FA700017R00070004.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SEE AMENDMENT 0004 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 9

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 04-Jan-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA700017R0007

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

09-Aug-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

04-Jan-2018

CODE

10 CONS - FA7000

STEIN, H.

8110 INDUSTRIAL DR STE 200

PKA

USAF ACADEMY CO 80840-2315

FA7000 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

FA700017R0007

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION

Amendment 0004 Block 14 Continuation Page The purpose of Amendment 0004 is:

1. The required response date is changed from 22 Nov 17 to 5 Feb 18.

2. The delivery date for CLIN 0001 is changed from 165 days ADC to 365 days ADC.

3. CLIN 0003 is changed from Deleted to Phase 2.

4. Attachment 01 SoW is revised and is dated 5 Dec 17.

5. Attachment 02 Cameras is revised and is dated 15 Dec 17. Revisions include Camera types E&F being added as they are part of Phase 2.

6. Attachment 06 Wage Determination is updated, dated 10 Nov 17.

7. Attachment 14 Hardware Software and Attachment 15 Phase 2 Drawings are added.

9. Addendum to Clause 52.212-1 Paragraphs 3) a) i. & iv. are revised, Paragraph 3) b) is revised, Paragraphs 3) b) 1., 2. & 3 are revised and Paragraph e) is revised.

10. Addendum to Clause 52.212-2 Paragraphs 2) a) i. & ii. are revised and Paragraph 2) b) 4. is revised.

11. Clause 52.217-7 is revised.

12. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 22-Nov-2017 02:00 PM to 05-Feb-2018 02:00 PM.

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

CLIN 0003

The CLIN description has changed from Deleted to Phase 2.

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

To:

Buildings, Areas, Network and Servers – Prep School The contractor shall provide all labor, materials, equipment, supervision, and incidentals to provide and install CCTV Basewide-Phase 2 in accordance with the Statement of Work, drawings, specifications, and contract attachments.NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

The pricing detail quantity 1.00 has been added.

The unit of issue Lot has been added.

The option status has changed from No Status to Option.

The FSC code 6350 has been added.

DELIVERIES AND PERFORMANCE

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0001 has been changed from:

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

165 dys. ADC 1 N/A

FOB: Destination

To:

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

365 dys. ADC 1 N/A

FOB: Destination

The following Delivery Schedule for CLIN 0003 has been added:

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

96 dys. ADC 1 N/A

FOB: N/A

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Table of Contents has changed from:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Attachment 01 SoW 6 05-OCT-2017 Attachment 02 Cameras 4 18-OCT-2017 Attachment 03 DVRs 1 01-AUG-2017 Attachment 04 USAFA Erosion Control

Revg Tree Care Stand

12 01-JUN-2013

Attachment 05 HAZMAT CCTV 293 20-SEP-2016 Attachment 06 Wage Determination 6 21-JUL-2017 Attachment 07 Specifications 307 28-MAR-2017 Attachment 08 USAFA Environmental

Standards

27 31-DEC-2016

Attachment 09 Phase 1A Drawings 62 28-MAR-2017 Attachment 10 Phase 1B Drawings 36 28-MAR-2017 Attachment 11 Experience Form 1 12-OCT-2017 Attachment 12 Financial Reference 1 12-OCT-2017 Attachment 13 G002_Typical_All_Phase s

1 12-OCT-2017

to:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Attachment 01 SoW 6 05-DEC-2017 Attachment 02 Cameras 6 15-DEC-2017 Attachment 03 DVRs 1 01-AUG-2017 Attachment 04 USAFA Erosion Control

Revg Tree Care Stand

12 01-JUN-2013

Attachment 05 HAZMAT CCTV 293 20-SEP-2016 Attachment 06 Wage Determination 6 10-NOV-2017 Attachment 07 Specifications 307 28-MAR-2017 Attachment 08 USAFA Environmental

Standards

27 31-DEC-2016

Attachment 09 Phase 1A Drawings 62 28-MAR-2017 Attachment 10 Phase 1B Drawings 36 28-MAR-2017 Attachment 11 Experience Form 1 12-OCT-2017 Attachment 12 Financial Reference 1 12-OCT-2017 Attachment 13 G002_Typical_All_Phase s

1 12-OCT-2017

Attachment 14 Hardware Software 2 12-DEC-2017 Attachment 15 Phase 2 Drawings 39 28-AUG-2017

The following have been modified:

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS--COMMERCIAL ITEMS

Notice to Offeror(s)/Supplier(s): Funds are not presently available for this effort. No award will be made under this solicitation until funds are available. The Government reserves the right to cancel this solicitation, either before or after the closing date. In the event the Government cancels this solicitation, the Government has no obligation to reimburse an offeror for any costs.

1) To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein.

Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, and representations and certifications, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or subfactors. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. The Government intends to award without discussions but reserves the right to conduct discussions if necessary. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete rationale. Proposals must be complete, self-sufficient, and respond directly to the requirements of this solicitation; alternate proposals will not be accepted. The response shall consist of two (2) separate parts; Part I - Price Proposal and Part II – Technical Proposal.

2) The contracting officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition for this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the contracting officer will review this determination and if, in the contracting officer's opinion, adequate price competition exists no additional data will be requested. However, if at any time during this competition the contracting officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists offerors may be required to submit cost data to the extent necessary for the contracting officer to determine the reasonableness and affordability of the price.

3) Specific Instructions:

a) PART I – PRICE PROPOSAL – No page limit. Submit 1 hard copy original and 1 compact disk (CD) with electronic data files, in accordance with paragraph 3(c) below:

i. Complete blocks 17a, 17b, 26, 30a, 30b, and 30c of page one on the RFP, SF1449. In doing so, the offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the RFP. Enter applicable CAGE code in block 17a, CODE. These sections constitute the model contract.

ii. Insert proposed unit and extended prices for Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs) 0001, 0002, and 0003 in this RFP. Round prices to the nearest whole dollar amount. Offerors shall ensure that price entered for each CLIN is exclusive of any costs of other CLINs and pricing is not duplicated to ensure the calculated aggregate of total extended price is the offeror’s lowest price for the entire project.

iii. Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in the Clauses Incorporated By Full Text Section. For this section, the offeror shall submit those pages that require a fill-in, including those with “None” or “N/A” responses. With the exception of FAR Clause 52.213-3 Offer Representations and Certifications – Commercial Items, if the offeror is registered on http://www.sam.gov/portal

iv. Include a letter of authorization for the Contracting Officer to verify offeror’s financial responsibility. Fill-in Attachment 12 in its entirety and return with the proposal.

v. Include SDVOSB specific documents: IAW FAR 19.1403(b) offerors’ shall register in the System for Award Management (SAM), self-certify as a SDVOSB under NAICS code 561621 in SAM. The contracting officer will verify the appropriateness of all registration documentation.

b) PART II – TECHNICAL PROPOSAL – All items must be new and come with the standard manufacturer’s warranty. Proposals submitted with used, reconditioned, refurbished, gray market, or liquidated stock will not be acceptable. The technical proposal shall be specific and complete. Legibility, clarity and coherence are very important. The technical proposal shall be limited to no more than 60 pages (pages that exceed the page limitation will be removed from consideration). Submit 1 original hard copy, 3 additional hard copies and 1 compact disk (CD) with the electronic data files in accordance with paragraph 3(c) below:

i. Technical Factors:

1.Subfactor 1: Equipment- Offeror must submit information on all software and hardware to be provided under this contract by filling in Attachment 14. The offeror shall provide a system/suite of equipment to satisfy the USAFA CCTV effort whereby the IA‐Enabled* products used within are listed on one of the following approving authorities:

DoDin Approved products list:

https://aplits.disa.mil/processAPList.action

Common Criteria:

https://www.commoncriteriaportal.org/products/

Other‐ An existing valid Certificate of Networthiness (CON) for the suite of equipment which satisfies the USAFA CCTV requirement exists. This includes an accompanying accreditation package demonstrating an Approval To Operate of the system. An existing CON will be reviewed to determine if the system/suite in its approved state can be deployed to the USAFA environment.

*IA‐enabled defined‐ "An IA‐enabled product is a product or technology whose primary role is not security, but which provides security services as an associated feature of its intended operating capabilities. Acquired IA‐enabled products must be evaluated if the IA features are going to be used to perform one of the security services (availability, integrity, confidentiality, authentication, or non‐ repudiation). Therefore, the determination of whether an IA‐enabled product must be evaluated will be dependent upon how that particular product will be used within the consumer’s system architecture.

https://aplits.disa.mil/processAPList.action https://www.commoncriteriaportal.org/products/

Examples include such products as security‐enabled web browsers, screening routers, and security‐ enabled messaging systems."

If an approved system/suite of equipment does not already exist, components which perform IA‐enabled duties, coupled with additional hardware and software required to meet the mission can be implemented.

The software and hardware list will be incorporated as an attachment into the successful offeror’s resultant contract.

2. Subfactor 2: Cameras- Offeror must submit salient information of their proposed cameras by filling in all values on Attachment 02 for each type of camera. Material data sheets from the proposed manufacturer must be provided for each camera, clearly verifying (i.e. highlighted, circled, etc.) the salient information entered in Attachment 02.

The camera list will be incorporated as an attachment into the successful offeror’s resultant contract.

3. Subfactor 3: Network DVRs- Offeror must submit salient information of their proposed Network DVR by filling in all values on Attachment 03. Material data sheets from the proposed manufacturer must be provided for the DVR, clearly verifying (i.e. highlighted, circled, etc.) the salient information entered in Attachment 03.

The Network DVR list will be incorporated as an attachment into the successful offeror’s resultant contract.

4. Subfactor 4: Experience Form- Offeror must submit experience information on Attachment 11. Fill in the form in its entirety. A point of contact must be provided, so the Government can verify the information provided. Only one Experience Form will be accepted. The first Experience Form included in the proposal will be evaluated. Any Experience Forms in excess of the first included will not be evaluated.

c) Format for both Part I and Part II shall be as follows:

i. The proposal will be submitted on 8 1/2” x 11” paper except for fold-outs used for charts, tables, or diagrams, which may not exceed 11” x 17”. A page is defined as one face of an 8 ½” x 11” sheet of paper (white or ivory in color) containing information. Charts, tables, or diagrams, may not exceed 11” x 17” and each face will be counted as one page. Includes all appendices, charts, graphs, diagrams, tables, photographs, etc.

Covers for volumes, table of contents, indices, title pages, cross reference indices, and section dividers/tables will not be included in the page count if they are inserted solely to provide ease to the reader in locating volumes/sections of the proposal. They will be counted if they contain any other information, (e.g. diagrams, extraneous data, etc.). Pages marked “This page intentionally left blank” will not be counted.

ii. A page is defined as one face of a sheet of 8 ½”x11” size paper containing information.

iii. Typing shall not be less than 12 font, with 1” margins on each side of the page. Smaller, legible font size may be used for charts and tables.

iv. Elaborate formats, bindings or color presentations are not desired or required. Company Name and solicitation number shall be included in the header of each page. Submit Part I and Part II of the proposal using a three ring binder. Part I and Part II shall be submitted in separate binders in order to clearly determine page counts.

v. Electronic copies of all data submitted with the proposal shall be submitted on 1 (one) compact disk.

Compact disks will be CD ROM in MS Word 2013, MS Excel 2013, any Microsoft Office 2013 product unless otherwise specified, or Adobe Acrobat. The paper or hard copy of the offeror’s proposal shall control any conflict between the electronic version and the paper copy submitted in response to this solicitation.

vi. Documents submitted in response to this RFP must be fully responsive to and consistent with the following:

1. Requirements of the RFP, drawings, specifications, and government standards and regulations pertaining to the specifications.

2. Evaluation Factors for Award in ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2 of this RFP.

3. Limitation on the number of proposal pages: Pages exceeding the page limitations set forth in this this

Clause, 52.212-1 will not be read or evaluated, and will be removed from the proposal.

d) The Government intends to award a single contract. Notice to Offeror(s)/Supplier(s): The Government reserves the right to cancel this solicitation, either before or after the closing date. In the event the Government cancels this solicitation, the Government has no obligation to reimburse an offeror for any costs.

e) Period for acceptance of offers: The offeror agrees to hold prices in its offer firm until 30 September 2018.

Prices of Option CLINs must remain vaild through the expiration of the delivery date of CLIN 0001.

f) Special instructions for delivering hard copy proposals: We recommend package be mailed since access to the USAF Academy may be difficult. Proposals may be submitted in person at the South Gate of the United States Air Force Academy in the Pass and Registration building (8486 South Gate Boulevard, USAFA, CO 80840) for one hour, 1:00 P.M. – 2:00 P.M. MDT, prior to the closing of the solicitation. Late proposals will not be accepted. Both hard copies and electronic copies must be submitted prior to the deadline in block 8 of the SF 1449 in order to not be considered late, in accordance with FAR 15.208(b)(1).

(End of provision)

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2 Evaluation -- Commercial Items

BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD:

1) In accordance with FAR Parts 12 and 15, the Government intends to award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsive, responsible, technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated price. FAR 15.101-2(b) states tradeoffs will not be made and no additional credit will be given for exceeding acceptability.

The following factors will be evaluated:

Factor 1: Price Factor 2: Technical

2) The evaluation process shall proceed as follows:

a) Price Evaluation:

i. Initially, the government shall rank all proposals by price (from lowest to highest total evaluated price), including any option prices if applicable. For proposal evaluation purposes, contract line items numbers (CLINs) shall be evaluated as follows:

CLIN 0001 + CLIN 0002 + CLIN 0003 = Total Evaluated Price (TEP)

ii. The government intends to award based on the aggregate total of CLIN 0001 + CLIN 0002 + CLIN 0003.

iii. The lowest aggregate total of all CLINs shall constitute the lowest price offering. Offerors shall ensure that price entered for each Base CLIN and Option CLIN is exclusive of any costs of other CLINs and pricing is not duplicated to ensure the calculated aggregate of total extended price is the offeror’s lowest price for the entire project.

iv. Multiple contracts will not be awarded as a result of this solicitation.

b) Technical Evaluation.

i. Next, beginning with the lowest priced TEP proposal:

1. The Government will evaluate proposals for technical acceptability on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis. ALL Technical Subfactors must be rated “Acceptable” to be considered technically acceptable.

2. To be eligible for award, an offeror must have an “Acceptable” rating in every non-priced subfactor either on the basis of the initial proposal, or as a result of discussions, if conducted.

3. The Technical Subfactors will receive a rating of Acceptable/Unacceptable as defined in accordance with DoD Source Selection Guide Procedures, Table C-1, listed below:

Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings Rating Description Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

4. Technical proposal will be evaluated based on the following four (4) subfactors:

• Subfactor 1: Equipment- The offeror shall fill in Attachment 14 for all software and hardware.

The offeror must propose a system/suite of equipment to satisfy the USAFA CCTV effort with IA-Enabled products listed on one of the following approving authorities: DoDin Approved products list:

https://aplits.disa.mil/processAPList.action or Common Criteria:

https://www.commoncriteriaportal.org/products/ or provide an existing valid Certificate of Networthiness (CON) for the suite of equipment which satisfies the USAFA CCTV requirement. This includes an accompanying accreditation package demonstrating an Approval To Operate of the system. An existing CON will be reviewed to determine if the system/suite in its approved state can be deployed to the USAFA environment. To be rated “Acceptable” the data for all IA-Enabled software and hardware products must be clearly listed on https://aplits.disa.mil/processAPList.action https://www.commoncriteriaportal.org/products/ or hold an existing valid Certificate of Networthiness to include an accompanying accreditation package demonstrating an Approval to Operate of the system.

• Subfactor 2: Cameras- The offeror must propose cameras that meet or exceed the salient information listed on Attachment 02. The offeror shall fill-in the yellow blocks on Attachment 02 with their proposed camera’s information. The yellow blocks correlate with the white blocks. The Government will compare the proposed cameras and submitted information to the salient information in the specificiations and drawings. To be rated “Acceptable” the data for every camera must meet or exceed the salient information for every category.

• Subfactor 3: Network DVRs- The offeror must propose network DVRs that meet or exceed the salient information listed on Attachment 03. The offeror shall fill-in the yellow blocks on Attachment 03 with their proposed camera’s information. The yellow blocks correlate with the white blocks. The Government will compare the proposed network DVRs and submitted information to the salient information in the specifications and drawings. To be rated “Acceptable” the data for every Network DVR must meet or exceed the salient information for every category.

https://aplits.disa.mil/processAPList.action https://www.commoncriteriaportal.org/products/ https://aplits.disa.mil/processAPList.action https://www.commoncriteriaportal.org/products/

• Subfactor 4: Experience- To be rated “Acceptable” the offeror must provide sufficient information on Attachment 11 to substantiate the offeror’s previous experience as follows:

A. The offeror must submit work performed as a prime contractor or subcontractor on a single CCTV

Installation Project (e.g. single task order, single purchase order, single contract, etc.) within the past five (5) years from the issuance date of the solicitation valued at $300,000 or more with installation of 100 or more CCTV cameras that includes the following incidental construction work; drywall repair, new conduit installation, electrical work, indoor and outdoor mounting.

AND

B. The project must be verified with the owner/customer by the evaluation team, via phone or email

The Government will verify the project was performed by the offeror. The Government will use the offeror's provided point of contact, phone or email to ensure that the minimum requirements stipulated above have been met.

3) If the lowest priced TEP is rated “Acceptable” for all Technical Subfactors and the offer represents the best value for the Government then the evaluation process stops at this point. Award shall be made to that offeror without further consideration of any other offers. If the lowest priced TEP offeror is not rated “Acceptable” for all Technical Subfactors, the next lowest priced offeror will be evaluated and the process will continue (in order by price) until an offeror is rated “Acceptable” for all Technical Subfactors.

4) The government intends to award a contract without discussions with respective offerors. The government, however, reserves the right to conduct discussions if deemed in its best interest. The government reserves the right to award one or no contract at all, depending on the quality of proposals submitted. Failure to propose for any item on the schedule may cause the offeror’s proposal to be rejected as non-responsive.

(End addendum)

52.217-7 OPTION FOR INCREASED QUANTITY--SEPARATELY PRICED LINE ITEM (MAR 1989)-

Amended

The Government may require the delivery of the numbered line item, identified in the Schedule as an option item, in the quantity and at the price stated in the Schedule. The Contracting Officer may exercise the options by written notice to the Contractor at any time before expiration of the Delivery Date of Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) 0001. Delivery of added items shall continue at the same rate that like items are called for under the contract, unless the parties otherwise agree. A Delivery Date is listed for each CLIN under the “Delivery Information” section.

These performance periods start when the CLIN is awarded, or for option CLINs exercised after the original award, when the option CLIN is exercised. If an option CLIN is exercised, the delivery date of that exercised option CLIN is as specified in the “Delivery Information” section, or the delivery date of CLIN 0001, whichever date is later.

(End of clause)

(End of Summary of Changes)