pastperformancequest.doc
DOC document 113 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA8751-08-R-0008
About this file
Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 08r0008sitevisitqanda.doc | DOC document | |
| 08r0008pwsgrounds20feb08.doc | DOC document | |
| caddrawings.dwg | DWG drawing | |
| repsandcerts.doc | DOC document | |
| workstatement.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FAR 3.104 & 2.101
OFFEROR
NAME:
ADDRESS:
TEL / EMAIL:
INSTRUCTIONS FOR OFFEROR
1. Fill out a separate Section A for each contract (3 required) to be used as a past performance reference.
2. Return this form to the Contract Specialist identified below. The Government then will obtain the information in the Questionnaire from the past performance references.
CONTRACT SPECIALIST
NAME:
BRYANT SOULE
TEL:
(315) 330-4723 or DSN 587-4723
FAX:
(315) 330-8136
E-MAIL:
bryant.soule@rl.af.mil
MAIL:
AFRL/RIKO
ATTN: BRYANT SOULE
26 ELECTRONIC PKWY
ROME NY 13441-4514
The contracts identified as past performance must be both RECENT and RELEVANT:
1. RECENT is defined as within the past 3 years.
2. RELEVANT is defined as similar in scope and magnitude to the work required by this solicitation.
3. SCOPE will be judged by comparing the offeror’s past performance to the tasks required in this solicitation’s Performance Work Statement (PWS) with consideration of the horticultural region where the work was performed.
4. MAGNITUDE will be judged by whether the property where grounds maintenance was performed was within the approximate range of 30 to 60 acres (or about +/-30% of 45 acres).
If possible, provide at least one of the three referenced contracts from a publicly owned institution (i.e. town, county, state, and federal) and one from a privately owned institution. At least one of the referenced contracts must be with an institution located in the state of New York.
Please identify contracts in which your firm has completed at least 50% of the work as the prime contractor, specifically work done by your firm’s labor force and/or equipment, but not solely management. Any resultant contract with the Government will incorporate the clause FAR 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting, which requires that the prime contractor perform at least 50% of the total contract effort.
To the maximum extent practicable, identify contracts for properties which are not owned or operated by your firm or by key personnel, including intended subcontractors, of your firm.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR REFERENCE
You have been provided as a past performance reference in response to the solicitation FA8751-08-R-0008 for Grounds Maintenance at the Air Force Research Laboratory’s Rome Research Site, Rome NY. In order for the government to evaluate the past performance of the firm providing you as a reference, please complete Section B, Past Performance Questionnaire, and return it to the Contract Specialist identified above.
The individual knowledgeable of the contractor’s day-to-day operations and overall performance should complete this questionnaire. However, that individual is encouraged to supplement their own knowledge of the contractor’s performance with the judgment of others within their organization, as applicable. Thank you for your assistance.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Per Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 12.206, the Government will consider past performance data from a wide variety of sources both inside and outside the Federal Government in accordance with the policies and procedures contained in FAR subparts 9.1, 13.106, and 15.3, as applicable.
After considering all past performance data gathered by the Government for this solicitation, an offeror’s past performance will be assigned an overall rating of either ACCEPTABLE or UNACCEPTABLE.
The past performance evaluations provided in Section B, Past Performance Questionnaire, will contribute significantly to the Government’s overall rating of an offeror’s past performance. For this part of the past performance evaluation:
(1) An offeror’s past performance will be considered ACCEPTABLE by the Government if most or all of the areas on all three referenced contracts are evaluated as 5 (High Confidence), 4 (Significant Confidence), or 3 (Satisfactory confidence).
(2) An offeror’s past performance will be considered NEUTRAL by the Government if most or all of the areas are evaluated as U (Unknown Confidence). If an offeror’s past performance is considered NEUTRAL, that offeror’s past performance is neither ACCEPTABLE nor UNACCEPTABLE.
(3) An offeror’s past performance will be considered UNACCEPTABLE by the Government otherwise.
SECTION A: Offeror completes this section to identify each past performance reference (3), then returns the forms to the Contract Specialist identified above. By completing this form, the offeror authorizes the past performance reference to complete the Questionnaire.
1.
REFERENCE:
TEL:
FAX:
EMAIL:
2.
CONTRACT #:
3.
CONTRACT TYPE:
Firm-Fixed Price
Cost-Reimbursement Other (describe) 4.
DESCRIPTION OF WORK:
5.
ACREAGE:
6.
AWARD DATE: _______________
SCHEDULED COMPLETION: ___________________
CURRENT / FINAL COMPLETION DATE (if different):
7.
AMOUNT PER YEAR: ___________________
AMOUNT TOTAL: ____________________
CURRENT / FINAL AMOUNT (if different): __________________________________________ Past Performance Questionnaire SECTION B: Past performance reference completes the entire past performance questionnaire section and returns it to the Contract Specialist identified above.
1.
NAME:
POSITION:
TEL:
FAX:
EMAIL:
2.
RELATIONSHIP AND TIME INVOLVED WITH OFFEROR:
3.
WHAT ORGANIZATION WAS THE OWNER OF THE MAINTAINED PROPERTY?
4.
WHAT, IF ANY, ELEMENTS OF WORK WERE SUBCONTRACTED? PLEASE ESTIMATE
THE PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL WORK THAT WAS SUBCONTRACTED.
SECTION B, CONTINUED: Please rate the offeror’s performance using the scale below.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| U |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
No
Confidence Little
Confidence Unknown
Confidence Satisfactory
Confidence Significant
Confidence High
Confidence
| Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were some problems of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective. |
| No past performance record or the record is inconclusive. Unknown confidence will be considered Neutral. |
| Performance met contract requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
| Performance met all requirements and exceeded some requirements to the Government / Owner’s benefit. There were a few minor problems which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner. |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the Government / Owner’s benefit. Problems if any were negligible and resolved in a timely, highly effective manner. |
EVALUATION
I. Quality 1 2 U 3 4 5
| 1. |
| Contractor provided effective quality control and inspection procedures that resulted in a quality-finished project. |
| 2. |
| Contractor developed and submitted realistic progress goals. |
| 3. |
| Contractor provided materials and products that met or exceeded contract requirements. |
| 4. |
| Contractor completed all work with good workmanship and in conformance with the specifications, resulting in minor, if any, punch list items. |
| 5. |
| Performance was cost effective. There were minimal cost increases to the original negotiated amount. If there were significant changes, please explain below. |
Comments:
II. Timely Performance 1 2 U 3 4 5
| 1. |
| Contractor met established frequency requirements to complete the project on time and to ensure quality results. |
| 2. |
| Contractor performed all work without the issuance of a cure notice or show cause letter. (If a notice was issued, please describe the circumstances in the comments section and identify how the situation was resolved.) |
| 3. |
| Contractor provided timely proposals and responses to contract changes, if any. |
| 4. |
| Contractor submitted progress schedules and interim progress reports, as required, in a timely manner. |
| 5. |
| Contractor provided submittals on time as required. |
| 6. |
| Contractor provided timely resolution of all punch list items. |
Comments:
III. Management Effectiveness 1 2 U 3 4 5
| 1. |
| Contractor provided experienced, qualified managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| 2. |
| Contractor hired quality subcontractors and effectively managed and coordinated their work. |
| 4. |
| Contractor ensured the site superintendent had sufficient authority to make decisions and take actions during project performance to keep the project on schedule. |
| 5. |
| Contractor provided timely and satisfactory response to warranty issues after project completion. |
| 6. |
| Contractor paid employees/subcontractors/suppliers fully and on time. |
| 7. |
| Contractor cooperated to resolve problems, attended meetings, and maintained effective communication to ensure satisfactory resolution. |
Comments:
IV. Contract Administration 1 2 U 3 4 5
| 1. |
| Contractor provided complete and correct documentation in a timely manner. |
| 2. |
| Contractor was responsive during contract performance on administrative issues. |
Comments:
V. Compliance with Safety Standards 1 2 U 3 4 5
| 1. |
| Adequacy of Safety Plan. |
| 2. |
| Implementation of Safety Plan. |
| 3. |
| Safe work habits demonstrated through proper and adequate use of protective equipment and job site protection to maintain accident-free work zone. |
| 4. |
| Response to incidents was timely, reports were made as required, and collateral risk was mitigated promptly. If no incidents for the project, write N/A. |
Comments:
VI. Overall Performance 1 2 U 3 4 5
| 1. |
| Please rate the contractor’s overall performance. |
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS (attach additional sheets as necessary):
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FAR 3.104 & 2.101
FA8751-08-R-0008
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .