PP_Questionnaire.pdf

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

(When filled in, this document contains Source Selection Sensitive Information)

SECTION C - CONTRACT SPECIFICS: To be completed by each reference. Some of this information is repeat from Section A and is requested only to confirm the information.

COMPETITIVE CONTRACT?

YES NO

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SECTION A - CONTRACTOR INFORMATION: Offeror is to complete this section prior to sending this form to each reference listed on the Past and Present Performance References form (Attachment 2).

CAGE CODE:

DUNS NUMBER:

FAX NUMBER (to include area code)

CONTRACTOR COMPANY NAME ADDRESS

RETURN COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO THE INDIVIDUAL LISTED BELOW:

POINT OF CONTACT AND E-MAIL ADDRESS TELEPHONE NUMBER (to include area code)

CONTRACT NUMBER CONTRACT TITLE

SECTION B - RESPONDENT INFORMATION: To be completed by each reference providing information in Sections C & E. This is a 4-page questionnaire---please complete all 4 pages.

COMPANY/ORGANIZATION

ADDRESS (Street, City, State, and Zip Code)

TYPED/PRINTED NAME TITLE

DATESIGNATAUREE-MAIL ADDRESS

FAX NUMBER (to include area code)TELEPHONE NUMBER (to include area code)

COMPLETE & RETURN PRIOR TO THE

OFFER DUE DATE & TIME INDICATED

ON STANDARD FORM 1449, BLOCK 8.

SECTION D - EVALUATION CONFIDENCE RATING SCALE:

POINT OF CONTACT AND E-MAIL ADDRESS:

PATRICIA THATCHER

patricia.thatcher@us.af.mil

MAILING ADDRESS:

27 SOCONS/PKA

110 AlisonAve, Bldg 600 Cannon AFB NM 88103-5214

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES

REASON FOR DIFFERENCE BETWEEN INITIAL AND CURRENT/FINAL CONTRACT COSTS

CURRENT/FINAL CONTRACT VALUE CONTRACT BEING EVALUATED AS (indicate which):

PRIME CONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTOR

TELEPHONE NUMBERS

VOICE: (575) 784-6193

FAX: (575) 784-0151

CONTRACT TITLE

INITIAL CONTRACT VALUE

APPROXIMATE SQUARE FOOTAGE APPROXIMATE NUMBER OF BUILDINGS

CONTRACT NUMBER CONTRACT TYPE (Firm-Fixed Price, Cost Reimbursement, etc.)

PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE

(When filled in, this document contains Source Selection Sensitive Information)

E

VG

S

M

U

NA

E VG S M U NA

E VG S M U NA

Contractor provided timely cost proposals for contract changes.

Contractor submitted revised service schedules as required.

Contractor provided well researched and clearly identified product information that matched contract requirements, if required.

Contractor completed all work with good workmanship and in conformance with the Performance Work Statement, resulting in mimimal contract discrepancy reports.

How well did contractor respond to overall contract requests (i.e., requests for proposal for modifications, ensuring required training is preformed when required, etc.)?

QUALITY OF SERVICE

How would you rate the contractor's willingness to improve and correct non-compliance issues?

How would you rate the contractor's initiative to resolve problems?

If applicable, how well did the contractor adhere to reperformance requirements as stated in the contract requirements? If not applicable, indicate N/A in this block.

y p g other administrative documents required by the contract?

Contractor developed and submitted realistic work schedule(s).

If applicable, how well did the contractor re-perform the work? If not applicable, indicate N/A in this block.

Contractor's history of recurring performance problems. How well did the contractor prevent the recurrence of the same performance problems?

Contractor provided effective quality control and inspection procedures, which resulted in quality service to the customer?

Contractor identified problems as they occurred; suggested realistic approaches to problesm; displayed initiative to solve problems; and performed as a "Team Member".

Contractor was reasonable and cooperated to resolve problems, attended meetings as needed, and maintained communication with the Government to keep all required services on schedule.

Contractor met established approved schedules to complete all the services on time, as scheduled.

Not Applicable

RATING

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

SECTION E: CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE RATINGS: To be completed by each reference using the rating scale in

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor was effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor was highly effective.

Unsatisfactory

Marginal

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The Contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully emplemented.Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

SCHEDULE

How well did the contractor adhere to required response times, upon notification of work?

DEFINITION

(When filled in, this document contains Source Selection Sensitive Information)

YES NO

E VG S M U NA

YES NO

How well did the contractor do in providing a responsible point of contact and giving that individual the proper authority to perform the work related to daily operation of the contract?

Contractor ensured the Project Manager or alternate was consistently available when work was performed.

PLEASE ANSWER YES/NO TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS AND PROVIDE EXPLANATIONS WHERE REQUESTED.

Contractor hired, maintained, and replaced as necessary, qualified personnel and subcontractors/suppliers.

Contractor provided experienced/qualified managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

Contractor ensured the Project Manager had sufficient authority to make decisions and take actions during contract performance to keep services on schedule.

How would you rate the contractor's quality of services and/or products provided? If marginal or unsatisfactory, please explain:

How well did the contractor do in complying with contract requirements (i.e., terms and conditions, performance work statement, clauses, etc.)? If marginal or unsatisfactory, please explain:

MANAGEMENT

SECTION E: CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE RATINGS (CON'T): To be completed by each reference using the rating scale in Section D.

PLEASE ANSWER YES/NO TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS AND PROVIDE EXPLANATIONS WHERE REQUESTED.

Contractor acted promptly to resolve problems, ensuring compliance with contract requirements and safety regulations.

Contractor hired quality subcontractors and effectively managed and coordinated their work, if required.

Did you ever elect not to exercise an option due to the contractor's performance? If yes, please explain:

Was the contractor ever issued a letter of concern, cure notice, or show-cause notice? If yes, please explain:

Did the contractor meet the terms of the contract within the contractually agreed price? If no, please explain:

How would you rate the contractor's reasonableness and cooperativeness in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements and disputes)?

How would you rate the contractor's effectiveness in managing the overall contract (incuding the ability to effectively lead, manage, and control the program)?

How would you rate the contractor's ability to provide experienced managers/supervisors during the initial startup and through the life of the contract? If marginal or unsatisfactory, please explain:

How would you rate the contractor's timeliness and effectiveness in problem resolution without extensive customer guidance and time?

How would you rate the contractor's quality and effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts?

Contractor paid employees/subcontractors/suppliers as required.

(When filled in, this document contains Source Selection Sensitive Information)

E VG S M U NA

E VG S M U NA

YES NO

Is the contract rated in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS)?

Contractor performed all work without the issuance of a CURE NOTICE or a SHOW CAUSE LETTER (If a notice was issued, please describe the circumstances)

Rate your overall satisfaction with this contractor's performance.

Has the contractor submitted any claims? If yes, please explain below. Were any of the claims valid?

Were any contract concessions or changes made due to the contractor's failure to accurately estimate costs? If yes, please explain:

Were any contract concessions or changes made due to the contractor's inability to meet technical requirements and/or delivery schedules? If yes, please explain:

BUSINESS RELATIONS

Rate the contractor's flexibility in satisfying the requirements of their customers within the terms of the contract.

After contract award, did the contractor live up to what was proposed during the solicitation process?

What were the contractor's greatest strengths in the performance of the contract?

What were the contractor's greatest weaknesses in the performance of the contract?

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

COST:

Contractor provided complete, supportable, accurate, and reasonable cost proposals that met the requirements of the contract or modifications thereto. They were not over-inflated nor were they underestimated.

Contractor demonstrated the ability to control costs and/or submit reasonable proposals for modifications to contract requirements.

PLEASE ANSWER YES/NO TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTION.

NARRATIVE SUMMARY

SECTION E: CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE RATINGS (CON'T): To be completed by each reference using the rating scale in Section D.

Sheet1