f-Attachment1SOO13Feb2015.pdf

Section J, ATTACHMENT 1

STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES

Reentry Field Support Equipment (RFSE) - Production

13 February 2015

AIR FORCE NUCLEAR WEAPONS CENTER (AFNWC)

INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE (ICBM) SYSTEMS DIRECTORATE

Flight Systems Division (AFNWC/NIB)

HILL AIR FORCE BASE

Revision Log Revision Date Notes Initial 13 January 2015 Initial Release

P a g e | ii

Table of Contents Revision Log ....................................................................................................................ii

1.0 Introduction

2.0 Purpose

3.0 Points of Contact

4.0 Applicable Documents

5.0 General Management

5.1 Program Management

5.2 Systems Engineering

5.3 Configuration Management

5.4 Quality

5.5 Manufacturing Documentation

5.6 Product Delivery

5.7 Proprietary Swaging Process

6.0 Objectives

6.1 Hardware Objective

6.2 Software/Firmware Objective

6.3 Physical Configuration Audit Objective

6.4 Delta Qualification Option Objective

6.5 Provisioning Option Objective

6.6 Interim Contractor Support (ICS) Option Objective

6.7 Training Option Objective

Attachment SOO-1, Compliance and Reference Documents ……………………..15

P a g e | iii

1.0 Introduction

The main purpose of the Reentry Field Support Equipment (RFSE) program is to replace the current and aging Reentry System Test Set (RSTS) and Safety Enhanced Reentry Vehicle (SERV) Field Test Set (SFTS).

The RSTS is used to check-out fielded Mk12A Minuteman (MM) III Reentry Systems (RSs) and Forward Sections. The RSTS has fulfilled its intended purpose for approximately forty years, but aging and obsolescence issues have limited its remaining useful life. The SFTS is used to check-out fielded Mk21 MM III RSs.

The RFSE Engineering Manufacturing and Development (EMD) program designed a test set that combined the RS testing functionality of both the RSTS and SFTS. The RFSE EMD program also designed a new test set to test the Mk12A forward sections.

This equipment is called the RFSE. The RFSE supports the buildup of the RS prior to mating the RS to the MM III missile. It verifies proper cabling, system level functionality of the RS, and functionality of the Mk12A forward section. Additionally, it tests the Mk21 when attached to the RS. The RFSE was designed to provide critical testing support and extend the current capabilities of the MM III weapon system to 2030.

The RFSE design consists of three parts: the Reentry System Test Console (RSTC), the Forward Section Test Set (FSTS), and a set of support equipment.

A set of support equipment includes the RSTC Alignment Console (RALC) and two pieces of specialized calibration equipment required to perform FSTS calibration.

An RFSE suite consists of (a) one RSTC console, (b) one FSTS console, (c) and the cables and adapters required to connect the test set to the Unit Under Test (UUT), and

(d) a vacuum chamber protective ring. The support equipment is required to support each RFSE suite. However, one set of support equipment can support multiple suites, so a set of support equipment has not been included in the definition of an RFSE suite.

2.0 Purpose

The main purpose of this effort is to produce and deliver seven (7) RFSE suites and four

(4) sets of support equipment. This is a build-to-print effort. However, it also includes other objectives to field and sustain the RFSE which consist of:

1- Physical Configuration Audit (PCA) 2- Delta Qualification 3- Provisioning 4- Interim Contractor Support 5- User Training

P a g e | 1

Some of the above objectives will be included in the initial contract award and the rest will be options that can be exercised by the Government.

3.0 Points of Contact

Contracting Officer: Mrs. Peggy Japngie-Lizotte

AFNWC/PZBE

801-775-2280 peggy.japngie_lizotte.1@us.af.mil

4.0 Applicable Documents

The RFSE - Production effort must be performed in accordance with (IAW) standards, practices, and procedures: contained in all applicable statutes, case law, regulations, instructions, operating procedures, technical orders, guidance, the Technical Data Package (TDP) (drawings, specifications, etc), and contractual documentation. These standards include, but are not limited to, the compliance and reference documents listed in Attachment SOO-1. If, throughout the course of this effort, the Contractor believes that a standard in a compliance or reference document listed here or in the contract, is no longer relevant, the Contractor shall submit a waiver to the Government for approval.

The standard will apply until the Government approves the waiver in the form of a contract modification. Policies, instructions, and regulations referred to in this Statement of Objectives (SOO) are the current versions at the time of the RFP release.

5.0 General Management

5.1 Program Management

The Contractor shall provide the overall management of production, integration, quality assurance, technical direction, coordination and administrative effort necessary to ensure that the SOO requirements are implemented and performed within the contract period of performance and the agreed upon Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) and Management Plan. The Contractor shall write a Contractor Statement of Work (CSOW) to detail how the Contractor will perform the work (submitted with proposal, placed on contract with contract award). The program management disciplines and processes employed must be sufficient to provide all program team members with in-depth, accurate and timely visibility into the technical, cost and schedule performance.

A001 Integrated Program Management Report (IMPR) DI-MGMT-81861 A005 Contractor’s Statement of Work (CSOW) DI-MGMT-81606 A007 Management Plan DI-MGMT-80004

5.1.1 Meetings

Program management integrated product team (IPT) meetings that include both Contractor and Government personnel will be held as

P a g e | 2 necessary and will be the standard reporting forum for project status, schedule status, risks. The IPT meetings will be supplemented with formal quarterly program management reviews. A kickoff meeting will be held within 30 days of contract award at the Contractor’s production facility. An Integrated Baseline Review (IBR) shall be completed within two months of contract award. The Contractor shall propose baseline changes via an IBR and the changes are subject to approval by the Government.

A001 Integrated Program Management Report (IMPR) DI-MGMT-81861

5.1.2 Briefing or Meeting Materials

The Contractor shall be responsible for producing all agendas, briefing materials, and meeting minutes related to any meeting, conference, review, etc. in which both parties will be in attendance.

A002 Conference Agenda (Meeting Agenda) DI-ADMN-81249A A003 Briefing Material DI-MGMT-81605 A004 Report, Record of Meeting/Minutes

(Meeting Minutes) DI-ADMN-81505

5.1.3 Document Delivery

The Contractor shall deliver and maintain all document products developed or modified by the Contractor on the Government’s Interim Data Repository (IDR). Data placed in the IDR shall be accompanied with an e-mail notification of name and location of file. Placement on IDR is considered delivered to the Government. In addition, all document products developed or modified by the contractor shall be maintained on the DAL. Data from the DAL shall be provided with-in a timely manner of any Government request for it.

A049 Data Accession List (DAL) DI-MGMT-81453A

5.1.4 Inventory Control

The Contractor shall provide inventory management of all property associated with this effort including but not limited to:

• Maintaining control of (a) all property provided by the Government for this effort (Government Furnished Property (GFP) or Government Furnished Material (GFM)), (b) all property purchased for this effort, and (c) property purchased with funds from this contract.

• Handling classified material and Nuclear Weapon Related Materiel per current Air Force Directives IAW AFI20-110, AFMCSUP20-110, and

AFI23-101.

P a g e | 3

5.1.5 Small Business Involvement

The RFSE contractor shall be required to make a best effort to meet small business subcontracting goals to include Small Businesses, Veteran-Owned Small Business, Service Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business, HUBZone Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, and with Women Owned Small Business. The small business subcontracting requirements clause will require the contractor to make a best effort to meet an overall minimum small business subcontracting goal. The contractor will also be encouraged to meet and/or exceed goals for each socioeconomic category stated in the clause. A small business subcontracting plan will be required IAW Federal Acquisition Regulation 52-219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan.

5.2 Systems Engineering

The Contractor shall provide a Systems Engineering Management Plan (SEMP) to ensure technical program organization, planning, and monitoring activities align with the Government’s Systems Engineering Plan (SEP). Program management integrated product team (IPT) meetings that include both Contractor and Government personnel will be the standard reporting forum for engineering status. Efforts that support the systems engineering and integration process include the Management Plan, IMS, risk management plan, technical reviews with identified entry and exit criteria, configuration management plan, change management plan for hardware, subcontractor management plan, environmental compliance, operations security plan, logistics and supportability plan, support for Technical Evaluation Review Board (TERB) actions, and support for trade studies.

Conduct and support the following system engineering reviews IAW ICBMSD OI 63-26 in an appropriate order of occurrence for a production activity. Government approval shall be obtained for entrance and exit of each review.

The technical interchange meeting maybe held via a telephone conference or a physical meeting depending on the content of the meeting and upon approval by the Government. All other reviews shall be held at the Contractor’s production facility.

• Production Readiness Review (PRR)

• Technical Interchange Meetings (TIM)

• Test Readiness Review (TRR)

• Physical Configuration Audit (PCA) (see paragraph 6.3)

A001 Integrated Program Management Report DI-MGMT-81861

P a g e | 4

A007 Management Plan DI-MGMT-80004 A008 Management Plan (Subcontractor

Management Plan) DI-MGMT-80004 A009 Contractor’s Configuration Management Plan DI-CMAN-80858B A012 Systems Engineering Management Plan

(SEMP) DI-SESS-81785

A013 Contractor’s Risk Management Plan DI-MGMT-81808 A017 Integrated Logistics Support Plan

(Logistics and Supportability Plan) DI-ILSS-80095 A018 Parts Management Plan (Change

Management Plan) DI-SDMP-81748 A019 Operations Security Plan DI-MGMT-80934C A033 Technical Report – Study/Services (Trade Study) DI-MISC-80508B/T A045 Hazardous Materials Management Plan DI-MGMT-81398

5.3 Configuration Management

Configuration management of the RFSE shall remain within the control of the Government and shall be managed IAW ICBMSD 62-03. If an Engineering Change (EC) is proposed, the Contractor will submit an Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) to the Government for review and approval or disapproval IAW ICBMSD OI 62-20. The Contractor shall not act on the EC until a contract modification incorporating the EC has been signed by the CO. Upon submission, the ECP will undergo review by the Government program management team, TERB IAW ICBMSD OI 63-29, and a Configuration Control Board (CCB) IAW ICBMSD OI 62-01. Contractor will support the TERB and CCB meetings by providing agendas, briefing materials, meeting minutes, and additional information sought by the boards. Any documentation produced in association with an EC will be maintained on the Government’s Interim Data Repository. If either board disapproves of the ECP, the Contractor will receive word of the disapproval through a letter from the CO. If both boards approve the ECP, the Contractor will work with the Government’s contracting office to incorporate the ECP into a contract modification. Once the contract modification is signed by the CO, the Contractor may act on the EC. Once an ECP has been approved, the Contractor shall submit an updated drawing package. The Government will have unlimited rights to the data and be given design authority for any new data produced by this contract.

The Contractor shall submit all technical order (TO) changes as source data if any ECP causes a TO change.

A002 Conference Agenda DI-ADMIN-81249A

P a g e | 5

A003 Briefing Material DI-MGMT-81605 A004 Report, Record of Meeting/Minutes DI-ADMN-81505 A025 Product Drawings/Models and Associated Lists DI-SESS-81000E/T A026 Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) DI-CMAN-80639C A048 Technical Manual Contract Requirement

(TMCR) TM-86-01N

5.4 Quality

A quality assurance program plan shall be written and delivered.

The Contractor’s program shall address managing both technical and process quality in an environment of continuous improvement. The plan shall describe the quality assurance system used to produce, test, and deliver products to the Government.

As a minimum, the plan shall address;

a. Description of the Quality Assurance System used

b. Inspection points (DCMA and Contractor QA)

c. Control of nonconforming product and processes

d. Control and monitoring of measurement equipment

e. Procurement

i. General process

ii. Inspection of procured items

iii. Nonconformance of supplied items

iv. How the Government-Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP) is followed

f. Counterfeit parts and materials (must also conform to the

Government’s Program Protection Plan)

g. Shelf-life controlled materials

h. Electrostatic discharge (ESD) control

i. Quality metrics tracked

The Contractor shall analyze and present its quality metrics at program management reviews. The Contractor shall provide an action plan for any identified issue for Government review and approval. All Quality data shall be summarized in a Quality Assessment Report.

A003 Briefing Material DI-MGMT-81605 A010 Quality Assurance Program Plan DI-QCIC-81794 A030 Quality Assessment Report DI-QCIC-81187

5.5 Manufacturing Documentation

The Contractor shall develop documentation to ensure RFSE components are built IAW the supplied TDP. This documentation includes, but is not limited to, P a g e | 6 manufacturing plan, strict configuration control (including formal change request processes), failure reporting and corrective action, handling of classified information and equipment, counterfeit part prevention, electrostatic discharge control, electromagnetic interference control, GIDEP participation, unique item identification and reporting, and acceptance testing. The hardware shall also comply with all standards called out within the supplied TDP. Contractor shall follow all developed plans.

The Government will provide the RFSE EMD Acceptance Test plans, procedures, and reports for the Contractor to develop production acceptance test plans and procedures. The production acceptance test plans will require procedures to be added for the FSTS Radar Range Simulator Calibration Box and the FSTS Continuity and Isolation Calibration Box. All acceptance test plans and procedures must be written IAW AFI99-103, AFMCI 99-103, AFNWCI 99- 101, and ICBMSD OI 99-103. All test plans and procedures shall be submitted to the Government for approval.

A006 Manufacturing Plan DI-MGMT-81889 A009 Contractor’s Configuration Management Plan DI-CMAN-80858B A010 Quality Assurance Program Plan DI-QCIC-81794 A011 Counterfeit Prevention Plan DI- MISC-81832 A014 Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) Control Program Plan DI-RELI-80669A A015 Handling Procedures for Electrostatic

Discharge (ESD) Sensitive Items DI-RELI-80671A A023 Acceptance Test Plan DI-QCIC-80553A A026 Engineering Change Proposal DI-CMAN-80639C A027 Item Unique Identification (IUID) Marking Plan DI-MGMT-81803 A028 Item Unique Identification (IUID) Marking Activity, Validation and Verification Report DI-MGMT-81804 A029 Failure Analysis and Corrective Action Reports DI-SESS-81315B

5.6 Product Delivery

The Contractor shall provide all resources necessary to (a) complete the tasks,

(b) produce the hardware, and (c) develop and deliver data identified in this SOO with the exception of the GFP listed in the GFP list which includes the connectors PN 819-100-006 and PN 819-200-007 that will be provided but will require disassembly and installation of new pins.

The Contractor shall deliver the test sets and support equipment by truck to an Air Force base, as directed by the Government. In addition, the final two suites will be delivered to Hill AFB, Utah at the same time. Delivery is defined as packaging and marking per Special Packaging Instruction (SPI) in the Special

P a g e | 7

Packaging Instructions Retrieval & Exchange (SPIRES) database, physically moving the test set and support equipment to the base, unpacking, inspecting, setting up, and checking out the test sets at the delivery site IAW Table 2. The delivery will occur to a Weapons Storage Area (WSA) on an Air Force Base. As such, the Contractor will have to coordinate the delivery with the Government and conform to the applicable rules and regulations required to gain access to the base and WSA.

Acceptance of RFSE components cannot be given until all of the following has been completed:

a) The Government has approved Acceptance Test Reports (ATRs) for all delivered hardware

b) All deliverables are delivered to the specified site(s)

c) The Government has completed an incoming inspection and approved the results.

The Government will furnish the RSTC, FSTS, RALC, and FSTS A4 chassis shipping containers as GFP, which are to be reused for every deliverable. The Contractor shall design and supply the SPIs for the initial spares.

A024 Acceptance Test Report DI-QCIC-81891 A047 Special Packaging Instructions DI-PACK-80121C

Table 2 – Test Set Checkout Requirements

Note 1: These tests will only be done at Vandenberg AFB and Hill AFB.

Test Set

Technical Order

Procedure Notes

RSTC 11N-

TRV5533-2

Inspection, Table 5-1, to include interior of cabinet

Preliminary procedures, Table 4-1 Shut Down, Table 4-2

11N-RS133-

2-8 SPB Self-Test, Table 4-3

Unique Signal Lines Self-Test, Table 4-12 MK12A FS&V Self-Test, Table 4-18 Chaff Self-Test, Table 4-31 MK21 Prearm Self-Test, Table 6-12 MK21 FS&V Self-Test, Table 6-19

11N-RS12A-

2-2 Mod 5 Final Confidence Self-Test, Table 4A-10

MDM Self-Test, Table 7A-8 1

P a g e | 8

5.7 Proprietary Swaging Process

For informational purposes, the current design of the RFSE includes components that are manufactured using a proprietary swaging process.

6.0 Objectives

6.1 Hardware Objective

The Contractor shall build-to-print up to Seven (7) RFSE suites and up to four (4) sets of support equipment IAW the TDP provided by the Government, the documents referenced in Section 4.0 of this SOO, and other applicable statutes, case law, regulations, instructions, standards, operating procedures, technical orders, and guidance. Calibration shall be completed in accordance Technical Order 11N-TRV5532-2 and 11N-TRV5533-2. Acceptance Testing shall be performed on each RFSE test set and spare produced IAW the Acceptance Testing Plan and a report written.

A023 Acceptance Test Plan DI-QCIC-80553A A024 Acceptance Test Report (ATR) DI-QCIC-81891

Mod 5 Installation Self-Test, Table 7A-10 1 MK12A Mod 5 FS&V Self-Test, Table 7A-14 1

11N-RS21M-

2-2 Mod 5 Final Confidence Self-Test, Table 4A-7

MK21 Mod 5 Prearm Self-Test, Table 7A-3 1 MDM Self-Test, Table 7A-9 1 Mod 5 Installation Self-Test, Table 7A-11 1

RALC 11N-

TRV5533-2

Inspection, Table 8-1, to include interior of cabinet

RALC Preliminary Procedures, Table 7-1 RALC Shutdown Procedures, Table 7-2 RSTC Annual Alignment, Table 7-3

FSTS 11N-

TRV5532-2

Inspection, Table 5-1

Preliminary Procedures, table 4-1 Shutdown, Table 4-2

11N-RV12A-

Functional Self-Test, Table 5A-10

Pressure Self-Test, Table 9A-2

11N-RS12A-

2-2 Mod 5 Forward Section Functional Self- Test, Table 4A-13

Mod 5 Pressure Self-Test, Table 7A-15 1

P a g e | 9

6.2 Software/Firmware Objective

The Contractor will load the Government provided software onto the test sets.

The Contractor shall not change the Government provided firmware. The Government will verify, during acceptance of the delivered item, that the firmware loaded on each RFSE suite is the provided firmware package.

6.3 Physical Configuration Audit Objective

A PCA will be conducted IAW MIL-STD-973 and ICBMSD OI 62-04 by the Government with support from the Contractor. The Contractor shall provide specifications, drawings, reports, memos and other documentation needed for PCA to the Government for the audit 60 days prior to the audit. The Contractor shall provide support in assembly and disassembly of RFSE equipment to complete the PCA as directed by the Government. The disassembly and assembly will be executed at the Contractor site. A full Acceptance Test and report shall be executed by the Contractor prior to and following the PCA.

A023 Acceptance Test Plan DI-QCIC-80553A A024 Acceptance Test Report DI-QCIC-81891

6.4 Delta Qualification Option Objective

If an ECP has been approved, the Government will determine, at its discretion, whether such a design change necessitates requalification or nuclear recertification. The ECP changes shall be assessed for nuclear surety, system safety, nuclear safety design certification impacts, Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM), and Mission Assurance impacts. If requalification or nuclear recertification is deemed necessary by the Government, this option will be exercised. ECP requests and exercise of this option must be completed prior to PCA.

If a requalification is required, the Contractor shall perform qualification testing for the RFSE suite and RALC. This qualification shall be considered a Delta qualification, leveraging to the maximum extent possible what was completed in the development phase of the program. Contractor shall produce a Delta Qualification Test Plan, Delta Qualification Test Procedures, and a Delta Qualification Test Report that will be complimentary to the existing system qualification report. If required, the Government will provide, and the Contractor shall include, the EMD Qualification Test Report in recertification documentation.

If a nuclear recertification is required, the contractor shall include the update, release, and coordination of all nuclear surety, system safety, nuclear safety design certification products, and deliverables IAW Air Force Manuals (AFMANs) 91-118 and 119, Air Force Instructions (AFIs) 63-125 and 91-103, the remaining AFI 91-series, and MIL-STD 882.

P a g e | 10

If an ECP requires a RSTC software change, the necessity of an Independent Validation and Verification (IV&V) testing and/or analysis, will be determined by the Government, and, if required, facilitated by the Government. The IV&V Contractor shall assess the changes and determine nuclear safety effects on the final configuration prior to acceptance of the RFSE test suite by the Government.

If exercised, this option shall be priced in accordance with the labor rate matrix, Section J, Attachment 4: Labor Rate Matrix.

A020 Test Plan (Delta Qualification) DI-NDTI-80566A A021 Test Procedure (Delta Qualification) DI-NDTI-80603A A022 Test/Inspection Report (Delta Qualification) DI-NDTI-80809B A032 Technical Report- Study/Services DI-MISC-80508A A036 Technical Report – Study Services (Supply chain

Risk Management Threat and Vulnerability Products) DI-MISC-80508B/T A037 Nuclear Certification Impact Statement (NCIS) DI-NUOR-81888A A038 Certification Requirements Plan (CRP) DI-NUOR-81409A A039 Nuclear Safety Assessment Report (BNSAR) DI-NUOR-81405A/T A040 Engineering Evaluation Report (EER) DI-NUOR-81411

6.5 Provisioning Option Objective

The Contractor shall provide data for and participate in the provisioning process in accordance with Initial Provisioning Performance Specification (IPPS) in the contract. The Contractor shall also produce or procure initial spares IAW Initial Spares List to support fielding of the RFSE suite and support equipment.

Acceptance Testing shall be performed on each RFSE spare produced IAW the Government approved Acceptance Test Plan and a report detailing the results of the acceptance testing conducted shall be provided to and approved by the Government prior to acceptance of the delivered item. Component acceptance will be determined by the same methods and criteria as specified in section 5.6.

A023 Acceptance Test Plan DI-QCIC-80553A A024 Acceptance Test Report (ATR) DI-QCIC-81891

6.5.1 Provisioning Technical Documentation (PTD)

The Contractor shall submit PTD in a format compatible with the AFMC Automated Provisioning System (D220) as required by the IPPS and IPPS attachments. The PTD will be submitted in accordance with the CDRLs and the Provisioning Performance Schedule (PPS) (AFMC Form 718).

The PPS will be completed at the Provisioning Guidance Conference

(PGC).

A042 Engineering Data for Provisioning (EDFP) DI-SESS-81874 A043 Logistics Product Data DI-SESS-81758A/T

P a g e | 11

6.5.2 Provisioning Guidance Conferences (PGC)

The Contractor shall support a Provisioning Guidance Conference (PGC) hosted by the Prime Provisioning Activity (PPA) at OO-ALC (Hill AFB) within 45 days of receipt of the contract by the PPA. The Contractor shall support Spares Provisioning Conference(s) as determined at the PGC.

6.5.3 Support Equipment Required Documents

The Contractor shall provide documentation to support identified support equipment through the provisioning process.

A044 Logistics Product Data Summaries (SE

Recommended Data (SERD) – Standard/Modified Hand Tools List DI-SESS-81759A

6.6 Interim Contractor Support (ICS) Option Objective

Provide Interim Contract Support to sustain the fielded RFSE assets (including those previously delivered under the EMD effort of the program).

The Contractor shall:

• Manage, and when required, repair the RFSE Suites, and support equipment, IAW TO’s 11N-TRV5532-2, -3, -4, and TO’s 11N-TRV5533-2, -3, and -4.

• Provide and manage spares as required to support ICS activities.

• Provide customer support to Government personnel to assist with RFSE operation, maintenance, troubleshooting, and repair, per the above listed technical orders, from 7:00 am to 6:00 pm, MST Monday through Friday, excluding holidays.

• Tracking and cataloging all failures received from the field.

• Actively utilizing the Failure Reporting Analysis and Corrective Action

System (FRACAS) using MIL-HDBK-2155 FRACAS as a guide for all LRU or SRU failures. Additionally, the Contractor shall deliver the FRACAS database to the Government at completion of the ICS effort in a format compatible with the Joint Deficiency Reporting System (JDRS) IAW T.O.

00-35D-54.

Track and catalog failed parts by elements such as National Stock

Number (NSN), Work Unit Codes, part and serial number, vendor, how malfunctioned code, time fielded, test set serial number and repair required to the failed LRU or SRU.

Generate Quarterly Failure Summary Reports.

P a g e | 12

• Repair, overhaul, and customer support will be provided by a Field Service

Representative (FSR). FSRs shall:

Provide on-site technical support within 1-3 business days of request from Government (i.e., rapid response maintenance (RRM)).

During RRM, support in-brief to RRM site Wing leadership as required During RRM, the FSR will perform necessary troubleshooting and document any identified problems.

The FSR shall obtain Government concurrence before repairing an item. No repair action shall be taken without Government concurrence.

If directed by the Government, resolve or repair any identified problems.

During RRM, FSRs will provide daily status of troubleshooting efforts to the Government.

Prior to FSR departure from the RRM site, provide the on-site

Government representative with a summary of troubleshooting, recommended resolutions, any resolution actions taken, and concerns for field level out brief.

During RRM, support out-briefs to RRM site Wing leadership as required.

If an RRM occurs, the FSR will deliver a after-trip report to the Government.

FSRs will be available for consultation and possible RRMs from 7:00 am to 6:00 pm MST Monday through Friday, excluding holidays.

Provide technical guidance as solicited during normal operation and maintenance.

Perform the following services, as requested by the Government:

o Perform maintenance task preparations and selection of spare parts, support equipment, tools, and technical data changes.

o Provide comments on suggested changes to technical manual procedures.

o Support practical test activities and schedules to include providing advice on equipment operations, calibrations, and maintenance IAW applicable technical orders.

o Provide technical guidance and informal on-the-job training for munitions maintenance personnel and depot repair technicians.

A031 Trip/Travel Report (Troubleshooting Resolution Trip Report DI-MISC-81943

A034 Technical Report – Study/Services (FRACAS Database Output) DI-MISC-80508B/T

A035 Technical Report – Study/Services (Failed Parts Report and Quarterly Summary

P a g e | 13

Report) DI-MISC-80508B/T

6.7 Training Option Objective

The Contractor shall provide training to Government technicians.

6.7.1 Field Level Training

Upon completion of this training the technicians will demonstrate an understanding of how to operate, test, maintain, troubleshoot problems, and do field-level repairs on all parts of the RFSE. The training will be conducted once at each location (three locations total) - Vandenberg, Minot, and Malmstrom. Training will be provided after the delivery and Government acceptance of the first test set delivered. The Contractor shall include training materials for the field level class in a format that Wing trainers can use to conduct future field-level training.

A046 Training Material DI-ILSS-80872

6.7.2 Depot Level Training

Upon completion of this training, technicians will demonstrate an understanding of all of the concepts covered in the field level class plus depot-level testing, troubleshooting, and repair. The training will be conducted at Hill AFB. Training will be provided after the delivery and Government acceptance of the test sets. The Contractor shall include training materials for depot level technicians in a format the Depot can use to conduct future depot-level training.

A046 Training Material DI-ILSS-80872

P a g e | 14

ATTACHMENT SOO-1:

Compliance and Reference Documents

Ref Doc Number Description Compliance/ Reference

1 AFI 20-110 Nuclear Weapons-Related Material Management

C

2 AFI 20-110 AFMCSUP Nuclear Weapons-Related Material Management Supplement

C

3 AFI 23-101 Air Force Material Management C

4 AFI 32-7086 Hazardous Materials Management R

5 AFI 63-101 Acquisition and Sustainment Life Cycle Management

C

6 AFI 63-125 Nuclear Certification Program C

7 AFI 91-103 Air Force Nuclear Safety Certification Program C

8 AFI 91-208

Hazards of Electromagnetic Radiation to Ordnance (HERO) Certification and Management

C

9 AFI 99-103 Capabilities-Based Test and Evaluation C

10 AFMAN 91-118 Safety Design and Evaluation Criteria for Nuclear Weapon Systems

C

11 AFMAN 91-119 Safety Design and Evaluation Criteria for Nuclear Weapon Systems Software

C

12 AFMCI 99-103 Test Management C

13 AFNWCI 99-101 Nuclear Enterprise Test and Evaluation Management

C

14 ICBMSD OI 62-01 Configuration Control Board (CCB) C

15 ICBMSD OI 63-29 Technical Evaluation Review Board (TERB) C

16 ICBMSD OI 63-26 Technical Design Review C 17 ICBMSD OI 99-103 Test and Evaluation C

18 MIL-HDBK-61A Configuration Management R

19 MIL-HDBK-454B

Guideline 1

General Guidelines for Electronic Equipment Safety Design Criteria – Personnel Hazards

R

20 MIL-HDBK-808 Finishes, Materials and Processes for Corrosion Prevention and Control in Support Equipment

R

21 MIL-HDBK-1250A

Handbook for Corrosion Prevention and Deterioration Control in Electronic Components and Assemblies

R

22 MIL-HDBK-1568

Materials and Processes for Corrosion Prevention and Control in Aerospace Weapons Systems

R

23 MIL-HDBK-2155 Failure Reporting, Analysis and Corrective Action System

R

24 MIL-STD-882E Standard Practice for System Safety R

P a g e | 15

Ref Doc Number Description Compliance/

Reference

25 MIL-STD-973 Configuration Management C

26 Mil-STD-1521 Technical Reviews and Audits for Systems, Equipment and Computer Software

R

27 MIL-STD-1686

Electrostatic Discharge Control Program for Protection of Electrical and Electronic Parts, Assemblies and Equipment

R

28 MIL-STD-2073-1E Department of Defense Standard Practice for Military Packaging

R

29 S-133-06395 System Specification for the Reentry Field Support Equipment (RFSE)

C

30 S-133-06396 Part I Prime Item Development Specification (PIDS) for Reentry System Test Console (RSTC)

C

31 S-133-06396 Part II Prime Item Product Fabrication Specification (PIPFS) for Reentry System Test Console

(RSTC)

C

32 S-133-06397 Part I Mk12A Forward Section Test Set (FSTS) Prime Item Development Specification (PIDS)

C

33 S-133-06397 Part II Prime Item Product Fabrication Specification (PIPFS) for Mk12A Forward Section Test Set

(FSTS)

C

34 S-133-06398 One Part Requirements Specification for the Reentry System Test Console (RSTC) Alignment Console

C

35 TO 11N-TRV5532-2 Technical Manual, Forward Section Test Set, Operation and Maintenance

C

36 TO 11N-TRV5532-3 Technical Manual, Forward Section Test Set, Overhaul Instructions

C

37 TO 11N-TRV5532-4 Technical Manual, Forward Section Test Set, Illustrated Parts Breakdown

C

38 TO 11N-TRV5533-2 Technical Manual, Reentry System Test Console, Operation and Maintenance

C

39 TO 11N-TRV5533-3 Technical Manual, Reentry System Test Console, Overhaul Instructions

C

40 RFSE Program Protection Plan C

41 RFSE System Engineering Plan C

42 RFSE Test and Evaluation Master Plan C

43 RFSE Programmatic Environment, Safety, and Occupational Health Evaluation

R

44 ICBM Security Classification Guide C

P a g e | 16