Attachment 6 - FINAL PP Questionaire.doc

DOC document 56 KB Posted

Attached to
Custodial Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA4621-11-R-0002
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Mobility Command

About this file

Attachment 6 - Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Custodial Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
Amendment 4 SF 30.pdf PDF
Pre-Proposal Conference Minutes —
Preproposal Conference Slides.pdf PDF
Questions from Meeting —
Attachment 5 - WAWF Worksheet.docx DOCX document
Attachment 1 - FINAL Price Schedule 25 Aug 11.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendment 3 SF 30.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 - New Custodial PWS 25 July 2011-Solicitation.docx DOCX document
Attachment 4 - WD 05-2215 R 13.docx DOCX document
Attachment 3 - Floorplans.docx DOCX document
Amendment 2 SF 30.pdf PDF
FA4621-11-R-0002-0002 Amendment.pdf PDF
FINAL Price Schedule 17 Aug 11.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendment.pdf PDF
FINAL Price Schedule 20 Jul 11.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
New Custodial PWS 25 July 2011-Solicitation.docx DOCX document
FINAL Price Schedule 20 Jul 11.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Pre-Proposal Conference Notice.doc DOC document
WAWF Worksheet.docx DOCX document
Attachment 3 WD 05-2215 R 13.docx DOCX document
Attachment 2 Floorplans.docx DOCX document
Solicitation.pdf PDF
FINAL PP Questionaire.doc DOC document
Show all 23

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 6

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Custodial Services McConnell AFB Kansas

FA4621-11-R-0002

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE AND COVER LETTER

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104 SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation

TO: ____________________

You have been identified as a point of contact for a past performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for a Custodial Service contract at McConnell AFB, KS.

Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, I can be contacted at (316) 759-4516.

KENNETH A. BUTLER

Contracting Officer

1 Atch

Past and Present Performance Questionnaire

A.

GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name: __________________________________________________________________ Address: ____________________________________________________________________________

Telephone Number: ________________________ Fax Number: _______________________________

Point of Contact:

Project Title or Brief Description of Work:

Contract Number: _________________________ Dollar Amount: ______________per____________ Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror:

*Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor ( Key Personnel.

B.

RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: _________________________________________________________________ Title: ______________________________________________________________________________ Address: ____________________________________________________________________________

Telephone Number:__________________________ Fax Number: ____________________________

Email Address:

C.

FAX COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO THE GOVERNMENT AT: 316-759-2874

If there are any questions or comments, please contact SSgt Selena Perez at 316-759-4512 or by email at selena.perez@mcconnell.af.mil.

D.

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.

E
G
S
M
U
N
Exceptional
Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

Performance meets/met contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets/met contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet/did not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet/did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ________________________ CONTRACT N0. _____________________

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor:
E
G
S
M
UC
1.
Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
2.
Home office participated in solving significant local problems.
3.
Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
4.
Complied with all federal, state and local laws and regulations to include appropriate licensing.
5.
Complied with all USAF regulations.
6.
Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
7.
Identified problems as they occurred.
8.
Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
9.
Displayed initiative to solve problems.
10.
Met established contract schedules.
11.
Was responsive to contract changes.
12.
Provided adequate project supervision.
13.
Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
14.
How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
15.
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” YES/NO
16.
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”

YES/NO

17.
Is this contract rated in CPARS? YES/NO

Remarks:___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Signature of Reviewer Date

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .