Draft_RFP_Responses_to_Industry.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 60 KB Posted Mar 23, 2016

Attached to: Aircraft and Airframe Structural Components Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number: FA8106-16-R-0004
Issued by: Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center Tinker Air Force Base

About this file

From the source

Draft RFP Responses to Industry 23 MAR 2016

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Aircraft and Airframe Structural Components, newest first.
File	Type	Posted
Questions_and_Responses_to_Industry_16_Nov.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Nov 17, 2016
Questions_and_Responses_to_Industry_15_Nov.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Nov 14, 2016
Exhibit_A_T-1A_AMP_CDRLs_A001_to_A048_Amend_0003.pdf	PDF	Nov 3, 2016
Attachment_G_Consolidated_DIDs_Amend_0003.pdf	PDF	Nov 3, 2016
Attachment_C_Price_Matrix_Amend_0003.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Nov 3, 2016
Attachment_B_SRD_Amend_0003.pdf	PDF	Nov 3, 2016
Attachment_E_Section_L_Amend_0003.pdf	PDF	Nov 3, 2016
Attachment_H_T1A_SGFP.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Oct 14, 2016
Attachment_C_T1A_Price_Matrix_Amend_0002.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Oct 14, 2016
FA810616R0004_______0002.pdf	PDF	Oct 14, 2016
Attachment_G_Consolidated_DIDs.pdf	PDF	Oct 14, 2016
Attachment_F_Section_M_Amend_0002.pdf	PDF	Oct 14, 2016
Questions_and_Responses_to_Industry_14_Oct.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Oct 14, 2016
Attachment_D_SRD_Evaluation_Table_Amend_0002.pdf	PDF	Oct 14, 2016
Attachment_A_SOW_Amend_0002.pdf	PDF	Oct 14, 2016
Attachment_E_Section_L_Amend_0002.pdf	PDF	Oct 14, 2016
FA810616R0004_______0001.pdf	PDF	Oct 6, 2016
Attachment_D_SRD_Evaluation_Table.pdf	PDF	Aug 10, 2016
Attachment_A_SOW.pdf	PDF	Aug 10, 2016
FA810616R0004.pdf	PDF	Aug 10, 2016
Attachment_C_T1A_Price_Matrix.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Aug 10, 2016
Attachment_B_SRD.pdf	PDF	Aug 10, 2016
Attachment_G_Consolidated_DIDs.pdf	PDF	Aug 10, 2016
Attachment_E_Section_L.pdf	PDF	Aug 10, 2016
Attachment_F_Section_M.pdf	PDF	Aug 10, 2016
Questions_and_Responses_to_Industry.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Aug 10, 2016
ppi_tool.accdb	—	Jul 29, 2016
Attachment_A_SOW_Final_Draft_(2).pdf	PDF	Jun 30, 2016
Attachment_H_Consolidated_DIDs_Final_Draft.pdf	PDF	Jun 29, 2016
Attachment_F_Section_M_Final_Draft.pdf	PDF	Jun 29, 2016
Attachment_B_T-1A_SRD_Final_Draft.pdf	PDF	Jun 29, 2016
Attachment_A_SOW_Final_Draft.pdf	PDF	Jun 29, 2016
FA810616R0004.pdf	PDF	Jun 29, 2016
Attachment_C_T1A_Price_Matrix_Final_Draft.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Jun 29, 2016
Attachment_E_Section_L_Final_Draft.pdf	PDF	Jun 29, 2016
Attachment_E_Section_L_May_2016.pdf	PDF	Jun 15, 2016
Attachment_D_SRD_Evaluation_Table_June_2016.pdf	PDF	Jun 15, 2016
Attachment_F_Section_M_MAY_2016.pdf	PDF	Jun 15, 2016
Attachment_G_T-1A_AMP_CDRLs_A001_to_A048.pdf	PDF	Jun 15, 2016
Attachment_B_T-1A_SRD_V7.pdf	PDF	Jun 15, 2016
Attachment_H_Consolidated_DIDs.pdf	PDF	Jun 15, 2016
Copy_of_T-1A_Industry_Questions_as_of_11_May_16_(2).xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	May 20, 2016
T-1A_Industry_Site_Visit_Charts.pptx	PPTX presentation	Feb 8, 2016
Site_Visit_Info.pdf	PDF	Dec 21, 2015
SRD_Attachment_B.pdf	PDF	Dec 21, 2015
Section_L_Attachment_E.pdf	PDF	Dec 21, 2015
SOW_Attachment_A.pdf	PDF	Dec 21, 2015
CDRLs_Exhibit_1.pdf	PDF	Dec 21, 2015
FA810616R0004.pdf	PDF	Dec 21, 2015
SRD_Matrix-Attachment_D.pdf	PDF	Dec 21, 2015

Show all 50

Aircraft and Airframe Structural Components has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

MASTER

T-1A Industry Site Visit Questions 27-28 January 2016
Number	Document	Question	Answer
1	SRD	Is it intended that this STC effort go through the FAA Military office? (SRD 3.1.2)	Yes, the contractor will be expected to work with the Military Certification Office per FAA Order 8110.101.
2	SRD	The FAA STC database search indicated the STC00055MC was not valid. Correction? (SRD 3.3.4)	This was a typo in the SRD. The CSO STC number is ST00055MC.
3	SOW	Is the STC expected 12 months from contract award?	Yes. STC is expected no later than 12 months after contract award.
4	SRD	Is it assumed that this figure will be achieved/proven through analysis? (SRD 3.1.3)	Per Appendix B, this requirement will be verified by demonstration and analysis. For proposal purposes it will be accomplished through analysis. It will be demonstrated through the life of the contract.
5	SRD	Will an existing Electrical Load Analysis be provided prior to the RFP? (SRD 3.2.4.1)	It is the Government's intent to provide an Electrical Load Analysis in the bidder's library at the final RFP release.
6	SRD	What is the current data transmission type/method; parameters transmitted; parameter addresses or labels? (SRD 3.3.1)	It is the Government's intent to provide these details in the bidder's library at the final RFP release.
7	SRD	Should Wind Shear be reactive or predictive; is the Government also asking for a lightning detection system? (SRD 3.7.7.6)	This is a NON-MANDATORY requirement. The Contractor may select the option they believe best fits the solution.
8	SRD	Is it the intent that single or dual DME T/R's be installed? (SRD 3.8.3 & 3.8.12)	Reference SRD 3.8.2….modified T-1 shall provide dual VOR capability. For information, the aircraft currently has the DME-442 - a 3-channel DME. (When two separate VOR freqs are tuned, the paired DME is also provided).
9	SRD	Does the Government intend that plain test only be transmitted; will ECCM (HAVE QUICK-I/II) be required? Is so, will timing (Mickey) be required from the GPS receiver(s)? (SRD 3.9.3)	ECCM (HAVE QUICK) will NOT be required.
10	SRD	Is VHF COM SIMOPS also required? (SRD 3.9.8)	No.
11	SRD	Define narrow band for RFP? (SRD 3.9.4)	Narrow band is defined as providing a radio which can tune frequencies 25kHz increments per SRD 3.9.3.
12	SRD	Will inner/outer loop flight data from current AFCS installation be made available; will serial yaw damping be required (Take-Off/Touch-Down)? (SRD 3.10)	No, the Government does not own this data and cannot provide inner/outer loop flight data. Currently yaw dampening is disengaged for both takeoff and landings.
13	SRD	Is current “Dutch Roll” data available? (SRD 3.10.5)	No, the Government does not own this data.
14	SRD	Is NVIS goggle compatibility desired for Cockpit/Cabin/CSO lighting? (SRD 3.15.3)	NVIS goggle capability is not desired or required.
15	SRD	Is the current installation compliant? (SRD 3.18.1)	Yes, the aircraft was certified under the references specified in the SRD requirement.
16	SRD	Is LPV approach capability intended to be mandatory? (SRD 3.8.14) This is beyond the current T-1A capability, not an FAA mandate, and will add cost to the proposal.	Yes.
17	SRD	Do the currently installed G-meter, AOA indicator, and clock meet the operational requirements of this solicitation, (ie. May these be retained as is)? (SRD 3.5.1, 3.5.2, 3.12)	The contractor proposed avionics suite shall replace (at a minimum) all of the items listed in SRD Appendix E. All of the new suite LRUs/components must meet the 20-year requirement noted in SRD 3.1.1.
18	General	Will there be DCMA requirements?	Yes, the Government is working with DCMA to determine the level of support required for this effort. The final RFP will contain the necessary clauses to identify this support. See Section L and M for additional information.
19	L	Will there be options?	Yes. See Section L 1.0.2, Section M 2.5.6, and CLIN structure.
20	General	Does the T-1 use a 1553 data bus?	No, the T-1A does not use a 1553 data bus.
21	General	Does the antenna require replacement if it will work with the proposed solution?	The contractor proposed avionics suite shall replace (at a minimum) all of the items listed in SRD Appendix E. All of the new suite LRUs/components must meet the 20-year requirement noted in SRD 3.1.1.
22	General	What is the PDM cycle for the T-1?	The T-1 does not have a PDM cycle.
23	General	Are there any known weight and balance issues for the T-1?	No. On a CSO modified aircraft or when a T-1A has approximately 4 or more people on board landing CG can be a concern. The T-1 by design has a forward CG and in these instances utilizes varying amounts of "ballast fuel" left in the wing tanks to offset the moment arm of the additional personnel. Additionally with approximately 4 or more personnel on board exceeding ramp weight, max TO, and maximum landing weight can be another consideration for the pilot. For non-CSO aircraft the basic aircraft weight is usually around 10,250 lbs. The maximum zero fuel weight is 13,000. The maximum ramp weight is 16,300. The maximum takeoff weight is 16,100 and maximum landing weight is 15,700. However on 98% of our sorties, landing CG and maximum weights are not an issue. On the remaining sorties, it does not present an issue if the pilot accounts for weight and balance correctly.
24	SRD	Who owns the current Aircraft Structural Integrity software and will details of the system/software be made available prior to RFP? (SRD 3.13.3)	The aircraft program office owns the data rights to the software and documentation. It is the Government's intent to provide these details in the bidder's library at the final RFP release.
25	SOW	Can the suite come from an equivalent aircraft, same class, or any business jet in same class? (SOW 1.2)	Yes
26	General	Would a solution that replaces only a subset of the components listed in SRD Appendix E, but ensured support for the retained equipment from the OEM be compliant?	The contractor proposed avionics suite shall replace (at a minimum) all of the items listed in SRD Appendix E. All of the new suite LRUs/components must meet the 20-year requirement noted in SRD 3.1.1.
27	General	Is there a RVSM requirement? Is there a reason why we would not do it?	There is no RVSM requirement.
28	General	Are there any glare issues from the cockpit?	No
29	General	Is AETC the only command with the T-1?	Yes
30	General	Is the audio panel next to the lavoratory required to stay in the modified aircraft?	Yes
31	General	Can the FDR be replaced?	If the contractor chooses to replace the flight data recorder, SRD requirements of 3.13 shall be met.
32	General	On Guard, can you transmit on another VHF frequency?	There is no requirement to manually select 121.5 and simultaneously be able to transmit on a different VHF frequency. Additionally, there is no requirement for the pilot to be able to select 243.0 and simultaneously transmit on a different UHF frequency. However, SRD 3.9.10 specifies the minimum requirement for the UHF radio transceiver is to be able to simultaneously monitor UHF guard.
33	SRD	What level of RNP is aircraft certified for?	The aircraft currently meets the SRD 3.7.3 requirement.
34	General	What level of effort is required for removal of the avionics rack?	Approximately 14 man hours are required to depopulate and remove the avionics rack, and approximately 14 man hours to install and populate the rack plus approximately 8 man hours for operational checks.
35	General	Can you stack LRU's in avionics rack?	Yes. Provided that the requirements of SRD 3.16.2 are met.
36	SOW	Is LRIP required?	Yes. See CLIN structure and pricing matrix. LRIP quantity will be PEO/PM decision.
37	SOW	Is FDR required?	Yes, a FDR is required. If the contractor chooses to replace the flight data recorder, SRD requirements of 3.13 shall be met.
38	SRD	The FCC-4001 is on the obsolete parts list. Does this mean the autopilot must be replaced?	The contractor proposed avionics suite shall replace (at a minimum) all of the items listed in SRD Appendix E. All of the new suite LRUs/components must meet the 20-year requirement noted in SRD 3.1.1.
39	SRD	MSP-85 mode select panel is on the obsolete parts list. Is this correct?	The contractor proposed avionics suite shall replace (at a minimum) all of the items listed in SRD Appendix E. All of the new suite LRUs/components must meet the 20-year requirement noted in SRD 3.1.1.
40	SRD	SVO-85B, servo in autopilot, is on the obsolete parts list. Is this correct?	SVO-85 is no longer listed in SRD Appendix E.
41	SRD	Is the GDL-90 installed in the CSO aircraft an independent system?	Yes, the GDL-90 is only used in the CSO training system. It does not connect with the cockpit avionics.
42	SRD	Why is the Flight Data Recorder not a requirement?	During research, the flight data recorder was not identified as a obsolete part. If the contractor chooses to replace the flight data recorded, SRD requirements 3.13 shall be met.
43	SRD	How many waypoints are required for storage in the FMS?	According to SRD requirement 3.7.3.6, the FMS shall store a minimum of 100 pilot generated waypoints.
44	General	The AMP effort will not meet the FAA ADS-B out requirement by January 2020. T1. What is Government's plan/strategy?	The Government is aware of the FAA ADS-B out requirement. Plans to keep the aircraft not modified by January 2020 compliant is being worked as a separate effort.
45	General	Is it the Government's responsibility for any corrosion/cracks found before the modification?	Any known discrepancies will be noted before the aircraft is delivered to the contractor facility. During installation, if damage is found not related to the AMP effort, then the Over and Above process may be used.
46	SIM	Does the 20 year requirement for the aircraft also pertain to the simulators?	Yes, as it pertains to any installed aircraft parts and their integration. Equipment installed in the OFT & PTT cannot have any known obsolescence issues.
47	SIM	Is the courseware requirement part of the Draft RFP (PTT)?	The Government will create the courseware based upon contractor deliverables. Reference Section 11 of SOW.
48	SIM	Will USAF provide PTT scenario book to Contractor?	Not all; however, a sample lesson will be posted in the bidders library.
49	SIM	Clarify software transition for simulator (OFT & PTT), and aircraft.	Currently there is no software transfer from the aircraft to the OFT and PTT. (i.e. no Operational Flight Program (OFP)).
50	SIM	Are the Simulators networked together?	The OFTs at one base are networked and cannot see OFTs at other bases. The OFTs are not connected to the Internet or NIPRnet. PTTs are stand alone and not networked together.
51	SIM	Does the PTT software change or remain the same?	Changes to the software may be required depending on the solution proposed. The requirement is for the simulators to reflect the new avionics suite. Per SRD, the modified simulator shall retain the current aero and engine models.
52	SIM	Who owns information on PTT?	The Government owns the PTT. Any technical data which can be released will be provided in the bidder's library.
53	SIM	How many hours per day are Simulators used?	Currently the simulators operate on a 16-hour window.
54	SIM	Will OFT simulator code be provided as Government Furnished Information?	All releasable simulator source code will be provided to the contractor selected to perform the modification. The bidder's library will contain system diagrams, drawings, and descriptions to assist during proposal development. A list of software and software licenses will be provided.
55	SIM	Will OFT simulator drawings be provided as Government Furnished Information?	It is the Government's intent to provide these details in the bidder's library at the final RFP release.
56	SIM	Is the hardware in the CSO OFT the same as the aircraft?	All hardware in the CSO aircraft is identical to the CSO OFT except the comm panel.
57	SIM	Does the OFT CSO push threats to the cockpit instruments?	Yes, the live OFT TCAS modification has allowed the CSO instructor laptops to display aircraft on the OFT visual systems and MFD. The CSO equipment installed on the aircraft do not push any information.
58	SIM	Is there a debrief station for the OFT?	Yes, the current OFT has the capability to remove a hard drive from the OFT and review the simulated flight using viewing software.
59	SIM	Will the AMP contractor be responsible for hardware and software in the OFT?	Yes, the AMP contractor will be responsible for modification of the necessary hardware and software in the OFT.
60	SIM	Do you want software the same so the training syllabus doesn't have to change?	The Government will create the courseware based upon contractor deliverables. Reference Section 11 of SOW.
61	SIM	Is there a flight model in the PTT?	There is a basic flight and engine model on the PTT. The throttles and the A/P allow the PTT to "fly" a flight plan that is programmed in the FMS, or just to fly a basic heading/course intercept to include instrument approaches.
62	SIM	Is the FMS in the OFT and PTT synthetic?	Yes. Details will be provided in the OFT and PTT drawings in the bidder's library.
63	SIM	Is there a parts list of what is real vs. synthesized in the OFT?	A list will be provided. Very few items in the OFT are still aircraft parts. A majority of the equipment is synthesized.
64	SIM	What software language are the different modules in the OFT written?	Host ADA, IOS developed in QT and C, Sim OS in Redhat, Control Loading Linux and C, Avionics displays in GL Studio and C. Engines in C, Audio is Symphonics V+. Auto Fidelity Tests in ADA. DATIFF inputs. Approach and Departure plates scalable pdf file to the IOS. This information will be included in the bidder's library.
65	SIM	Is the software on the IOC a L-3 Link product?	A list of software will be provided in the bidder's library.
66	SIM	How periodic are the software updates in the OFT?	It varies by training need. However NAVAIDs and approach plates are monthly. Average baseline updates are three times a year.
67	SIM	What is the interface from the airport environment computers to the OFT simulators?	The enviroment such as weather, wind, clouds, day , night ,etc. are selected at the IOS. A complete list is found in the Operators Manual which will be available in the bidder's library.
68	SIM	Will the successful Offeror be able to look at the PTT after contract award?	Yes
69	SIM	Is the IOS in the PTT the same as the OFT?	The software in the PTT is a subset of what is run in the OFT. It does not contain all of the functions.
70	SIM	Does the OFT have two levels of visual system (regular vs. hi-def)?	Yes, the resolution is 1 meter resolution around the Main Operation Bases (MOB)s and 15 meters elsewhere.
71	SIM	Interface from SIM to interactive airport environment, do you replace or maintain?	The interface shall be maintained. An interface document will be provided in the bidder's library.
72	SIM	Will network connectivity need to be maintained between a modified and unmodified OFT?	Yes. See SRD 4.1.4.
73	SIM	Is it mandatory for students to spend time at the PTT?	Yes
74	SIM	Who performed the latest PTT modifications?	L-3 Link Simulation and Training
75	SIM	Do we have a list of faults for IOC?	A malfunction list will be provided in the bidder's library.
76	SIM	How do you get an ACA with the simulator CLS contractor when we don’t know who the contractor will be?	The SOW will be updated to include language regarding ACA requirements.
77	SIM	What type of data rights do we have for the OFT? Can we leverage GP data rights?	The Government will provide all information allowed, to include a list of software licenses and rights in the bidder's library.
78	SIM	Is there a certification requirement for the simulators?	No. The simulators do not require certification, however Qualification Test and Operational Test requirements must be met. SOW 6.4.1.
79	SIM	Must a PTT/OFT solution use DAFIF?	Per SRD 4.1.20, the simulator shall continue to use DAFIF or equivalent database (SRD to be updated).
80	SRD	What is the current CSO intercom system; will wiring diagrams be provided prior to the RFP? (SRD 3.3.3)	It is the Government's intent to provide these details in the bidder's library at the Formal RFP release.
81	SRD	Can the current intercom of the CSO jet be touched?	According to SRD requirement 3.3.3, the aircraft CSO Inter Communication System (ICS) capability shall be retained. Movement of the panel is allowed.
82	General	SOW 4.4.1 appears to require that at least 50% of labor be subcontracted instead of requiring that at least 50% of labor be performed by the prime contractor as specified in the referenced FAR clause (FAR 52.219-14). Perhaps it should say, “At least 50 percent of the cost of the contract performance incurred for personnel (services) shall be expended for employees of the contractor.”	The SOW 4.4.1 has been updated to reflect the proper terminology.
83	General	The SOW references RTCA DO-178C and the preference to use COTS equipment. It also references Software Assurance Countermeasures Planning, Cybersecurity Planning, and Source Configuration of Commercial Software. Paragraph 4.7 states that some of these requirements may be non-applicable. Request that the Government review these requirements and provide additional guidance for software that is FAA approved (TSO or PMA) and developed under DO-178C or other commercial distribution standards.	The Government will review this section and provide guidance in the Formal RFP.
84	SIM	A model of the cockpit is used to repeat instrument settings at the IOS of the OFT. What format is the model in and will we have access to the source files for that model?	Yes, the source code is in ADA which is non-proprietary, with hooks for GLStudio (DisTi). These are called the cockpit repeater images, designed by L-3.
85	General	The SRD states in Section 1.3 "the AMP approach is to address obsolescence by replacing the avionics suite in its entirety". Please clarify what is meant by "in its entirety".	The Government has reviewed and updated the SRD.
86	L	The ITO indicates that the technical volume is to contain both the SRD matrix (18 pages in the template) and the FAA Certification Plan (a minimum of 20 pages – the FAA Certification Plan on CSO was around 25 pages). That results in only about 60 pages for the bulk of the technical volume. Is there a chance that you could make the SRD matrix or the FAA Certification Plan (or both) an attachment to the proposal and free up those pages for the remainder of material?	Matrix reference changed to Table. Additionally, page limit was increased to 125.
87	General	What is a small business? What does 51% of the work mean (dollars, hours,…)?	A small business for this acquisition is classified as a company that meets the size standards per the applicable NAICS code 336411. Further, a small business must self certify IAW FAR 52.219-28.
88	General	Can you clarify the 8210 requirement? (Noted, many small businesses can't comply)?	This requirement is exempt from the Ground and Flight Risk clause IAW DFARS 228.370(iv). As such, compliance with DCMA 8210 is not required. An addendum will be included in the RFP.
89	SIM	Do the OFT and PTT utilize the same software or the same software base?	The software in the PTT is a subset of what is run in the OFT. It does not contain all of the functions.
90	General	Which CMMI level is required or is it acceptable for small business to utilize another form of configuration management?	The Government has reviewed and updated the SOW Section 9.
91	SRD	Were requirements 4.1.23 and 4.1.25 omitted from the matrix on purpose? OFT/PTT	Yes.
92	SRD	How does a student "select" a scripted mission? SRD 4.2.6	Students can initialize the PTT either in air or on the ground. Scripted missions are provided by AETC on printed material.
93	SRD	Please clarify, this reads as components not meeting this requirement (fire resistant) can only be used when in the aircraft configuration? SRD 4.1.25	The Government has reviewed and updated the SRD.
94	SRD	Will the contractor be required to have an ACA (Associate Contractor Agreements) with Stevens Aviation or Camber if contractor does not need support from either of these companies? If Yes, does the Govt see this as a potential conflict of interest due to potential Stevens Aviation and Camber teaming toward pursuing this award? SRD Sec 3.3	The Government does not intend to require an offeror to have an ACA with Stevens Aviation or Camber. If an offeror's proposed technical solution involves getting an ACA with these two companies, then it is the offeror's voluntary choice.
95	SRD	Will bidders library contain the wiring diagrams for the CSO modification to include interface to the existing avionics systems and audio system? SRD Sec 3.3	Yes. The bidder's library will contain these items.
96	SRD	Does the USAF have Government Purpose Rights to Arinc 429 Data Dictionary for the received CSO Station data from the existing avionics suite? If yes, will this be provided to contractor? SRD Sec 3.3	The parameters sent to the CSO training system over the ARINC 429 is documented in an Interface Design Document and will be provided in the bidder's library.
97	General	Since this is a rated order DO-1A under 15 CFR 350, will the government require Stevens to provide the STC complete data package to the successful contractor?	There is no 15 CFR 350. The intent is for Stevens to remain the applicant of the CSO STC ST00055MC.
98	SRD	P/N 76621-4 Pitch Trim Controller & 132-384029-1 Soft Start Module are related to airframe hardware (Non COTS / Proprietary to Airframe Manufacturer) and not part of the current Avionics Suite. Since the AMP is addressing primarily COTS avionics suite replacement, can these parts be removed from the requirement to replace? SRD Appendix E	The contractor proposed avionics suite shall replace (at a minimum) all of the items listed in SRD Appendix E. All of the new suite LRUs/components must meet the 20-year requirement noted in SRD 3.1.1.
99	SRD	Would the mounting of one each LRU associated with engine indication (analog to digital converter) in a rack assembly behind the respective Pilot and Copilot Primary Flight Display PFD be acceptable if this is the intended avionics manufacturer design and can be accessed by removing 4 fasteners for the PFD? SRD 3.16.1	No, it does not meet requirement 3.16.1.
100	SRD	Does this mean the TCAS-II system must accept ADS-B IN Traffic information and provide this as a combined (active interrogation and ADS-B IN Traffic) presentation on the new cockpit displays. SRD 3.7.6.2	The government has reviewed and updated the SRD.
101	SRD	Will the CSFDR wiring interface be part of the bidders library? SRD 3.13.1	The wiring diagram of the entire system will be provided in the bidder's library.
102	SRD	Will the CSFDR recorder parameters and freq of capture be part of the bidders library? SRD 3.13.1	Yes, the parameters captured and the frequency of sampling will be provided in the bidder's library.
103	SRD	Will an aircraft flight manual be present in the bidders library which will show a current T-1A SUPT and CSO aircraft weight and balance? SRD 3.2.5	Yes, the flight manual will be avaliable in the bidder's library which contains the worksheet to be filled out. Each aircraft has a different weight and balance. Refer to answer on question 23 for description of weight and balance for the T-1A.
104	SRD	Requirements for non proprietary architecture and COTS solutions appear to be in contradiction with one another in Government procurement language. Commercial Off the Shelf and CaNDi products/services are used to simplify procurement processes but are not exposed to Government Purpose Rights (GPR) since COTS solutions are developed outside of a contract vehicle. If proprietary items are required as GPR, what assurance can the Govt provide for protecting proprietary items such as source code, particularly when CLS providers may be potential competitors within the industry? SRD 3.2.1 and 3.2.2	The government has reviewed and updated the SRD.
105	SRD	A modified OFT shall still be able to operate with legacy OFT simulators in networked exercises. SRD 4.1.4. Do current OFT networks support WAN or LAN capability?	Yes to LAN, no WAN.
106	SRD	A modified OFT shall still be able to operate with legacy OFT simulators in networked exercises. SRD 4.1.4. Will current network capabilities, architecture, and interface be provided in the Bidder’s Library so we can estimate the scope of work required for continued support of legacy OFTs with modified OFTs?	A Software Design Description will be provided.
107	SRD	The modified OFT as a minimum shall retain current capabilities of the Instructor Operating Station (IOS). – Regardless of avionics solution platform, it is likely many normal, abnormal, and emergency/failure modes and functions will change along with the Circuit Breakers for the avionics suite. SRD 4.1.5. We wish to clarify if any of the IOS functions relating to the current solution still need to be maintained/retained as stated, or with the modification if those features no longer required (as part of the legacy avionics) can be discarded?	Normal, abnormal, and emergency/failure modes and functions should reflect the proposed avionics solution. Any legacy information that is no longer applicable can be discarded
108	SRD	The modified OFT shall retain the current aero and engine models. SRD 4.1.11. Any new autopilot will require development in both control loading and host, will source code for host be provided?	Yes, ADA code is non-proprietary.
109	SRD	The modified OFT shall retain the current aero and engine models. SRD 4.1.11. A new avionics modification may result in a lighter empty weight and new CG. If there is significant weight or CG change, will adjusting the aero model be considered in scope, or will this be considered Over and Above (O&A), or require a contract modification?	It is to be considered in the scope.
110	SRD	References to AC120-40B. SRD 4.1.14 and 4.1.15. How are specified tolerances for the OFTs tested, is a QTG required?	The Auto Fidelity Tests (AFTs) have build in tolerences, with graphs printed out for each device before teardown. Also the Acceptance Test Procedures will be made available and have tolerences spelled out for each test. A SIMCERT manual also calls out for pilot exercising the simulator for correct function or "freeplay". SIMCERT also checks for overall sim appearance, dents, dings, wear and tear, screem blemishes, etc.
111	SRD	References to AC120-40B. SRD 4.1.14 and 4.1.15. How come 120-40B was used when the OFTs are not FFS? Why not use 120-45 which provided guidance on fixed-base, flight training devices (FTDs)? The concern is that some tolerances for FFS are not applicable to a non-FFS and the added burden may be an unnecessary cost factor for the USG.	Changed SRD from AC120-40B to AC120-45.
112	SRD	ACCS shall work in single and network configurations. SRD 4.1.18. Is this for the CSO OFTs only?	All OFT devices perform the same while the CSO is in off mode. When CSO is mode turned on, then threats also get passed over the network.
113	SRD	ACCS shall work in single and network configurations. SRD 4.1.18. Is this accomplished via a LAN system?	Yes, LAN system.
114	SRD	ACCS shall work in single and network configurations. SRD 4.1.18. Will the existing ICD be provided?	Yes, the ACCS ICD will be provided for the Bidders Library.
115	SRD	The modified OFT shall be initially programmed with a Continental US (CONUS) Digital Aeronautical Flight Information File (DAFIF) current on the date of issue of this contract. – Current avionics solution platforms extract data from the Jeppesen database as the NGA ceased to provide public access to the DAFIF database in 2006. SRD 4.1.19. Will standard COTS Jeppesen databases be acceptable or will USG provide an agreement with the NGA to provide DAFIF information? Utilizing the Jeppesen format would be more in-line with commercial avionics solutions and would also allow better facilitation to maintain concurrency of information on databases available to the aircraft, OFTs, and PTTs.	See updated SRD in bidder's library.
116	SRD	As with the previous question regarding DAFIF versus Jeppesen airport database information, utilizing a Jeppesen format would then allow the USG/CLS provider to update the database in a similar and non-proprietary fashion as the aircraft and would make this requirement less costly to be realized. SRD 4.1.20.	See updated SRD in bidder's library.
117	SRD	The PTT shall have the same tactile feel as the aircraft. – It is clear the current PTT does not replicate tactical feel throughout the entire cockpit or many of the avionics sub-systems and components. What is the scope of tactile feel? SRD 4.2.3. Will a list of training tasks currently performed on the PTT be provided in the Bidder’s Library?	PTT functionality will be included in the Bidder's library.
118	SIM	What are the existing operating systems of the OFT and PTT?	Same as the OFT.
119	SIM	What are the testing/acceptance requirements for the OFTs and PTTs – DCMA approval via ATP, FAA QTG?	PTT, same as OFT. Engineering Design Reviews, preliminary ATPs, run ATPS with Discrepancy Reports (DRs) maintained my the contractor. Pilots SMEs provide feedback with WP engineer.
120	SIM	There are concerns that systems within the OFT will either become obsolete or extremely costly to the USG to maintain system functionality until 2035. These are systems beyond the areas affected by a potential avionics modernization program but will impact the overall sustainability and life-cycle costs of the OFTs. There is also concern that software of this vintage may also be impossible to support until 2035 due to technology advancement. Would the Government consider additional modification to the OFTs in order to enable support/sustainability until 2035, reduce life-cycle costs and mitigate obsolescence to be within the scope of the requirements as currently outlined and defined?	20 year requirement only pertains to any installed aircraft parts and their integration. Equipment installed in the OFT & PTT cannot have any known obsolescence issues.
121	SRD	The T-1A aircraft shall maintain FAA certification following the AMP modification effort (MANDATORY). SRD 3.1.2. It is our understanding that the T-1A is not currently FAA certified. Beechcraft certified the model 400T. Is the intent of this that the 400T certification would be updated?	The aircraft is still type certified with the FAA under TC number A16SW. This modification will require this certification be maintained through updating the type certification or supplemental type certification.
122	SRD	The avionics suite shall use non-proprietary architecture and interfaces (MANDATORY). SRD 3.2.1. Is it acceptable for connections between LRUs that constitute the AMP modification to use proprietary interfaces for LRU to LRU connections, provided that all required interfaces with 3rd party LRUs are non-proprietary?	The government has reviewed and updated the SRD.
123	SRD	The accelerometer display shall be readable from the pilot, copilot, and jump seat positions (MANDATORY). SRD 3.5.1.5. Does the existing sensor/display provide this capability as currently installed, and if so it is acceptable to leave the sensor as-is?	Yes, the instrument can be seen from all three positions. The contractor proposed avionics suite shall replace (at a minimum) all of the items listed in SRD Appendix E. All of the new suite LRUs/components must meet the 20-year requirement noted in SRD 3.1.1.
124	SRD	The modified T-1A aircraft shall provide an AOA instrument display that compares the relative wind to the chord line of the wing (MANDATORY). SRD 3.5.2.1. What is the existing AOA sensor? Can it be retained?	There are several components in the AOA system which are described in the 1T-1A-2-27GS-00-1 and a parts listed provided in 1T-1A-4-27. Both of these manuals will be included in the bidder's library. The contractor proposed avionics suite shall replace (at a minimum) all of the items listed in SRD Appendix E. All of the new suite LRUs/components must meet the 20-year requirement noted in SRD 3.1.1.
125	SRD	The modified T-1A aircraft shall provide for rendezvous using Air-to-Air TACAN (MANDATORY). SRD 3.7.2.1. Can the ICD for the existing TACAN be made available in the Bidder's Library?	A description of the system, a list of parts, and a wiring diagram will be provided in the bidder's library.
126	SRD	TCAS II shall be ADS-B compatible (MANDATORY). SRD 3.7.6.2. Can further explanation on this requirement be provided? ADS-B compatibility is typically a separate and independent function from TCAS II functionality.	The government has reviewed and updated the SRD.
127	SRD	The modified T-1A aircraft shall have an ICS with a minimum of one VHF communication, one UHF communication, and two VHF navigation radios (MANDATORY). SRD 3.9.1. Can the ICD for the existing UHF be made available in the Bidder's Library? Is it acceptable if the proposed installation includes two VHF comms instead of one?	A description of the system, a list of parts, and a wiring diagram will be provided in the bidder's library. According to the requirement, it would be acceptable to have more than one VHF comm.
128	SRD	The UHF communication radios shall provide at minimum tuning frequencies from 225 – 399.975 MHz in 25kHz increments (MANDATORY). SRD 3.9.3. Does the existing UHF comm provide this capability?	Yes
129	SRD	Communications and navigation receiver volume levels shall be separately adjustable at each crew position (MANDATORY). SRD 3.9.13. Does "each crew position" mean pilot/co-pilot only, or does it include the observer position as well? If it does include the observer position, can the existing control panel be retained? Can the ICD for the existing control panel at the observer position be made available in the Bidder's Library?	Current crew positions for the SUPT aircraft are pilot, co-pilot, observer, and avoinics rack. Current crew positions for a CSO aircraft are pilot, co-pilot, observer, student 2, and instructor 2 positions. The requirement is to meet all of these positions.

The contractor must determine what systems will be retained and which ones will be replaced. Any items installed are required to meet all requirements in the SRD.

A description of the system, a list of parts, and a wiring diagram will be provided in the bidder's library.

130	SRD	The modified T-1A aircraft shall provide for crew members in the pilot, copilot, and jump seat positions to silence all extraneous radio signals allowing communications among themselves via headset and microphone (MANDATORY). SRD 3.9.21. What is the design criticality level of this function?	The Government has not assessed a design criticality to this requirement. It is included in the SRD and shall be included in the proposed avionics suite.
131	SRD	The modified T-1A aircraft shall provide a settable 24-hour digital clock, readable at night, with continuous time display to include hour, minutes, and seconds at the pilot and co-pilot positions (MANDATORY). SRD 3.12.1. Is it acceptable to retain existing clock? What are the requirements for being "settable"? Must it be able to be set to any time, or is the choice between setting the clock with different time formats acceptable?	The contractor must determine what systems will be retained and which ones will be replaced. Any items replaced are required to meet all requirements in the SRD.

The government has updated the SRD with a definition of "settable".

	132	SRD	For LRUs installed as part of the T-1A AMP, removal of a failed LRU shall not require removal of any other LRU (MANDATORY). SRD 3.16.1. Can this requirement be modified to instead specify a maximum number of minutes for removal of an LRU? There are potentially advantageous installation considerations if the requirement allows for removal of an LRU to get to another LRU.	The Government has reviewed the request and still requires the original requirement as stated.
	133	SRD	The avionics installed as part of the T-1A AMP effort shall provide for ground operations through takeoff in an outside ambient temperature range from -40 degrees Fahrenheit at sea level to +130 degrees Fahrenheit at sea level, including corresponding internal temperatures (MANDATORY). SRD 3.17.1. Is there data on the corresponding internal temperatures that can be provided? What is the expected duration that the avionics would need to operate at these extreme temperatures?	Updated the SOW to ensure "The Contractor shall be responsible for all tests and studies required to meet SRD requirememts".
	134	SRD	All modified T-1A aircraft environment, safety, and occupational health hazard risks shall be mitigated to the Acceptable level in accordance with current Radio Technical Commissions for Aeronautics / Document Number (RTCA/DO)-160 (MANDATORY). SRD 3.17.8. Are zonal DO-160 requirements available for the program?	No zonal requirements have been defined for this effort.
	135	SOW	Various references throughout the SOW to DO-178C. The SOW requires DO-178C rather than DO-178B. FAA AC 20-115C states that Applicants who have used DO-178B in the past may still be able to use the same means of compliance for certification projects, and gives guidance for determining if DO-178B is acceptable for previously approved appliances and their derivatives. Is it acceptable products to be certified under DO-178B as allowed by AC 20-115C?	The Government has reviewed and updated the SOW.
	136	SOW	SOW. Applicable Documents. Are the listed documents provided for reference only, or is the intent that all documents listed in Section 2 and subsequent subsections must be followed in their entirety? In many cases, COTS avionics products do not follow the MIL processes listed in the tables of Section 2.	Applicable documents are for reference and to be followed as applicable.
	137	SOW	COTS vs Military Development. Many of the requirements in Section 9 and throughout the document are consistent with software exclusively developed for an Air Force program rather than software developed for COTS avionics. SOW. Is it possible to add language that the software and hardware used in AMP either be developed per the requirements in the SOW or alternatively per FAA and commercially approved processes?	SOW has been updated to provide clarity and eliminate confusion between COTS vs Military Development
	138	SOW	All T-1A AMP developed software shall use a structured programming language and open-system approach as defined by the Open System Joint Task Force and consistent with existing Air Force guidance. SOW Section 9. Can this requirement be amended to include an alternative that allows for FAA and commercially approved processes?	Updated to include "simulator".
	139	SOW	All technical data and training device software related to this program will be IAW 10 USC § 2320 (a)(2)(A)(C)(iii) and will be marked IAW DoDI 5230.24 as Distribution “D”, Government purpose rights, which will allow the Government to use all data related to this modification for sustainment and future training as necessary with no additional cost. This includes, but not limited to, TO, training material, OFT and PTT software, installation drawings, and STC. SOW 3.3. Can a more definitive definition of "technical data" be provided? For example, does "technical data" include source code for software, or only the completed software product?	SOW 6.11 has been updated to define technical data.
	140	SOW	The Contractor shall utilize its Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) certified Technical Consistent Process (TCP) to develop the T-1A avionics suite and simulators. SOW Section 9. Suggest modifying this language to state "The Contractor shall utilize its Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) certified Technical Consistent Process (TCP) or equivalent FAA and commercially approved processes to develop the T-1A avionics suite and simulators."	The government has reviewed and updated the SOW.
	141	SRD	Appendix E of the Draft SRD lists the parts that have been marked for obsolescence. Can USAF provide a full avionics parts list? It would be helpful to know the models of the existing FDR, UHF control, TACAN, etc.	A parts list will be provided in the bidder's library.
	142	General	Can USAF provide technical data from Stevens Aviation for the CSO STC to possibly include a Wiring Diagram/System Schematic, Instructions for Continued Airworthiness, Maintenance Manual Supplement, Parts List, etc.? It was indicated at Industry Day this would be the selected contractor’s responsibility. It seems that the USAF may already have this information.	Information on the CSO installation will be in technical manuals provided in the bidder's library.
	143	General	Can a contractor offer new ICS components for the CSO aircraft? USAF would like to keep the existing ICS configuration, however would USAF be open to new components that have the same functionality?	SPO added the word "Capability" to 3.3.3 along with the addition of a 3.9.28 to highlight the aditional CSO ICS capability. This will allow Industry the option to explore different solutions, they can choose to use the current equipment...or not.
	144	SOW	In regards to Draft SOW Section 4.2, it is implied that the contractor must be compliant to AS9100C. Would USAF consider changing this to the contractor having AS9100C Certification?	The Government does not intend to change the wording in the SOW.
	145	SOW	In regards to Draft SOW Section 6.8, contractors must apply for Equipment Frequency Allocation. In past experience, this can be a lengthy process. Since the modification must be certified within 12 months, can this be scheduled concurrently with the FAA certification process?	Yes. This can be concurrent with the FAA certification process.
	146	SOW	In regards to Draft SOW Section 7.2, it stipulates that the contractor will store all removed items and that USAF will determine disposition at a later date. Can contractors quote trade-in credit for the removed equipment as a part of their proposal?	No.
	147	M	In regards to Draft Section M, can USAF elaborate further on the trade-offs between proposal components in regards to the basis for contract award? Will there be a weighted average assigned to each component and will USAF explain this in detail?	No, there will not be a weighted average assigned to each component. Explanation is included in 2.1.2.
	148	RFP	Solicitiation Part I – The Schedule, Section B Supplies or Services and Prices/Costs, j.) and Aircraft Performance-Based Payment Schedule Table, pg. 5 of 119:
Comment/Questions: Subparagraph j.) identifies the basic period progress payment schedules for aircraft and simulator work. What is the payment schedule for the remaining 20% in each area? What are the payment terms for subsequent CLINs?	Performance Based payments will be made IAW FAR Part 32. The final payment for the CLIN will made upon inspection/acceptance by the Government. All remaining CLINs will be paid upon acceptance by the Government.
	149	RFP	Solicitation Part I – The Schedule, Section B Supplies or Services and Prices/Costs, Travel, Item No. 0006, pg. 12 of 119:
Comment/Question: Item 0006 (and the associated Option Items) state that travel is FFP for unanticipated Government-directed travel only. How will the cost for each event be negotiated after award?	The Government will request a quote for travel when the definitive requirement arises. At that time, it will be negotiated and a modifciation completed.
	150	RFP	Solicitation Part I – The Schedule, Section B Supplies or Services and Prices/Costs, Over and Above, Item No. 0007, pg. 12 of 119 and SOW Paragraph 12.1:
Comment/Question: Item 0007 O&A states that O&A is defined as events not considered during the original proposal as well as any pre-existing damage to an aircraft before it enters the contractor’s facility for modification. SOW Paragraph 12.1 states that the Contractor shall be responsible to complete scheduled maintenance and meet all Government maintenance/upkeep requirements in order to maintain aircraft airworthiness and certification throughout the modification when directed by the PCO, and that the Contractor shall have the capability to repair any damage identified during the modification process not directly related to the AMP effort when directed by the PCO. Neither the RFP nor the SOW addresses unscheduled maintenance, such as engine repairs or system malfunctions associated with unmodified portions of the aircraft. How will costs associated with unscheduled maintenance be reimbursed to the contractor?	Unscheduled Maintenance discovered during the AMP modification will be handled as Over and Above. In the event a failure unrelated to the AMP modification occurs, the Government will send a Contract Field Team for resolution.
	151	RFP	Solicitation Option CLINS: Initial Spares
Question: Are Initial Spares for each Option considered stand-alone for that option, or should spares be calculated for each option considering existing spares delivered under previous options?	Initial Spares (B-Kits) shall be priced IAW estimates in the pricing matrix of Section M. However, execution will be driven by program delivery schedule.
	152	RFP	Solicitation Option CLINS: Quantities
Question: Will all Option quantities be defined and Options exercised upon the completion of the FAA certification and successful OT&E (as stated in the Draft RFP), or will the quantities be defined and the Options awarded year by year?	Please see Schedule B-CLIN Description of the RFP.
	153	RFP	Part IV Representations and Instructions, Section L Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors or Respondents: See Section J for Instructions to Offerors and See Section J for evaluation factors for award
Questions: Is the reference to Section J correct here? Or should it reference Sections L and M (respectively) of the ITO?	Corrected in contract
	154	RFP	Attachment C Price Matrix and Part I – The Schedule, Section B Supplies or Services and Prices/Costs, l.)
Comment/Request for Clarification: The Price Matrix provides for entry of all CLINs for all years, and Part I – Schedule, Section B Supplies or Services and Prices/Costs, Paragraph l.) states that CLINs starting with 0 are in the Basic Period; however, the Price Matrix has entries for all years. Please clarify which years should be utilized by the contractor for pricing information in Attachment C Price Matrix for each CLIN.	Price Matrix and Section M have been updated to correct this issue.
	155	L	Section L, 1.1.2: Award will be made on the basis of “best value” utilizing tradeoff source selection procedures. If used, the tradeoff will be between technical risk, past performance, and price among those Offerors who have been determined technically acceptable.

and Section M, 1.1 Basis for Contract Award: This acquisition will utilize Tradeoff Source Selection procedures, with technical proposals, to make an integrated assessment for a best value award decision. Tradeoffs will be made only between past performance, technical risk, and price among those Offerors who have been determined technically acceptable. Award will be made to the Offeror who is deemed responsible in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 9, as supplemented, whose proposal conforms to the solicitation’s requirements (to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by Section L of this solicitation) and is judged, based on the evaluation factors, to represent the best value to the Government.

Question/Comment: If the tradeoff cited in this paragraph is not used, what tradeoff will be used to determine best value? Section M does not include the “if used” language in the tradeoffs discussion.	Corrected in Section L 1.1.2 to remove "if used".
	156	L	Section L, 1.4: All or parts of the Contractor’s Technical Proposal may be added to the contract. Should there be any discrepancies between the Technical Proposal and the Statement of Work (SOW), the SOW will take precedence.
Question: How and when will the Contractor be notified about what parts of the final Technical Proposal will be included versus excluded prior to final contract negotiations?	During the award process, the successful Offeror will have an opportunity to review the Governments determination of what will be included in the contract.
	157	L	Section L, 2.2 Organization/Number of Copies/ Page Limits, Table 2.1 and 2.2.4 File Names: Offerors shall submit volumes with the following file names: Volume 1 – Technical.doc, Volume II – PastPerf.doc, Volume III –Price.doc, and Volume IV – Contract.doc.and 2.5 Electronic Offers The Offeror shall submit volumes I through V in electronic format.
Comment/Request for Clarification: Paragraph 2.2, Table 2.1, lists volumes I through IV, and Paragraph 2.2.4 specifies file names for volumes I through IV. However, Paragraph 2.5 refers to volumes I through V. Please clarify if this proposal includes four or five volumes.	Corrected in Section L. Proposal includes 4 volumes.
	158	L	Section L, 2.2 Organization/Number of Copies/Page Limits
Comment/Question: The Technical Volume is limited to 100 pages with a mandated 12-point Arial font, which allows fewer words per page. Will the Government consider a higher page limit for the Technical Volume, i.e., 150 pages? And/or will the Government consider changing the font size to 10-point Arial or 12-point Times New Roman?	Page limit has been increased to 125. Font size remains the same.
	159	L	Section L, 2.2.8 Requirements Correlation Matrix (with Table 2.2) and Table 2.1 Proposal Organization:

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Nov 14, 2017.