Q&A_4.docx

DOCX document 13 KB Posted

Attached to
Hazmat Pourdown Facility Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA8224-17-R-0028
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center Hill Air Force Base

About this file

Vendor Q&A 4

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Hazmat Pourdown Facility, newest first.
File Type Posted
EESOH-MIS_User_Guide_Hazardous_Waste_v1.pdf PDF
Q&A_5.docx DOCX document
SF_1449_Amendment_04.docx DOCX document
SF_1449_Amendment_03.docx DOCX document
SF_1449_Amendment_02.docx DOCX document
Wage_Determination_No._2015-5483.pdf PDF
Q&A_3.docx DOCX document
Q&A_2.docx DOCX document
Wage_Determination.pdf PDF
Amendment_01.docx DOCX document
Q&A_1.docx DOCX document
PWS_Final_Pour_Down_Facility.docx DOCX document
SF_1449.pdf PDF
HazMat_Pour_Down_CDRLs_ABCDE003_4.pdf PDF
HazMat_Pour_Down_CDRLs_ABCDE001_2.pdf PDF
HazMat_Pour_Down_CDRLs_ABCDE005_6.pdf PDF
Show all 16

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

1. Reference Q & A 3, Question #2. We do not believe that the answer provided clarifies the intent of the question. Are we correct in our assumption that the unit that should be shown in Section B should actually be “month” with a quantity of 12 as this is a FFP contract versus billing on a “per piece/unit i.e. liter” basis?

- Please disregard the previous answer in Q&A 3 Question 2. The correct unit it LOT. Please propose accordingly.

2. The Wage Determination (WD) that was incorporated does not appear to be the appropriate document primarily due to not only the minimal number of job classifications available, but the job descriptions (SCA Directory of Occupations, Fifth Edition) of the positions offered. This WD starts out by stating that “Employed on contracts for removal of oil spills, hazardous waste materials and related cleanup services.”, which is not the work being performed under this contract. Additionally, the “Environmental Technician” description clearly identifies this person as someone akin to someone specially trained in laboratory procedures. The description in part states “The Environmental Technician conducts tests and field investigations to obtain data for use by environmental, engineering and scientific personnel in determining sources and methods of controlling pollutants in air, water, and soil, utilizing knowledge of agriculture, chemistry, meteorology, and engineering principles and applied technologies.” And also states, “This worker prepares sample for testing, records data, and prepares summaries and charts for review, sets monitoring equipment to provide flow of information, installs, operates, and performs routine maintenance on gas and fluid flow systems, chemical reaction systems, mechanical equipment, and other test instrumentation.”. The Laborer position offered is categorized as part of the “23000 - Mechanics and Maintenance and Repair Occupations” which is also not the type of work performed. We feel the use of Wage Determination No. 2015-5483, Rev 3 dated 08/03/2017 is more appropriate thereby allowing offerors the latitude to select a more appropriate job classification.

-The amended Wage Determination has been applied to the solicitation.

3. Reference Q & A 2, question #8. It appears that the first part of the question wasn’t answered. What employee labor category is currently being used?

- The current labor category being used is Material Handling Laborer (21050).

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .