Attch_5_Questionnaire_Performance.doc

DOC document 128 KB Posted

Attached to
72kW Ground Power Unit Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA8533-08-R-22907
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center Robins Air Force Base

About this file

Attch 5

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to 72kW Ground Power Unit, newest first.
File Type Posted
FA853308R22907______0005.doc DOC document
FA853308R22907 QA —
FA853308R22907______0004.doc DOC document
DoD_5230 25_(export_controlled).pdf PDF
PD08WRGBGEA04_Amd_01.doc DOC document
FA853308R22907 QA 9 Mar 09.doc DOC document
FA853308R22907______0003.doc DOC document
GPU Schedule to Offerors.xls XLS spreadsheet
SOW8Oct08.doc DOC document
72kW Memorandum to Offerors.pdf PDF
FA853308R22907______0002.pdf PDF
72KW Clarification.doc DOC document
GPU viewing.pdf PDF
Answers to offeror's questions.pdf PDF
FA853308R22907______0001.pdf PDF
SOW1.pdf PDF
RFP.pdf PDF
PD08WRGBGBEA04.pdf PDF
Pkg AFMC158.pdf PDF
Exhibit D.pdf PDF
Gen Eng Notes.pdf PDF
Attch_2_Client_Ltr.doc DOC document
GPU Cost Volume to Offerors.xls XLS spreadsheet
Exhibit A.pdf PDF
Exhibit C.pdf PDF
Exhibit B.pdf PDF
EDL.pdf PDF
Attch_3_Tracker.doc DOC document
Attch_1_FACTS_Sheet.doc DOC document
Attch_4_Transmittal_Ltr.doc DOC document
Show all 30

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 3.104

RFP FA8533-08-R-22907

ATTACHMENT 5

PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

72 KW/90KVA GENERATOR (GPU)

Return Your Completed Questionnaire Via Fax To: 478-222-1854 or By Electronic Mail To: Michele.Milush@robins.af.mil Please Call 478-222-1954 Before Transmittal To Ensure Confidentiality.

NOTICE: WHEN COMPLETED, THIS QUESTIONNAIRE WILL BE CONSIDERED SENSITIVE AND WILL NOT BE RELEASED TO THE OFFEROR.

Please provide the following information about you and your company:

Name of Respondent Name:

Role Relative to Contract (Buyer, Program Manager, etc.)

Role:

Agency or Business:

Address:

Telephone No.:

Fax Number:

Please provide the following information on the specific program:

Contractor/Business:

Cage Code:

Program Title and Brief Description:

Contractor’s Role in the Program:

Prime Subcontractor Vendor/Supplier Contract Number:

Number of Years:

Basic:

Option:

Contract Type:

Competitive Contract:

Yes

No:

General Information about this Contract

Period of Performance of Contract or Effort Beginning Date Through Have there been any changes to the original schedule? If yes, please explain.

Original Contract Dollar Value

Current Contract Dollar Value

If different, please explain.

The following section will require you to rate the past/present performance of the offeror. If your response is other than a “satisfactory”, please provide supporting information. To assist you in your evaluation, please use the following definitions:

EEXCEPTIONAL: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
VVERY GOOD: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
SSATISFACTORY: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
MMARGINAL: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
UUNSATISFACTORY: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N/ANOT APPLICABLE: Did not apply to this acquisition; or, questionnaire respondent has no knowledge of, and/or did not observe, the contractor’s performance in this area.

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

N/A U M S V E Extent to which company's products and/or services met the specification /performance requirements:

Configuration Management

(first product delivered same as last):

Quality of Completed Product:

Company’s knowledge of and proficiency with industry standards and regulations:

Quality of Operation and Maintenance Manuals

If applicable, quality of training/orientation material:

If EPA tier engine changes were applicable did the company manage EPA Tier engine changes along with associated parts support:

If provisioning was provided were spare/repair parts sufficiently identified for the purpose of supportability:

Customer’s Satisfaction with warranty response times and corrective actions and other “after the sale” actions:

Timely recognition and notification of administrative, engineering, production, problems affecting the program:

Completed Work on Time:

Extend to which company utilized small businesses, veteran-owned small businesses, small disadvantaged businesses, and other soci-economic business sectors in its contract performance:

Additional Comments: (please indicate number next to comment)

Miscellaneous Questions Has action been initiated to cancel or terminate the contract for default? If yes, explain.

Have there been any disputes/claims relative to the contract? If yes, explain.

Describe the contractor’s or offeror’s strong and/or weak points identified as a result of technical performance and any technical performance risk identified during the life of the contract

If given a choice, would you award to this contractor again? If not, please explain.

Do you feel you “got what you paid for”? Please explain.

Additional Remarks.

The Major Programs Team would like to thank you for your time.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .