2-9 Past Performance Survey and Reference Letter.docx

DOCX document 40 KB Posted

Attached to
Remove and Replace Three Perimeter Chainlink Fences
Solicitation number
FA4427-10-R-0114(S)
Issued by

About this file

Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attachment 1.docx DOCX document
Amendment 0003.docx DOCX document
Amendment 0002.docx DOCX document
Amendment 0001.docx DOCX document
B-18 ATCH 3 Wage Determination Applicability.docx DOCX document
fence AF66form .xls XLS spreadsheet
fence 32 31 13.doc DOC document
fence Sect01000.doc DOC document
Schedule of Drawings.pdf PDF
Solicitation.pdf PDF
fence SPEC INDEX.doc DOC document
section 03300.pdf PDF
drawing.pdf PDF
Section B-K fill in.docx DOCX document
Show all 14

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FA4427-10-R-0114Attachment 5
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

60TH CONTRACTING SQUADRON (AMC)

Dated 16 July 2010

MEMORANDUM FOR (Contractor please add reference information)

FROM: 60 CONS/LGCA

350 Hangar Ave Bldg 549 Travis AFB, CA 94535-2632

SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Questionnaire Information for FA4427-10-R-0114, Fence DASR, DORM, & AERO CLUB Travis AFB, CA

1. You have been identified as a reference point of contact for past and/or present performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire form. This firm is currently interested in providing a proposal for a Hangar Door Controls, Bldg 808, at Travis AFB, CA.

2. Please complete the attached survey questionnaire and return no later than 20 Aug 2010. Please e-mail the survey back to A1C Zachary Bowens at zachary.bowens@travis.af.mil and Ms. Marguerite J. Holbein-Stephenson at marguerite.holbein@travis.af.mil . Also send a courtsey copy to E. Jane Bailey at jane.bailey@travis.af.mi. You may fax the questionnaire to (707) 424-5189.

3. If you have any questions, please contact A1C Zachary Bowens at (707) 424-7725 or Ms. Marguerite J. Holbein-Stephenson at (707) 424-7765.

4. Your information MUST be submitted by 20 Aug 2010. Your expedient attention regarding this matter is greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance.

MARGUERITE HOLBEIN
Contracting Officer

PRESENT AND PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Solicitation Number FA4427-10-R-0114 Repair and Replace Fence at Travis AFB, CA

When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Contractor please complete block A before sending to your reference.

Contractor’s Name:

Address:

Telephone Number:

Fax Number:

Point of Contact:

Project Title or Brief Description of Work:

Contract Number Provided by Offeror: Dollar Amount: $

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror:

Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent:

Title: Company:

Address:

Telephone Number:

Fax Number:

Email Address:

C. Email Completed Questionnaire Form Not Later Than 20 Aug 2010 To:

A1C Zachary BowensMarguerite J. Holbein-Stephenson
zachary.bowens@travis.af.milmarguerite.holbein@travis.af.mil

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Circle the number on the scale of 1 to 6 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2.

Based on the offeror’s performance record:

6
Exceptional (E)
Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
5
Very Good (VG)
Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
4
Satisfactory (S)
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
3
Marginal (M)
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
2
Unsatisfactory (U)
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
1
Neutral (N)
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

The Contractor…

N U M S VG E

PERFORMANCE/PROGRAM MGMT

1. Upon award the contractor was timely in 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A fulfilling contract requirements (submitting documents, starting work, submitting materials & acknowledgements, etc)?

2. Cooperated with owner/government personnel 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A after award.

3. Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain & 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A replace if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

4. Provided experienced employees with the 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A technical & administrative abilities to meet contract requirements.

5. Provided material submittals in accordance 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A with the contract requirements.

6. Provided payrolls in a timely manner. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

7. Maintained a single point of contact to 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A manage and resolve problems.

8. Provided adequate employee supervision. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

9. Company headquarters participated in solving 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A significant local problems.

10. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner & 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A pursuant to their quality control procedures.

11. Met established turn around times 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A for required periodic contract reports, etc.

12. Identified risks/problems as they occurred. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

13. Suggested alternative approaches to problem. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

14. Was responsive to contract changes. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

15. Effectively managed sub-contractor 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A efforts.

16. Do you have any reservations about Yes ( ) No ( ) N/A ( ) having this contractor perform another contract for you? (If yes, please explain under “remarks”.)

17. Rate the contractor’s overall performance 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A under this contract.

EMPLOYEE RETENTION

1. Demonstrated ability to retain a qualified 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A workforce.

INVOICING & PROGRESS REPORTS

1. Provided accurate and timely invoices. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

2. Provided accurate and timely progress reports 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

ORGANIZATION

1. Has demonstrated good organizational 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A structure and accountability.

2. If there were problems with the on site supervision, Yes ( ) No ( ) N/A ( ) were you able to easily resolve those problems with the company’s management? (Please explain under “remarks”.)

3. Are you aware of any documented organizational Yes ( ) No ( ) N/A ( ) deficiencies with the contractor?

(If yes, please explain under “remarks”.)

LEGAL

1. Are you aware of any legal problems experienced by Yes ( ) No ( ) N/A ( ) the contractor? (Please explain under “remarks”.)

2. Are you aware of any verified ethical problems Yes ( ) No ( ) N/A ( ) experienced by the contractor? (Please explain under “remarks”.)

GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS ONLY

1. Was the contractor ever issued a cure notice Yes ( ) No ( ) N/A ( ) or show cause? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks”.

2. Has the contract been partially or completely terminated Yes ( ) No ( ) N/A ( ) or is the contract pending termination?

2a. If you answered “YES” to question #2, please explain under “remarks”.

3. Has an election ever been made to not exercise an option due to contractor’s performance. Yes ( ) No ( ) N/A ( ) If yes, explain in “remarks”.

3. Was there any specific delivery order that had problems?

(please explain under “remarks” Yes ( ) No ( ) N/A ( )

NARRATIVE SUMMARY

1. What were the contractor’s greatest strengths in performance of the contract?

2. What were the contractor’s greatest weaknesses in performance of the contract?

Please add any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance.

Remarks:

Please provide the Name, Organization, e-mail and phone number of the Inspector on this contract in the blocks below.

_______________________________________________________________________________
(Name)(Organization)(E-mail)(Phone Number)

FA4427-10-R-0114 Page 6 of 6

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

image1.emf

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .