Past Performance Survey Attachment 6.docx

DOCX document 23 KB Posted

Attached to
RECOVERY-- NZAS021035 - Rpair Dormitory 768 Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA4626-09-R-0022
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Global Strike Command

About this file

Past Performance Survey - Renovate Dorm 768 Attachment 6

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to RECOVERY-- NZAS021035 - Rpair Dormitory 768, newest first.
File Type Posted
A1.1 and 1.2 Clarifications.docx DOCX document
021035M100-DWF.dwf DWF file
Amendment 6.doc DOC document
Bid Item 105 Q & A.docx DOCX document
Question regarding cabinet hinges in Dorm 768.docx DOCX document
Revised Drawings 2.ZIP ZIP file
Amendment 5.doc DOC document
Door Hardware Questions.docx DOCX document
Amendment 4.doc DOC document
Revised Drawings Dorm 768.zip ZIP file
General Decision Number Amend 4.docx DOCX document
Responses.doc DOC document
Amendment 3.doc DOC document
021035A41-DWF.pdf PDF
Amendment 2.doc DOC document
Question and Answer 1.docx DOCX document
Pre-Proposal Site Visit Agenda.doc DOC document
Solicitation Amendment 0001.doc DOC document
Renovate Dorm 768 Solicitation.doc DOC document
Revised DWF FILES Attachment 4.zip ZIP file
Spec Doc Files Attachment 1.zip ZIP file
768 drawingindex Attachment 3.doc DOC document
Subschedule-D768 Attachment 2.xls XLS spreadsheet
General Decision Number MT1 Attachment 5.docx DOCX document
General Decision Number MT5 Attachment 5.docx DOCX document
Show all 25

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FA4626-09-R-0022

ATTACHMENT 6

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104 WHEN FILLED IN

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Telephone Number: ____________________ Address: __________________________ Fax Number: _________________________ __________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________

__________________________
__________________________

Project Title and Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________*

Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: ________*

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ______________________*

Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

THIS IS INFO FOR US ONLY – REMOVE PRIOR TO POSTING * Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name & Title of Evaluator: _____________________ Company Name: ____________________________

Address: _____________________Telephone Number: ___________________ _____________________________Fax Number:_____________________
_____________________________Email Address: _____________________

C. SEND COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO:

341st Comptroller Contracting Squadron/LGCA
7015 Goddard Drive, Bldg 145
Malmstrom AFB, MT 59402-6863
ATTN: Jenny Reed
Or FAX: (406) 731-3748
Or EMAIL: jenny.reed@malmstrom.af.mil
DUTY PHONE: (406) 731-3624

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.

E
G
S
M
U
N
Exceptional
Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor:
E
G
S
M
U
N
1.
Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2.
Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
3.
Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
4.
Home office participated in solving significant local problems.
5.
Followed approved quality control plan.
6.
Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
7.
Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
8.
Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.
9.
Identified problems as they occurred.
10.
Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
11.
Displayed initiative to solve problems.
12.
Developed realistic progress schedules.
13.
Met established project schedules.
14.
Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.
15.
Was responsive to contract changes.
16.
Provided adequate project supervision.
17.
Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.
18.
Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
19.
Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.
20.
Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
21.
How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
22.
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”

YES/NO

23.
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”

YES/NO

24.
Is the contractor rated in CCASS?
YES/NO

OVERALL RATING: ___________________________

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ___________________ CONTRACT NUMBER __________

Remarks:___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104 WHEN FILLED IN

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .