Attachment 6 - FINAL PP Questionaire.doc
DOC document 56 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Custodial Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4621-11-R-0002
About this file
Attachment 6 - Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 23
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 6
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Custodial Services McConnell AFB Kansas
FA4621-11-R-0002
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE AND COVER LETTER
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104 SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation
TO: ____________________
You have been identified as a point of contact for a past performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for a Custodial Service contract at McConnell AFB, KS.
Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, I can be contacted at (316) 759-4516.
KENNETH A. BUTLER
Contracting Officer
1 Atch
Past and Present Performance Questionnaire
A.
GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name: __________________________________________________________________ Address: ____________________________________________________________________________
Telephone Number: ________________________ Fax Number: _______________________________
Point of Contact:
Project Title or Brief Description of Work:
Contract Number: _________________________ Dollar Amount: ______________per____________ Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror:
*Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor ( Key Personnel.
B.
RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent: _________________________________________________________________ Title: ______________________________________________________________________________ Address: ____________________________________________________________________________
Telephone Number:__________________________ Fax Number: ____________________________
Email Address:
C.
FAX COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO THE GOVERNMENT AT: 316-759-2874
If there are any questions or comments, please contact SSgt Selena Perez at 316-759-4512 or by email at selena.perez@mcconnell.af.mil.
D.
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Exceptional |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
Performance meets/met contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
| Performance meets/met contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
| Performance does not meet/did not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Performance does not meet/did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ________________________ CONTRACT N0. _____________________
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| The contractor: |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| UC |
| 1. |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. |
| 2. |
| Home office participated in solving significant local problems. |
| 3. |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| 4. |
| Complied with all federal, state and local laws and regulations to include appropriate licensing. |
| 5. |
| Complied with all USAF regulations. |
| 6. |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| 7. |
| Identified problems as they occurred. |
| 8. |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
| 9. |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems. |
| 10. |
| Met established contract schedules. |
| 11. |
| Was responsive to contract changes. |
| 12. |
| Provided adequate project supervision. |
| 13. |
| Cooperated with Government personnel after award. |
| 14. |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? |
| 15. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” YES/NO |
| 16. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
YES/NO
| 17. |
| Is this contract rated in CPARS? YES/NO |
Remarks:___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Signature of Reviewer Date
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .