FA4625-16-R-0013-0002 _Bonds_ _Relevancy.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to:

A) Update Attachment 4, General Information, dated 8 August 2016.

B) Update relevancy in Section L, Instructions to Offerors, and Section M, Evaluation Factors for Award.

C) Insert FAR Clause 52.228-13, Alternative Payment Protections.

////////// LAST ITEM /////////////

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 9

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 08-Aug-2016

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA4625-16-R-0013

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

18-Jul-2016

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

08-Aug-2016

CODE

509 CONS/LGCA - FA4625

660 TENTH STREET, STE 222

WHITEMAN AFB MO 65305-5316

FA4625 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

FA4625-16-R-0013

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION I - CONTRACT CLAUSES

The following have been added by full text:

52.228-13 ALTERNATIVE PAYMENT PROTECTIONS (JULY 2000)

(a) The Contractor shall submit one of the following payment protections:

Performance Bond

Payment Bond

(b) The amount of the payment protection shall be 100 percent of the contract price.

(c) The submission of the payment protection is required within 10 days of contract award.

(d) The payment protection shall provide protection for the full contract performance period plus a one-year period.

(e) Except for escrow agreements and payment bonds, which provide their own protection procedures, the

Contracting Officer is authorized to access funds under the payment protection when it has been alleged in writing by a supplier of labor or material that a nonpayment has occurred, and to withhold such funds pending resolution by administrative or judicial proceedings or mutual agreement of the parties.

(f) When a tripartite escrow agreement is used, the Contractor shall utilize only suppliers of labor and material that signed the escrow agreement.

(End of clause)

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

The following have been modified:

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

1. Statement of Work (SOW), dated 18 July 2016

2. Wage Determination, (DBA) MO160001, dated 1 July 2016

3. Policy Letters:

a. Installation Traffic Code

b. Designated Tobacco Areas

c. Foreign National Access

d. Drug-Free Workplace and Alcohol

4. General Information, dated 8 August 2016

5. *Seed project SOW, dated 28 April 2016

5a. *Seed Bid Schedule

6. *Bid Schedule, dated 18 July 2016

7. *Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

* Will not be part of the resultant contract.

End of List of Attachments

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

THIS SECTION IS FOR SOLICITATION PURPOSES ONLY. THIS SECTION WILL BE PHYSICALLY

REMOVED FROM ANY RESULTANT AWARD, BUT WILL BE DEEMED INCORPORATED BY

REFERENCE.

NOTE: All proposal preparation cost will be the sole responsibility of the Offeror. The Government will not reimburse any firm for their proposal preparation cost.

Period for acceptance of offers: The Offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm until 120 days after proposal due date.

Proposal Preparation Instructions

A. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, Offerors must follow the instructions contained herein.

Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The response shall consist of two (2) separately bound parts:

PART I - TECHNICAL CAPABILITY

PART II - PRICE

B. Offerors must complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in Sections I through K. Section K shall be returned in its entirety. For Sections C through I, the Offeror shall submit only those pages that require a fill-in.

C. Relationship between Solicitation Section L and Section M. Your attention is directed to the functional relationship between Section L and M of this solicitation. Section L provides information for the purpose of organizing the proposal and is not intended to be all-inclusive. Section M describes the evaluation factors for award, to include the evaluation procedures for the Technical Capability and, the ranking of the Price proposals. Since the

Government evaluation of proposals will cover areas identified in Section M, proposals should address all such areas of evaluation. Proposals that do not contain the information required risk rejection and consideration for award.

PART I – TECHNICAL CAPABILITY

A. Subfactor 1 – Professional Qualifications – Limited to no more than 10 pages. Submit original with one (1) copy and one (1) sanitized copy with Offerors CAGE code only. A sanitized copy removes all direct references that can identify an Offeror by name or other easily recognizable characteristic. The sanitized copy will only contain a

CAGE code as an identifier. The sanitized copy will be used during source selection procedures as detailed in

Section M of the solicitation.

1. CRITERIA: Offeror must provide an organizational chart identifying key personnel with a description of their work experience relating to projects similar in scope to those expected under this contract. At a minimum, the Offeror shall provide the following information.

a) A block diagram identifying the individuals (management and supervisors) associated with this requirement to include:

(1) Key personnel: Each individual’s name, title, duty, years of experience and experience level relating to similar contracts in size and scope. At a minimum, the Offeror shall provide information for the following disciplines:

(a) Project Manager

(b) Site Superintendent

(2) The narratives for the Project Manager and Site Superintendent, must show a minimum of two (2) years’ experience for each respective discipline on a project of similar size and scope.

b) A description of the organization’s program management policies and procedures to include project planning approach, the process for information flow, reporting, and the policies and procedures for maintaining and recruiting qualified staffing throughout the contract period for prime and subcontractor employees in accordance with the SOW.

B. Subfactor 2 – Past Performance

1. When addressing past performance evaluation criteria set forth in this solicitation, the Offeror shall provide recent and relevant information regarding an Offeror’s actions under previously awarded contracts. Relevant past performance includes contracts with work of a nature, magnitude and scope similar to that required for this contract within the past three (3) years. Relevant past performance consists of installing commercial grade slat metal fencing, privacy fencing with vertical elements, and/or chain-link fencing in a commercial environment.

2. The Offeror shall forward a list, not to exceed ten (10), of their most recent references, for whom the Offeror has contracted similar services with Federal, State, and Local Governments. If the Offeror does not have Government references, the Offeror shall provide references from private industry sources that are not prohibited from furnishing information to the Government. The Past Performance questionnaires must be forwarded to a verified point of contact at each of those agencies or business organizations for completion. Prior to forwarding the questionnaire to each reference, the Offeror shall complete the Section entitled “Contractor Information”. Offerors may include with their proposal information on problems encountered on the identified contracts and the Offeror’s corrective actions.

The Government will consider this information as well as information obtained from any other sources when evaluating the Offeror’s past performance information.

3. A cover letter sent by the Offeror with the Past Performance Questionnaire should request the reference to complete the questionnaire and mail it to 509 CONS/LGCA, ATTN SSgt Theodore Church-Reeves, 660 10th Street, Suite 222, Whiteman AFB MO 65305; or by fax to (660) 687-7083; or by email to 509cons.sollgca@us.af.mil, with receipt no later than the proposal due date. Offerors are responsible for ensuring that their reference sources receive the questionnaires in time to complete and return the questionnaire to the 509 CONS and be received no later than the proposal due date.

4. Complete the necessary fill-ins

(1) Contracting Agency/Customer

(2) Contract Number

(3) Contract type

(4) Project title and brief description of contract effort

(5) Period of performance

(6) Contract value at time of award

(7) Current value, including all changes and exercised options

(8) Contracting Officer’s name, address and telephone number

5. Past Performance Questionnaire and cover letter are located in Attachment 6 of this solicitation.

6. Other Present/Past Performance Information: Offerors are encouraged to include information relevant to the following:

a. Professional/Industry Awards (Identify award type, date of award and copy of certificate if applicable.)

b. Letters of appreciation, recognition or commendation, etc. received on behalf of customer may be submitted.

PART II – PRICE PROPOSAL

A. Complete the SF 1442, Blocks 14, 15, 17, 19, 20A, 20B, 20C and 30. An official having the authority to bind your company contractually must sign and date the SF 1442 Block 30b. One copy of the SF 1442 must bear an original, authorized signature. Submit original and one (1) copy of this part. In doing so, the Offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the RFP. All sections of the RFP, excluding Instructions to Offerors and

Evaluation Procedures Sections, constitute the model contract.

B. Bid Schedule – Insert proposed pricing on the SF 1442 Bid Schedule, for each Contract Line Item and in

Attachment 2, Bid Schedule, including all option years. Along with the paper copy, include an electronic copy of the Bid Schedule, in an Excel format, version 97-2003 or later. Attachment 2 will be used for evaluation purposes only.

C. Acknowledge any and all amendments to the solicitation.

D. Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in all sections, to include Section K. Offerors shall submit only those pages that require fill-in.

E. The Contracting Officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. All pricing received in response to this solicitation will be evaluated for price realism for the purposes of making a reasonableness determination. Upon examination of the initial offers, the Contracting Officer will review this determination and if, in the Contracting Officer’s opinion, adequate price competition exists, no additional cost information will be requested and certification under FAR 15.406-2 will not be required. If at any time during this competition the Contracting Officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists, such as an event where multiple Offers are determined to be unrealistic, Offerors may be required to submit information to the extent necessary for the Contracting Officer to determine the realism and reasonableness of the price.

GENERAL INFORMATION

A. Any limitation on the number of proposal pages. Pages exceeding the page limitations set forth in 52.212-1 will not be read or evaluated, and will be removed from the proposal.

Format for proposal Part I & II shall be as follows:

1. A page is defined as one face of an 8 ½” x 11” sheet of paper containing information.

2. Typing shall not be less than 12 pitch.

B. INFORMATION REGARDING SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS: We will not accept emailed or faxed proposals. The sealed envelope or package used to submit your proposal must show the time and date for receipt, the Solicitation Number, and the name and address of the Offeror. Mailed proposals (USPS, FedEx, UPS, DHL, etc.) must be sent to the following address:

509 CONS/LGCA

Attn. Theodore Church-Reeves

660 10th Street, Suite 222

Whiteman AFB, MO 65305

C. Offerors are cautioned that Whiteman AFB, MO has visitor control procedures requiring individuals not affiliated with the installation to obtain a visitor pass prior to entrance. SOME DELAY SHOULD BE

ANTICIPATED WHEN HANDCARRYING PROPOSALS. Offerors should allow sufficient time to obtain a visitor pass and arrive at the bid depository PRIOR to the time specified for receipt.

D. Late proposals will be processed in accordance with FAR 52.212-1(f) “Late submission, modifications, revisions and withdrawals of offerors.”

E. FEDERAL HOLIDAYS: The following Federal Legal Holidays are observed by this base:

New Year’s Day – 1 January

Martin Luther King’s Birthday – Third Monday in January

Presidents Day – Third Monday in February

Memorial Day – Last Monday in May

Independence Day – 4 July

Labor Day – First Monday in September

Columbus Day – Second Monday in October

Veterans Day – 11 November

Thanksgiving Day – Fourth Thursday in November

Christmas Day – 25 December

F. E-mail or facsimile modifications to proposals will be accepted; however, the originals must be received in this office prior to award. The e-mail address is 509cons.sollgca@us.af.mil, the fax number is 660-687-7083.

G. Acknowledgement of solicitation amendments (SF30) will be accepted by e-mail or fax. An original copy is not required to be mailed. The acknowledgement must be received prior to solicitation closing date. The e-mail address is 509cons.sollgca@us.af.mil, the fax number is 660-687-7083.

(end of Section L)

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARDS

THIS SECTION IS FOR SOLICITATION PURPOSES ONLY. THIS SECTION WILL BE PHYSICALLY

REMOVED FROM ANY RESULTANT AWARD, BUT WILL BE DEEMED INCORPORATED BY

REFERENCE.

1. The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible Offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

The following factors shall be used in the following order to evaluate offers:

PART I - TECHNICAL CAPABILITY

PART II - PRICE

2. Offerors are cautioned to submit sufficient information and in the format specified in Section L. Offerors may be asked to clarify certain aspects of their proposal (for example, to respond to adverse past performance information to which the Offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond). Adverse past performance is defined as past performance information that supports a less than satisfactory rating on any evaluation element or any unfavorable comments received from sources without a formal rating system. Communications conducted to resolve minor or clerical errors will not constitute discussions and the Contracting Officer reserves the right to award a contract without the opportunity for proposal revision.

3. BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD: This is a competitive best value source selection in which technically acceptable competing Offerors will be evaluated as being equal to Cost or Price; however, cost/price will contribute substantially to the selection decision. By submission of its offer, the Offeror accedes to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being determined unacceptable. The evaluation process shall proceed as follows:

PART I – TECHNICAL CAPABILITY

1. First, the technical capability of all offers will be evaluated on an ACCEPTABLE / UNACCEPTABLE basis.

a) ACCEPTABLE – Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

b) UNACCEPTABLE – Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

2. Evaluators shall assign a rating of ACCEPTABLE / UNACCEPTABLE based on the minimum requirements stated below.

A. Subfactor 1 – Professional Qualifications

1. CRITERIA: Offeror must provide an organizational chart identifying key personnel with a description of its work experience relating to projects similar in scope to those expected under this contract. Additionally, provide a narrative describing the organization’s program management policies, procedures, and processes.

2. MINIMUM STANDARD OF ACCEPTABILITY: The minimum standard of acceptability is met when the Offeror provides:

a) A block diagram identifying the individuals (management and supervisors) associated with this requirement to include:

(1) Key personnel: Each individual’s name, title, duty, years of experience and experience level relating to similar contracts in size and scope. At a minimum, the Offeror shall provide information for the following disciplines:

(a) Project Manager

(b) Site Superintendent

(2) The narratives for the Project Manager and Site Superintendent, must show a minimum of two (2) years’ experience for that respective discipline on a project of similar size and scope.

b) A description of the organization’s program management policies and procedures to include project planning approach, the process for information flow, reporting, and the policies and procedures for maintaining and recruiting qualified staffing throughout the contract period for prime and subcontractor employees in accordance with the SOW.

B. Subfactor 2 – Past Performance

1. MINIMUM STANDARD OF ACCEPTABILITY: The minimum standard of acceptability is met when the Offeror provides (see SECTION L, PART 1, “Subfactor 2” paragraph B for details):

Recent and relevant information regarding an Offeror’s actions under previously awarded contracts.

b) A list, not to exceed ten (10) of the Offeror’s most recent references for similar services with Federal, State, and

Local Governments.

c) Cover letter sent by the Offeror with the Past Performance Questionnaire should request the reference to complete the questionnaire and mail it to 509 CONS/LGCA, ATTN SSgt Theodore Church-Reeves, 660 10th Street, Suite 222, Whiteman AFB MO 65305; or by fax to (660) 687-7083; or by email to 509cons.sollgca@us.af.mil, with receipt no later than the proposal due date.

d) Complete the necessary fill-ins

(1) Contracting Agency/Customer

(2) Contract Number

(3) Contract type

(4) Project title and brief description of contract effort

(5) Period of performance

(6) Contract value at time of award

(7) Current value, including all changes and exercised options

(8) Contracting Officer’s name, address and telephone number

2. The Evaluation Team will be accomplished by reviewing aspects of an Offerors recent and relevant past performance and will primarily rely on information provided by Offeror’s completed past performance questionnaires and/or from the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). However, the

Government may use information previously obtained from past performance questionnaires or data independently obtained from other government and commercial sources in the evaluation process. In the event an Offeror submits a Past Performance Questionnaire and it is subsequently determined that the referenced project was formally evaluated in the CPARS, CPARS ratings shall take precedence.

3. First, each past performance reference shall undergo a recency determination. In order to be determined recency, the contract effort shall have been performed during the past three (3) years from the date of issuance of this solicitation.

4. Next, each recent past performance reference shall undergo a relevancy determination. Relevant performance includes performance of efforts that are similar in scope, magnitude and complexity to the effort described in this solicitation. Relevant past performance consists of installing commercial grade slat metal fencing, privacy fencing with vertical elements, and/or chain-link fencing in a commercial environment. An overall relevancy determination of the Offerors present and past performance, including joint ventures, subcontractors and/or teaming partners, will be made. All relevant past performance references will be equally weighted and used to establish the Offerors overall relevancy.

5. In determining relevancy for individual contracts, consideration will be given to the effort, or portion of the effort, being proposed by the Offeror, joint ventures, subcontractors and/or teaming partners whose contract is being reviewed and evaluated. The following relevancy definitions apply:

VERY RELEVANT: Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

RELEVANT: Present/Past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

SOMEWHAT RELEVANT: Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

NOT RELEVANT: Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

6. When relevant performance record indicates performance problems, the Government will consider the number and severity of the problems and the appropriateness and effectiveness of any corrective actions taken (not just planned or promised). The Government may review more recent contracts or performance evaluations to ensure corrective actions have been implemented and to evaluate their effectiveness.

7. Technical Capability will be evaluated as acceptable/unacceptable. Past Performance and Professional

Qualifications subfactors will be weighted equally. A Past Performance subfactor rating of ACCEPTABLE will be required. A Professional Qualifications subfactor rating of ACCEPTABLE will be required.

PART II – PRICE PROPOSAL

A. Next, offers that are deemed technically acceptable shall be ranked according to price, including option prices. The Offeror’s price proposal will be submitted in a separate volume. No price information is to be included in the past performance sections of the proposal.

B. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. Each Offeror’s price proposal will be evaluated for completeness and reasonableness. Unrealistically low proposed costs/prices may be grounds for eliminating a proposal from competition either on the basis that either the Offeror does not understand the requirement or the Offeror has made an unrealistic proposal. Proposed unit prices, including options, will be evaluated for unbalanced pricing IAW FAR

15.404-1(g). Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more contract line items or sub-line item(s) appear to be significantly overstated or understated as indicated by the application of cost or price analysis techniques. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

C. An Offeror’s proposal may be rejected if the Contracting Officer determines the lack of realistic, balanced, or reasonable price information contained in any portion of an Offerors price proposal.

3. The Government intends to award a contract without discussions with respective Offerors. Therefore, the

Offeror’s initial offer should contain that Offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. The

Government, however, reserves the right to conduct discussions if deemed in its best interest. Prior to discussions, a competitive range may be established and the Offerors within the competitive range will be part of the discussions.

The Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

(end of Section M)

(End of Summary of Changes)