Posted Attch_1_FACTS_Sheet.doc - - 10-30-2009.doc

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - See FAR 3.104

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

RFP FA8519-10-R-26669

Integrated Smart-BEAR Power Systems

ATTACHMENT 1

Present/Past Performance “FACTS Sheet”

(TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR

FOR EACH EFFORT)

Request the offeror complete a separate FACTS Sheet for each relevant contract. See the Proposal Requirements section of this RFP for detailed instructions and limits on number and recency of contracts. Offeror is requested to provide frank, concise comments regarding present/past performance on the program identified in B. below.

A. OFFEROR:

(1) Name (Company/Division)

(2) Address:

(3) CAGE Code B. PROGRAM TITLE and CONTRACT NUMBER:

C. NAME OF CONTRACTING ACTIVITY OR CUSTOMER:

D. CONTRACT TYPE(S) – CHECK ALL THAT APPLY

D. Firm Fixed Price D. Time & Materials D. Cost

D. Other (Explain)

E. CONTRACT VALUE:

1. Original contract dollar value and current dollar value:

2. Estimated value at completion and primary causes of changes:

3. If Award Fee Contract, what percentages of the fee have been awarded in each of last 3 years?

F. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF EFFORT: (check which applies)

PRIME

SUBCONTRACTOR

1. As a part of this narrative description, highlight portions considered most relevant to the current acquisition; addressing how and to what extent the proposed effort relates to the program identified in B. above. To supplement the data provided in response to this paragraph, complete the table below (page 6) regarding relevancy of the effort identified in paragraph B to the proposed effort. This is limited to two pages beyond the page limitation of the FACTS sheet information.

2. This paragraph shall also include details to support the offeror’s record for on time delivery, technical quality and cost control for this effort identified in paragraph B. above.

3. Discuss your compliance with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns. That is, did you carry out the policy of the United States in the awarding of subcontracts to small business concerns, veteran-owned small business concerns, service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns, HUBZone small business concerns, small disadvantaged business concerns, and women-owned small business concerns to the fullest extent consistent with efficient contract performance? This is applicable to all offerors.

4. Identify whether a subcontracting plan in accordance with FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan, was required by this effort you are submitting. If one was required, complete the following regarding subcontracting goals and status-to-date for effort identified in paragraph B. If goals were not met, please explain. This is applicable to large business concerns only.

Yes ____ No ____

Small Business

Small Disadvantaged Business

Women-Owned Small Business

HUBZone Small Business

Veteran-Owned Small Business

Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business

HBCU/MI

5. Include relevant information concerning your compliance with subcontracting plan goals for small disadvantaged business (SDB) concerns, monetary targets for SDB participation (FAR 52.219-24), and notifications submitted under FAR 52.219-25, Small Disadvantaged Business Participation Program-Disadvantaged Status and Reporting. If goals were not met, please explain. This is applicable to ALL offerors.

G. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: (include start and end dates, i.e., Jan 2004 – Dec 2006)

1. Original schedule:

2. Current schedule (if changed):

3. Estimated dollars at contract completion:

4. How many times changed and primary causes of changes:

F. PRIMARY POINTS OF CONTACT: (The offeror is responsible for exerting its best efforts to ensure that current information is provided for all individuals.)

Name and Office Symbol

(Customer’s Information) Phone Number

(DSN & Commercial)

Procuring Contracting Officer

Program Manager

Administrative Contracting Officer

Other (Please Specify)

I. If the offeror or critical subcontractor (if applicable) is a newly formed entity who either has no prior contracts or does not possess relevant corporate past performance, but does have key personnel with relevant past performance while employed by another company, specify by name, such key individual(s) who will participate in the proposed effort under this acquisition who also participated in the program identified in B. above, and indicate their contract role. Describe how participation of these key personnel contributed to the success of the previous effort and how this indicates probability of success on the proposed effort.

J. Use this space to address any aspect about this program considered unique. Describe quality awards or certifications that indicate the offeror possesses a high-quality process for developing and producing the product/service required.

K. Summarize contract issues relative to the number and severity of quality deficiencies recorded/contract discrepancy reports issued, cure notices, show cause letters, termination for default or cause, disputes, claims, latent defects; and, corrective actions taken for the contract listed in paragraph B. above.

L. Additionally, for those efforts where the offeror is cognizant of unfavorable and/or marginal past performance ratings/reports previously assessed by customers or clients, but feel that significant progress has been made but not yet credited or formally documented, provide the program name, contract number, customer location and a narrative explaining "fixes" made to date, or any other information regarding the unfavorable/marginal assessment. This narrative portion is limited to one (1) additional page beyond the FACTS sheet required page limitation. It is not presumed that the offeror's performance has been perfect. Rather, the proposal should contain evidence of the offeror's ability to isolate the root causes of problems and should describe programs or actions taken to resolve those causes. Demonstrated corrective actions (not just planned or promised), and the overall work record will be considered. Problems not addressed by the offeror, but found by the Government during the evaluation of the information in this volume, will be assumed to still exist. Note: In the case of Contractor Performance Assessment Report System (CPARS), if your input has already been provided and the rationale/ circumstances have not changed, DO NOT repeat them here.

M. Was this contract effort (as identified in paragraph B. above) submitted as a past performance source of data for a previous WR-ALC procurement. Yes No . If yes, identify the buyer and/or contracting officer, their phone number and office symbol and solicitation number of the procurement for which this effort was submitted.

PLEASE NOTE: The Government is not bound by the offeror's opinion of relevancy. The Government will perform an independent assessment of relevancy of the data provided or obtained.

RELEVANCY TABLE

(Complete with each effort submitted for evaluation)

This table will assist the PCAG in evaluating the relevancy of the proposed effort to the instant requirement. Offerors shall only complete the highlighted table. Offerors answers are applicable only to the effort identified in paragraph B above, not the offeror’s proposed solutions to the instant effort. If additional space is needed, please attach a separate sheet to your response (limited to two pages).

Yes No

6. Program Similarity

Magnitude

Design/Development

Yes No

Evaluation

11. Other

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - See FAR 3.104

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY