Attachment_3_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 30 KB Posted

Attached to
AGE Maintenance and Fuels Management Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA5570-14-R-0001
Issued by
Department of the Air Force United States Air Forces in Europe - Air Forces Africa

About this file

Attachment 3 PPQ

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to AGE Maintenance and Fuels Management Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
Site_Visit_Minutes.pdf PDF
AGE_and_Fuels_Pre_Proposal_Conference.pdf PDF
Requests_for_Information.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_TUPE.pdf PDF
FA5570-14-R-0001.pdf PDF
Attachment_4_site_visit.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_PWS.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FA5570-14-R-0001 Attachment 3

Past and Present Performance Questionnaire

A. GENERAL INFORMATION:

Vendor’s Name: ____________________ Telephone Number: ____________________ Address: __________________________ Fax Number: _________________________ __________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________

Project Title and Brief Description of Work: ___________________________________

Contract Name/Number: ___________________ $/£ Amount: ________________

Contract Period or Project Period of Performance: __________________________ Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: _____________________ Title: ___________________________ Company/Organization:____________________________________________________ Address: ________________________Telephone Number: _______________________ _______________________________ Fax Number:____________________________ _______________________________ Email Address: __________________________

C. EMAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: andrew.pillow.gb@us.af.mil & 501csw.rco@us.af.mil

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (A or U) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF Unacceptable (U).

A U Acceptable Unacceptable

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element may have contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

mailto:andrew.pillow.gb@us.af.mil mailto:501csw.rco@alconbury.af.mil

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor: Acceptable Unacceptable Not Applicable

1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements and adequate project supervision at the place of performance.

2. Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and/or replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

3. Demonstrated ability to provide adequate manning and equipment to respond to surge requirements, contingencies, emergencies and weather delays.

4. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

5. Interfaced and cooperated with government quality assurance personnel (or corporate/agency equivalent) after being awarded the contract and/or commencement of project performance.

6. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

7. Performed services on time.

8. Displayed initiative to solve problems and follow-up to ensure desired results were achieved.

9. Was responsive to contract changes (if applicable).

10. Business relations (partnering meetings, etc)

11. Effectively responded to customer complaints in a timely manner.

12. Were offeror’s staff trained on the specific contract requirements?

13. Provide adequate number of personnel to carry out the requirements of the contract/project? Allowing for leave of absence, etc.)

14. Did offeror’s quality control process include accountability of operative’s performance?

15. Displayed environmental awareness. (Compliance and initiatives)

16. Displayed effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling contract cost. In addition, demonstrates a sense of cost responsibility, through the efficient use of resources, in each work effort.

17. How would you rate the vendor's overall performance?

REMARKS/COMMENTS:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .