Section_L_ATTACHMENT_3_Questionnaire.doc

ATTACHMENT 3

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Offeror: Complete Section 1, then e-mail questionnaire to the customer points of contact listed on the Past Performance Information Sheet.

Offeror’s Evaluator: Complete Sections 2-5 and e-mail to: ronald.hilliard@hill.af.mil and andrew.hatch@hill.af.mil .

DO NOT PROVIDE A COPY BACK TO THE OFFEROR.

When filled in, this document is source selection sensitive information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor:

B. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to:

C. Contract number:

D. Contract type:

E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

F. Period of performance:

G. Initial contract cost:

H. Current/final contract cost:

I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs: (enter below) J. Description of service provided (enter below):

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of services under this contract (enter below)

Local_____; Nationwide_____; Worldwide_____; Other Command(s) _____

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's name:

B. Evaluator's title:

C. Evaluator's phone/fax number:

D. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract:

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

1. Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE

PERFORMANCE LEVEL

B BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL - The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

P PURPLE/VERY GOOD- The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

G GREEN/SATISFACTORY – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or was satisfactory.

Y YELLOW/MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

R RED/UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.

T1. Ability to maintain configuration control and baseline management.

T2. Adequate tools and internal practices to effectively plan, execute, track, and report on test, evaluation and other activities.

T3. Contractor’s facilities and equipment supported the supplies or services provided.

T4. Demonstrated the technical capabilities and expertise that were required in the contract.

T5. Ability to deliver accurate technical data packages and Technical Orders.

T6. Ability of the contractor to identify and handle Diminishing Manufacturing Sources (DMS) issues.

T7. Successfully provided data to acquire different types of airworthiness certifications (i.e. JTIC, Seek Eagle, HERO, GATM)

T8. Overall effectiveness in creating, maintaining, and using 3-D Models.

T9. Efficiency in creating, validating, and documenting a Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Model.

T10. Capability in providing ASIP support (specifically Tasks IV and V of MIL-STD-1530C) on A-10 era aircraft.

T11. Ability to troubleshoot A-10 era aircraft’s mechanical and propulsion systems.

T12. Correctly perform durability and damage tolerance analysis.

T13. Effectively collect and evaluate Loads/Environment Spectra Survey (L/ESS) data and provide L/ESS updates.

T14. Effectively develop structural repairs with valid structural analyses and provide post repair inspection criteria.

T15. Ability to perform structural teardowns and/or fatigue tests and provide useful recommendations of fleet impacts.

T16. Ability to generate stress spectra for new fatigue critical locations.

T17. Ability to stand-up or maintain and operate an avionic system software/hardware integration/test capability to effectively & efficiently perform aircraft level system integration and test.

T18. Ability to meet the timelines proposed for reconfiguring a system software/hardware integration capability.

T19. Ability to troubleshoot A-10 era aircraft’s avionic systems.

T20. Ability of the contractor to develop software Operational Flight Programs (OFP) and resolve deficiency reports (DRs).

P1. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, and control the program).

P2. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes).

P3. Ability to understand/comply with customer objectives and technical requirements.

P4. Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material).

P5. Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer.

P6. Ability to meet contract schedule

P7. Contractor was cooperative/successful dealing with other contractors (through an ACA) that weren’t subcontractors

O1. Ability to hire a qualified workforce for this effort.

O2. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.

O3. Contractor effectiveness in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/ phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts.

O4. Effective management of its subcontractors/ teaming partners

S1. Ability to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan

S2. Ability to effectively manage small business participation to meet technical performance.

C1 Accuracy in forecasting contract costs

C2 Ability to meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs

C3 Ability to alert Government of unforeseen costs before they occur

C4 Sufficiency and timeliness of cost reporting

2. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated B/E (Blue/Exceptional), Y/M (Yellow/Marginal), or R/U (Red/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

3. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___ No ___

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

SECTION 5: OVERALL PERFORMANCE SUMMARY

1. Describe the contractor’s greatest strong points in the performance of the contract.

2. Describe the contractor’s greatest shortcomings in the performance of the contract.

3. Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Yes ____ No ____ (If yes, provide details/comments)

Evaluator’s Signature

Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please e-mail this completed questionnaire to: ronald.hilliard@hill.af.mil and andrew.hatch@hill.af.mil .

Questions or Comments can be directed to Capt Ron Hilliard at (801)777-4174 or ronald.hilliard@hill.af.mil and Andrew Hatch at (801) 775-2291 or andrew.hatch@hill.af.mil