Attachment 10_Past Performance Questionnaire_Template.pdf
PDF 1 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Air Force Drug Testing Laboratory Support Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA805220R0001
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire template and information about a related federal contract opportunity for Air Force Drug Testing Laboratory Support Services. The past performance questionnaire is a template for agencies to evaluate a contractor's past performance on relevant prior contracts. It requests information on quality, schedule, cost control, management, and small business factors. The federal contract opportunity is a solicitation seeking proposals for nineteen full-time equivalents to provide support services at the Air Force Drug Testing Laboratory. The support services are to be performed at Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland in Texas and include laboratory technicians, data entry clerks, analytical scientists, and information technology support. The response deadline is January 22, 2020.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 23
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Questionnaire Solicitation # ________________
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 1 of 4
773d Enterprise Sourcing Squadron ___________________________________
TO: ________________________________________________________________________________
AGENCY: ___________________________________________________________________________
PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION REQUEST
1. This office is currently in the process of awarding a competitive service contract.
_________________________ has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding _________________________ record of past performance under contract number _________________________. Specifically, we are looking for past performance information related to the following areas:
a. Quality of Product or Service. Conformance to contract requirements, specifications and standards of good workmanship, accuracy of reports, appropriateness of personnel, and technical excellence.
b. Schedule. Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction, completed on time, including wrap-up and contract administration, no liquidated damages assessed.
c. Cost Control. Within budget, current accurate and complete billings, actual cost/rates reflect closely to negotiated cost/rates, cost efficiency measures, adequate budgetary internal controls.
d. Management or Business Relations. Effective management, businesslike correspondence, responsive to contract requirements, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, flexible, proactive, effective Contractor recommended solutions, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program.
e. Management of Key Personnel. How long key personnel stayed on the contract, how well they managed their portion of the contract, the quality and relevancy of the products/services generated by key personnel.
f. Small Business Subcontracting. Commitment to Small Business, HUBZone Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Women-Owned Small Business, Service Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business, and Veteran-Owned Small Business Subcontracting.
2. In order for our team to complete its evaluation, the Government requests that you complete the questionnaire below and email it, along with any other pertinent information, no later than ___________
AM PM (____________________) on ____________________, to _________________________ at ______________________________. Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned contractor.
Very Respectfully, FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 2 of 4
Contractor Performance Evaluation Survey
1. Agency Name: ____________________________________________________________________
2. Agency Point-of-Contact:
a. Name: _______________________________________________________________________
b. Phone: ______________________________________________________________________
c. Email: _______________________________________________________________________
3. Contract/Order Number: ____________________________________________________________
4. Contract Title: ____________________________________________________________________
5. Description of Contract Service:
6. Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Specify): ______________
7. Period of Performance: _____________________________________________________________
8. Dollar Amount of Award: ____________________________________________________________
9. Complexity of Work: Difficult Routine
10. Evaluation Factors: Please read the statements below and indicate your relative level of agreement in one of the check boxes provided. Please provide a brief explination in the text box for evaluations rated “Unsatisfactory” or “Exceptional.”
a. Quality Factors:
Quality Factor Statements Rating
(1) The contractor provided a product or service that conformed to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship.
(2) The contractor submitted accurate reports.
(3) The contractor utilized personnel that were appropriate to the effort performed.
N/A Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very Good Exceptional
Narrative
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 3 of 4
b. Schedule Factors:
Schedule Factor Statements Rating
(1) The tasks required under this effort were performed in a timely manner and in accordancde with the period of performance of the contract.
(2) The contractor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction.
N/A Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very Good
c. Cost Control Factors:
Cost Control Factor Statements Rating
(1) The contractor performed the effort within the estimated cost/price.
(2) The contractor submitted accurate invoices in a timely manner.
(3) The contractor demonstrated cost efficiencies in performing the required effort.
(4) The actual cost/price realized closely reflected the negotiatied cost/price.
N/A Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very Good
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 4 of 4
d. Management Factors:
Management Factor Statements Rating
(1) The contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed.
(2) The contractor maintained an open line of communication so that the appropriate points-of-contact were apprised of technical, cost, and schedule issues.
(3) The contractor presented information and correspondence in a clear, concise, and businesslike manner.
(4) The contractor promptly notified the appropriate points-of-contact in a timely manner regarding urgent issues.
(5) The contractor provided flexible, proactive, and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues.
(6) The contractor made timely award to, and demonstrated effective management of, its subcontractors.
N/A Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very Good
e. Small Business Factors:
Small Business Factor Statement Rating
The contractor demonstrated an effective small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program.
N/A Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very Good
11. Would you select this firm again? I would would not recommend _________________________ for similar requirements in the future.
| questionnaire below and email it along with any other pertinent information no later than: Off |
| undefined_2: On |
| Contract Title: Insert Brief Title |
| Firm Fixed Price: Off |
| Cost Reimbursement: Off |
| Other Specify: Off |
| Period of Performance: Insert Period of Performance |
| Dollar Amount of Award: |
| Difficult: Off |
| Routine: Off |
| NA: Off |
| Unsatisfactory: Off |
| Marginal: Off |
| Satisfactory: Off |
| Very Good: Off |
| Exceptional: Off |
| NA_2: Off |
| Unsatisfactory_2: Off |
| Marginal_2: Off |
| Satisfactory_2: Off |
| Very Good_2: Off |
| Exceptional_2: Off |
| NA_3: Off |
| Unsatisfactory_3: Off |
| Marginal_3: Off |
| Satisfactory_3: Off |
| Very Good_3: Off |
| Exceptional_3: Off |
| NA_4: Off |
| Unsatisfactory_4: Off |
| Marginal_4: Off |
| Satisfactory_4: Off |
| Very Good_4: Off |
| Exceptional_4: Off |
| NA_5: Off |
| Unsatisfactory_5: Off |
| Marginal_5: Off |
| Satisfactory_5: Off |
| Very Good_5: Off |
| Exceptional_5: Off |
| would: Off |
| would not recommend: Off |
| PPQ Letter Date: 01/02/2020 |
| Sender: Title: Contract Specialist |
| POC To Complete PPQ: POC to complete PPQ |
| Interested Contractor: Interested Contractor Name |
| Contract or Order Number: Insert Identifying Number |
| Time Due: 4:00 |
| Time Zone: Central Standard Time |
| Date Due: 01/22/2020 |
| Deliver To: Name: Nathaniel W. Trulove |
| Deliver To: Email: nathaniel.trulove.3@us.af.mil |
| Sender: Name: Nathaniel W. Trulove |
| Sender: Email: nathaniel.trulove.3@us.af.mil |
| Solicitation Number: FA8052-20-R-0001 |
| Agency To Complete PPQ: Agency to complete PPQ |
| Agency POC to Complete PPQ: First M. Last |
| Agency POC: Phone: |
| Agency POC: Email: first.m.last@provider.com |
| Contract/Order Number: Insert Identifying Number |
| Description of Services: The purpose of this section of the PPQ form is to allow the agency POC completing the form the opportunity to provide a brief description of the services performed by the interested contractor. This block will wrap text and contains a spell check feature. |
| Other Type: |
| Quality Narrative: The purpose of this text box is to allow the agency POC completing the PPQ the opportunity to elaborate on the factors and ratings stated above. This block will wrap text and contains a spell check feature. Delete the existing text and input a narrative; particularly for any factor rated "Unsatisfactory" or "Exceptional." |
| Schedule Narrative: The purpose of this text box is to allow the agency POC completing the PPQ the opportunity to elaborate on the factors and ratings stated above. This block will wrap text and contains a spell check feature. Delete the existing text and input a narrative; particularly for any factor rated "Unsatisfactory" or "Exceptional." |
| Cost Control Narrative: The purpose of this text box is to allow the agency POC completing the PPQ the opportunity to elaborate on the factors and ratings stated above. This block will wrap text and contains a spell check feature. Delete the existing text and input a narrative; particularly for any factor rated "Unsatisfactory" or "Exceptional." |
| Management Narrative: The purpose of this text box is to allow the agency POC completing the PPQ the opportunity to elaborate on the factors and ratings stated above. This block will wrap text and contains a spell check feature. Delete the existing text and input a narrative; particularly for any factor rated "Unsatisfactory" or "Exceptional." |
| Small Business Narrative: The purpose of this text box is to allow the agency POC completing the PPQ the opportunity to elaborate on the factors and ratings stated above. This block will wrap text and contains a spell check feature. Delete the existing text and input a narrative; particularly for any factor rated "Unsatisfactory" or "Exceptional." |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .