DMSMS_Predictive_Tool_PreProposal_Conference_Slides_6_Jul_2017R1.pdf

Air Force Sustainment Center

6 July 2017

Pre-Proposal Conference

RFP FA8109-17-R-0001

Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages Predictive Tool

For Official Use Only 1

B r e a k i n g B a r r i e r s … S i n c e 1 9 4 7

Proposals due 31 Jul 17, 3:00 pm CST

Discuss Government Requirements

Discuss Contract Type

Discuss Line Item Number (CLIN) Structure

Discuss Source Selection Criteria

Address Submitted Questions

RFP content takes precedence over Information provided in any Question & Answer Forum

Pre-Proposal Conference Agenda

For Official Use Only

Program Manager: Danny Meyers (Lead) 429 SCMS/GUMD PCO: Christina B. Jones, AFSC/PZAAC Linda Murphy, AFSC/PZAAC Michael Graham, 429 SCMS/GUMD

Government Team

Government Requirement

Description: Provide an Enterprise-wide DMSMS Predictive Tool Capability

Efforts include: Determining the present and future state of Program Managed System’s Bill of Material (BOM), identified items status, and their Life Cycle procurement efforts. Additionally, the requirement will consist of the loading and updating of the BOM data.

User(s): Provide DMSMS support for all Air Force (AF) users located at Hill AFB, Tinker AFB, and Robins AFB.

4For Official Use Only

B r e a k i n g B a r r i e r s … S i n c e 1 9 4 7 5

DMSMS Predictive Tool is a tool using Information Technology to provide users the ability to status obsolescence across multiple weapon systems to assure all required parts and materials are available within production lead times.

Capabilities include: linking data to run reports and queries, engineering and technical services, determine present and future state of BOMs, loading and uploading of large amounts of data

Acquisition is for IT services and does not include the purchase of hardware or software by the USAF

AFSC/PZAAC will administer the Services Contract after award.

Program Description

Contract Type: Competitive Firm Fixed Price (FFP), Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Single Award

Minimum Obligation $500K on funded task order on one or more CLINs

Data Provided by Government after Award: PWS Appendix B Data for transfer under CLIN 0006

Services Contract Period of Performance (estimated): 16 Dec 2017 – 14 Jun 2021 Options: One year base and two one-year options, with option for up to 6 month extension IAW 52.217-8 Funding - will be obligated on individual task orders

Contract Type

B r e a k i n g B a r r i e r s … S i n c e 1 9 4 7 7

CLIN Structure

For Official Use Only

CLIN(s) Type Description

0001 Firm Fixed Price Loading Line Item Data

0002 Firm Fixed Price Updating Line Item Data

0003 Firm Fixed Price Travel Costs

0004 Not Separately Priced Data

0005 Not Separately Priced Appendix B Flat File

0006 (Year One only) Firm Fixed Price Importing of Appendix B data and linking Contractor provided

Appendix C data

Small Business Concerns: Large and Small Business Offerors will be required to provide Small Business Participation Plan with proposal and Large Business

Offerors will also provide a Small Business Subcontracting Plan with proposal.

Cost and Pricing Data: If only one proposal is received, certified cost and pricing data will be required.

Security Issues: Offeror required to possess Certification and Accreditation

(C&A) and Authority to Operate (ATO) with a minimum Mission Assurance

Category “3” with a Confidentiality Level of “Sensitive”. After proposal submission, offerors will be given three business days after notification, to provide proof of active (C&A) and Authority to Operate (ATO) with a minimum

Mission Assurance Category “3” with a Confidentiality Level of “Sensitive.

Acquisition involves Export Controlled Information

Proposal Considerations

Source Selection Criteria

Award will be made to the offeror proposing the combination of factors deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment of the evaluation factors described below.

Factor 1: Technical Subfactor 1: Live Demonstration of Tool Capabilities Subfactor 2: Contractor Requirements Subfactor 3: Small Business

Factor 2: Past Performance

Factor 3: Price

9For Official Use Only

For this acquisition, technical acceptability requires that the

Government receive a photocopy of the contractor’s Authority to Operate (ATO) within three business days after government request. The ATO must be current and in accordance with the PWS. The ATO is a condition to award and if not presented to the Government PCO within three business days of request, the offeror shall be removed from consideration and award will be made to next competitive offeror. The government will consider an ATO from another DoD agency, provided the DoD approved ATO contains the same security requirements as the AF approved ATO.

For this acquisition, technical acceptability is a prerequisite to the best value analysis and potential trade-off between Past Performance and Price.

For all technically acceptable proposals, Factor 2, Past Performance, is significantly more important than Factor 3, Price.

10For Official Use Only

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

To be determined technically acceptable at the factor level, the offeror must be rated acceptable in each subfactor. Only those proposals determined to be technically acceptable, either initially, or as a result of Discussions(if held), will be considered for award.

•All Technical subfactors will be rated as “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable”

Subfactor 1: Live Demonstration of Tool Capabilities Subfactor 2: Contractor Requirements Subfactor 3: Small Business

Factor 1: Technical

Evaluation Criteria

Factor 1: Technical

Subfactor 1: Live Demonstration of Tool Capabilities The subfactor minimum is met when the offeror demonstrates all of the following essential components within allotted three hours provided.

Live demonstration shall be considered acceptable when the offeror's demonstration includes successfully downloading twelve individual query results to Government provided CDs which:

Were generated from a single logon point

Are displayed in a format exportable to Excel

Contain 100% of the required part attribute data requested at the beginning of the live demonstration. 100% of the part attribute data from each query is for the Appendix B Sample Data only.

Display on the computer screen all part attribute data fields listed on PWS Appendix B and Appendix C that were not included in the twelve query results

12For Official Use Only

Subfactor 2: Contractor Requirements The subfactor minimum is met when the offeror’s proposal indicates an adequate understanding of the requirements and provides convincing rationale how their approach will meet the requirements with little potential for disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance.

The offeror shall provide a detailed approach which ensures requirements in PWS Sections,

1.3 through 1.3.19 are met. As a minimum, the offeror’s approach shall include details of how:

The approximately 26.5 million line items provided by the Government will be imported, linked, populated with PWS Appendix C data and made available to Air Force users in 90 days from funded order

Loading of new lines of data and updating of line item data will be accomplished The Tool/Tools Authority to Operate will be kept current Tool Database Training will be accomplished The technical evaluation will also consider technical risk in determining overall acceptability as it pertains to the potential for unsuccessful contract performance. Technical risk rating will be inherent within the subfactor rating and the overall Technical rating

Evaluation Criteria (Cont’d)

Subfactor 3: Small Business

SB identified by SB category

SB Participation

SB Participation will be measured in dollars and as a percentage of total contract value.

Offeror’s proposal must meet the minimum mandatory total SB participation of 7 percent (through collective SB participation from any type of SB or sub-category SB).

SB Subcontracting- measured in percentage goals, and in dollars of work subcontracted per FAR 19.704. Subcontracting Plan, required of large business offerors (in accordance with FAR 19.702), must provide for a minimum goal for small disadvantaged businesses of 5 percent.

Factor 2: Past Performance

Evaluation Criteria (Cont’d)

For Official Use Only

Rating Description

SATISFACTORY

CONFIDENCE

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

NEUTRAL

CONFIDENCE

No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

LIMITED

CONFIDENCE

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

NO CONFIDENCE Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

The Past Performance evaluation assesses the degree of confidence the Government has in an offeror’s ability to supply products and services that meet users’ needs, including cost and schedule, based on a demonstrated record of performance. The Past Performance factor will receive one of the following performance confidence assessments.

With regards to the best value award decision, all offerors rated as “Satisfactory Confidence” will be considered equal for the Past Performance Factor.

Factor 3: Price

The Government shall evaluate the Total Evaluated Price (TEP) of all technically acceptable Offerors. The TEP is the sum of extended pricing for the base year, the two option years and the six month extension option.

Unreasonable prices may be grounds for eliminating a proposal from the competition based on an apparent lack of adequate understanding of the requirement. Offerors are cautioned to not use underbidding as a pricing strategy with the intention of recovering under-bid costs after contract award via Requests for Equitable Adjustments (REAs) or other devices.

Unbalanced pricing may increase performance risk to the Government. The offeror may be rejected by the PCO if a determination is made that lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the Government. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total price, the price of one or more line items is significantly over or understated as demonstrated by application of price analysis techniques.

Proposed pricing will be evaluated for price realism. This pertains to CLIN pricing as well as TEP. To be realistic, proposed pricing shall be consistent with the proposed approach, demonstrating an understanding of the requirement and program complexity.

Award Schedule

RFP Release 15-Jun-17 Pre-proposal Conference 6 - Jul -17 Proposals Due 31-Jul-17 Evaluation Complete 17-Oct-17 Legal Review 3-Nov-17 SSABrief 10-Nov-17 Contract Clearance 24-Nov-17 1279 Notification 8-Dec-17 Contract Award 12-Dec-17

PROJECTED SCHEDULE:

Submitted Questions - 1

RFP Front Page, First paragraph of Section L. Question: The RFP states that "offerors shall have 20 calendar days after request by the contracting officer to submit certified cost and pricing data in accordance with FAR Part 15.4 and Table 15-2, along with a Proposal Adequacy Checklist (DFARS 252.215-7009)." Please clarify that offerors are only to provide the completed Proposal Adequacy Checklist in Section K (252.215-7009) if requested by the contracting officer--that the Proposal Adequacy Checklist provided as part of the model contract in Volume IV does not have to be completed for the initial proposal submission.

Government Response: Offerors are only to provide the completed Proposal Adequacy Checklist in Section K (DFARS 252.215-7009) if requested by the contracting officer--Proposal Adequacy Checklist does not have to be completed for the initial proposal submission.

18For Official Use Only

Submitted Questions - 2 RFP Section B,CLIN 0006. Question: RFP states . . . “After receipt of a funded task order, Contractor shall import all Government owned part attribute data into their Tool, restructure, and relink as required by this PWS. In addition to the Government owned part attribute data, the contractor shall populate the same approximate 26.5 million line items with the contractor supplied part attribute data listed in APPENDIX C.

Question/Recommendation: Does the government intend for the price of CLIN 0006 to include both importing the government owned part attributes (Appendix B data) and the researching and linking of all of the Appendix C Contractor Supplied Part Attributes data?

Government Response: The price on CLIN 0006 includes importing the government owned part attribute data (Appendix B data) and the researching and linking of all of the Appendix C contractor supplied part attribute data.

19For Official Use Only

Submitted Questions - 3

RFP Section I. Question: DFARS prescription 246.710(1)(iii) states to use Alternate II in firm-fixed-price solicitations and contracts.

Question/Recommendation: Does the Government intend to invoke Alternate II?

Government Response: DFARS prescription 246.710(1)(iii) states to use Alternate II in firm-fixed-price solicitations and contracts and DFARS 252.246-7001 Alt II is applicable to this acquisition.

20For Official Use Only

Submitted Questions - 4

Question: Section L, paragraph LG1.2 indicates "Proposals shall be addressed to the PCO and mailed to:

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

Office: AFSC/PZAAC Attention: Christina B. Jones Address: 3001 Staff Drive, Suite 1AC198C Tinker AFB OK 73145-3033

Please clarify that the name and address in section LG.1.2 is for mailing submissions since the name and address of the PCO listed in Section A is different.

Government Response: Please use the PCO named in section LG.1.2 -Christina B. Jones- for mailing submissions, Email:

Christina.Jones.1@us.af.mil, NOT the PCO listed in Section A(Linda Murphy) of RFP.

21For Official Use Only

Submitted Questions - 5

Sec. L, LG1.0.12 Question: The RFP indicates that a Title Page must be included in volume and must show the show the solicitation number, name, address, telephone number and facsimile number of the offeror…" Please clarify that the Title Page is the first page of the electronic file for each volume and the first page inside each volume for the hard copy.

Government Response: The Title Page is the first page of the electronic file for each volume and the first page inside each volume for the hard copy.

22For Official Use Only

Submitted Questions - 6

RFP Sec. L, LG1.0.14, LT1. Question: The RFP indicates that "offerors shall prepare the proposal as set forth in the Proposal Organization Table as outline below. However, the Proposal Organization table is not consistent with the proposal organizations outlined in sections LT1. Please clarify where in the Proposal Organization Table where offerors are to include LTSF1 and LTSF2 and their respective page count.

Government Response: In order to be consistent, the preferred organization on LT1 is:

23For Official Use Only

Submitted Questions – 6(Cont’d)

LT1.:

Title Page Team List Table of Contents List of Tables and Figures Glossary LTSF1 Live Demo (placeholder page only – not included on maximum page limit) LTSF2 Contractor Requirements LTSF3.1 Small Business Small Business Participation Small Business Subcontracting Plan

LTSF3.2 Documentation of Commitment

24For Official Use Only

6(Cont’d)

LT1 organization in LG1.0.14:

25For Official Use Only

Volume ITO Para Number Volume Title

Hard Copies / Disk

Copies

Page Limit

I LT1 Technical 8/1 40

LG1.0.12 Title Page (Not included in page limit) 1

LG1.0.13 Team List (Not included in page limit) 5

LG1.0.18 Table of Contents Unlimited

LG1.1.2 List of Tables and Figures Unlimited

LG1.0.19 Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms Unlimited

LTSF1 Live Demonstration- Placeholder Page(Not included in page limit) 1

LTSF2 Contractor Requirements Included on

40 page limit for LT1

LTSF3.1 Small Business Subcontracting Plan (Not included in page limit) Unlimited

LTSF3.1 Small Business Participation Plan (Not included in page limit) Unlimited

LTSF3.2 Documentation of Commitment Unlimited

Submitted Questions - 7

Section L, LG1.0.14. Question: The Proposal Organization Table indicates that Volume III Price Volume is organized into a General Information section and Volume Organization section. Please clarify what information offerors are to include in the General Information section since the requirements listed in LCP1.0 are listed included in the Volume Organization.

Government Response: Information offerors are to include in the General Information section of Volume III Price Volume is LCP1 information not included in LCP4, which would include information that would assist in evaluation of the reasonableness of proposed pricing.

26For Official Use Only

Submitted Questions - 8 Section L, LCP4, LG1.0.14. Question: The Proposal Organization

Table is not consistent with LCP4. Please clarify and that LCP4 is the correct organization for Volume III Price and update the Proposal Organization Table to be consistent with the LCP4.

Government Response: In order to be consistent LCP4 should include:

Title Page Team List Table of Contents List of Tables and Figures Glossary General Information Volume Organization

Section 1 LCP1.0.1 to LCP1.0.3 Section 2 LCP2.2.1 to LCP2.2.4 Section 3 LCP 2.2.5 to LCP 2.2.9 Section 4 Pricing Matrix LCP 3

27For Official Use Only

8(Cont’d)

Section L, LG1.0.14 to include:

28For Official Use Only

III LCP4.0 Price Volume 4/2 Unlimited

LG1.0.12 Title Page (Not included in page limit) 1

LG1.0.13 Team List (Not included in page limit) 5

LG1.0.18 Table of Contents Unlimited

LG1.1.2 List of Tables and Figures Unlimited

LG1.0.19 Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms Unlimited

LCP1.0 General Information Unlimited

LCP4.0

Volume Organization

Section 1 LCP1.0.1 to LCP1.0.3

Section 2 LCP2.2.1 to LCP2.2.4

Section 3 LCP 2.2.5 to LCP 2.2.9

Section 4 Pricing Matrix LCP 3

Unlimited

Submitted Questions - 9 Section L, LG1.0.14. Question: The Proposal Organization Table indicates that offerors are to include “Attachments to the Model Contract (except QASP).” However, the RFP is not clear on what constitutes the attachments other than excluding the QASP.

Please provide the complete list of attachments to the Model Contract that offerors need to include in this section to ensure we are compliant with this requirement….

Government Response: RFP Section J sets forth its attachments:

Appendix A –PWS, Exhibit AA – CDRLs, Attachment 1 - Wage Determination, Attachment 2 - Sample Data, Attachment 3 - Pricing Matrix, Attachment 4 - Section L, Attachment 5 - Section M. QASP is not required. In LG1.0.14 on Volume IV, Reps and Certs Section K, including 252.227-7014 RIGHTS IN

NONCOMMERCIAL COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND

NONCOMMERCIAL COMPUTER SOFTWARE DOCUMENTATION

(FEB 2014), comes after the Model Contract.

29For Official Use Only

Submitted Questions - 10

Section L. Question: Section LG1.1.3 indicates that a "cover sheet shall be bound in each book, clearly marked as to the volume number, title, copy number, and solicitation identification and the offeror's name. Please clarify that cover sheet is the cover of the binder only and is not the same as the Title Page.

Government Response: Under Section LG1.1.3, the cover sheet is the cover of the binder only and is not the same as the Title Page.

30For Official Use Only

Submitted Questions - 11

Section L, LG1.0.14. Question: Can the Government confirm that the 1 page placeholder for the Live Demonstration is not included in the 40 page limit?

Government Response: The one-page placeholder for the Live Demonstration is not included in the 40 page limit of LT1 Volume I - Technical.

31For Official Use Only

Submitted Questions - 12

Section L’s Attachment 5 “Team List”. Question: Please clarify that in addition to the information included in LG1.0.13, offerors are to complete Section L, Attachment 5 and include it as part of the Team List for Volume II Past Performance only.

Government Response: Section L's Attachment 5 shall be included as part of the Team List for Volume II Past Performance only.

32For Official Use Only

Submitted Questions - 13

Section L, LCP4, LCPP2.2. Question: The Volume Organization is not consistent with the section numbering in section LCP2.2.

Please clarify that the section numbering in LCP2.2 is the correct subparagraph numbering.

Government Response: LCP4 Section 3 is corrected to reflect the correct section numbering: Section 3 LCP 2.2.5 to LCP 2.2.9.

33For Official Use Only

Submitted Questions - 14

Section L’s Attachment 1 - Past Performance Information Sheet - Question: Item E.1 requires offerors to enter in an "Estimate at Completion." Please clarify if offerors are expected to estimate contract value at the completion?

Government Response: Section L’s Attachment 1 Past Performance Information Sheet under Item “E.1” requires the offeror to estimate contract value at completion.

34For Official Use Only

Submitted Questions - 15

Section L, LG1.0.14 and Volume IV. Question: Table identifies for the Volume IV submission of the team list (LG 1.0.13) to submit Team List, Arrangements, and/or Letters of Intent.

Question/Recommendation: Offerors are required by Section LG

1.0.13 to submit a team list in every volume, and LTSF 3.2 requires offerors to submit teaming agreements regarding commitments. Please clarify what the Arrangements, and/or Letters of Intent are that need to be submitted with this volume?

Government Response: LTSF 3.2 requires offerors to submit teaming agreements regarding SB Participation. Under LG1.0.14 Volume IV, Arrangements or Letters of Intent would include agreements on work to be performed by other firms, even if unfinalized, quotes, letters from subcontractors or suppliers on the materials or services they are available to perform, etc.

35For Official Use Only

Submitted Questions - 16

Section L, LG1.0.11, LG1.2. Question: The RFP states . . .

“Proposals and modifications to proposals shall be submitted ….addressed to the PCO at the address shown in Section A of the model contract/solicitation . . . “ PCO listed on Section A is Linda Murphy. LG1.2. Distribution ….. Proposals shall be addressed to the PCO and mailed to:

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

Office: AFSC/PZAAC Attention: Christina B. Jones ….

Who should the proposals be addressed to Linda Murphy or Christina B. Jones?

Government Response: Please use the PCO named in section LG.1.2 -Christina B. Jones- for mailing submissions, Email:

Christina.Jones.1@us.af.mil, NOT the PCO listed in Section A(Linda Murphy).

36For Official Use Only

Submitted Questions - 17

Section L, LG 1.0.16, LTSF 3.1. Question: Paragraph LG 1.0.16 states . . . “All price information shall be addressed ONLY in the Price Volume.” . . . Paragraph LTSF3.1 requires offerors to and provide the extent to which each identified SB concern will participate (expressed in both dollars and percentages of the total acquisition) and submit their small business participation plan (dollars expressed in total contract value) and a Small Business Subcontracting Plan (dollars expressed in subcontracted dollars) in Volume I - Technical . Question/Recommendation: Please clarify if the SB subcontracting plan is to include goals in both dollars and percentages of total contract value or just percentages since the SB plan is part of the Technical Volume and not the Price Volume.

Government Response: It is permissible to mention total contract price in LTSF3.1.

SB subcontracting plan is to include goals in both dollars and percentages of Small Business part of the total contract portion subcontracted, as part of the Technical Volume.

37For Official Use Only

Submitted Questions - 18

Section L, LTSF1 Live Demo. Question: The RFP States, “All live demonstrations will be conducted at Tinker AFB, OK.”Question/Recommendation: How will the contractor(s) be granted access to Tinker AFB if they don’t have a CAC?

Government Response: Contractors without a CAC will be issued a guest pass at the Tinker access office and will be escorted by a government representative to the demonstration location on base.

38For Official Use Only

Submitted Questions - 19

Section M, MTSF1. Question: Can the Government clarify that the requirement in Section 1.c to provide 100% of the part attribute data from each query is for the Appendix B Sample Data only?

Government Response: Under LTSF1, and under MTSF1 Section 1.c, contractor to provide 100% of the part attribute data from each query is for the Appendix B Sample Data only.

39For Official Use Only

Submitted Questions - 20 Section M, MTSF1 Question: Can the Government clarify whether the requirement to “Display on the computer screen all part attribute data fields listed on PWS Appendix B and Appendix C that were not included in the twelve query results” (requirement

2) includes the Appendix C data fields only, or if those data fields are to be populated with actual data? Our interpretation based on the language in the requirement is that Appendix C data attributes (contractor provided data) will be populated during the 90 day transition period and not required to be populated for the sample data set during the Live Demonstration.

Government Response: Under LTSF1 and MTSF1, on items that were not included in the twelve query results, offeror will display only all part attribute data fields listed on PWS Appendix B and Appendix C, not the actual data on the Appendix C data fields.

40For Official Use Only

Submitted Questions - 21

PWS 1.3.4. Question: The RFP states, "…Common Access Card (CAC) access as well as other secure logon methods for Tool access." Can the Government clarify in the PWS language that the other secure logon methods would be an procedure in accordance with the contractor's ATO

Government Response: Under PWS Paragraph 1.3.4, a contractor’s other secure logon methods for Tool access would include a secure logon method in accordance with contractor’s

ATO.

41For Official Use Only

Submitted Questions - 22

PWS, 6.4.2. Question: The RFP states, "The Tool shall deliver reports pre-formatted to meet government requirements for upload to D200F API." Will the Government supply the D200F

API?

Government Response: The Government will supply the contractor after award the appropriate format on D200F API under PWS Appendix A 6.4.2. The USAF will not supply the

D200F API.

42For Official Use Only

Submitted Questions - 23

PWS 6.7.1-6.7.4[]Question: The RFP states that the Tool shall capture the T.O. number date, Change Number (if applicable), and Change Number date (if applicable) from the header data in the T.O. manual. How will the tool get access to the T.O. manual?

Will this be provided with the data? (It is not with the sample data)

Government Response: The T.O. number date, Change Number (if applicable), and Change Number date (if applicable) from the header data in the T.O. manual will be available to the contractor after award once a TODO account is established by the contractor from USAF.

43For Official Use Only

Submitted Questions - 24

PWS 6.7.5. Question: The RFP states, "The Tool shall capture the Equipment Specialist (ES) code for a given T.O." Will this be provided with the data? (It is not with the sample data)

Government Response: The ES on the T.O. will be available from USAF government systems after contract award.

44For Official Use Only

Submitted Questions - 25

PWS 1.3.1.Question: Paragraph 1.3.1 states “Contractor is responsible for accessing new data systems and the following list is subject to change” but a list does not follow. Are offerors to assume this relates to Appendix D as described in the previous sentence?

Government Response: PWS Paragraph 1.3.1 where it states “Contractor is responsible for accessing new data systems and the following list is subject to change” refers to PWS Appendix D.

45For Official Use Only

“Approval“ of RFP content does not change during this pre-proposal conference. Changes shall only be approved via RFP Amendment.

Offerors’ proposal must acknowledge any RFP Amendment.

Strongly recommend interested vendors to sign up for alerts within the Federal Business Opportunities website

Proposals are due 31 July 2017, 3:00 pm Central Standard Time Point of Contact for Proposal Submission

Procuring Contracting Officer:

Christina B. Jones, AFSC/PZAAC

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

Office: AFSC/PZAAC Attention: Christina B. Jones Address: 3001 Staff Drive, Suite 1AC198C Tinker AFB OK 73145-3033 Telephone: 405-739-3455 Email: Christina.Jones.1@us.af.mil

Final Comments