FA6800-17-Q-S002_-_C-UAS_Comined_Synopsis-Solicitation-FINAL.pdf

Combined Synopsis/Solicitation

FA6800-17-Q-S002

Portable Drone Defense/Counter Unmanned Aerial System (C-UAS)

28 October 2016

i. This Request for Proposals (RFP) is a re-compete of solicitation # FA6800-16-Q-S010 to provide support for the Air Force Global Strike Command, Installation and Mission Support

Directorate, Security Forces Division (AFGSC/A4S), to acquire a commercial product that can provide an interim solution to counter potential emerging threats to Government resources. The

Air Force Installation Contracting Agency, Operating Location – Air Force Global Strike

Command, Specialized Contracting Division (AFICA/KGQ), is requesting competitive proposals for commercial items prepared in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)

Subpart 12.6, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice. Simplified procedures as outlined in FAR 13.5 will be used for the acquisition of this commercial item. The

Government intends to award a single, Firm Fixed Price (FFP), Indefinite Delivery Indefinite

Quantity (IDIQ) contract. This IDIQ will have a minimum order amount of 38 units and a maximum order ceiling of 100 units. This IDIQ will have a one (1) year ordering period.

ii. This solicitation is issued as an RFP. Offerors must submit written proposals and a bid sample

(oral quotes will not be accepted).

ii. This solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through the Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-91.

iv. After extensive market research, including analyzing the results of the Sources Sought notice posted to Federal Business Opportunities (FBO) on 22 Dec 15, as well as, the results of similar procurements (RFQ #FA6800-16-Q-S005 and FA6800-16-Q-S010), the Contracting Officer, with concurrence from the Small Business Administration (SBA), has determined this requirement will be solicited as unrestricted (i.e. full and open competition). The North

American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code is 334511 – Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical Systems and Instrument Manufacturing with a

Small Business Size Standard of 1,250 employees.

v. The IDIQ contract will contain two Contract Line Item Numbers which the Government can order from. CLIN 0001 will be the Portable Drone Defense device and CLIN 0002 will be for

On-Site training. Refer to the attached SOW for a detailed description of requirements for the product/service being acquired.

The Bid Schedule and the contract CLIN schedule are as follows:

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QTY UNIT UNIT

PRICE

AMOUNT

CLIN 0001

Portable Drone

Defense IAW the

SOW

100.00

Each

NTE

CLIN 0002 On-Site

Training

IAW the

SOW

10.00 Jobs NTE

Total Proposed Price TOTAL:

The purpose of this requirement is for support in providing and training the capability of

Counter-Unmanned Ariel Systems (C-UAS) in accordance with the attached Statement of Work

(SOW).

vi. INITIAL ORDER.

Upon award of the IDIQ contract, the Government will issue the initial Delivery Order (DO) for the minimum order amount as follows:

CLIN 0001 – Portable Drone Defense: 38/ea units to be delivered NLT 90 days after issuance of the DO. The initial order will include the bid sample.

CLIN 0002 – On-Site Training: 1/job; training must be completed NLT 30 days after the delivery of the 38 units (CLIN 0001) are delivered and accepted by the Government.

vii. DELIVERY.

Delivery of subsequent orders will be determined at the time the order is issued; however, for the initial order of 38 units, lots of 10/ea (CLIN 0001) shall be delivered as soon as manufactured in order to enable the rapid fielding of this capability, with the final 8 being delivered NLT 90 days after issuance of DO. Delivery will be FOB Destination.

viii. 52.212-1, Instruction to Offerors – Commercial, applies to this acquisition.

52.212-1 Addendum – Proposal Preparation Instructions

A. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of the proposal, the offeror must follow the instructions contained herein. The proposal must be complete, self-sufficient, and respond directly to the requirements of this solicitation. The response shall consist of three (3) separate

Parts: Part I – Price Proposal and Part II – Technical Proposal, Part III – Bid Sample.

B. The contracting officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the contracting officer will review this determination and, if in the contracting officer’s opinion adequate price competition exists, no additional cost information will be requested and certification under FAR 15.406-2 will not be required. However, if at any time during this competition the contracting officer http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/15.htm#P587_118401 determines that adequate price competition no longer exists offerors may be required to submit information other than cost or pricing data to support a determination of price reasonableness.

C. Documents submitted in response to this solicitation must be fully responsive to and consistent with: (1) Requirements of the solicitation and SOW, including Government standards and regulations pertaining to the SOW; (2) Evaluation Factors and Subfactors for Award.

D. All information contained in the proposal that an offeror feels is “Proprietary Information”, and therefore, not releasable under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), should be labeled

“Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104”.

E. Offeror should acknowledge awareness of all amendments to the solicitation by signing and dating Page 1 of each Amendment of Solicitation and include it in Part I – Price, of the proposal.

F. Part I – Price Proposal

i. Complete the solicitation Bid Schedule (section 2.2) of this RFP by inserting the proposed unit price and extended price in the respective blocks. Any offer received without the completed schedule will be determined “nonresponsive” to the RFP and will not be considered for award.

Proposed unit must be whole dollar values (e.g. $10.00). The extended amount must equal the whole dollar unit price multiplied by the number of units.

ii. For this requirement, the proposed technical solution will require extensive field testing and legal review/approval prior to the award being made. Due to this limitation, proposals must remain valid for an extended amount of time to allow for the required testing and approval to be completed. Therefore, the Government requires a minimum acceptance period of 180 calendar days from the date of receipt of offers. The offeror’s proposal must affirmatively state an acceptance period equal to, or greater than, 180 calendar days. Offerors shall include this statement in their Price Proposal. Any offer received without this statement will be determined

“nonresponsive” to the RFP and will not be considered for award.

iii. Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in provisions. The provision 52.212-3 shall be submitted to the Contracting Officer as part of the offeror’s price proposal or be available through the Government’s System for Award Management (SAM). The provision 252.209-7991

(included in full text in section 5.0 of this solicitation) shall be submitted to the Contracting

Officer as part of the offeror’s price proposal.

G. Part II – Technical Proposal (Product Specifications and Information and On-Site Training

Plan).

i. A – Product Specifications and Information. The offeror will include detailed specifications and product information regarding the offeror’s proposed Portable Anti-Drone Defense device.

The offeror’s proposed Portable Anti-Drone Defense product specifications and information must be detailed to show that the product can meet the minimum specifications outlined in the

SOW (Attachment 1).

ii. B – On-Site Training Plan. The Technical Proposal shall also include the offeror’s plan to conduct On-Site Training IAW the SOW to include tasks and milestones.

H. Part III – Bid Sample

i. The Government requires one (1) sample of the offeror’s proposed product to be submitted with the proposal. The sample shall include all parts and accessories (to include a shipping container to securely transport via private contracted courier) that would be provided with a delivered unit IAW the SOW. The Bid Sample will be tested to ensure it meets or exceeds the technical specifications listed in the SOW to include: technical aspects, Nuclear HERO certifications, and Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC) legal determinations. The Bid Sample will be transported by the Government to multiple test facilities.

(End of Addendum)

ix. 52.212-2 Evaluation – Commercial Items (Jan 1999)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

1) Price

2) Technical capability of the item offered to meet the Government requirement

Award will be made to the lowest priced technically acceptable offer (LPTA).

(b) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the

Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of Provision)

52.212-2 Addendum

A. Basis for Contract Award

i. This acquisition will be conducted as a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection IAW FAR Parts 12, 13, and 15, as supplemented by the Defense Federal Acquisition

Regulation Supplement (DFARS), the Air Force Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement

(AFFARS), the DoD Source Selection Procedures, Appendix A, dated 01 Apr 16, and the Air

Force Mandatory Procedures, 5315.3, dated 21 Apr 14. These regulations are available electronically at the Air Force (AF) FARSite, http://farsite.hill.af.mil. The Government will select the proposal with the lowest evaluated price from among those meeting the acceptability standards for non-price factors. Contract may be awarded to the offeror who is deemed responsible in accordance with the FAR Part 9.1, as supplemented, whose proposal conforms to the solicitation’s requirements (to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by 52.212-1 of this solicitation) and is judged, based on the evaluation factors and subfactors, to represent the lowest price technically acceptable proposal. While the Government will strive for maximum objectivity, the source selection process, by its nature, is subjective; and therefore, professional judgment is implicit throughout the entire process.

ii. The Government intends to award one (1), Firm Fixed Price (FFP), Indefinite Delivery

Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract for this requirement.

iii. Discussions. If, during the evaluation period, it is determined to be in the best interest of the

Government to hold discussions, offeror responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs) and the Final

Proposal Revision (FPR) will be considered in making the source selection decision. If the offeror’s proposal has been evaluated as acceptable at the time discussions are closed, any changes or exceptions in the Final Proposal Revision are subject to evaluation and may introduce risk that the offeror’s proposal be determined unacceptable and ineligible for award.

iv. Solicitation Requirements, Terms, and Conditions. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as factors or subfactors. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in the offeror being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and must provide complete supporting rationale. The Government reserves the right to determine any such exceptions unacceptable.

B. Evaluation Methodology.

i. The award decision will be made on the basis of LPTA. In order to be eligible for award, offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, evaluation factor requirements, and be deemed responsible

IAW FAR Part 9. If an offeror fails to meet all solicitation requirements, the Government may not make an award to that offeror.

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/

ii. Proposals will be evaluated using the following Factors and Subfactors:

Factor A. Price

Factor B. Technical

Subfactor 1 – Product Specifications and Information

Subfactor 2 – On-Site Training Plan

Subfactor 3 – Bid Sample

ii. The Government will evaluate proposals for technical acceptability, but will not rank the proposals by the non-priced factors. Technical will be evaluated for acceptability and price will be evaluated for reasonableness. The Government reserves the right to award without discussions, to open discussions, or to establish the competitive range IAW FAR 15.306(c).

C. Evaluation Factors and Subfactors.

i. Factor A – Price. First, offers will be ranked by price. Each offeror’s price proposal will be evaluated to ensure it is fair and reasonable pursuant to FAR 15.404. For additional information, see FAR 31.201-3. Offerors whose price is determined to be unreasonable may not be considered for award and will be eliminated from competition.

ii. Factor B – Technical.

a. After ranking proposals by price, the Government’s technical evaluation team shall evaluate the written technical proposals (Technical Subfactors 1 and 2) on an acceptable or unacceptable basis, assigning one of the ratings for each subfactor. Any subfactor evaluated as “Unacceptable” will render the entire proposal unacceptable, and therefore, unawardable. Only those written proposals determined to be technically acceptable, either initially, or as a result of discussions, will move on to the evaluation of Subfactor 3 – Bid Sample. Technical Subfactors will be given an evaluation rating using the below table:

TABLE 1 - TECHNICAL RATINGS

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

b. Subfactor 1 – Product Specifications and Information. This subfactor will receive an

“Acceptable” rating when the offeror’s proposed product specifications and information detail how their proposed product will meet or exceed the required specifications IAW sections 1.2.

and 2.0. of the SOW.

c. Subfactor 2 – On-Site Training Plan. This subfactor will received an “Acceptable” rating when the offeror’s proposed On-Site Training Plan details the offeror’s plan to provide on-site training to include use, service, maintenance, and basic repair IAW section 4.0. of the SOW.

d. For those offers evaluated as “Acceptable” under Subfactors 1 and 2, their Bid Sample will then be tested and evaluated for technical acceptability. The sample shall include all parts and accessories that would be provided with a delivered unit IAW the SOW, as well as a shipping container to securely transport via private contracted courier. The Bid Sample will be tested to ensure it meets or exceeds the technical specifications listed in the SOW to include the technical aspects, Nuclear HERO certifications, and LOAC legal determinations. During evaluations, the

Bid Sample unit will be transported by the Government to multiple test facilities. The Contractor will NOT have the opportunity to be present during sample testing.

e. Subfactor 3 – Bid Sample. This subfactor will receive an “Acceptable” rating when the offeror’s proposed Bid Sample meets or exceeds the specifications and requirements IAW sections 1.2., 2.0. and 3.0. of the SOW as a result of the Government testing and evaluation.

f. If the Offeror fails to deliver a Bid Sample on time, or if the Contracting Officer disapproved the Sample for failure to meet the specifications of the SOW, the Offer shall be determined to be

“Unacceptable” and will render the entire proposal unacceptable, and therefore, unawardable.

D. Small Business Subcontracting Plan: IAW DFARS 215.304(c)(i), small business participation is exempted from being part of the evaluation for LPTA source selections.

However, offerors are reminded that IAW FAR 19.702(a)(1), if the apparently successful offeror is a large business, and their total proposed amount exceeds $700,000, they will be required to submit an acceptable subcontracting plan before the contract can be awarded. If the apparently successful offeror fails to negotiate a subcontracting plan that is acceptable to the contracting officer within the time limit prescribed by the contracting officer, the offeror will be ineligible for award.

x. Include a completed copy of the provision at 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and

Certifications -- Commercial Items, with your offer or indicate they are current and available through the Government’s System for Award Management (SAM). Contractors must also include a completed copy of the provision at 252.209-7991, Representation by Corporations

Regarding an Unpaid Delinquent Tax Liability or a Felony Conviction under any Federal

Law—Fiscal 2016 Appropriations with their offer.

xi. Clause at 52.212-4, Contract Terms and Conditions -- Commercial Items, applies to this acquisition.

xii. Clause at 52.212-5, Contract Terms and Conditions Required To Implement Statutes Or

Executive Orders -- Commercial Items, applies to this acquisition with the following clauses cited within the clause applicable to this acquisition:

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/52_000.htm#P1479_204463 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/52_000.htm#P1760_244281

52.203-6, Restrictions on Subcontractor Sales to the Government with Alternate I (Oct 1995)

52.204-10, Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier Subcontract Awards (Oct

2015) (Pub. L. 109-282) (31 U.S.C. 6101 note)

52.209-6, Protecting the Government’s Interest When Subcontracting with Contractors

Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for Debarment. (Oct 2015) (31 U.S.C. 6101 note)

52.219-4, Notice of Price Evaluation Preference for HUBZone Small Business Concerns

(Oct 2014) (if the offeror elects to waive the preference, it shall so indicate in its offer)(15

U.S.C. 657a)

52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns (Oct 2014) (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(2) and (3)).

52.219-9, Small Business Subcontractor Plan (Oct 2015) (15 U.S.C. 637 (d)(4)).

52.219-16, Liquidated Damages - Subcontracting Plan (Jan 1999) (15 U.S.C.

637(d)(4)(F)(i)).

52.219-28, Post Award Small Business Program Representation (Jul 2013) (15 U.S.C.

632(a)(2))

52.222-3, Convict Labor (June 2003) (E.O. 11755)

52.222-19, Child Labor – Cooperation with Authorities and Remedies (Jan 2016) (E.O.

13126)

52.222-21, Prohibition of Segregated Facilities (Apr 2015) 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity

(Apr 2015) (E.O. 11246)

52.222-26, Equal Opportunity (Apr 2015) (E.O. 11246).

52.222-35, Equal Opportunity for Veterans (Oct 2015) (38 U.S.C. 4212).

52.222-36, Affirmative Action for Workers with Disabilities (Jul 2014) (29 U.S.C. 793)

52.222-37, Employment Reports on Special Disabled Veterans, Veterans of the Vietnam Era, and Other Eligible Veterans (Feb 2016) (38 U.S.C. 4212).

52.222-40, Notification of Employee Rights under the National Labor Relations Act (Dec

2010) (E.O. 13496).

52.222-50, Combating Trafficking In Persons (Mar 2015) (22 U.S.C. chapter 78 and E.O.

13627)

52.223-18, Encouraging Contractor Policies to Ban Text Messaging While Driving (Aug

2011) (E.O. 13513)

52.225-13, Restriction on Certain Foreign Purchases (Jun 2008) (E.O.’s, proclamations, and statutes administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the Department of the

Treasury).

52.232-33, Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer— System for Award Management (Jul

2013) (31 U.S.C. 3332)

xiii. The following additional clauses and provisions apply to this solicitation and are included by reference. Clauses with an asterisk indicate they will be incorporated by full text in the actual contract award (contact the CO with any questions you may have pertaining to the fill-in data if you feel it may have an effect on your proposal):

52.203-3, Gratuities (Apr 1985)

52.203-12, Limitation on Payments to Influence Certain Federal Transactions (Oct 2010)

52.203-17, Contractor Employee Whistleblower Rights and Requirement To Inform

Employees of Whistleblower Rights (Apr 2014)

52.219-1 Alt I, Small Business Programs Representations - Alternate I (Oct 2014)

52.225-25, Prohibition on Contracting with Entities Engaging in Certain Activities or

Transactions Relating to Iran—Representation and Certification (Oct 2015)

52.232-8, Discounts for Prompt Payment (Feb 2002)

52.232-40, Providing Accelerated Payments to Small Business Subcontractors (Dec 2013)

52.247-34, F.o.b. Destination (Nov 1991)

252.203-7000, Requirements Relating to Compensation of Former DoD Officials (Sep

2011)

252.203-7002, Requirement to Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights (Sep 2013)

252.204-7003, Control of Government Personnel Work Product (Apr 1992)

252.204-7008, Compliance with Safeguarding Covered Defense Information Controls (Dec

2015)

252.204-7012, Safeguarding of Unclassified Controlled Technical Information (Aug 2015)

252.209-7004 Subcontracting with Firms that are Owned or Controlled by the

Government of a Country that is a State Sponsor of Terrorism (Oct 2015)

252.209-7991 Representation by Corporations Regarding an Unpaid Delinquent Tax

Liability or a Felony Conviction under any Federal Law—Fiscal 2016 Appropriations (Oct

2015)

*252.211-7003, Item Unique Identification and Valuation (Dec 2013)

252.225-7001, Buy American Act and Balance of Payments Program (Nov 14)

252.225-7002, Qualifying Country Sources as Subcontractors (Dec 2012)

252.225-7012, Preference for Certain Domestic Commodities (Feb 2013)

252.226-7001, Utilization of Indian Organizations, Indian Owned Economic Enterprises, and

Native Hawiian Small Business Concerns (Sep 2004)

252.232-7003, Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and Receiving Reports (Jun

2012)

252.232-7006, Wide Area Workflow Payment Instructions (May 2013) 252.232-7010, Levies on Contract Payments (Dec 2006)

252.232-7010, Levies on Contract Payments (Dec 2006)

252.243-7002, Request for Equitable Adjustment (Dec 2012)

252.244-7000, Subcontracts for Commercial Items (Jun 2013)

252.247-7023, Transportation of Supplies by Sea- Basic (Apr 2014)

*5352.201-9101, Ombudsman (Apr 2014)

5352.223-9000, Elimination of Use of Class I Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS) (Nov

2012) (No substances identified)

The following additional clauses and provisions apply to this solicitation and are included by full text:

52.214-20 -- Bid Samples (Apr 2002)

(a) “Bid sample” means a product sample required to be submitted by a bidder to show those characteristics of the offered products that cannot adequately be described by specifications, purchase descriptions, or the invitation for bid (e.g., balance, facility of use, or pattern).

(b) Bidders must furnish bid samples as part of the bid. The Government must receive the bid samples by the time specified in the invitation for bids. If the bidder fails to submit samples on time, the Government will reject the bid, except that the Contracting Officer will consider a late sample sent by mail under the Late Submissions, Modifications, and Withdrawals of Bids provision of this solicitation.

(c) The Government will test or evaluate bid samples to determine compliance with all the characteristics listed for examination in this solicitation. The Government will reject the bid when the sample fails to conform to the required characteristics. Products delivered under any resulting contract must conform to --

(1) The approved sample for the characteristics listed for test or evaluation; and

(2) The specifications for all other characteristics.

(d) Unless otherwise specified in the solicitation, bid samples shall be --

(1) Submitted at no expense to the Government; and

(2) Returned at the bidder’s request and expense.

(End of Provision)

52.216-18 – Ordering (Oct 1995)

(a) Any supplies and services to be furnished under this contract shall be ordered by issuance of delivery orders or task orders by the individuals or activities designated in the Schedule. Such orders may be issued from Award Date (TBD) through One Year from Award Date.

(b) All delivery orders or task orders are subject to the terms and conditions of this contract. In the event of conflict between a delivery order or task order and this contract, the contract shall control.

(c) If mailed, a delivery order or task order is considered “issued” when the Government deposits the order in the mail. Orders may be issued orally, by facsimile, or by electronic commerce methods only if authorized in the Schedule.

(End of Clause)

52.216-19 -- Order Limitations (Oct 1995)

(a) Minimum order. When the Government requires supplies or services covered by this contract in an amount of less than 5, the Government is not obligated to purchase, nor is the Contractor obligated to furnish, those supplies or services under the contract.

(b) Maximum order. The Contractor is not obligated to honor --

(1) Any order for a single item in excess of 50;

(2) Any order for a combination of items in excess of 55; or

(3) A series of orders from the same ordering office within 30 days that together call for quantities exceeding the limitation in subparagraph (b)(1) or (2) of this section.

(c) If this is a requirements contract (i.e., includes the Requirements clause at subsection 52.216-

21 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)), the Government is not required to order a part of any one requirement from the Contractor if that requirement exceeds the maximum-order limitations in paragraph (b) of this section.

(d) Notwithstanding paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, the Contractor shall honor any order exceeding the maximum order limitations in paragraph (b), unless that order (or orders) is returned to the ordering office within 15 days after issuance, with written notice stating the

Contractor’s intent not to ship the item (or items) called for and the reasons. Upon receiving this notice, the Government may acquire the supplies or services from another source.

52.216-22 -- Indefinite Quantity (Oct 1995)

(a) This is an indefinite-quantity contract for the supplies or services specified, and effective for the period stated, in the Schedule. The quantities of supplies and services specified in the

Schedule are estimates only and are not purchased by this contract.

(b) Delivery or performance shall be made only as authorized by orders issued in accordance with the Ordering clause. The Contractor shall furnish to the Government, when and if ordered, the supplies or services specified in the Schedule up to and including the quantity designated in the Schedule as the “maximum.” The Government shall order at least the quantity of supplies or services designated in the Schedule as the “minimum.”

(c) Except for any limitations on quantities in the Order Limitations clause or in the Schedule, there is no limit on the number of orders that may be issued. The Government may issue orders requiring delivery to multiple destinations or performance at multiple locations.

(d) Any order issued during the effective period of this contract and not completed within that period shall be completed by the Contractor within the time specified in the order. The contract shall govern the Contractor’s and Government’s rights and obligations with respect to that order to the same extent as if the order were completed during the contract’s effective period;

provided, that the Contractor shall not be required to make any deliveries under this contract after 13 months from date of initial IDIQ award.

52.252-2 Clauses Incorporated By Reference (Feb 1998)

This contract incorporates one or more clauses by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. Also, the full text of a clause may be accessed electronically at this/these address(es):

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vffara.htm http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vfdfara.htm http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vfaffara.htm

52.252-6, Authorized Deviations in Clauses (Apr 1984)

(a) The use in this solicitation or contract of any Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR

Chapter 1) clause with an authorized deviation is indicated by the addition of “(DEVIATION)” after the date of the clause.

(b) The use in this solicitation or contract of any DFARS (48 CFR Ch. 2) clause with an authorized deviation is indicated by the addition of “(DEVIATION)” after the name of the regulation.

(End of Clause)

252.209-7991, Representation by Corporations Regarding an Unpaid Delinquent Tax

Liability or a Felony Conviction under any Federal Law—Fiscal 2016 Appropriations

(Deviation 2016-O0002) (Oct 2015)

(a) In accordance with section 101(a) of the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2016 (Pub. L. 114-

53) and any subsequent FY 2016 appropriations act that extends to FY 2016 funds the same restrictions as are contained in sections 744 and 745 of division E, title VII, of the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015 (Pub. L. 113-235), none of the funds made available by this or any other Act may be used to enter into a contract with any corporations that-

(1) Has any unpaid Federal tax liability that has been assessed, for which all judicial and administrative remedies have been exhausted or have lapsed, and that is not being paid in a timely manner pursuant to an agreement with the authority responsible for collecting the tax liability, where the awarding agency is aware of the unpaid tax liability, unless the agency has http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vffara.htm http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vfdfara.htm http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vfaffara.htm considered suspension or debarment of the corporation and made a determination that this further action is not necessary to protect the interests of the Government; or

(2) Was convicted of a felony criminal violation under any Federal law within the preceding 24 months, where the awarding agency is aware of the conviction, unless the agency has considered suspension or debarment of the corporation and made a determination that this action is not necessary to protect the interests of the Government.

(b) The Offeror represents that--

(1) It is [ ] is not [ ] a corporation that has any unpaid Federal tax liability that has been assessed, for which all judicial and administrative remedies have been exhausted or have lapsed, and that is not being paid in a timely manner pursuant to an agreement with the authority responsible for collecting the tax liability,

(2) It is [ ] is not [ ] a corporation that was convicted of a felony criminal violation under a Federal law within the preceding 24 months.

(End of provision) xiv Reserved

xv. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION.

Proposals are due NLT 05 December 2016 by 1200 (Noon) Central Time. The written proposals (Part I – Price and Part II –Technical) are requested to be sent electronically via email to Capt Thaddeus Wright at thaddeus.wright@us.af.mil and Capt John Sidor at john.sidor@us.af.mil.

Part III –Bid Sample is requested to be sent to the following address and must be marked as stated below:

AFICA/KGQ

Attn: Capt Thaddeus Wright

**SOURCE SELECTION SENSATIVE**

** DO NOT OPEN IN MAIL ROOM**

841 Fairchild Ave

Barksdale AFB, LA 71110

Offerors are encouraged to verify the Government has received their proposal by calling one of the two numbers below. Any proposal that arrives to the contracting office after 1200 Central

Time on 05 Dec 16 will not be considered for award.

Please contact Capt Thaddeus Wright at 318-456-2487 or Capt John Sidor at 318-456-8983 with any questions.

mailto:thaddeus.wright@us.af.mil mailto:john.sidor@us.af.mil