Appendix-E-QASP.doc

DOC document 98 KB Posted

Attached to
E-4B Contract Logistic Support Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA8106-15-R-0003
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center Tinker Air Force Base

About this file

Solicitation Appendix E QASP Appendix C is reserved

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to E-4B Contract Logistic Support, newest first.
File Type Posted
Appendix-A-PWS.docx DOCX document
Appendix-C-SecurityClassification.pdf PDF
Attachment-2-WageDetermination.pdf PDF
Attachment-1-ApplicableMatrix.xls XLS spreadsheet
FA810615R0003.pdf PDF
Letter_RFP.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP)

E-4B Contractor Logistics Support (CLS) (PR number TBD) (27 Jan 15)

Air Force Life Cycle Management Center (AFLCMC)

AFLCMC/WLVSA

Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma

1. Objective: The subject contract is for E-4B Contractor Logistics Support of the E-4B National Airborne Operation Center (NAOC). This requirement is to provide Program Management, Aircraft Depot Maintenance, Supply Chain Management, Field Service Representatives (FSRs), and Engine Maintenance and Overhauls. The Contractor shall provide all labor, materials, tools, equipment, parts, transportation, etc. required to fulfill the requirements of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

2. Goals of the Multi-functional Team (MFT). The goals of this team are to provide the highest levels of contract performance and customer satisfaction.

3. MFT Members and their Responsibilities. The membership, goals and responsibilities of the MFT are outlined below.

3.1. Procurement Contracting Officer (PCO) and/or Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO) Responsibilities:

1. Advise the MFT on Surveillance Plan development.

2. Appoints a Contracting Officer Representative (COR) via a COR Designation Memorandum, indicating their areas of responsibilities and limitation of authority and ensures that the COR, Contractor and Quality Assurance Program Coordinator (QAPC) are notified in writing of such.

3. Provides Contract Specific Training for any COR appointed by the PCO. Maintains suitable records reflecting decisions regarding the acceptability of the requirements as well as actions to correct defects.

4. Requests re-performance and/or reduction of price of contract when services are not performed or do not meet contract requirements.

5. Determines that the amount withheld constitutes a reasonable estimate of the Contractor's potential liability.

6. Ensures that the withholdings represent an amount commensurate with the reasonable value of such services.

7. Ensures past performance inputs are prepared documenting any performance issues.

8. Includes in the contract file documentation identifying nonperformance and actions taken.

9. Keeps communication lines open with the Contractor regarding performance issues.

10. Terminates the COR Designation in writing, when appropriate, and forwards copies of COR Termination to the COR, COR Supervisor and QAPC and notifies the Contractor.

12. Participates as a member of the MFT.

3.2. DCMA QAR /COR Responsibilities: Ensures supplies or services rendered by Contractor meet contract requirements.

1. Notifies the PCO/ACO and the Contractor of any performance deficiencies in writing or by e-mail.

2. Assists with contract/order closeout.

3. Ensures discrepancy reports are accurate and reported properly.

4. For AFLCMC or 1 AMU COR, completes DoD Standard COR training and the Contract Specific Training prior to contract start date and/or Refresher Training IAW the DOD standard for certification of a COR. Identifies areas that warrant a change in assessment method, frequency, or performance threshold and provides suggestions about the surveillance plan to the PCO.

5. Maintains accurate documentation of Contractor assessment activities as required by the surveillance plan and reports the results of Contractor assessment activities to the ACO/PCO.

6. Works with the Contractor and the PCO/ACO to resolve issues.

7. Maintains a file* in accordance with (IAW) the Surveillance Plan and requests PCO/ACO disposition at the completion of the contract or termination of COR appointment (if applicable).

8. Submits all requests for corrective action to the PCO/ACO.

9. Inspects and accepts Contractor services at the completion of each contract payment period, usually monthly. The QAR /COR will certify services actually received, unless the PCO/ACO retains the authority for acceptance.

10. Ensures the Contractor complies with the requirements of FAR Clause 52.222-50(c), (d), and (f) (Combating Trafficking in Persons).

11. Participates as a member of the MFT.

3.3. Quality Assurance Program Coordinator (QAPC) Responsibilities:

1. Will assist the Contracting Officer and/or Contracting Officer Designee in providing Contract Specific Training per paragraphs 1.4.1 – 1.4.6 of AFFARS MP 5301.602-2(d) and/or Refresher Training regardless of provider for any COR, upon request

2. Provide training for COR Management

3. Supports the MFT in the development of contract requirements specifically to ensure that requirements are clearly stated and enforceable.

4. Offers advice on development for the Service Summary and Surveillance Plan.

5. Participates as a member of the MFT.

3.4. Contracting Officer Representative (COR) Management (i.e. Supervisor) Responsibilities:

1. Upon request from PCO, prepares COR nomination package.

2. Ensure prospective COR understands importance of performing their designated functions.

3. Ensure the COR will be afforded the necessary resources (time, supplies, equipment and opportunity) to perform their designated functions.

4. Ensure that performance of the designated functions will be addressed as part of the COR’s annual performance appraisal.

5. Solicit input on performance of COR duties from the PCO.

6. Ensure COR completes required training prior to award or prior to their designation as a COR if appointed after contract award.

6. Identifies mission essential services (i.e. Functional Commander only responsibility)

7. Completes training offered by the Quality Assurance Program Coordinator (QAPC)

8. Participates as a member of the MFT.

3.5 Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA)/ACO-Specific Responsibilities:

*NOTE: A Memorandum of Agreement will be in place outlining specific DCMA/ACO responsibilities.

1. Performs contract administration as defined in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 42 and DCMA Guidebook as needed and as authorized by the PCO.

2. Performs inspections and acceptance on all Contract Line Items (CLINs) that are inspection/acceptance at origin IAW the FAR clause and the DCMA Guidebook.

3. Initiates and monitors corrective actions given to the Contractor during the performance of the contract.

4. Keeps PCO informed of the corrective actions that pertain to the contract.

5. Notifies, when necessary, the PCO of any potential delays and any Contractor performance that poses risks to the completion and quality of the contract.

6. Participates as member of the MFT.

*File should include a copy of the contract/order and all modifications (unless readily available electronically); a copy of COR designation memorandum (if applicable); correspondence between you and the Contractor; copies of correspondence to or from PCO/ACO; minutes of all meetings; copies of all invoices submitted and paid; and all other documentation of actions taken by QAR/COR.

4. Performance Assessment.

The required performance objectives can be found in the Service Summary in the PWS. The contractor service requirements are summarized into performance objectives that relate directly to the mission essential items. The performance threshold describes the minimum acceptable levels of service for each requirement. The contractor shall be aware that the absence of any contract requirement from the service summary does not detract from its enforceability nor limit the rights or remedies of the Government under any other provision of the contract.

Title
PWS
Performance Requirement Threshold
Surveillance Method
Safeguarding Classified Materials
1.4.9.1
100% compliance required for each contract quarter.
Customer Complaint

Periodic Inspection

OEM/Subcontractor Agreements
1.5
100% compliance
100% Inspection
PDM Flow Days
1.8.10
PDM completion within O =180 calendar days and T = 240 calendar days from induction to delivery
100% Inspection
PDM Quality
1.8.15
0 Critical DRs; 2 Major DRs; <10 Minor DRs
100% Inspection
Paint
1.8.3
O = 35 calendar days; T = 45 calendar days
100% Inspection
Operational Supply Effectiveness
1.9.1.1.1
Operational Supply effectiveness: T = 90%; O = 80%
100% Inspection
Depot Supply Effectiveness
1.9.1.1.2
Depot Supply Effectiveness: T = 90%; O = 80%
100% Inspection
SHF SIL Supply Effectiveness
1.9.1.1.3
SHF SIL Supply Effectiveness: T=85%; O=75%
Customer Complaint

100% Inspection

NIS Deficiencies: Stock availability
1.9
Red Ball/Alert Aircraft < 1% NMCS (AOG) and PMCS < 2% Expedite/Routine/ISO Inspection Requirement <3%
Customer Complaint

100% Inspection

Turn Around Time (TAT): Meet repair turnaround time requirement
1.9.1.2
75 calendar day (monthly average)
100% Inspection
GSI PDM Support: GSI recoverable items are to be returned to the user after receiving replacement
1.9.1.2
5 calendar days
100% Inspection
Response Time (Status of Material): When requested material or service is not available on-site
1.9.1.5
All Material Availability Status <1 hr Not Carried/ NIS Status Red Ball/Alert Aircraft <2 hrs Not Carried /NIS AOG/Critical Status <4 hrs All other Not Carried/NIS Status <24 hrs Emergency Services (AOG/NMCS [CONUS]) <24 hrs
100% Inspection
Maintain Mission Support Kits
1.9.1.6
100% fill; any kit with a less than 100% compliance will require Government authorization
Customer Complaint

100% Inspection

Support Equipment Availability
1.9.2.5
T = 90%; O = 95%
100% Inspection
Issue Time: Meet all issue demands within the designated time frames, depending on priority
2.4
Red Ball/Alert Aircraft < 30-minutes NMCS (AOG) and PMCS (critical) < 1 hr Expedite/Routine/Isochronal (ISO) Inspection Requirement < 4 hr

Bench Stock < 8 hr 100% Inspection

CDRL Delivery: Deliver all CDRL items on or before due date.
4
No more than four (4) validated complaints or deviations from Plans or Reports received in a quarter.
100% Inspection
CDRL Quality: Data submitted is accurate and in accordance with Contractor processes and established Government policies.
4
For each submittal, no more than one (1) submittal returned for re-work in response to original Government comments of Contractor submitted documentation complying with Contractor established processes. If more than one (1) submittal return is required, the Contractor shall perform the additional re-write at no additional cost to the Government.

100% Inspection

4.1. Procedures.

The government QAR/COR will periodically perform inspections to ensure Contractor compliance with the appropriate paragraphs of the PWS and will record the results of inspections, noting the date and time. If inspection indicates a performance threshold is not met, the QAR/COR will notify the Contractor and the contracting officer of the deficiency for correction. The Contractor shall be given a reasonable time after notification to correct the unacceptable performance if such correction is possible. The length of time allowed to correct the problem will depend upon the requirement and the deficiency, and the Contractor will be notified by the PCO of the time allowed for correction when the deficiency is reported to the Contractor. The QAR/COR will not consider the services complete until all deficiencies have been corrected. Deficiencies not corrected or estimated dates of completion that are not acceptable to the QAR/COR will be forwarded to the PCO for action.

4.2 Surveillance Responsibility

Contract support will occur at Boeing Oklahoma City, OK; Buildings 565, 524, 307 and Hangar 5 at Offutt AFB; the Program Depot Maintenance Facility at San Antonio, TX; and the SHF System Integration Lab (SIL) at Tinker AFB, OK. The COR will have the surveillance responsibility at Offutt AFB NE and the SHF SIL Tinker AFB, OK. DCMA will have responsibility at Boeing Oklahoma City, OK and the Program Depot Maintenance Facility at San Antonio, TX. The QAR/COR will certify services actually received under this contract in accordance with its terms and conditions, unless the PCO/ACO retains authority for acceptance. Format is at the discretion of the QAR/COR.

Upon notification from the contractor that the defect has been corrected, the QAR/COR will re-inspect the area/task associated with the customer complaint or Correction Action Report that was issued by the Government. The QAR/COR will verify the root cause and corrective/preventative actions submitted by the contractor are effective and prevent reoccurrence.

4.2.1. Corrective Action Report (CAR) A CAR shall be used by the QAR/COR to document contract requirement findings and subsequent corrective actions to be taken. A computer-generated CAR may be used, provided the information on the CAR remains the same. See attached CAR and instructions for filling out.

4.2.2. Definitions of Major Findings & Minor Findings.

Major Findings. Major findings are contract non-conformances which are considered critical or major. IAW FAR 46.101, a major non-conformance means a non-conformance, other than critical, that is likely to result in failure or reduce the usability of the services for their intended purpose. A critical non conformance means a non-conformance that is likely to result in a hazardous or unsafe condition for individuals using, maintaining, or depending upon the services; or is likely to prevent performance of a vital agency mission. If at any time QAR/COR identifies a condition as having a significant adverse effect on the quality of the activity, such as those stated below, the QAR/COR shall document their findings and notify the Contracting Officer immediately in writing (email is acceptable).

A. Contractor failure to meet a Performance Threshold.

B. Failure to provide adequate corrective action to preclude reoccurrence of Government identified findings.

C. Failure to provide corrective action to deficiencies identified by the contractor within a prescribed suspense period.

D. Any failure to adhere to security and/or safety regulations that results in a security or safety incident.

Minor Finding. IAW FAR 46.101, a minor non conformance means a non-conformance that is not likely to materially reduce the usability of the services for their intended purpose, or is a departure from established standards having little bearing on the effective use or operation of the services. When the COR identifies a minor finding, the QAR/COR shall document the findings, but is not required to notify the Contracting Officer. However, if the same minor finding is repeatedly identified, it may be an indication that a major finding is occurring, or has occurred, because the Contractor has not taken proper steps to prevent recurrence. In this case, the QAR/COR shall notify the Contracting Officer in writing (email is acceptable).

4.3. Methods of Surveillance. 1) Customer Complaint/Observation; 2) 100% Inspection; and 3) Periodic Inspection of process or output.

4.3.1. Customer Complaint/Observation.

The requiring organization will furnish written instructions and/or customer training to each organization receiving the contractor's services. Any customer observing unacceptable services, either incomplete or not performed, for any of the above performance objectives should immediately contact the QAR/COR. The QAR/COR must evaluate the complaints on a case-by-case basis. If any Government action or lack of action caused unacceptable performance, the complaint is not valid. The QAR/COR will document the invalid complaint and keep for their records. If the complaint is not a result of any Government action, the procedures in paragraph 4.1 will be followed.

4.3.2. 100% Inspection. All deliverables (reports etc.) will be inspected 100% for errors and omissions.

4.3.3. Periodic Inspection. This type of surveillance is based upon selecting samples for evaluation on other than 100% inspection on a statistically random basis.

4.4. Standard. The Contractor must correct each discrepancy through re-performance. Recurring discrepancies during the reporting period which bring the performance threshold below the acceptable level will be recorded and reported to the PCO for appropriate action. Additionally if the same discrepancy (ies) occurs repeatedly throughout different reporting periods, this will reflect upon the Contractor's performance. The QAR/COR will annotate the unacceptable performance and notify the PCO in order to address the problem areas with the Contractor. In those instances where re-performance is not possible, the PCO may deduct payment IAW the inspection of services clause.

4.5. Surveillance of Non-Service Summary Items.

The Government reserves the right to inspect and test services required by the contract, to the extent practicable, at all times and places, during the term of the contract IAW the contract inspection clause.

4.6 Remedies for Non-Conformance. If inspections indicate unacceptable performance, the

QAR/COR will notify the Contractor of the deficiencies for correction. The Contractor shall be given an appropriate time frame (depending on the discrepancy identified) after notification to correct the unacceptable performance. If deficiencies are not corrected within the required time frame, the QAR/COR should notify the PCO for action. If the Contractor disagrees with the noted discrepancy and an agreement cannot be reached, the PCO shall be notified for a final decision.

4.7 Positive and Negative Incentives. IAW the results of the QAR/COR surveillance documentation, areas warranting a change in assessment method, frequency, or performance threshold will be changed in either a positive or negative manner throughout the life of the contract, if warranted.

4.8 Combating Trafficking in Persons. IAW DFARS PGI 222.17, the COR shall pursue, as appropriate, the following methods of monitoring the contractor’s performance regarding trafficking in persons such that non-compliances with FAR clause 52.222-50 are brought to the immediate attention of the Contracting Officer:

a. Keep the lines of communication open with the contractor. At the Post-Award conference, remind the contractor of his contractual responsibilities to notify the government if the contractor receives notification of any alleged violations to this policy or if actions have been taken against the contractor employees, subcontractors or subcontractor employees pursuant to the clause.

b. When appropriate, encourage contractor to complete Human Trafficking Awareness Training.

c. Encourage the contractor to take steps to investigate and eliminate slavery and human trafficking in their supply chains and to publish information for consumer awareness.

d. Periodically access the Department of State’s Trafficking in Person (TIP) website for updates and to view the latest reports. http://www.state.gov/g/tip

5. Performance Management.

5.1. Market Research. Market research will be used as a tool throughout the life of the contract to remain current with the most efficient and effective assessment methods and techniques of the commercial marketplace.

5.2. MFT Meetings. The MFT will manage the contract for the life of the contract. This team is a partnership between the government and the Contractor to ensure the best possible service is provided for the life of the contract.

5.2.1. Performance Assessment Data. All performance assessment data will be reviewed at these meetings. If performance improvement is necessary, a plan of action will be created.

5.2.2. Goal of the MFT. The goal of the MFT is to give all members a vested interest in maintaining the highest quality service to our customers and the ability to propose/initiate improvements. The success of the contract is a combined effort of all MFT members.

5.3. Disputes. Attempts will be made to resolve all disputes arising under this plan using the Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) as outlined in FAR 33.214. The objective is mutually agreeable resolutions that are relatively inexpensive and expeditious. If no resolution can be made under ADR, the PCO shall be notified for a final decision.

5.4 Initial Performance Review. The MFT initial evaluation of contractor performance will take place within 30 days after the contractor assumes full performance responsibilities (i.e. after completion of transition/mobilization) to ensure the contractor has successfully started performance, completed transition, is fully operational, and is within the estimated cost, schedule, and performance parameters of the contract. The Services Designated Official (SDO) may waive the initial evaluation for contractors that have continued performance under a successor contract award (i.e. prior incumbent) or for contractors which have otherwise demonstrated full compliance with contract start-up. Separate initial contract performance review is not required when they would duplicate existing reviews.

5.4.1. Initial Performance Review Criteria. The MFT will report the results of the initial performance review to the SDO. The report will include an assessment of schedule, management, technical, staffing and cost performance (i.e. cost performance will be reported only if other than Firm Fixed Price). Negative variations in cost, schedule, staffing, and/or performance will be reported with an assessment of the root causes and corrective action plan.

5.4.1.1 Schedule. The assessment will include a discussion of the contractor’s adherence to the required delivery schedule, milestones, and administrative requirements and should address the contractor’s efforts during the assessment period that contributes to or affect the schedule variance, as applicable.

5.4.1.2 Management/Performance. The assessment will include a discussion of the integration and coordination of all activity needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior (to include timely identification of issues in controversy), customer satisfaction, timely award and management of subcontracts including progress on small business subcontracting goals.

5.4.1.3 Technical. The assessment will include a discussion of the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements, specifications and standards of good workmanship (i.e. commonly accepted technical, professional, environmental, or safety and health standards), as applicable.

5.4.1.4 Cost.. The assessment will include a discussion of the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling contract cost, as applicable.

5.4.1.5 Staffing. The assessment will include a discussion of contractor’s performance in selecting, retaining, supporting, and replacing, when necessary, key personnel, as applicable.

5.4.1.6. Special Interest Items. Special interest items are to be included in the initial performance report when significant modifications to the contract have been made since contract award.

5.4.2. Assessment Values

5.4.2.1. GREEN—No issues.

5.4.2.2. YELLOW—Issue(s) but contractor has an adequate mitigation or corrective action plan in place.

5.4.2.3. RED—Issue(s) with inadequate or no contractor’s mitigation or corrective action plan. Any “RED” assessment will include the government proposed actions with respect to the failing contractor.

6. Revisions to this Surveillance Plan. Revisions are the joint responsibility of the ACO, PCO and QAR/COR. This document can be changed at any time following coordination with the MFT.

REVISION
QASP CHANGE ACTIVITY
DATE
Original
Surveillance Plan for E-4B Contactor Logistics Support
27 Jan 15

CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT (CAR)

(If more space is needed, use reverse and identify by number)

1. CONTRACTOR

2. CONTRACT NUMBER

3. TYPE OF SERVICES

4. FUNCTIONAL AREA

5. SUSPENSE DATE

6. CONTROL NUMBER

7. DEFICIENCY FORMCHECKBOX

MAJOR FORMCHECKBOX

MINOR

FINDING:

FINDING IMPACT:

Please respond with a written corrective action plan that details the corrective action of the cited deficiency, the cause of the deficiency, and actions taken to prevent recurrence by Suspense Date in Block 5. If date was not entered in Block 5, the contractor is not required to provide a response.

8. CONTRACTING OFFICER REPRESENTATIVE (COR)

TYPED NAME AND GRADE

SIGNATURE AND DATE

9. ISSUING AUTHORITY

TYPED NAME AND GRADE

SIGNATURE AND DATE

10. COR RESPONSE TO CONTRACTOR CORRECTIVE ACTION AND ACTION TAKEN TO PREVENT RECURRENCE

11. COR DETERMINATION

FORMCHECKBOX

ACCEPTED FORMCHECKBOX

REJECTED

12. CLOSE DATE

Corrective Action Report (CAR) Template, Feb 05 (SAF/AQCP)

CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT (CAR)

Continuation Sheet

(Number to correspond with applicable Item Number on reverse)

Corrective Action Report (CAR) Template, Feb 05 (SAF/AQCP)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .