FA448618R0003P0003.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this Amendment is to:

1. Change the Contract Administrator from Ms. Tania Cardoso to Ms. Andrea Silva.

2. The Government Point of Contact (POC) for this Amendment is Ms. Andrea Silva, (011-351) 295 57 3148, andrea.silva.1.pt@us.af.mil and 65CONF.LGC.ALL@us.af.mil.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 9

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 18-Jun-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA448618R0003

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

22-May-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

18-Jun-2018

CODE

65 CONF/PKA

65TH CONTRACTING FLIGHT

APO AE 09720-7710

FA4486 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

FA448618R0003

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION I - CONTRACT CLAUSES

The following have been modified:

52.236-27 SITE VISIT (CONSTRUCTION) (FEB 1995) – ALTERNATE I (FEB 1995)

(a) The clauses at 52.236-2, Differing Site Conditions, and 52.236-3, Site Investigations and Conditions Affecting the Work, will be included in any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation. Accordingly, offerors or quoters are urged and expected to inspect the site where the work will be performed.

(b) An organized site visit has been scheduled for – 30 May 2018 by 2:00pm AZOST

(c) Participants will meet at: 65th Contracting Flight, Conference Room Lajes Field, Building T-615, Room 203 on 2nd Floor

(d) All prospective offerors are highly encouraged to attend this conference. Failure of a prospective offeror to submit any questions or attend the conference will be construed to mean that the prospective offeror fully understands all requirements of the solicitation. The Point of Contact (POC) for this project is Ms. Andrea Silva, Contract Administrator (CA), (011-351) 295-573-148, andrea.silva.1.pt@us.af.mil and 65CONF.LGC.ALL@us.af.mil.

(e) Prospective offerors are advised that the pre-proposal conference will be held solely for the purpose of explaining the specifications, terms, and conditions of this requirement. Answers to questions raised during the pre-proposal conference will be provided to prospective offerors within seven (7) workdays following the conference.

(f) Due to security conditions, all interested offerors must register to attend this conference and site visit. Email the information below for all attendees no later than 29 May 2018 by 02:00pm AZOST to Ms. Tania Cardoso, tania.cardoso.2.pt@us.af.mil and 65CONF.LGC.ALL@us.af.mil.

Company Name and Telephone Number Visitor’s Full Name Civil Identification Number or Passport Number

(g) Even if you have access to base you must register to ensure adequate seating. Providing the above information is voluntary; however, your failure to provide all or part of the requested information may result in the denial of your access to the pre-proposal conference.

(h) Visitors must pick up their installation access passes at the Installation’s Main Entry Building “SIC.” If you need a vehicle access pass, you will be required to present the following information upon arrival: (1) Vehicle Registration,

(2) Proof of Insurance for Vehicle, (3) Vehicle Inspection Form. Any of the above information furnished by you is protected under the Privacy Act and shall not be released unless permitted by law and/or you have consented to such.

Please allow plenty of time for vehicle inspections at the gate.

(End of provision) mailto:tania.cardoso.2.pt@us.af.mil mailto:65CONF.LGC.ALL@us.af.mil

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

1. GENERAL PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

1.1. To ensure timely and equitable evaluation of the proposal, the offeror must follow the instructions contained herein. The proposal must be complete, self-sufficient and respond directly to the requirements of this solicitation.

Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications and all identified evaluation factors. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. The response shall consist of three (3) separate parts:

Volume I – Construction Permit Volume II – Price and Contract Forms Volume III – Past Performance

Offerors shall submit one (1) electronic proposal of Volumes I, II and III. A paper hardcopy is optional.

The offeror shall prepare the proposal as set forth in the volume submission requirements Table below. The titles and contents of the volumes shall be as defined in this table, all which shall be within the required page limitation and with the number of copies as specified. Pages exceeding the page limitations set forth in the section will be removed from the proposal and will not be read or evaluated.

Volume Submission Requirements Copies Page Limit

Volume I Construction Permit 2 Paper / 1 Electronic Unlimited

Volume II Price and Contract Forms 2 Paper / 1 Electronic Unlimited

Volume III Past Performance 2 Paper / 1 Electronic 30 Max

1.2. This is an all-electronic solicitation release. Hard copies are not available. The Government will post amendments to the solicitation to the Electronic Posting System (EPS) at https://www.fbo.gov. If an amendment is issued, normal procedures relating to the acknowledgment and receipt of any such amendment as described in contract clause 52.215- 1, Instructions to Offerors-Competitive Acquisition, of this Request for Proposal (RFP) shall apply. It is the responsibility of each offeror to review the web page for notice of amendments, updates or changes to current information.

1.3. All offers questions regarding this solicitation must be emailed to andrea.silva.1.pt@us.af.mil and 65CONF.LGC.ALL@us.af.mil no later than 4 June 2018. The US Government will not be held responsible for answering any questions after this time. The answers to the questions received shall be disseminated in the same manner the Soliciation was.

1.4. Offers may be submitted by hand delivery, mail or email in response to this solicitation. The content and page size of electronic copies must be identical to the hard copies. Facsimile submissions will not be accepted. The offer must arrive by 22 June 2018, 02:00pm, AZOST to the following email addresses: andrea.silva.1.pt@us.af.mil and 65CONF.LGC.ALL@us.af.mil. If submitting proposal by e-mail, only submit one copy and the maximum size of email shall not exceed 8MB. Proposal can be split over multiple e-mails and if sending multiple e-mails, ensure subject line contains how many emails have been sent with the text to be used as follows: “E-mail X of Y” (1 of 4, 2 of 4, etc.)

If the offeror chooses to mail the offer via postal services, the Government will not be responsible for any non-receipt of the offer, or any failure of the offeror to verify receipt of the mailed offer.

Submit to address shown below:

mailto:andrea.silva.1.pt@us.af.mil mailto:65CONF.LGC.ALL@us.af.mil mailto:tania.cardoso.2.pt@us.af.mil

Commercial:

Seccao de Contratos, Base Aerea No. 4 Attn: Andrea Silva, 65th CONF/PKA Avenida do Imperio, Edf. T-615 9760-277 Terceira, Azores, Portugal

USA Postal:

65th Contracting Flight Attn: Andrea Silva Bldg. T-615, Rm. 203 Unit 7710

APO AE 09720

The proposal may also be hand delivered to the 65th Contracting Flight, Building T-615, room 203. Late proposals will be processed in accordance with FAR 15.208, “Late Submission, Modifications, and Withdrawals of Proposals”.

If installation access is not granted, please contact the contract administrator immediately.

NOTE: Offerors are cautioned that Lajes Field, Terceira Island, Azores, Portugal has visitor control procedures requiring individuals not affiliated with the installation to obtain a visitor’s pass prior to entrance.

SOME DELAY SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED WHEN HANDCARRYING PROPOSALS. Offerors should allow sufficient time to obtain a visitor pass and arrive at Bldg. T-615 PRIOR to the time specified for receipt of offers. Offerors should verify receipt of any mailed, delivered or e-mailed proposal with the contracting point of contact.

2. SPECIFIC PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS:

2.1. VOLUME I - CONSTRUCTION PERMIT

(a) The offeror is required to provide proof that they possess a valid Construction Permit/Alvara, issued by the Portuguese Institute of Public Market, Real Estate and Construction (IMPIC, I.P.), in accordance with Portuguese Law 41/2015 of 3 June 2015, for a class according to their proposal.

2.2. VOLUME II - PRICE AND CONTRACT FORMS

(a) Provide an introductory page to include NCAGE Code, DUNS number, points of contact, and contact information.

(b) Complete blocks 14 through 20C of Section A in the Standard Form (SF) 1442. In doing so, the offeror assents to the contract’s terms and conditions as written in the Sections A through K. An official having the authority to contractually bind your company must sign the SF 1442 in accordance with FAR 4.102, Contractor’s Signature.

(c) Insert the proposed total price in Section B for the Contract Line Item Number (CLIN).

(d) Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in Sections I through K. Section K shall be returned in its entirety. For Sections F through J, the offeror shall submit only those pages that require a fill-in.

(e) A letter of authorization for the contracting officer to verify the offeror’s financial responsibility. Include name, address and phone numbers for financial institutions to include points of contact.

(f) Acknowledgement of all amendments to the solicitation in accordance with the instructions on the SF 30.

(g) All proposed prices shall be submitted in Euro, offers received in any other currency will not be considered valid.

2.3 VOLUME III - PAST PERFORMANCE

Past Performance includes current/on-going performance that is complete by 70% or greater.

(a) Offeror’s shall provide a Performance Relevancy Questionnaire (PRQ), Exhibit A.

Exhibit A shall be used to provide information that demonstrates a history of performance on contracts that are similar in scope, complexity, and cost magnitude to the present project drawings and specifications.

Prepare no more than five (5).

Offeros should consider the recency, complexity and relevancy of the past performance information to be considered, the performance must have been completed during the past five (5) years. The period begins five

(5) years prior to the solicitation release date and includes current performance. More Current performance may have greater impact than older performance.

Explain what aspects of the contract the offeror finds relevant to the proposed effort and identify how each contract ranks, in terms of relevancy, with respect to the other contracts addressed in the proposal.

In determining relevancy to the solicitation requirement, offerors should consider the similarity of construction methods employed, size, scope, cost magnitude, location, client type (e.g. public or private) and complexity of work performed to those required for the proposed effort.

(b) Offerors shall prepare and submit to prior customers (of all the projects listed on your Exhibit A submission) a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ), Exhibit B.

Offerors shall instruct their references to email all questionnaires directly to the contract administrator at andrea.silva.1.pt@us.af.mil and 65CONF.LGC.ALL@us.af.mil. The Government will use the PPQ to evaluate the recency and relevancy of the offeror’s past performance.

Offerors are advised that the Government may use all data provided by the offeror in this volume and data obtained from any other sources, to include, but not limited to, data independently obtained from other Government or commercial sources; from any other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to, the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), or other databases; interviews with Program/Project Managers, Contracting Officers or rely upon personal business experience with the offeror. The Government reserves the right to obtain and evaluate past performance information from any source it deems appropriate. While the Government may elect to consider data obtained from other sources, the burden of providing current, accurate, and complete past performance information rests upon the offeror.

(c) A listing of the PPQ references shall be included in the Past Performance Volume III.

3. FORMAT

Format for Volumes I, II and III shall be as follows:

(a) The proposals will be 8 1/2” x 11” paper or standard A4 paper, except for fold-outs used for charts, tables, or diagrams, which may not exceed 11” x 17”.

(b) A page is defined as one face of a sheet of paper containing information.

(c) Typing shall not be less than 12 point.

4. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS

Notice to Offerors: Funds are not presently available for this effort. Therefore, offerors must declare their proposal is valid until 30 September 2018. No award will be made under this solicitation until funds are available. The Government reserves the right to cancel this solicitation, either before or after the closing date. In the event the Government cancels this solicitation, the Government has no obligation to reimburse an offeror for any preparation costs.

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. Basis for Contract Award: The Government intends to award a Firm Fixed Price contract to a qualified offeror deemed responsible in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) FAR 9.104, whose proposal conforms to all RFP requirements and is judged to represent the Best Value to the Government, with appropriate consideration to: Volume I - Construction Permit, Volume II - Price and Volume III - Past Performance.

The Government will utilize the Tradeoff Process in accordance with FAR 15.101-1, as supplemented by the Defense FAR Supplement (DFARS) 215.3, the DoD Source Selection Procedures dated 1 April 2016, the Air Force FAR Supplement (AFFARS) 5315.3, and AFFARS Mandatory Procedure (MP) MP5315.3 and the Performance Price Tradeoff source selection strategy. In terms of relative importance, Past Performance is considered approximately equal to price. To arrive at a best value decision, the Government Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) and the Source Selection Authority (SSA) will strive for maximum objectivity however, this source selection process, by its nature, is subjective and, therefore, professional judgment is implicit throughout the entire process. The government has the right to award to an offeror whose price is higher than the lowest acceptable offeror if the past performance factor is rated higher than the lowest priced. The minimum acceptable evaluation ratings to be eligible for contract award are as follows:

Factor 1 – Construction Permit: Acceptable Factor 2 – Price: Fair and reasonable Factor 3 – Past Performance: Neutral

The evaluation process will contemplate all three Factors. First, Factor 1 will be rated either acceptable or unacceptable; Factor 2 will be subject to a fair and reasonable assessment; and, finally, Factor 3 will ascertain the confidence level of the Government in obtaining a successful performance.

2. Discussions: The Government intends to make the award without conducting discussions with any offerors. Nevertheless, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if, during the evaluation period, it is determined to be in the best interest of the Government to do so.

Discussions, if necessary, will be conducted in accordance with FAR 15.306. The Government also reserves the right to conduct exchanges with some, all or none of the offerors.

3. Evaluation Factors: The contracting officer will begin the evaluation process by conducting a proposal compliance review for all timely-received proposals for determination of basic proposal adequacy prior to providing the proposals to the evaluators. Failure to address any of the following factor(s) and/or submitting an incomplete package will result in the proposal being removed from further consideration for award: (1) Construction Permit, (2) Price and (3) Past Performance.

3.1. Factor 1 – Construction Permit: This factor will receive either an “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable” rating, as stated in the following table. If an offeror receives an ‘Unacceptable” rating they will NOT be eligible for award.

Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

CRITERIA: Offeror shall provide proof that they possess a valid Construction Permit/Alvara, issued by the Portuguese Institute of Public Market, Real Estate and Construction (IMPIC, I.P.).

MEASURE OF MERIT: This requirement is met when the offeror submits a copy of a valid Construction Permit/Alvara Certification attesting that the offeror can conduct business in the country of Portugal, and if the Construction Permit/Alvara Certification’s level covers the scope and magnitude of their proposal.

3.2. Factor 2 – Price: The Government will evaluate price to make a determination that it is fair and reasonable in accordance with FAR 15.404 and FAR 31.201-3.

a) Fair and Reasonable Determination: The Government reserves the right to use one or more of the price analysis techniques defined in FAR 15.404, in order to determine fairness and reasonableness. The price evaluation will document fairness and reasonableness of the proposed price. Offers that include unreasonable, unbalanced, or incomplete pricing may not be considered for award.

b) Completeness: A proposal is complete when all pricing information required by the solicitation is provided in the format prescribed.

3.3. Factor 3 – Past Performance: The Past Performance factor will receive one of the performance confidence assessments described in the Confidence Assessment table, IAW Table 5 of the DoD Source Selection Procedures dated 1 April 2016. The following two elements will be considered when performing the past performance assessment.

a) Recency Assessment: An assessment of the past performance information will be made to determine if it is recent. The time period during which past performance references are considered relevant for this solicitation is five (5) years prior to the release date of the solicitation.

b) Relevancy Assessment: The Government will conduct an in-depth evaluation of the past performance information submitted and the information obtained through other sources to determine how closely the past projects relate to the Specifications of the requirement. The past performance information and information obtained from other sources will be used to establish the degree of relevancy of past performance. The Government will use the relevancy definitions and matrix below.

RELEVANCY ASSESSMENT

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant

Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

c) Confidence Assessment: The confidence rating represents an overall evaluation of the contractor’s past performance, that ascertain’ s the confidence level of the Government in obtaining a successful performance.

CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENT

Substantial Confidence

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence

No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

(End of Summary of Changes)