FDR 30 3.1.5 Rapid Prototype Model for each

Row 5 weeks prior to FDR

31 3.1.5 Geometric Inspection report for the prototype blades

5 weeks prior to FDR

32 3.1.6 Copies of all proposed test plans

14 days prior to testing

33 3.1.7 Accept/Reject Criteria for blade suitability

21 Days Prior to FDR

35 3.1.9 Master NDI calibration Standards

Prior to LRIP Delivery

36 3.1.10 Baseline NDI inspection report for each blade

At Blade Delivery

IRA-2620, PA-AEDC2016-195

Page-9

37 3.1.11 Post-Testing NDI of LRIP Blades

4 weeks after contractor receipt of acceptance tested

LRIP blades 38 3.1.13 Material Safety Data Sheets

(MSDS) for all blade materials At FDR

39 3.1.14 Any maintenance manuals, parts lists, operating instructions, etc.

Prior to LRIP Delivery

40 3.1.18 Estimate to repair blade with a 3" long x 3" wide x full thickness hole in the blade

At FDR

41 3.1.12 3.5.4.5

Blade/Cuff Installation Procedure (If Req’d)

Delivered with LRIP Blades

42 3.8.2 Accept/Repair Criteria for the blade

At FDR

43 3.8.4 NDI plan and method

44 4.1.1 Testing reports necessary to establish material allowables and process parameters

IRA-2620, PA-AEDC2016-195

A-1

APPENDIX A

SUBMITTAL PROCEDURE

PART 1 GENERAL

1.1 DESCRIPTION OF REQUIREMENTS. This section specifies procedural requirements for non-administrative submittals, including but not limited to shop drawings, product data, manufacturer’s certificate, design data, calculations, and verifications, manufacturer’s instructions, manufacturer’s field service reports, samples, operation and maintenance manuals, and other miscellaneous work-related submittals. These submittals are required to amplify, expand, and coordinate other information contained in the contract. This section describes the type and content of submittals that may be required for this work. The required submittals are included in the Statement of Work.

Non-work-related submittals are addressed elsewhere in the contract rather than in the specification and may include items such as: contract progress schedule, permits, payment applications, performance and payment bonds, insurance certificates, and progress reports.

The Contracting Officer may request submittals in addition to those specified when deemed necessary to adequately describe the work covered in the respective sections of the specification or statement of work.

1.2 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURE

A. Definition: For the purposes of this section, the term “Contractor” denotes the prime contractor.

B. Listing: At the end of the Statement of Work is a summarized listing of item submittals requiring approval for the work. The listing is included for the convenience of users of the contract documents. The listing may not be all inclusive and additional item submittals may be required. Within 10 days after receiving contract award, Contractor shall submit a copy of the summarized submittal listing with calendar dates assigned to each item submittal indicating when submittal will be received by the Government. If contract requires a pre-construction conference, Contractor may submit completed submittal listing at the conference.

C. Risk: Do not proceed with the part of the work covered by an item submittal including purchasing, fabricating, and delivering until approval is received.

Machinery, equipment, material, and articles that do not have the required approval shall be installed or used at the risk of subsequent rejection. Any fabrication or other work performed in advance of the receipt of accepted item submittals and approvals shall be entirely at the Contractor’s risk and expense.

IRA-2620, PA-AEDC2016-195

A-2

D. Transmittal Timing: Coordinate the preparation and processing of item submittals with the performance of the work. Prepare and transmit each item submittal to the Contracting Officer sufficiently in advance of the performance of related work and other applicable activities. Transmit related item submittals for the same unit of work so that processing will not be delayed by the Government's need to review submittals concurrently for coordination. No delay damages or time extensions will be allowed for time lost in late submittals.

E. Content: Each submittal shall be complete and in sufficient detail to allow ready determination of compliance with contract requirements. Complete AF Form 3000 and attach as cover sheet for each submittal. Contractor may include multiple item numbers on an AF Form 3000.

F. Language: All item submittals shall be written in English, including documents, notes on drawings, sketches, and/or samples, calculations, manuals, and all other instances of written text and communication.

G. Units: All item submittals shall be marked or show dimensions and values in the same units as specified in the contract documents.

H. Review Time: Allow sufficient time so that contract performance will not be delayed as a result of the time required to properly process submittals, including time for re-submittals, if necessary. Allow 10 working days for initial Government processing of each submittal. No extension of time will be authorized because of the Contractor's failure to transmit submittals to the Government sufficiently in advance of the work.

I. Contractor Certification: All submittals shall be carefully reviewed by an authorized representative of the Contractor prior to submission to the Government. Each submittal shall be dated, signed, and certified by the Contractor as being correct and in strict conformance with the contract documents. No consideration for review by the Government of any Contractor’s submittal will be made for any items which have not been so certified by the Contractor. All noncertified submittals will be returned to the Contractor without action taken by the Government, and any delays caused thereby shall be the total responsibility of the Contractor.

J. Deviations: Should any item submittals required by the contract documents show deviations from the contract requirement, the Contractor shall make specific mention of such deviations in the letter of transmittal, including stating cost effects, and product and system limitations which may adversely affect the work, in order that if acceptable, suitable action may be taken for proper adjustment of the contract; otherwise the Contractor will not be relieved of the responsibility for executing the work in accordance with the contract documents and the approved submittals. Contractor shall clearly mark the proposed variation in all documentation and specifically

IRA-2620, PA-AEDC2016-195

A-3 point out deviations from contract requirements in transmittal letters. Failure to point out deviations may result in the Government requiring rejection and removal of such work at no additional cost to the Government. Deviations from contract requirements require Government approval and will only be considered when advantageous to the Government. When proposing deviations, deliver written request to the Contracting Officer, with documentation of the nature and features of the deviation and why the deviation is desirable and beneficial to the Government. If lower cost is a benefit, include an estimate of the cost savings. In addition to documentation required for deviation, include the submittal information required for the item. Allow an additional 10 working days beyond normal submittal review period for consideration by the Government of submittals with deviations.

K. Approved Submittals: The part of the work covered by the approved item submittal may proceed provided it complies with the requirements of the contract documents. Final acceptance will depend upon that compliance.

The term “Approved” shall only indicate that there is no exception taken to the submittal. Approval of the item submittal shall not be construed as a complete check, and indicates only that the general method or other information appears to meet the contract requirements. Approval does not relieve the Contractor of the responsibility for any error which may exist.

After item submittals have been approved by the Contracting Officer, no resubmittal for the purpose of substituting materials or equipment, or changes to any other information will be considered unless accompanied by an explanation of why a substitution or change is necessary.

L. Disapproved Submittals: Contractor shall correct disapproved item submittals and resubmit for approval within timeframe noted. If no date is given, Contractor shall submit corrected submittal within 10 working days.

If the Contractor considers any correction or notation on the returned submittal to constitute a change to the contract drawings, specification, or statement of work the Contractor shall notify the Contracting Officer.

M. Responsibility: The Government’s review of Contractor submittals shall not relieve the Contractor of the entire responsibility for the correctness of details and dimensions and conformance to the specifications. The Contractor shall assume all responsibility and risk for any mistakes and/or costs due to any errors in submittals.

N. Inconsistencies: If a conflict or inconsistency arises between an approved item submittal and the contract documents, the contract documents shall govern.

1.3 SPECIFIC SUBMITTAL DESCRIPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS: Submittal requirements for individual units of work are specified in the applicable specification section or Statement of Work (SOW). Except as otherwise indicated

IRA-2620, PA-AEDC2016-195

A-4 in the individual specification sections or SOW, comply with the following requirements for each type of submittal.

A. Shop Drawings: These are technical drawings and data specially prepared for this contract including fabrication and installation drawings, setting and seaming diagrams, and coordination drawings (for use on-site). Shop drawings include drawings, diagrams and schedules specifically prepared to illustrate some portion of the work, diagrams and instructions from a manufacturer or fabricator for use in producing the product and as aids to the Contractor for integrating the product or system into the project, or drawings prepared by or for the Contractor to show how multiple systems and interdisciplinary work will be coordinated. Information required on shop drawings includes dimensions, identification of specific products and materials which are included in the work, compliance with specified standards, and notations of coordination requirements with other work.

Provide special notations of dimensions that have been established by field measurements. Highlight, encircle, or otherwise indicate deviations from the contract documents on the shop drawings. Furnish one hard copy and one electronic copy.

B. Product Data: This data includes standard printed information on manufactured products that has not been specially prepared for this contract, including manufacturers' product specifications illustrating size, physical appearance and other characteristics of materials, installation instructions, standard color charts, catalog cuts, illustrations, schedules, standard wiring diagrams, standard product operating and maintenance manuals, and samples of warranty language when the contract requires extended product warranties. General information required specifically as product data includes manufacturers' standard printed recommendations for application and use, compliance with recognized standards of trade associations and testing agencies, the application of their labels and seals (if any), special notation of dimensions which have been verified by way of field measurement, and special coordination requirements for interfacing the material, product, or system with other work. Furnish three hard copies and one electronic copy.

C. Design Data: Design data includes design calculations, analyses or other data pertaining to a part of work. Refer to individual sections of the specification or statement of work for required quantities, formats, and signatures or certifications required. Furnish three hard copies and one electronic copy.

D. Test Reports: These include reports signed by an authorized official of a testing laboratory that a material, product or system identical to the material, product or system to be provided has been tested in accordance with the specified requirements. Testing shall have been within three years of date of contract award for the project. Reports also include findings of tests

IRA-2620, PA-AEDC2016-195

A-5 required to be performed by the Contractor on an actual portion of the work or prototype prepared for the project before shipment to the job site, findings of tests made at the job site or on a sample taken from the job site, investigation reports, daily logs and checklists, and final acceptance test and operational test procedures. Furnish three hard copies and one electronic copy of each such report required.

E. Manufacturer’s Instructions: Preprinted material describing installation of a product, system or material, including special notices and Material Safety Data sheets concerning impedances, hazards and safety precautions.

Furnish three hard copies and one electronic copy.

F. Operation and Maintenance Data: Data furnished by the manufacturer, or the system provider, to the equipment operating and maintenance personnel, including manufacturer’s help and product line documentation necessary to maintain and install the equipment, and needed by operating and maintenance personnel for the safe and efficient operation, maintenance, and repair of the item. The data is intended to be incorporated in an operations and maintenance manual or control system. Furnish two hard copies and one electronic copy.

G. Final Design Drawings and Documentation: Final design documentation including drawings, CAD models, specifications, estimates, and other required deliverables. Electronic documentation submitted shall include every associated component file of drawings and other documentation, including raster images, jpeg, tiff, Excel, and any related items required to view, modify, or manipulate the electronic files. Furnish a CD or DVD-ROM of all final design documentation, and drawings in a format compatible with Autodesk Inventor 2015 format or later, to the Contracting Officer for approval prior to applying for final payment.

H. Miscellaneous Submittals: These are work-related, non-administrative submittals that do not fit in the previous categories, including the following:

1. Project photographs. Furnish both hard copies and digital files.

2. Qualification certificates. Furnish one hard copy and one electronic copy.

3. Warranties.

END OF SOW AND APPENDICES