Attch_5_Questionnaire_Performance.doc - - 10-30-2009.doc
DOC document 58 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RECOVERY - DEVELOPMENT OF AN INTEGRATED SMART-BEAR POWER SYSTEM (ISBPS) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA8519-10-R-26669
About this file
ATTACHMENT 5 QUESTIONNAIRE
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS(2).doc | DOC document | |
| FA851910R26669______0001.pdf | ||
| Subcontractor_TEAMING PART RELEASE AGREEMENT.doc | DOC document | |
| QuestionsAnswers.doc | DOC document | |
| FA851910R26669.pdf - - 11-04-2009.pdf | ||
| Posted Attch_1_FACTS_Sheet.doc - - 10-30-2009.doc | DOC document | |
| QASP.pdf - - 11-04-2009.pdf | ||
| SOO_and CDRLs.pdf - - 10-23-2009.pdf | ||
| Posted Attch_4_Transmittal_Ltr.doc - - 10-30-2009.doc | DOC document | |
| DRAFT ISBPS SOO.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
RFP FA8519-10-R-26669
ATTACHMENT 5
PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
INTEGRATED SMART BEAR POWER SYSTEM (ISBPS)
Return Your Completed Questionnaire Via Fax To: 478-222-1854 or By Electronic Mail To: Sonia.Lizotte@robins.af.mil. Please Call 478-222 1754 Before Transmittal To Ensure Confidentiality.
NOTICE: WHEN COMPLETED, THIS QUESTIONNAIRE WILL BE CONSIDERED SENSITIVE AND WILL NOT BE RELEASED TO THE OFFEROR.
1. Please provide the following information about you and your company:
| Name of Respondent |
| Name: |
Role Relative to Contract (Buyer, Program Manager, etc.)
Role:
| Agency or Business: |
| FORMTEXT |
| Address: |
| FORMTEXT |
| Telephone No.: |
| FORMTEXT |
| Fax Number: |
| FORMTEXT |
2. Please provide the following information on the specific program:
| Contractor/Business: |
| FORMTEXT |
Cage Code:
Program Title and Brief Description:
| Contractor’s Role in the Program: |
| Prime FORMCHECKBOX |
Subcontractor FORMCHECKBOX
Vendor/Supplier FORMCHECKBOX
| Contract Number: |
| FORMTEXT |
| Number of Years: |
| Basic: |
Option:
| Contract Type: |
| FORMTEXT |
| Competitive Contract: |
| Yes |
No:
3. General Information about this Contract
| Period of Performance of Contract or Effort |
| Beginning Date FORMTEXT |
Through FORMTEXT
Have there been any changes to the original schedule? If yes, please explain.
FORMTEXT
| Original Contract Dollar Value |
| FORMTEXT |
Current Contract Dollar Value
If different, please explain.
4. The following section will require you to rate the past/present performance of the offeror. If your response is other than a “satisfactory”, please provide supporting information. To assist you in your evaluation, please use the following definitions:
E EXCEPTIONAL: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
V VERY GOOD: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
S SATISFACTORY: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
M MARGINAL: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
U UNSATISFACTORY: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N/A NOT APPLICABLE: Did not apply to this acquisition; or, questionnaire respondent has no knowledge of, and/or did not observe, the contractor’s performance in this area.
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
| N/A |
| U |
| M |
| S |
| V |
| E |
1. Extent to which company's products and/or services met the specification /performance requirements:
2. Configuration Management (Product solution development):
3. Quality of Completed Product: Testing results according to plan
4. Company’s knowledge of and proficiency with industry standards and regulations, i.e. Environment laws, Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) standards, American Welding Society (AWS) standards, and International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards.
5. Quality of Operation and Maintenance Manuals/ Technical Manuals:
6. Customer’s Satisfaction with warranty response times and corrective actions and other “after the sale” actions:
7. Timely recognition and notification of administrative, engineering, production, problems affecting the program:
8. Completed Work on Time:
9. Extend to which company utilized small businesses, veteran-owned small businesses, small disadvantaged businesses, and other soci-economic business sectors in its contract performance.
FORMTEXT
Additional Comments: (please indicate number next to comment) Miscellaneous Questions
Has action been initiated to cancel or terminate the contract for default? If yes, explain.
FORMTEXT
Have there been any disputes/claims relative to the contract? If yes, explain.
FORMTEXT
Describe the contractor’s or offeror’s strong and/or weak points identified as a result of technical performance and any technical performance risk identified during the life of the contract
FORMTEXT
If given a choice, would you award to this contractor again? If not, please explain.
FORMTEXT
Do you feel you “got what you paid for”? Please explain.
FORMTEXT
Additional Remarks. FORMTEXT
The Major Programs Team would like to thank you for your time.
PAGE
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .