ATTACHMENT_11_Cross_Reference_Matrix.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 34 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Modification of Equipment Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA8214-14-R-0005
About this file
Attachment 11 - Cross Reference Matrix
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
Modification of Equipment has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
New Matrix
| Reviewed | PWS | WORK REQUIREMENT | PWS | Section L | Section M | Proposal |
| Engineering Services | Configuration Management. 1.6.4.1.6.1 For hardware, software, firmware, protocols, and interfaces, the contractor shall perform configuration identification, configuration control, configuration status accounting, and configuration audits to maintain the integrity of Ground Subsystems. Configuration management processes shall be IAW ANSI/EIA-649B, National Consensus Standard for Configuration Management and shall be consistent with ICBMSD 62-CMP, ICBM Configuration Management Plan, OI 62-03, Configuration Management Policies and Procedures, and OI 62-13, Software Configuration Management (CM). 1.6.4.1.6.2 The contractor’s plan for configuration management shall include: |
• Maintaining control of baselines and environments including those delivered by subcontractors and associate contractors.
• Ensuring contractor’s CM processes and tools interoperate with the Government’s CM processes and tools.
• Conducting Functional Configuration Audits (FCA) and Physical Configuration Audits (PCA) consistent with ICBMSD OI 62-04, Configuration Audits, to verify the functional and physical baselines of products and demonstrate compliance to the technical requirements of the developmental and product specifications. [CDRL A067, DI-SESS-81646, Configuration Audit Plan]
• Maintaining product baseline after PCA.
• Providing Government-approved baselines to the NSCCA/PATE/IV&V contractor, upon direction of the Government.
| 1.6.4.1.6 | 4.2.3.1.1 | 2.1.1.1.1 |
| Systems Safety. 1.6.4.1.8.1 The contractor shall support the Government System Safety Program by identifying and controlling ICBM hazards, preventing mishaps, and tracking mishaps IAW System Safety Program Plan, Safety Study Plan, and Safety Study Report. This task is in support of the Government efforts to comply with requirements tailored from Military Standard (MIL-STD)-882, DOD Standard Practice: System Safety; AFPD 91-2, Safety Programs; AFI 91-202, The US Air Force Mishap Prevention Program; AFI 91-204, Safety Investigations and Reports, and Air Force Manual (AFMAN) 91-221, Weapons Safety Investigations and Reports, and Air Force policies. 1.6.4.1.8.4 The contractor shall execute the system safety responsibilities for the areas of Fault Tree Development and Analysis, Nuclear Safety Assessment, human factors, reliability analysis, probabilistic risk assessments, and the capabilities to perform system safety engineering in general. |
| 1.6.4.1.8 | 4.2.3.1.2 | 2.1.1.1.2 | |||
| Nameplates and Product Markings. 1.6.4.1.10.2 The contractor shall provide an Item Unique Identification (IUID) Plan, which covers asset marking and tracking and IUID marking procedures. | 1.6.4.1.10 | 4.2.3.1.2 | 2.1.1.1.2 | ||
| Engineering Services | 1.6.4.2.1 Sustaining Engineering Requirements. Sustainment Engineering is the engineering effort on systems, products, or materials, required to resolve technical or supportability deficiencies revealed in operational service. The contractor shall ensure continued operation and maintenance of Ground Subsystems through sustainment engineering activities. The contractor shall employ sustainment engineering practices to identify, review, assess, and resolve deficiencies for Ground Subsystems. The contractor shall maintain the system at its baseline configuration and capability. For MMIII, major portions of Sustainment Engineering efforts are dedicated to assessment of system status relating to key performance requirements. The listing below provides a significant amount of Ground Subsystems tasks the contractor shall perform: |
• Assess deficiency indicators
• Evaluate and resolve parts obsolescence issues
• Define the characteristics and causes of deficiencies
• Determine the impact on the affected product
• Identify and evaluate alternative solutions
• Recommend the preferred solution
• Design, integrate, and validate the Government-approved solution
• Propose corrective actions to the Government in enough detail that will allow the Government to plan and program the resources necessary to implement a solution
• Estimate mitigation program costs
• Weigh mitigation options benefits against costs
• Perform life cycle cost studies to determine when equipment replacement is cost effective
• Provide weapon system domain expertise during MPHN
• Prepare source data to update TO procedures and illustrated parts breakdown (IPB)
• Provide technical support during TO validation/verification
• Perform troubleshooting at operational wings, Vandenberg AFB, Strategic Missile Integration Complex (SMIC), Little Mountain Test Facility, and maintenance shops
• Assess and document equipment risks
• Collaborate with other subsystems on equipment interfaces
• Collaborate with Missile Engineering Office (MEO) on Real Property Installed Equipment (RPIE) interfaces
• Perform tolerance studies to determine worst case allowable conditions
• Perform structural analysis to determine safety margins
• Perform finite element analysis models
• Develop flow rate and heat transfer models
• Provide weapon system domain expert support before, during, and after planning conferences
• Research and define equipment requirements
• Reverse-engineer undocumented equipment and software
• Provide Implementation Management Plans
• Provide test plans, procedures, and reports. It includes all associated efforts (e.g., engineering and technical data, modeling, simulation, and testing) which are integral to the completion of the overall engineering task. The engineering effort necessary to define and specify embedded system and associated test system software changes after establishment of an initial software production baseline is also included.
• Monitoring to assess and report on the effectiveness of the corrective actions.
• Provide source data for system level reports
• Evaluate effective approach to implement COTS-type hardware and firmware solutions
• Evaluate sustainability for all recommended changes
| 1.6.4.2.1 | 4.2.3.1.2 | 2.1.1.1.2 | |||
| Engineering Services | 1.6.4.2.1 | 4.2.3.1.2 | 2.1.1.1.2 | ||
| Engineering Services | Hardware Sustainment 1.6.4.2.3.2 In addition to the task list in section 1.6.4.2, the contractor shall support the Government in sustaining MMIII Ground Subsystems hardware (installed equipment, transportation and handling equipment, and support equipment) by performing the following tasks: • Perform and document technical analyses (circuits, structural, hydraulic, pneumatic, heat transfer, thermodynamics, closed loop failure analysis (CLFA), corrosion prevention, feasibility, failure modes and effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) and failure trends, test launch silo thermal, air blast affects, suspension system (dynamic) launcher closure door performance, etc.) |
• Perform troubleshooting at Depot/Missile Wings and recommend potential mitigations
• Provide technical support to hardware repair activities (ETARs, MPHNs, Technical Requirements Working Group (TRWG), TRB, CCB, and ICWG.)
• Develop test plans/procedures and perform testing as defined in section 1.6.4.4.1 (form/fit/function, diagnostic, and field/SMIC troubleshooting)
• Perform nuclear hardness (electromagnetic interference (EMI), electromagnetic compatibility (EMC), radiation, shock and vibration) test and evaluation
• Provide support to test set control, operation, diagnostic, data production and storage
• Provide and maintain source data for specifications, TOs, EOs, drawings, and Integrated Master Plan (IMP)s.
• Provide system integration support on issues that cross subsystem boundaries
• Select and qualify suitable substitute parts and support COTS unique issues
• Perform environmental assessments and regulation compliance
• Perform long-term weapon supportability planning
• Perform 3-D and other computer modeling
| 1.6.4.2.3 | 4.2.3.1.2 | 2.1.1.1.2 |
| Parts, Materials, and Maintenance. 1.6.4.2.5.1 The contractor shall identify and analyze problems with parts, materials, and processes related to Ground Subsystems and formulate and document recommended corrective actions. |
1.6.4.2.5.1.1 The contractor shall support tasks for identifying parts substitutes and replacements, developing standards, and controls for repair parts modifications and replacement actions, and maintaining the data required to perform these tasks consistent with 526 ICBMSW OI 20-04, Parts, Materials, and Process Engineering.
1.6.4.2.5.1.2 The contractor shall support the Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Materiel Shortages (DMSMS) program as required by DOD 4140.1 R, Supply Chain Materiel Management. [CDRL A110, DI-SESS-81656, Source Data for Forecasting Diminishing Manufacturing Sources & Material Shortages (DMSMS)]
1.6.4.2.5.2 The contractor shall implement a risk-based Counterfeit Prevention Plan to comply with Public Law 112–81 – Section 818, and MIL-STD-3018, Parts Management to minimize the impact of counterfeit parts or suspect counterfeit parts on Ground Subsystems.
1.6.4.2.5.2.1 The contractor shall be responsible for detecting and avoiding the use or inclusion of counterfeit parts or suspect counterfeit parts in Ground Subsystems delivered to the Government under this PWS.
| 1.6.4.2.5 | 4.2.3.1.2 | 2.1.1.1.2 | |||
| Engineering Services | Test and Evaluation. 1.6.4.4.1.1 The contractor shall identify and define test requirements where applicable for all Ground Subsystems programs and for future assigned sustainment, modification, or acquisition programs associated with the Ground Subsystems. 1.6.4.4.1.2 The contractor shall perform T&E on all Ground Subsystems replacement, modification, and sustainment activities requiring test IAW AFI 99-103, Capabilities-Based Test and Evaluation and subordinate documents: ICBMSD OI 99-103, Test and Evaluation references related to Air Force Policy Directive (AFPD) 99-1, Test and Evaluation Process; AFI 99-103, Capabilities-Based Test and Evaluation; AFMCPD 99-1, Test Management; Air Force Materiel Command Instruction (AFMCI) 99-103, Test Management; and Air Force Nuclear Weapons Center Instruction (AFNWCI) 99-103, Nuclear Enterprise Test and Evaluation Management. 1.6.4.4.1.3 The contractor shall support test integration and scheduling, and conduct associated testing with WS effectiveness programs performed to measure AS, reliability, availability, maintainability, accuracy, and nuclear hardness and survivability. | 1.6.4.4.1 | 4.2.3.1.2 | 2.1.1.1.2 | |
| Software Development. 1.6.4.1.12 The contractor shall develop and modify both nuclear and non-nuclear certified software IAW AFI 91-119, Safety Design and Evaluation Criteria for Nuclear Weapons Systems Software in support of Ground Subsystems operational needs. The contractor shall be capable of transforming an operational need into a description of system performance parameters and apply software engineering process to ensure software updates or upgrades to Ground Subsystems do not degrade operational readiness. | 1.6.4.1.12 | 4.2.3.1.3 | 2.1.1.1.3 | ||
| Software Engineering Requirements. 1.6.4.1.12.2.7 The contractor shall plan and perform the integration, regression testing, and qualification testing of software items for each build, including support of WS integration. | 1.6.4.1.12.2.7 | 4.2.3.1.3 | 2.1.1.1.3 | ||
| Software Engineering Requirements. 1.6.4.1.12.2.8 The contractor shall develop software test reports addressing testing results to include any anomalies discovered during testing and mitigation requirements. | 1.6.4.1.12.2.8 | 4.2.3.1.3 | 2.1.1.1.3 | ||
| 3, 70 | Engineering Services | Software Sustainment. 1.6.4.2.2.6 The contractor shall provide technical advisor support to Ground Subsystems operations during the sustainment to include: • Software analysis |
• Software development (includes upgrade, enhancement, repair, and test)
• Software problem/deficiency analysis
• Anomaly resolution
• Configuration management
• Subsystem troubleshooting
• WS integration
• Trending analysis to optimize Ground Subsystems operations, sustainment, and test procedures
• Review delivered documentation for proposed hardware and software changes to Ground Subsystems
• Develop and recommend changes to Ground Subsystems operation procedures and training documentation
• Perform technical feasibility and analysis studies
• Support software at the Depot, Missile Wings, or other facilities where GFE (including GOTS) and software exist
• Test set control, operation, diagnostic, data production, and data storage
• Software T&E on existing test equipment designed to support Ground Subsystems maintenance and/or assessment IAW AFI 99-103, Capabilities-Based Test and Evaluation • Perform requirements traceability for all proposed changes to the baseline(s)
| 1.6.4.2.2 | 4.2.3.1.3 | 2.1.1.1.3 | |||
| Ground Subsystems Health 1.6.4.3.1.9 The contractor shall conduct Failure Modes and Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) IAW SAE ARP5580 on Ground Subsystems hardware as directed to determine what failures could occur and the effect such failures would have on the WS. | 1.6.4.3.1 | 4.2.3.1.4 | 2.1.1.1.4 | ||
| Nuclear Hardness and Survivability 1.6.4.3.4.1 The contractor shall perform hardness assessments for new/modified equipment occurring under this contract, and evaluate changes to the Ground Subsystems for hardness and provide updates to Hardness Data Manuals. 1.6.4.3.4.2 The contractor shall perform survivability assessments for modified equipment and evaluate changes to the Ground Subsystems for survivability. 1.6.4.3.4.3 The contractor shall provide Survivability Management Status Reports (SMSR). | 1.6.4.3.4 | 4.2.3.1.4 | 2.1.1.1.4 | ||
| 69 | Nuclear Surety 1.6.4.3.5.7 The contractor shall provide nuclear surety support to Ground Subsystems-related ICBM test and maintenance programs. Support shall include development of assessments, reports, and briefings to verify compliance with applicable AFI 91-series and 526 ICBMSW OI 91 01, Nuclear Surety and Nuclear Certification. 1.6.4.3.5.8 The contractor shall provide and implement a Certification Requirements Plan (CRP) to support nuclear surety as part of the software development effort. | 1.6.4.3.5 | 4.2.3.1.4 | 2.1.1.1.4 | |
| Engineering Services | Aging Surveillance (AS) 1.6.4.3.3.1 The contractor shall perform service life assessments and detect/quantify and report aging trends as early as possible. 1.6.4.3.3.1.1 The contractor shall maintain an AS database. 1.6.4.3.3.1.2 The contractor shall monitor system performance degradation resulting from aging. 1.6.4.3.3.1.3 The contractor shall conduct age-sensitive items analysis to determine which materials or components change with the life of the Ground Subsystems and the likelihood of failures resulting from continued use of aged materials or components.1.6.4.3.3.1.4 The contractor shall maintain a list of critical OGE that require service life assessment and/or aging surveillance testing along with a rationale for why the items are critical, what parameters will be monitored, and what failure modes will be detected. The results of service life testing shall be provided to the Government to be included in the Assessment Report and WSER as appropriate. 1.6.4.3.3.2 The contractor shall prepare and review test plans and test reports for tests required as a result of trend analysis and assessments. 1.6.4.3.3.3 The contractor shall analyze component-level AS test data, trends, and possible impacts documented in nonconformance documents, e.g., AFMC Form 202, Nonconforming Technical Assistance Request and Reply, field-generated MARs per TO 00-25-107, Maintenance Assistance. 1.6.4.3.3.4 The contractor shall conduct shelf-life analysis for specific components as requested by the Government. 1.6.4.3.3.5 The contractor shall review any required AS test types and make recommendations for increased or decreased subsystem-level testing based on current and emerging service life estimates, and aging trends. | 1.6.4.3.3 | 4.2.3.1.5 | 2.1.1.1.5 | |
| 68 | Team Structure and Partnership. 1.6.3.1.6.2 Build Team Structure and Partnership: The contractor shall confirm human resource availability and obtain the team necessary to complete project activities. The contractor shall establish and maintain an organizational team structure (including subcontractors) possessing the knowledge, skills, processes, and experience necessary to effectively support all GSSC requirements. See Section J, Attachment 5 labeled “Labor Categories Description” for personnel qualifications. The contractor shall ensure skills, experience, training, and education are directly related to the specific service or specialty which the individual is designated to perform. 1.6.3.1.6.2.2 The contractor shall ensure at all times, personnel have sufficient expertise to perform the tasks identified in this PWS. 1.6.3.1.6.2.2.1 The contractor shall ensure a minimum of 50 percent of personnel have 5 years or greater strategic nuclear weapon experience (at least 60 percent of the strategic nuclear weapon experience shall be ICBM specific). 1.6.3.1.6.2.2.2 The contractor shall ensure at a minimum, an additional 20 percent of personnel have 10 years or greater strategic nuclear weapon experience (at least 60 percent of the strategic nuclear weapon experience shall be ICBM specific). 1.6.3.1.6.2.2.3 The contractor shall ensure at a minimum, an additional 15 percent of personnel have 15 years or greater strategic nuclear weapon experience (at least 60 percent of the strategic nuclear weapon experience shall be ICBM specific). | 1.6.3.1.6.2 | 4.2.3.1.6 | 2.1.1.1.6 | |
| Sample Sustainment Scenario Task | 4.2.3.1.7 | 2.1.1.1.7 | |||
| Awardable Tasks | Awardable Tasks 1 - Simulated Electronic Launch Minuteman (SELM)/Guided Missile Launcher Electrical Circuit (GMLEC) | SOO | 4.2.3.2.1 | 2.1.1.2.1 | |
| Awardable Task 2 - Software Modification Task | SOO | 4.2.3.2.2 | 2.1.1.2.2 | ||
| Transition | Tasks and Responsibilities Transfer 1.6.3.2.3.1 The contractor shall identify, in the Transition Plan, the risks for transitioning Ground Subsystems tasks from the PBC to the GSSC/Government and provide ranking of the identified risks and the criteria used. The Transition Plan shall include recommended mitigation strategies to overcome the identified transition risks. 1.6.3.2.3.2 The contractor shall include, in the Transition Plan, a transition schedule, detailing identification, impacts, and mitigation(s) for on-going Ground Subsystems efforts. The contractor shall execute the Transition Plan and be responsible for performance of all tasks covered within this PWS not later than 6 months after the Contract Post Award Conference. | 1.6.3.2.3 | 4.2.3.3.1 | 2.1.1.3.1 | |
| Facilities, Equipment, and Qualified Personnel 1.6.3.2.3.3 The contractor shall address, in the Transition Plan, all necessary material used in the execution of sustainment and acquisition in support of the Ground Subsystems. At minimum, the contractor shall identify how Government-furnished property (GFP), software code (and associated compilers), data, documentation, tools, and models can be effectively used to ensure completion of all tasks covered within this PWS while avoiding, to the maximum extent possible, negative impacts to on-going Ground Subsystems efforts on other contracts. 1.6.3.2.3.3.1 The contractor shall have the capability to establish or have access to the facilities, equipment, and qualified personnel necessary to meet the requirements of the PWS. The contractor shall have the ability to obtain and effectively utilize these facilities, equipment, and qualified personnel not later than 6 months after the Contract Post Award Conference. The Government is not obligated to provide these facilities/equipment; however, the contractor may opt to make arrangements or partnerships to use Government or other facilities/equipment. 1.6.3.2.3.3.2 If the contractor proposes alternative tools, models, equipment, etc. in supporting Ground Subsystems sustainment and acquisition, the verification, validation, and accreditation of the those items shall be included in the Transition Plan. | 1.6.3.2.3.3 | 4.2.3.3.2 | 2.1.1.3.2 | ||
| Program Management Support | Small Business Subcontracting Plan 1.6.3.1.6.5 The contractor will apply good faith efforts toward meeting small business subcontracting goals to include HubZone, Service Disabled Veteran Owned, 8(a), and Woman Owned small business. The Small Business Subcontracting Requirements and Incentives clause will require the contractor to meet an overall minimum small business subcontracting requirement. The contractor will also be encouraged to meet and/or exceed goals for each socioeconomic category stated in the clause. A Small Business Subcontracting Plan will be required IAW with FAR 19.704. The Small Business Subcontracting Plan will be coordinated through and approved by the Hill Air Force Base Small Business Office upon contract award. | 1.6.3.1.6.5 | 4.2.3.4.1 | 2.1.1.4.1 | |
| Program Management Support | Cost Management. 1.6.3.1.4.1 Plan Cost Management: The contractor shall establish procedures and documentation for planning, managing, expending, and controlling project costs. |
1.6.3.1.4.2 Estimate Costs: The contractor shall develop an approximation of the monetary resources needed to complete project activities.
1.6.3.1.4.3 Determine Budget: The contractor shall aggregate the estimated costs of individual activities or work packages to establish an authorized cost baseline.
1.6.3.1.4.4 Control Costs: The contractor shall monitor the status of the project to update the project cost and manage changes to the cost baseline.
1.6.3.1.4.5 Individual Baseline Reviews: The contractor shall establish and maintain the capability to prepare and conduct Integrated Baseline Reviews (IBR) as directed.
| 1.6.3.1.4 | 4.2.3.4.2 | 2.1.1.4.2 |
| Program Management Support | Time Management 1.6.3.1.3.1 Plan Schedule Management: The contractor shall establish procedures and documentation for planning, developing, managing, executing, and controlling the project schedule. |
1.6.3.1.3.2 Define Activities: The contractor shall identify and document the specific actions to be performed to produce the project deliverables.
1.6.3.1.3.3 Sequence Activities: The contractor shall identify and document relationships among the project activities.
1.6.3.1.3.4 Estimate Activity Resources: The contractor shall estimate the type and quantities of material, human resources, equipment, and supplies required to perform each activity.
1.6.3.1.3.5 Estimate Activity Durations: The contractor shall estimate the number of work periods needed to complete individual activities with estimated resources.
1.6.3.1.3.6 Develop Schedule: The contractor shall analyze activity sequences, durations, resource requirements, and schedule constraints to create a project schedule model.
1.6.3.1.3.7 Control Schedule: The contractor shall monitor the status of project activities to update project progress and manage changes to the schedule baseline to achieve the plan. 1.6.3.1.1.3 Monitor and Control Project Work: The contractor shall track, review, and report project progress against the performance objectives defined in the Program Management Plan. For each assigned effort greater than $20M, the contractor shall create, monitor, and analyze Earned Value Management System (EVMS) reports and submit Integrated Program Management Report (IPMR) for sustainment efforts (excluding Fixed Price), development subcontracts, and report any issues to the appropriate IPT. The contractor’s EVMS, when applicable, shall adhere to guidelines in the American National Standards Institute/Electronic Industries Alliance (ANSI/EIA)–748, Earned Value Management System.
| 1.6.3.1.3, 1.6.3.1.1.3 | 4.2.3.4.3 | 2.1.1.4.3 |
| Quality Management 1.6.3.1.5.1 Plan Quality Management: The contractor shall identify quality requirements and/or standards for the project and its deliverables and document how the project will demonstrate compliance with quality requirements. |
1.6.3.1.5.2 Perform Quality Assurance: The contractor shall audit the quality requirements and the results from quality control measurements to ensure that appropriate quality standards and operational definitions are used.
1.6.3.1.5.3 Control Quality: The contractor shall monitor and record results of executing the quality activities to assess performance and recommend necessary changes.
1.6.3.1.5 4.2.3.4.4 2.1.1.4.4
&"Arial,Bold"&14GSSC Cross Reference Matrix &D
Page &P of &N
Sheet1
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .