Section_L_Attachment_3_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

For Official Use Only Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Section L Attachment 3:

Past Performance Questionnaire – DCRIOS

The 38th Contracting Squadron of Air Force Space Command (AFSPC) is in the process of selecting a contractor for the Defensive Cyber Realization, Integration & Operational Support (DCRIOS) Services contract.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.

Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. In order to meet the acquisition milestones, we request your written response no later than [10] calendar days after your receipt of this letter. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of negotiations.

The questionnaire should be completed electronically and be returned via e-mail to Anthony Owens (anthony.owens.7@us.af.mil) and Donna Williams (donna.williams.6@us.af.mil). You may contact Mr. Owens at 405-734-9637 if you have any questions about this request. Your completed questionnaire will become part of the official Source Selection records.

Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

V/r Anthony P. Owens Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)

1 Atch Past Performance Questionnaire

Section 1: Contract Identification

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Number or Task Order Number:

D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

E. Program Title:

F. Brief Program Description:

G. Program Phase (e.g., Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD)):

H. Period of Performance

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable):

I. Contract Dollar Value

1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

J. Description of work performed:

K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel

Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last three (3) years, please complete separate Past Performance Questionnaire forms for those contracts as well.

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of work performed under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):

Section 3: Respondent Identification

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone/fax number/e-mail address:

D. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

E. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Performance Information

In the table below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided on whether or not the contractor performed the task. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

Note: The following are SAMPLE questions. Past Performance evaluation teams MUST construct a simple and concise Past Performance Questionnaire, tailored to seek out key information tied to the significant aspects of the planned acquisition. Avoid questions that can be answered with a “yes” or “no” but instead include probing and direct questions to draw out the required information desired. Comment by OWENS, ANTHONY P CIV USAF AFSPC 38 CONS/LGCC: Info only, will delete

1. Demonstrated the ability to hire, maintain, and replace, sometimes on short notice, qualified personnel during the contract period.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

2. Demonstrated experience hiring and maintaining a qualified work force IAW DoD 8570.01-M.

3. Demonstrated experience ensuring seamless transition of operations at the beginning and end of the performance period.

4. Demonstrated experience performing cyber vulnerability assessments.

5. Demonstrated experience performing cyber IT security compliance assessments.

6. Demonstrated experience performing penetration testing.

7. Demonstrated experience performing detecting, discovering and characterizing advanced adversary tradecraft within friendly networks that evade routine security measures.

8. Demonstrated experience performing in the area of defining and understanding adversary TTPs with special emphasis on Cyber Security Incident Damage Assessment Analysis.

9. Demonstrated experience performing in supporting the identification of deficiencies in Cyberspace training, equipment, support or tactics that will improve the end-state security posture of the cyber system or enclave.

10. Demonstrated experience performing development of cyberspace or IT training scenarios/curriculum and qualifying personnel to conduct cyber security operations.

11. How smoothly did the contractor transition resources and personnel?

12. How effective was the contractor in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts?

13. How effective was employee compensation towards quality of work?

14. To what degree was the contractor able to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan?

15. How well did the contractor meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs?

16. How successfully did the contractor alert the Government of unforeseen costs before they occurred?

17. How successfully did the contractor respond to emergency and/or surge situations?

18. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract?

19. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain.

EXPLANATION:

☐ Yes ☐ No

20. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain.

EXPLANATION:

☐ Yes ☐ No

Areas Rated:

(1) Quality of Service Rating:

Supporting Narrative:

(2) Schedule Rating:

Supporting Narrative:

(3) Cost Control: N/A

Supporting Narrative:

(4) Business Relations Rating:

Supporting Narrative:

(5) Management of Key Personnel Rating:

Supporting Narrative:

Additional remarks:

[click and pick the date]

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Via e-mail to Anthony Owens (anthony.owens.7@us.af.mil) and Donna Williams (donna.williams.6@us.af.mil). You may contact Mr. Owens at 405-734-9637 if you have any questions about this request.

For Official Use Only Page 1 of 7