Amendment_1.doc

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 15-Sep-2015 04:30 PM to 21-Sep-2015 04:30 PM.

The solicitation issue date has changed from 20-Aug-2015 to 22-Aug-2015.

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

The following have been modified:

ATTACHMENTS

ATTACHMENTS:

Documents Type Description Pages Date Attachment 1 Statement of Work (SOW) 27 Jul 15

Attachment 2

Appendix A - N

1,174

01 Jun 15 Attachment 3 Wage Determination Heavy & Highway 02 Jan 15 Attachment 4

Schedule of Material Submittals (Revised)

24 Aug 15 Attachment 5

Schedule B

4 Aug 15

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been modified:

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

SECTION M – EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

M-1 SOURCE SELECTION

A. Basis for Contract Award

This is a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection conducted in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15, Contracting by Negotiation, as supplemented by the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), the Air Force Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (AFFARS), DoD Source Selection Procedures, Appendix A, and Air Force Mandatory Procedures 5315.3. These regulations are available electronically at the Air Force (AF) FAR Site, http://farsite.hill.af.mil. A contract may be awarded to the offeror who is deemed responsible in accordance with the FAR Subpart 9.1, as supplemented, whose proposal conforms to the solicitation’s requirements (to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by Section L of this solicitation) and is judged, based on the evaluation factors to represent the lowest price technically acceptable proposal. While the Government will strive for maximum objectivity, the source selection process, by its nature, is subjective; and therefore, professional judgment is implicit throughout the entire process.

B. Number of Contracts to be Awarded

The Government intends to award one contract in response to this solicitation.

C. Discussions

The Government intends to award without discussions; therefore, offerors should submit proposals that represent their best efforts. If, during the evaluation period, it is determined to be in the best interest of the Government to hold discussions, offeror responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs) and the Final Proposal Revision (FPR) will be considered in making the source selection decision. In the event discussions are to be conducted, the competitive range will be established IAW FAR 15.306(c).

D. Solicitation Requirements, Terms and Conditions

Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as factors. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in the offeror being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and must provide complete supporting rationale. The Government reserves the right to determine any such exceptions unacceptable.

E. Evaluation Process

The evaluation process to be used is as follows:

Step 1:

Perform price evaluations on all proposals and rank them from lowest to highest;

Step 2:

Conduct technical evaluations beginning with the lowest priced proposal. If the lowest priced proposal is determined to be technically unacceptable, then the next lowest priced proposal will be evaluated. Technical evaluations will continue until the lowest priced technically acceptable proposal is identified. The Government, at its discretion, may continue technical evaluations until the Contracting Officer determines that a sufficient number of technically acceptable proposals have been identified to permit determination of price fair and reasonable based on adequate price competition.

Step 3:

Once a proposal has been deemed technically acceptable, the Contracting Officer will evaluate the past performance submitted with the proposal to determine acceptability. The Government reserves the right to verify third party information and/or additional sources. In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Therefore, the offeror will be determined to have unknown past performance and shall be considered “Acceptable”.

The Government reserves the right to award without discussions. The Government reserves the right to perform both price and technical evaluations on unacceptable offerors to determine if it is in its interest to open discussions. Only those offerors determined to be technically acceptable, either initially or as a result of discussions, will be considered for award.

M-2 EVALUATION FACTORS

A. Evaluation Factors

The following evaluation factors will be used to evaluate each proposal. The Government will evaluate proposals for acceptability, but will not rank the proposals by the non-price factors.

Factor 1:

Price

Factor 2:

Technical: Proposed Schedule

Factor 3:

Past Performance

B. Price Factor

The evaluated price shall be the total price proposed by the offeror in Section B. The evaluated price must be determined “reasonable” as defined in FAR 31.201-3. Proposals will then be ranked from lowest to highest based on evaluated price. Price analysis will be done using one or more of the techniques defined in FAR 15.404-1.

C. Technical Factor

For the purposes of technical evaluation, the term “offeror” will include any proposed teaming arrangements.

The Government’s technical evaluation team shall evaluate the technical proposals on an acceptable or unacceptable basis, assigning one of the ratings described below for each factor. Any factor evaluated as “Unacceptable” will render the entire proposal unacceptable and, therefore, may not be eligible for award. Only those proposals determined to be technically acceptable, either initially or as a result of discussions, will be considered for award. However, the offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion.

TECHNICAL RATINGS

The proposals shall be evaluated against the following technical factor:

Factor: Proposed Schedule

Description: This factor evaluates the schedule proposed by the offeror.

Standard: This requirement is met when the offeror submits a schedule that captures all SOW requirements and execution timelines. The offeror must demonstrate project completion showing all major elements of work to include percentage of each work element (i.e. a schedule using an AF Form 3064 which can be located on http://www.e-publishing.af.mil).

D. Past Performance

The Contracting Officer shall seek past performance information on offerors based on the past efforts provided by the offeror and/or data independently obtained from other Government and commercial sources.

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RATINGS

The proposal shall be evaluated against the following past performance factor:

Factor: Past Performance

Description: This factor evaluates whether the offerors present/past performance is acceptable/unacceptable to the subject solicitation.

Standard: The requirement is met when the offeror demonstrates recent and relevant past performance. The offeror must provide evidence of three (3) to five (5) projects within the past five (5) years involving airfield concrete repair. The project cited as evidence must have a construction cost between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000. Evidence/documentation shall include:

· The project title

· A description of the project’s scope

· The project’s location (city/base and state)

· The project’s original award amount and the final cost

· Contact information (name, email address and current telephone number) of the project’s owner.

(End of Summary of Changes)