Tech_Evaluation.pdf

PDF 113 KB Posted

Attached to
Composite Paint & Layup Area HVAC Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA8126-16-Q-0099
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center Tinker Air Force Base

About this file

Technical Evaluation - Composite Paint Layup Area HVAC

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Composite Paint & Layup Area HVAC, newest first.
File Type Posted
Questions_and_Responses_to_Solicitation_FA8126-16-Q-0099.docx DOCX document
Statement_of_Work_Composite_Paint_ _Layup_Area_HVAC_Rev_4_29JAN16.pdf PDF
Solicitation_FA8126-16-Q-0099_Composite_Paint_Booth_and_Layup_Room_HVAC.doc DOC document
Statement_of_Work_Composite_Paint_ _Layup_Area_HVAC_06JAN16.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Technical Evaluation Criteria for Composites Paint and Layup Area HVAC, Bldg.9001

Subfactor 1: Layup Room HVAC System

The Government will assess the Offeror’s proposed approach and design for the Layup

Room HVAC System. Offerors are required to present all the information as stated in the

Instructions to Offerors (ITO), FAR 52.212-1. The subfactor minimum is met when the

Offeror’s proposal demonstrates an adequate understanding, and thoroughly substantiates all of the following essential components:

a. An acceptable approach for Layup Room HVAC System which meets all requirements of the SOW paragraph 3.1.1 with corresponding tables and sections.

The approach must include specific descriptions, detailed specifications, and sketches to show how the Layup Room HVAC System is designed and operated, and if any required equipment upgrade is needed to meet the requirements in aforementioned SOW paragraphs.

b. An acceptable approach for any new equipment or upgrades to existing equipment to meet all requirements of the SOW.

c. An acceptable approach with detailed descriptions to upgrade existing equipment

(if necessary) to achieve the requirements for the subfactor. The approach must include descriptions, manufacturer(s) and model(s), and sketches of the equipment to be installed.

Subfactor 2: Paint Booth HVAC System

The Government will assess the Offeror’s proposed approach and design for the Layup

Room HVAC System. Offerors are required to present all the information as stated in the

Instructions to Offerors (ITO), FAR 52.212-1. The subfactor minimum is met when the

a. An acceptable approach for Paint Booth HVAC System which meets all requirements of the SOW paragraph 3.1.2 with corresponding tables and sections.

The approach must include specific descriptions, detailed specifications, and sketches to show how the Layup Room HVAC System is designed and operated, and if any required equipment upgrade is needed to meet the requirements in aforementioned SOW paragraphs.

b. An acceptable approach for any new equipment or upgrades to existing equipment to meet all requirements of the SOW.

c. An acceptable approach with detailed descriptions to upgrade existing equipment

(if necessary) to achieve the requirements for the subfactor. The approach must include descriptions, manufacturer(s) and model(s), and sketches of the equipment to be installed.

Subfactor 3: Monitoring and Controls Systems

The Government will assess the Offeror’s proposed approach and design for the monitoring and controls systems. Offerors are required to present all the information as stated in the

Instructions to Offerors (ITO), FAR 52.212-1. The subfactor minimum is met when the

a. An acceptable approach for monitoring and controls systems which meet all requirements of the SOW paragraphs 3.1.1.1 & 3.1.2.1 and corresponding Tables

1 for Composite Layup Room and 2 for Paint Booth. The approach must include specific descriptions, detailed specifications, and sketches to show how the monitoring and controls systems are designed and operated, and if any required equipment upgrade is needed to meet the requirements in aforementioned SOW paragraphs.

b. An acceptable approach for any new equipment or upgrades to existing equipment to meet all requirements of the SOW.

c. An acceptable approach for how the alarming type as described in the tables in each of the paragraphs mentioned above will be designed and installed.

Subfactor 4: Project Schedule and Project Management

The Government will assess the Offeror’s proposed approach for Project Schedule and

Project Management. Offerors are required to present all the information as stated in the Instructions to Offerors (ITO), FAR 52.212-1. The subfactor minimum is met when the Offeror’s proposal demonstrates an adequate understanding, and thoroughly substantiates all of the following essential components:

a. The contractor shall warranty the final deliverable for a period of two (2) years from the completion date IAW section 3.11 of the SOW.

b. An acceptable approach for Schedule and Hour of Operation which meets the requirements in section and subsequent subsections 4.0 of the SOW.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .