Atch_1_Appendix_C_-_JBSA_B663_Limited_Asbestos_and_Lead_Inspection.pdf

LIMITED

ASBESTOS & LEAD

INSPECTIONS

Building 663 Randolph Air Force Base

For

Ms. Sharon Moore

Randolph Air Force Base by AEHS, Inc.

4402 Center Gate

San Antonio, Texas 78217

(210) 656-9300 www.aehs-sa.com

Appendix C

Asbestos and Lead Inspections AEHS, Inc.

Building 663, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas Environmental, Health, and Safety Consulting

June 2015

LIMITED ASBESTOS AND LEAD INSPECTIONS

Building 663

Randolph Air Force Base, Texas

This report is divided into two sections corresponding to the consulting performed. The on-site inspections were performed by Matthew Bishop and

Michael Kauffman under the overall direction of Ronald M. Bishop. Matt is a

Texas Department of State Health Services (TDSHS) licensed Asbestos

Individual Management Planner (No. 205572), and Lead Risk Assessor (No.

2070727). Mike is a Texas Department of State Health Services (TDSHS) licensed Asbestos Inspector (No. 60-3118) and Lead Risk Assessor (No.

2071013). Ron Bishop is a TDSHS licensed Asbestos Consultant, Lead Risk

Assessor, Lead Project Designer, and Mold Consultant as well as a Certified

Industrial Hygienist, Certified Safety Executive, Registered Sanitarian, Diplomate in Environmental Health, and Registered Environmental Professional, Registered

Environmental Manager and Green Consultant.

A. ASBESTOS INSPECTION

1.0. GENERAL.

1.1. Construction materials containing asbestos have been used extensively in buildings because it possesses excellent properties for fire-proofing, insulation, and condensation control. Asbestos may be found in: (1) cement products; (2) spray applied or trowel applied materials on ceiling, walls, and other surfaces; (3) insulation on pipes, boilers, tanks, ducts, and other equipment; (4) vinyl floor tiles; (5) roofing; (6) flooring coatings; and (7) other miscellaneous products.

1.2. Friable materials are those materials that when dry can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure. Material that contains more than one percent asbestos by weight is considered to be asbestos containing material. Some of these asbestos-containing building materials are not considered friable now, but could become friable if not properly managed and maintained under an asbestos management program.

1.3. The concern about exposure to asbestos in buildings is based on evidence linking various respiratory diseases with occupational exposure in the shipbuilding, mining, milling, and fabricating industries. The presence of asbestos in a building does not mean that there is a significant health risk to building occupants. As long as asbestos-containing materials remain

Building 663, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas Environmental, Health, and Safety Consulting in good condition and are not disturbed, exposure is unlikely. Through proper control of building operations and maintenance activities, disturbance or damage to asbestos-containing materials is minimized, thus limiting the building occupant's exposure to airborne asbestos fibers.

1.4. Building alterations and/or demolition require knowledge of what materials contain asbestos and if they will be removed or disturbed during the project. Under the Clean Air Act, EPA has issued a National Emission Standard for Asbestos (40 CFR 61.140 - 61.156). This

Standard regulates reporting requirements, work practices, waste disposal, and emissions from facility modification and/or demolition operations. The Standard applies only to materials containing more than one percent asbestos. The State of Texas has adopted a set of regulations (25 TAC 295.31 - 295.70) known as "Texas Asbestos Health Protection Rules" which govern asbestos removal, encapsulation, or enclosure, including licensing and regulation, in all buildings of public occupancy or access. Any disturbance or removal of

ACBM in the building or facilities are subject to this Texas Statute.

2.0. BACKGROUND.

2.1. AEHS, Inc. was contacted by Ms. Sharon Moore to perform limited asbestos and lead inspections on Building 663, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.

2.2. The building houses offices, multi-purpose rooms, hallways, and restrooms.

3.0. SCOPE OF WORK.

3.1. The asbestos inspection was performed on 11 June 2015 and consisted of visual assessments to determine the presence of suspect ACBM in the area of concern. Bulk samples of suspect ACBM (materials which possibly contain asbestos, as determined by an accredited

EPA AHERA Building Inspector/Consultant) were collected. The visual inspection, bulk sampling, and inspection documentation was performed by Matt Bishop [Individual

Management Planner (No. 205572)].

3.2. AEHS, Inc. is a TDSHS Licensed Asbestos Constant Agency (No.10-0335), PCM

Laboratory (No. 30-0295), and Training Provider (No. 00-0068).

3.3. The specific objectives of the survey were to:

Perform a visual inspection and physical assessment following the Asbestos

Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) protocol as a guideline to identify, quantify, and assess accessible friable and non-friable ACBM;

Collect and analyze bulk samples of suspect material for asbestos content and identification by an American Industrial Hygiene Association Accredited

Laboratory that is also licensed by the Texas Department of State Health Services;

Building 663, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas Environmental, Health, and Safety Consulting

Ensure the technical quality of all work by using the AHERA protocol and a

TDSHS licensed consultant and inspector for the inspection.

ssue a final report that includes findings, bulk sample locations, and confirmed asbestos-containing building materials.

4.0. DESCRIPTION.

4.1. The inspection was of specific areas in Building 663 as indicated by the escort.

4.2. It consist of areas scheduled for renovation on the basement level, first floor, and second floor.

5.0. INVESTIGATIVE METHODS.

5.1. Visual Inspection.

5.1.1. Building materials were inspected and assessed using the methods presented in the federal AHERA regulations (40 CFR, Part 763) as a guideline. The procedures mandated are considered the industry standard and are applied to all surveys performed by

AEHS, Inc.

5.1.2. The suspect ACBM in the basement consisted of wallboard, float mud, plaster, carpet mastic, pipe mastic, two (2) types of ceiling tile, and four (4) types of floor tile with associated mastics.

5.1.3. The suspect ACBM on the first floor consisted of wallboard, float mud, plaster, carpet mastic, cove base mastic, pipe mastic, pipe wrap, two (2) types of ceiling tile, and floor tile with associated mastic.

5.1.4. The suspect ACBM on the second floor consisted of wallboard, float mud, plaster, carpet mastic, cove base mastic, pipe mastic, duct mastic, two (2) types of ceiling tile, and two (2) types of floor tile with associated mastics.

5.2. Bulk Sampling.

5.2.1. Bulk samples of all homogeneous materials from identified functional spaces containing suspect ACBM were collected. A homogeneous material is defined as a surfacing material, thermal system insulation, or miscellaneous material that is uniform in use, color and texture. Examples of homogeneous materials include:

Pipe insulation produced by the same manufacturer and installed during the same time period;

Building 663, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas Environmental, Health, and Safety Consulting

Floor or ceiling tile of identical size, color and/or pattern;

Sprayed-on acoustical ceiling materials located in contiguous areas; and

Trowelled on plaster of same texture and location.

5.2.2. A functional space is defined as any spatially distinct unit within a building that contains identifiable populations of current or previous building occupants. Examples of functional spaces include:

Office areas;

Storage (warehousing) areas; and

Living quarters.

The functional space concept is helpful in determining the use and occupancy of building areas containing confirmed ACBM. Knowing the types of occupants and their use of an area also may influence the selection of an asbestos management option and/or corrective action. If multiple corrective actions are necessary, the occupancy and use of individual areas may also become important factors when establishing the priority, or ranking, of each corrective action.

5.2.3. Prior to obtaining the samples, all friable suspect material are sprayed with amended

(surfactant added) water to minimize fiber release. Small pieces of the suspect material were sampled by cutting off a sufficient quantity of the wetted suspect material in an inconspicuous location and securing the sample in a plastic bag. Samples were extracted from the center of the wetted area. The tool used to collect the suspect sample was then cleaned to ensure no cross-contamination occurred between samples. A plastic bag was used to contain the samples of the suspect material and quickly sealed to prevent the escape of the material or the introduction of ACBM contamination from outside sources.

5.3. Bulk Sample Analysis.

5.3.1. All bulk samples collected during this survey were analyzed by Environmental

Hazards Services, Inc.’s Laboratory in Richmond, Virginia. Environmental Hazards

Services laboratory is accredited under the National Institute of Standards and

Technology’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) and the

American Industrial Hygiene Association. Additionally, the laboratory is a TDSHS licensed (No. 30-0188) Asbestos Laboratory (Polarized Light Microscopy). Their address, telephone number, and quality assurance review are depicted on their laboratory reports.

5.3.2. All asbestos samples were analyzed using Polarized Light Microscopy/Dispersion

Staining (PLM/DS) techniques in accordance with methodology approved by the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), method number 600/R-93/116. The percentage of asbestos present in the samples was determined on the basis of a visual area estimation as set forth in 40 CFR Part 763, Appendix A, Subpart F, Section 1.2 and 1.7.2.4. The

Building 663, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas Environmental, Health, and Safety Consulting lower limit of reliable detection for asbestos using the PLM/DS method is approximately

1% by volume.

5.3.2.1. The Environmental Protection Agency considers materials with greater than one percent (>1%) asbestos content to be asbestos containing. Therefore, when asbestos containing building material (ACBM) appear in this report, it should be interpreted as meaning the sample(s) taken contained greater than (>1%) asbestos and is considered a regulated material. However, material that contains equal to or less than one percent is not considered to be asbestos containing material. If the results of sampling indicate that the asbestos containing material is a trace or up to 10% asbestos, the results must be verified by polarized light microscopy point counting or presumed to be asbestos. For this survey, AEHS personnel used their experience with similar materials.

5.3.2.2. When “No Asbestos Detected” (NAD) appears in this report, it should be interpreted as meaning no asbestos was observed in the sample material above the reliable limit of detection for the PLM/DS method.

5.3.2.3. The Texas Department of State Health Services requires a minimum of three samples to be collected from each homogeneous area. In order for a material to be considered negative, all samples must be negative. On the other hand, if one of the three samples is positive, then the material is considered positive.

6.0. RESULTS OF INSPECTION.

6.1. Analytical Results. The analytical results from the inspection and chain of custody are at Appendix A. A total of ninety-six (96) samples were collected which resulted in one hundred and eight (108) analyses due to layering and first positive stop.

6.2. Photographs. Photographs are at Appendix B.

6.3. Summary Positive Asbestos Containing Building Materials.

Floor Asbestos Containing

Building Material

Asbestos

Content Location

Basement 12” Black Floor Tile 3% Chrysotile Central Hallway

Basement 12” White Floor Tile 3% Chrysotile Central Hallway

Basement 12” Beige Floor Tile with

Black Mastic underneath 3% & 4% Chrysotile Under Carpet

Basement 12” Green Floor Tile 3% Chrysotile Under Carpet

Building 663, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas Environmental, Health, and Safety Consulting

Floor Asbestos Containing

Building Material

Asbestos

Content Location

First Floor 12” Beige Floor Tile with

Black Mastic underneath 4% & 8% Chrysotile Under Carpet

Second Floor 12” Beige Floor Tile with

Black Mastic underneath 3% & 8% Chrysotile Under Carpet

Second Floor

Black Mastic under 12”

White Floor Tile with

Blue Specks

5% Chrysotile Under Carpet

7.0. ASSESSMENT.

7.1. Friable Asbestos Material. None.

7.2. Non-Friable Materials. Floor Tiles and Black Mastics.

8.0. RECOMMENDATION.

8.1. Maintain a copy of this report with the project files.

8.2. If the floor tile and/or mastic underneath is going to be disturbed, it must be abated by a

TDSHS licensed Abatement Contractor.

8.3. A TDSHS notification is required.

8.4. Specifications must me written by a licensed Asbestos Consultant and Asbestos Project

Management to include air monitoring are required.

B. LEAD BASE PAINT

1.0. GENERAL.

1.1. Background.

1.1.1. Inspections and risk assessments for lead base paint (LBP) hazards emerged in response to an insurance problem in the nation’s public housing programs after children in housing units throughout the nation were found to contain elevated blood lead levels.

When investigations pursued, the houses were found to contain LBP where deterioration

Building 663, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas Environmental, Health, and Safety Consulting was extensive and the children were ingesting the paint directly (chewing on the sills, etc.)

or indirectly by placing contaminated items into their mouths.

1.1.2. At the present time, many of the standards used in lead hazard assessments are not health-based standards. A limit that will not produce adverse health affects has not been established for lead content of paint, dust or in soil. This is due in part to differences in individual behavior, particularly with respect to hand-to-mouth activity. However, the limits that are established in the various standards will significantly reduce the health impacts. Also, these limits dictate requirements for action, if exceeded.

1.1.3. The reason lead base paint inspections are conducted for commercial facilities is to determine potential worker exposure and environmental insult during demolition and disposal of the wastes based on the lead content.

1.2. Standards. As indicated in the Table 1 below, there are various standards that currently define lead base paint. The applicable standards to this project include the OSHA requirements, for worker protection performing the renovation, and the environmental requirements for disposal of materials painted with lead base paint.

Table 1

Lead Standards

Standard/Regulation Level Remarks

Consumer Product Safety Commission 600 ppm

0.06% parts per million

% by weight

HUD – 24 CFR Part 35 0.5% by weight

1.0 mg/cm

NLLAP Accredited Lab

XRF

TELLR - Texas Environmental Lead

Reduction Rules

0.5% by weight

1.0 mg/cm

NLLAP Accredited Lab

XRF

OSHA - 29 CFR 1926.62 - Lead in

Construction; Interim Final Rule Any amount Worker Protection

EPA - 40 CFR 261 - Identification and

Listing of Hazardous Wastes 5 ppm TCLP

TCLP - Toxicity Characteristic

Leaching Procedure

1.3. Lead Risk Assessment.

1.3.1. A Lead Risk Assessment is to determine, and then report on the existence, nature, severity, and location of lead base paint hazards in residential dwellings through on-site investigations. Normally, risk assessments determine the immediately available sources of lead in a dwelling and provides advice on long-term and/or short-term responses to any hazards found. In general, inspections measure lead base paint concentrations while risk assessments measure lead base paint hazards.

1.3.2. The specific differences between an Inspection and a Risk Assessment depicted in

Table 2, below:

Building 663, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas Environmental, Health, and Safety Consulting

Table 2

Inspections/Risk Assessments

Inspections Risk Assessments

Measure the concentration of lead in the paint on a surface-by-surface basis

Measure the level of lead in dust and soil and deteriorated paint

Identify the presence of lead base paint on all components

Identity the location and nature of all lead base paint hazards (primary prevention)

Allow the owner to avoid treating paint that is not lead base paint

Consider information about past maintenance and management practices

Allow the owner to treat all lead hazards present

Limited Risk Assessment/Inspection

A combination of the Inspection and Risk Assessment tailored to the specific renovations to be performed under the specifications.

2.0. APPROACH.

2.1. Limited Inspection. A limited lead base paint inspection was conducted on 10-11 June

2015 at the location as described in paragraph 4 of the Asbestos Section.

2.2. Credentials.

2.2.1. The Limited Inspection was performed by Michael Kauffman. Mike is a TDSHS certified Lead Risk Assessor (No. 2071013).

2.2.2. AEHS, Inc. is a TDSHS certified/licensed Lead Firm (No. 21100283) and Lead

Training Provider (No. 20439)

2.3. Methodology. XRF measurements were taken at representative locations on interior painted surfaces in the area of concern as requested by the escort. XRF Niton Model XLp

300A (Serial No. 13422) was used in the testing for lead base paint. Calibrations were performed prior to and after testing each building in accordance with Performance

Characteristics Sheets (PCS). See Appendix C for a table of the results.

3.0. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS.

3.1. The HUD/EPA guidance for target housing is 1 mg/cm

while the Toxic Characteristic

Leaching Procedure (TCLP) limit for lead is 5 parts per million (ppm).

Building 663, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas Environmental, Health, and Safety Consulting

3.2. The OSHA requirements, as promulgated in 29 CFR 1926.62 (Lead Standard for the

Construction Industry), considers any amount of lead as lead containing paint; however, any measured surface below 0.1 mg/cm should be considered negative for lead base paint.

4.0. RESULTS.

4.1. Ninety-four (94) measurements were made with the XRF for lead content.

4.2. Based on the XRF measurements, AEHS, Inc. has determined that the following should considered positive for lead base paint:

Exterior beige concrete walls

Interior beige brick walls

Interior beige concrete walls

Interior beige plaster walls

Interior white plaster walls

Interior gray drywall walls

Interior beige concrete ceiling beams

Interior black wood doors

Interior black wood door casings

Interior brown wood door casings

Interior black wood door jambs

Interior brown wood door jambs

Interior brown wood door transoms

Interior white metal window casings

Interior brown metal window casings

Interior brown plaster window sills

Interior black concrete stair risers

Interior black metal stair railings

Interior white metal pipes

5.0. RECOMMENDATIONS.

5.1. Maintain a copy of this report with the project files.

5.2. Provide a copy of this report to the contractor performing the renovation and inform them that they must comply with all provisions of 29 CFR 1926.62.

Building 663, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas Environmental, Health, and Safety Consulting

DISCLAIMER

This report, which contains inspections/measurements for hazardous material is given for the sole benefit of the aforementioned client(s). The client expressly confirms their understanding that the conclusions/ recommendations stated in this report are limited to and based solely upon the scope of the assignment, and samples and field measurements taken. In addition, the client understands that any field observations contained herein reflect the conditions present on the date and time of inspection. No representations or warranties are made or may be implied as to the validity of their applicability to any other days or times.

Ronald M. Bishop, MPH, CIH

Asbestos Consultant (10-5492)

Lead Risk Assessor (2070124)

Lead Project Designer (2090015)

26 June2015

Appendix A

Asbestos Lab Results

Asbestos Bulk Analysis Report

Client:

Report Number:

Project/Test Address:

Client Number:

Reported Date:

Received Date:

Analyzed Date:

AEHS 06/12/2015

45-5371

06/17/2015

15-06-01988

7469 Whitepine Rd

Telephone: 800.347.4010

Richmond, VA 23237

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C.

RAFB B-663 Basement; San Antonio, TX

Laboratory Results Fax Number:

210-656-8499

4402 Center Gate San Antonio, TX 78217

06/17/2015

Layer Type AsbestosClient Sample Number

Other Materials

Lab Gross DescriptionLab Sample Number

White Powdery Chalky;

Homogeneous

15-06-01988-001 1-WB 2% Cellulose 2% Fibrous Glass 96% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Pink Powdery Chalky ;

Homogeneous

15-06-01988-002 2-WB 3% Cellulose 97% Non-Fibrous

NAD

White Powdery Chalky;

Homogeneous

15-06-01988-003 3-WB 2% Cellulose 2% Fibrous Glass 96% Non-Fibrous

NAD

White Chalky; Beige Paint-Like;

Inhomogeneous

15-06-01988-004 4-FM 100% Non-FibrousNAD

White Chalky; Beige Paint-Like;

Inhomogeneous

15-06-01988-005 5-FM 100% Non-FibrousNAD

1 of 8Page

White Chalky; Beige Paint-Like;

Inhomogeneous

15-06-01988-006 6-FM 100% Non-FibrousNAD

Black Vinyl;

Homogeneous

15-06-01988-007A 7-BFT 100% Non-FibrousTile NAD

Yellow Adhesive;

Homogeneous

15-06-01988-007B 7-BFT 100% Non-FibrousMastic NAD

White Vinyl;

Homogeneous

15-06-01988-007C 7-BFT 100% Non-FibrousTile NAD

Yellow Adhesive;

Homogeneous

15-06-01988-007D 7-BFT 100% Non-FibrousMastic NAD

Black Vinyl;

Homogeneous

15-06-01988-008A 8-BFT 100% Non-FibrousTile NAD

Yellow Adhesive;

Homogeneous

15-06-01988-008B 8-BFT 1% Cellulose 99% Non-Fibrous

Mastic NAD

Green Vinyl;

Homogeneous

15-06-01988-008C 8-BFT 97% Non-FibrousTile 3% Chrysotile

3%Total Asbestos:

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C

Project/Test Address:

Client Number: Report Number:45-5371 15-06-01988

RAFB B-663 Basement; San Antonio, TX

Other Materials

AsbestosLab Sample Number

Layer Type Lab Gross DescriptionClient Sample Number

2 of 8Page

Black Vinyl;

Homogeneous

15-06-01988-009A 9-BFT 100% Non-FibrousTile NAD

Yellow Adhesive;

Homogeneous

15-06-01988-009B 9-BFT 100% Non-FibrousMastic NAD

15-06-01988-009C 9-BFT Tile Did Not Analyze (Positive Stop)

Black Adhesive;

Homogeneous

15-06-01988-009D 9-BFT 2% Cellulose 98% Non-Fibrous

Mastic NAD

White Vinyl;

Homogeneous

15-06-01988-010A 10-WFT 100% Non-FibrousTile NAD

Yellow Adhesive;

Homogeneous

15-06-01988-010B 10-WFT 100% Non-FibrousMastic NAD

Green Vinyl;

Homogeneous

15-06-01988-010C 10-WFT 97% Non-FibrousTile 3% Chrysotile

3%Total Asbestos:

Black Adhesive;

Homogeneous

15-06-01988-010D 10-WFT 1% Cellulose 99% Non-Fibrous

Mastic NAD

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C

Project/Test Address:

Client Number: Report Number:45-5371 15-06-01988

RAFB B-663 Basement; San Antonio, TX

Other Materials

AsbestosLab Sample Number

Layer Type Lab Gross DescriptionClient Sample

3 of 8Page

White Vinyl;

15-06-01988-011A 11-WFT 100% Non-FibrousTile NAD

Yellow Adhesive;

Homogeneous

15-06-01988-011B 11-WFT 100% Non-FibrousMastic NAD

15-06-01988-011C 11-WFT Tile Did Not Analyze (Positive Stop)

Black Adhesive;

Homogeneous

15-06-01988-011D 11-WFT 1% Cellulose 99% Non-Fibrous

Mastic NAD

White Vinyl;

Homogeneous

15-06-01988-012A 12-WFT 100% Non-FibrousTile NAD

Yellow Adhesive;

Homogeneous

15-06-01988-012B 12-WFT 1% Cellulose 99% Non-Fibrous

Mastic NAD

Gray Granular; White Paint-Like;

Inhomogeneous

15-06-01988-013 13-P 100% Non-FibrousNAD

Gray Granular; White Paint-Like;

Inhomogeneous

15-06-01988-014 14-P 100% Non-FibrousNAD

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C

Project/Test Address:

Client Number: Report Number:45-5371 15-06-01988

RAFB B-663 Basement; San Antonio, TX

Other Materials

AsbestosLab Sample Number

Layer Type Lab Gross DescriptionClient Sample

4 of 8Page

Gray Granular; White Paint-Like;

Inhomogeneous

15-06-01988-015 15-P 100% Non-FibrousNAD

Gray/White Fibrous;

Inhomogeneous

15-06-01988-016 16-CCT 55% Cellulose 35% Fibrous Glass 10% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Gray/White Fibrous;

Inhomogeneous

15-06-01988-017 17-CCT 55% Cellulose 35% Fibrous Glass 10% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Gray/White Fibrous;

Inhomogeneous

15-06-01988-018 18-CCT 55% Cellulose 35% Fibrous Glass 10% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Gray/White Fibrous;

Inhomogeneous

15-06-01988-019 19-WCT 55% Cellulose 35% Fibrous Glass 10% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Gray/White Fibrous;

Inhomogeneous

15-06-01988-020 20-WCT 55% Cellulose 35% Fibrous Glass 10% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Gray/White Fibrous;

Inhomogeneous

15-06-01988-021 21-WCT 55% Cellulose 35% Fibrous Glass 10% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C

Project/Test Address:

Client Number: Report Number:45-5371 15-06-01988

RAFB B-663 Basement; San Antonio, TX

Other Materials

AsbestosLab Sample Number

Layer Type Lab Gross DescriptionClient Sample

5 of 8Page

Beige Vinyl-Like;

15-06-01988-022 22-PM 3% Fibrous Glass 3% Wollastonite 94% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Beige Vinyl-Like;

Homogeneous

15-06-01988-023 23-PM 3% Fibrous Glass 4% Wollastonite 93% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Beige Vinyl-Like;

Homogeneous

15-06-01988-024 24-PM 3% Fibrous Glass 3% Wollastonite 94% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Yellow Adhesive;

Homogeneous

15-06-01988-025 25-CM 2% Cellulose 1% Synthetic 97% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Yellow Adhesive;

Homogeneous

15-06-01988-026 26-CM 3% Cellulose 1% Synthetic 96% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Yellow Adhesive;

Homogeneous

15-06-01988-027 27-CM 3% Cellulose 1% Synthetic 96% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Gray Vinyl; Homogeneous15-06-01988-028A 28-FTB 97% Non-FibrousTile 3% Chrysotile

3%Total Asbestos:

Black Adhesive;

Homogeneous

15-06-01988-028B 28-FTB 96% Non-FibrousMastic 4% Chrysotile

4%Total Asbestos:

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C

Project/Test Address:

Client Number: Report Number:45-5371 15-06-01988

RAFB B-663 Basement; San Antonio, TX

Other Materials

AsbestosLab Sample Number

Layer Type Lab Gross DescriptionClient Sample

6 of 8Page

15-06-01988-029A 29-FTB Tile Did Not Analyze (Positive Stop)

15-06-01988-029B 29-FTB Mastic Did Not Analyze (Positive Stop)

15-06-01988-030A 30-FTB Tile Did Not Analyze (Positive Stop)

15-06-01988-030B 30-FTB Mastic Did Not Analyze (Positive Stop)

Green Vinyl;

Homogeneous

15-06-01988-031A 31-GFT 97% Non-FibrousTile 3% Chrysotile

3%Total Asbestos:

Black Adhesive;

Homogeneous

15-06-01988-031B 31-GFT 100% Non-FibrousMastic NAD

15-06-01988-032A 32-GFT Tile Did Not Analyze (Positive Stop)

Black Adhesive;

Homogeneous

15-06-01988-032B 32-GFT 100% Non-FibrousMastic NAD

15-06-01988-033A 33-GFT Tile Did Not Analyze (Positive Stop)

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C

Project/Test Address:

Client Number: Report Number:45-5371 15-06-01988

RAFB B-663 Basement; San Antonio, TX

Other Materials

AsbestosLab Sample Number

Layer Type Lab Gross DescriptionClient Sample

7 of 8Page

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C

Project/Test Address:

Client Number: Report Number:45-5371 15-06-01988

RAFB B-663 Basement; San Antonio, TX

Other Materials

AsbestosLab Sample Number

Layer Type Lab Gross DescriptionClient Sample Number

Black Adhesive;

Homogeneous

15-06-01988-033B 33-GFT 100% Non-FibrousMastic NAD

Tasha Eaddy

1% Asbestos

Analyst:

Reporting Limit:

Method:

QC Blank:

QC Sample:

Kathy Fletcher

EPA Method 600/R-93/116, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020

QA/QC Clerk

Reviewed By Authorized Signatory:

72-M22010-3

SRM 1866 Fiberglass

NAD = no asbestos detectedLEGEND:

The condition of the samples analyzed was acceptable upon receipt per laboratory protocol unless otherwise noted on this report. Each distinct component in an inhomogeneous sample was analyzed separately and reported as a composite. Results represent the analysis of samples submitted by the client. Sample location, description, area, volume, etc., was provided by the client. This report cannot be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of the

Environmental Hazards Service, L.L.C. California Certification #2319 NY ELAP #11714 NVLAP #101882-0 VELAP 460172. All information concerning sampling location, date, and time can be found on Chain-of-Custody. Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C. does not perform any sample collection.

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C. recommends reanalysis by point count (for more accurate quantification) or Transmission Electron Microscopy

(TEM), (for enhanced detection capabilities) for materials regulated by EPA NESHAP (National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants) and found to contain less than ten percent (<10%) asbestos by polarized light microscopy (PLM). Both services are available for an additional fee.

400 Point Count Analysis, where noted, performed per EPA Method 600/R-93/116 with a Reporting Limit of 0.25%.

* All California samples analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020, Dec. 1982.

8 of 8Page

Client:

Report Number:

Project/Test Address:

Client Number:

Reported Date:

Received Date:

Analyzed Date:

AEHS 06/12/2015

45-5371

06/17/2015

15-06-01995

7469 Whitepine Rd

Telephone: 800.347.4010

Richmond, VA 23237

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C.

RAFB B-663 First Floor; San Antonio, TX

Laboratory Results Fax Number:

210-656-8499

4402 Center Gate San Antonio, TX 78217

06/15/2015

Layer Type AsbestosClient Sample Number

Other Materials

Lab Gross DescriptionLab Sample Number

Off-White Powdery;

Homogeneous

15-06-01995-001 1-WB 5% Cellulose 95% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Off-White Powdery;

Homogeneous

15-06-01995-002 2-WB 7% Cellulose 93% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Off-White Powdery;

Homogeneous

15-06-01995-003 3-WB 5% Cellulose 95% Non-Fibrous

NAD

White Chalky;

Homogeneous

15-06-01995-004 4-FM 100% Non-FibrousNAD

White Chalky;

Homogeneous

15-06-01995-005 5-FM 100% Non-FibrousNAD

1 of 6Page

White Chalky;

15-06-01995-006 6-FM 100% Non-FibrousNAD

Yellow Adhesive;

Homogeneous

15-06-01995-007 7-CM 4% Synthetic 96% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Yellow Adhesive;

Homogeneous

15-06-01995-008 8-CM 5% Synthetic 95% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Yellow Adhesive;

Homogeneous

15-06-01995-009 9-CM 5% Synthetic 95% Non-Fibrous

NAD

White Rubbery; Yellow Fibrous; Inhomogeneous

15-06-01995-010 10-PM 10% Fibrous Glass 90% Non-Fibrous

NAD

White Rubbery; Yellow Fibrous; Inhomogeneous

15-06-01995-011 11-PM 5% Fibrous Glass 95% Non-Fibrous

NAD

White Rubbery; Yellow Fibrous; Inhomogeneous

15-06-01995-012 12-PM 8% Fibrous Glass 92% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Gray Cementitious; White Granular; Inhomogeneous

15-06-01995-013 13-P 100% Non-FibrousNAD

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C

Project/Test Address:

Client Number: Report Number:45-5371 15-06-01995

RAFB B-663 First Floor; San Antonio, TX

Other Materials

AsbestosLab Sample Number

Layer Type Lab Gross DescriptionClient Sample

2 of 6Page

Gray Cementitious; White Granular; Inhomogeneous

15-06-01995-014 14-P 100% Non-FibrousNAD

Gray Cementitious; White Granular; Inhomogeneous

15-06-01995-015 15-P 100% Non-FibrousNAD

Yellow Adhesive;

Homogeneous

15-06-01995-016 16-CBM 7% Synthetic 93% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Pale Yellow Brittle; White Chalky; Green/Brown Paint; Inhomogeneous

15-06-01995-017 17-CBM 100% Non-FibrousNAD

Brown Brittle; Fibrous;

Inhomogeneous

15-06-01995-018 18-CBM 8% Cellulose 92% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Beige Fibrous; White Paint; Inhomogeneous

15-06-01995-019 19-WCT 65% Cellulose 20% Fibrous Glass 15% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Beige Fibrous; White Paint; Inhomogeneous

15-06-01995-020 20-WCT 65% Cellulose 20% Fibrous Glass 15% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Beige Fibrous; White Paint; Inhomogeneous

15-06-01995-021 21-WCT 65% Cellulose 20% Fibrous Glass 15% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C

Project/Test Address:

Client Number: Report Number:45-5371 15-06-01995

RAFB B-663 First Floor; San Antonio, TX

Other Materials

AsbestosLab Sample Number

Layer Type Lab Gross DescriptionClient Sample

3 of 6Page

Beige Fibrous; White Paint; Inhomogeneous

15-06-01995-022 22-CCT 65% Cellulose 20% Fibrous Glass 15% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Beige Fibrous; White Paint; Inhomogeneous

15-06-01995-023 23-CCT 65% Cellulose 20% Fibrous Glass 15% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Beige Fibrous; White Paint; Inhomogeneous

15-06-01995-024 24-CCT 65% Cellulose 20% Fibrous Glass 15% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Gray Vinyl; Homogeneous15-06-01995-025A 25-FT 96% Non-FibrousTile 4% Chrysotile

4%Total Asbestos:

Black Adhesive;

Homogeneous

15-06-01995-025B 25-FT 92% Non-FibrousMastic 8% Chrysotile

8%Total Asbestos:

15-06-01995-026A 26-FT Tile Did Not Analyze (Positive Stop)

15-06-01995-026B 26-FT Mastic Did Not Analyze (Positive Stop)

15-06-01995-027A 27-FT Tile Did Not Analyze (Positive Stop)

15-06-01995-027B 27-FT Mastic Did Not Analyze (Positive Stop)

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C

Project/Test Address:

Client Number: Report Number:45-5371 15-06-01995

RAFB B-663 First Floor; San Antonio, TX

Other Materials

AsbestosLab Sample Number

Layer Type Lab Gross DescriptionClient Sample

4 of 6Page

Cream Fibrous; Silver Foil;

Inhomogeneous

15-06-01995-028 28-PW 35% Cellulose 15% Fibrous Glass 50% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Cream Fibrous; Silver Foil;

Inhomogeneous

15-06-01995-029 29-PW 35% Cellulose 15% Fibrous Glass 50% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Cream Fibrous; Silver Foil;

Inhomogeneous

15-06-01995-030 30-PW 35% Cellulose 15% Fibrous Glass 50% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C

Project/Test Address:

Client Number: Report Number:45-5371 15-06-01995

RAFB B-663 First Floor; San Antonio, TX

Other Materials

AsbestosLab Sample Number

Layer Type Lab Gross DescriptionClient Sample

5 of 6Page

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C

Project/Test Address:

Client Number: Report Number:45-5371 15-06-01995

RAFB B-663 First Floor; San Antonio, TX

Other Materials

AsbestosLab Sample Number

Layer Type Lab Gross DescriptionClient Sample Number

Tasha Eaddy

1% Asbestos

Analyst:

Reporting Limit:

Method:

QC Blank:

QC Sample:

Katherine Charles Harris

EPA Method 600/R-93/116, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020

QA/QC Clerk

Reviewed By Authorized Signatory:

80-M22013-3

SRM 1866 Fiberglass

NAD = no asbestos detectedLEGEND:

The condition of the samples analyzed was acceptable upon receipt per laboratory protocol unless otherwise noted on this report. Each distinct component in an inhomogeneous sample was analyzed separately and reported as a composite. Results represent the analysis of samples submitted by the client. Sample location, description, area, volume, etc., was provided by the client. This report cannot be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of the

Environmental Hazards Service, L.L.C. California Certification #2319 NY ELAP #11714 NVLAP #101882-0 VELAP 460172. All information concerning sampling location, date, and time can be found on Chain-of-Custody. Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C. does not perform any sample collection.

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C. recommends reanalysis by point count (for more accurate quantification) or Transmission Electron Microscopy

(TEM), (for enhanced detection capabilities) for materials regulated by EPA NESHAP (National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants) and found to contain less than ten percent (<10%) asbestos by polarized light microscopy (PLM). Both services are available for an additional fee.

400 Point Count Analysis, where noted, performed per EPA Method 600/R-93/116 with a Reporting Limit of 0.25%.

* All California samples analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020, Dec. 1982.

6 of 6Page

Client:

Report Number:

Project/Test Address:

Client Number:

Reported Date:

Received Date:

Analyzed Date:

AEHS 06/12/2015

45-5371

06/17/2015

15-06-02001

7469 Whitepine Rd

Telephone: 800.347.4010

Richmond, VA 23237

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C.

RAFB B-663 2nd Floor; San Antonio, Texas

Laboratory Results Fax Number:

210-656-8499

4402 Center Gate San Antonio, TX 78217

06/16/2015

Layer Type AsbestosClient Sample Number

Other Materials

Lab Gross DescriptionLab Sample Number

White Powder;

Homogeneous

15-06-02001-001 1-WB 5% Cellulose 95% Non-Fibrous

NAD

White Powder;

Homogeneous

15-06-02001-002 2-WB 5% Cellulose 95% Non-Fibrous

NAD

White Powder;

Homogeneous

15-06-02001-003 3-WB 5% Cellulose 95% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Tan Granular;

Homogeneous

15-06-02001-004 4-FM 100% Non-FibrousNAD

Tan Granular;

Homogeneous

15-06-02001-005 5-FM 100% Non-FibrousNAD

1 of 6Page

Tan Granular;

15-06-02001-006 6-FM 100% Non-FibrousNAD

Tan/Green Adhesive;

Homogeneous

15-06-02001-007 7-CM 2% Cellulose 98% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Tan/Green Adhesive;

Homogeneous

15-06-02001-008 8-CM 2% Cellulose 98% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Tan/Green Adhesive;

Homogeneous

15-06-02001-009 9-CM 2% Cellulose 98% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Tan Adhesive;

Homogeneous

15-06-02001-010 10-PM 1% Cellulose 4% Fibrous Glass 95% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Tan Adhesive;

Homogeneous

15-06-02001-011 11-PM 1% Cellulose 4% Fibrous Glass 95% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Tan Adhesive;

Homogeneous

15-06-02001-012 12-PM 1% Cellulose 4% Fibrous Glass 95% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Tan Adhesive;

Homogeneous

15-06-02001-013 13-CBM 100% Non-FibrousNAD

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C

Project/Test Address:

Client Number: Report Number:45-5371 15-06-02001

RAFB B-663 2nd Floor; San Antonio, Texas

Other Materials

AsbestosLab Sample Number

Layer Type Lab Gross DescriptionClient Sample

2 of 6Page

Tan Adhesive;

15-06-02001-014 14-CBM 100% Non-FibrousNAD

Tan Adhesive;

Homogeneous

15-06-02001-015 15-CBM 100% Non-FibrousNAD

Gray Vinyl; Homogeneous15-06-02001-016A 16-FT 97% Non-FibrousTile 3% Chrysotile

3%Total Asbestos:

Black Tar-Like;

Homogeneous

15-06-02001-016B 16-FT 1% Cellulose 91% Non-Fibrous

Mastic 8% Chrysotile

8%Total Asbestos:

15-06-02001-017A 17-FT Tile Did Not Analyze (Positive Stop)

15-06-02001-017B 17-FT Mastic Did Not Analyze (Positive Stop)

15-06-02001-018A 18-FT Tile Did Not Analyze (Positive Stop)

15-06-02001-018B 18-FT Mastic Did Not Analyze (Positive Stop)

Tan Fibrous; White Paint;

Inhomogeneous

15-06-02001-019 19-WCT 65% Cellulose 5% Fibrous Glass 30% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C

Project/Test Address:

Client Number: Report Number:45-5371 15-06-02001

RAFB B-663 2nd Floor; San Antonio, Texas

Other Materials

AsbestosLab Sample Number

Layer Type Lab Gross DescriptionClient Sample

3 of 6Page

Tan Fibrous; White Paint;

Inhomogeneous

15-06-02001-020 20-WCT 65% Cellulose 5% Fibrous Glass 30% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Tan Fibrous; White Paint;

Inhomogeneous

15-06-02001-021 21-WCT 65% Cellulose 5% Fibrous Glass 30% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Tan Fibrous; White Paint;

Inhomogeneous

15-06-02001-022 22-CCT 65% Cellulose 5% Fibrous Glass 30% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Tan Fibrous; White Paint;

Inhomogeneous

15-06-02001-023 23-CCT 65% Cellulose 5% Fibrous Glass 30% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Tan Fibrous; White Paint;

Inhomogeneous

15-06-02001-024 24-CCT 65% Cellulose 5% Fibrous Glass 30% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Tan Adhesive; Tan Fibrous; Homogeneous

15-06-02001-025 25-DM 23% Fibrous Glass 77% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Tan Adhesive; Tan Fibrous; Homogeneous

15-06-02001-026 26-DM 23% Fibrous Glass 77% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C

Project/Test Address:

Client Number: Report Number:45-5371 15-06-02001

RAFB B-663 2nd Floor; San Antonio, Texas

Other Materials

AsbestosLab Sample Number

Layer Type Lab Gross DescriptionClient Sample

4 of 6Page

Tan Adhesive; Tan Fibrous; Homogeneous

15-06-02001-027 27-DM 23% Fibrous Glass 77% Non-Fibrous

NAD

Brown Granular; White Paint; Inhomogeneous

15-06-02001-028 28-P 100% Non-FibrousNAD

Brown Granular; White Paint; Inhomogeneous

15-06-02001-029 29-P 100% Non-FibrousNAD

Brown Granular; White Paint; Inhomogeneous

15-06-02001-030 30-P 100% Non-FibrousNAD

White/Blue Vinyl;

Homogeneous

15-06-02001-031A 31-WWBSFT 100% Non-FibrousTile NAD

Black Tar-Like;

Homogeneous

15-06-02001-031B 31-WWBSFT 4% Cellulose 91% Non-Fibrous

Mastic 5% Chrysotile

5%Total Asbestos:

White/Blue Vinyl;

Homogeneous

15-06-02001-032A 32-WWBSFT 100% Non-FibrousTile NAD

15-06-02001-032B 32-WWBSFT Mastic Did Not Analyze (Positive Stop)

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C

Project/Test Address:

Client Number: Report Number:45-5371 15-06-02001

RAFB B-663 2nd Floor; San Antonio, Texas

Other Materials

AsbestosLab Sample Number

Layer Type Lab Gross DescriptionClient Sample

5 of 6Page

White/Blue Vinyl;

15-06-02001-033A 33-WWBSFT 100% Non-FibrousTile NAD

15-06-02001-033B 33-WWBSFT Mastic Did Not Analyze (Positive Stop)

Howard Varner

1% Asbestos

Analyst:

Reporting Limit:

Method:

QC Blank:

QC Sample:

Christian H. Schaible

EPA Method 600/R-93/116, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020

General Manager

Reviewed By Authorized Signatory:

80-M22013-3

SRM 1866 Fiberglass

NAD = no asbestos detectedLEGEND:

The condition of the samples analyzed was acceptable upon receipt per laboratory protocol unless otherwise noted on this report. Each distinct component in an inhomogeneous sample was analyzed separately and reported as a composite. Results represent the analysis of samples submitted by the client. Sample location, description, area, volume, etc., was provided by the client. This report cannot be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of the

Environmental Hazards Service, L.L.C. California Certification #2319 NY ELAP #11714 NVLAP #101882-0 VELAP 460172. All information concerning sampling location, date, and time can be found on Chain-of-Custody. Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C. does not perform any sample collection.

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C. recommends reanalysis by point count (for more accurate quantification) or Transmission Electron Microscopy

(TEM), (for enhanced detection capabilities) for materials regulated by EPA NESHAP (National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants) and found to contain less than ten percent (<10%) asbestos by polarized light microscopy (PLM). Both services are available for an additional fee.

400 Point Count Analysis, where noted, performed per EPA Method 600/R-93/116 with a Reporting Limit of 0.25%.

* All California samples analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy, EPA Method 600/M4-82-020, Dec. 1982.

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C

Project/Test Address:

Client Number: Report Number:45-5371 15-06-02001

RAFB B-663 2nd Floor; San Antonio, Texas

Other Materials

AsbestosLab Sample Number

Layer Type Lab Gross DescriptionClient Sample

6 of 6Page

Appendix B

Photographs

Randolph Air Force Base B-663

San Antonio, Texas

(Asbestos Photographs)

1. Basement Black and White Floor Tile 2. Basement Beige Floor Tile 3% Chrysotile Asbestos

3% Chrysotile Asbestos Black mastic Under Tile 4% Chrysotile Asbestos

3. Basement Green Floor Tile 3% Chrysotile 4. First Floor Floor Tile 4% Chrysotile Asbestos

Asbestos Black Mastic Under Tile 8% Chrysotile Asbestos

5. Second Floor Floor Tile 3% Chrysotile 6. Second FloorWhite with Blue Speck Floor

Asbestos, Black Mastic Under Tile 8% Tile 5% Chrysotile Asbestos

Chrysotile Asbestos

Randolph Air Force Base B-663

San Antonio, Texas

(Lead Based Paint Photographs)

1. Black Door Components 2. White Metal Pipes 3. Brown Door Components

4. Brown Metal Window Casings 5. Beige Concrete Walls 6. Brown Window Sills

7. Black Wood Doors 8. Gray Drywall Walls 9. White Plaster Walls

10. Black Stair Components 11. White Window Casings 12. Beige Ceiling Beams

Appendix C

XRF Measurements

Building 663 - Randolph Air Force Base

No. Time Bldg. Room Component Feature Substrate Cond. Color Res. PbC

1 6/10/15 9:27 1.27

2 6/10/15 9:27 Calibration Neg 0.9

3 6/10/15 9:28 Calibration Neg 0.9

4 6/10/15 9:30 Calibration Pos 1

5 6/10/15 9:32 663 Basement Wall Drywall Det White Neg 0.01

6 6/10/15 9:32 663 Basement Electr Panel Casing Metal Intact White Neg 0

7 6/10/15 9:33 663 Basement Electr Panel Door Metal Intact White Neg 0

8 6/10/15 9:34 663 Basement Door Door Wood Det White Neg 0.01

9 6/10/15 9:34 663 Basement Door Casing Wood Det White Neg 0.07

10 6/10/15 9:34 663 Basement Door Jamb Wood Det White Neg 0.01

11 6/10/15 9:35 663 Basement Access Door Wood Intact Varnish Neg 0

12 6/10/15 9:35 663 Basement Access Casing Wood Det White Neg 0

13 6/10/15 9:36 663 Basement Access Jamb Wood Det Beige Neg 0

14 6/10/15 9:37 663 Basement Wall Brick Det Beige Pos 0.24

15 6/10/15 9:37 663 Basement Wall Panel Wood Det Beige Neg 0.05

16 6/10/15 9:38 663 Basement Door Wood Intact Varnish Neg 0.01

17 6/10/15 9:38 663 Basement Door Casing Wood Det White Neg 0

18 6/10/15 9:38 663 Basement Door Jamb Wood Det White Neg 0

19 6/10/15 9:39 663 Basement Wall Drywall Det Gray Neg 0.01

20 6/10/15 9:40 663 Basement Door Metal Det Gray Neg 0

21 6/10/15 9:40 663 Basement Door Jamb Plaster Det White Neg 0.03

22 6/10/15 9:41 663 Basement Door Casing Metal Det Gray Neg 0

23 6/10/15 9:41 663 Basement Wall Drywall Intact Blue Neg 0

24 6/10/15 9:42 663 Basement Wall Drywall Intact Brown Neg 0

25 6/10/15 9:42 663 Basement Wall Drywall Intact Gray Neg 0

26 6/10/15 9:42 663 Basement Wall Drywall Intact Red Neg 0

27 6/10/15 9:43 663 Basement Wall Drywall Intact Yellow Neg 0

28 6/10/15 9:43 663 Basement Wall Drywall Intact Lt Brown Neg 0

29 6/10/15 9:44 663 Basement Wall Drywall Intact Lt Gray Neg 0

30 6/10/15 9:45 663 Basement Wall Drywall Intact Beige Neg 0

31 6/10/15 9:46 663 Basement Door Wood Intact Varnish Neg 0.02

32 6/10/15 9:47 663 Basement Door Casing Wood Intact White Neg 0

33 6/10/15 9:47 663 Basement Door Jamb Wood Det White Neg 0

34 6/10/15 9:48 663 Basement Window Casing Metal Det White Pos 1.2

35 6/10/15 9:50 663 Basement Wall Plaster Intact Beige Neg 0

36 6/10/15 9:51 663 Basement Stairs Tread Concrete Det Black Neg 0.01

37 6/10/15 9:51 663 Basement Stairs Riser Concrete Det Black Pos 0.16

38 6/10/15 9:54 663 Basement Stairs Railing Metal Det Black Pos 1.7

39 6/10/15 9:57 663 Basement Wall CMU Intact White Neg 0

40 6/10/15 9:57 663 Basement Door Wood Det Beige Neg 0

41 6/10/15 9:58 663 Basement Door Jamb Wood Det Beige Neg 0.02

42 6/10/15 9:58 663 Basement Door Casing Metal Det White Neg 0.02

43 6/10/15 9:58 663 Basement Wall Plaster Intact White Pos 2.2

44 6/10/15 9:59 663 Basement Door Casing Wood Det White Neg 0.02

45 6/10/15 10:00 663 Basement Wall Wood Det White Neg 0

46 6/10/15 10:03 663 Basement Ceiling Concrete Det Beige Neg 0.01

47 6/10/15 10:04 663 Basement Ceiling Beam Concrete Det Beige Pos 0.1

48 6/10/15 10:05 663 Basement Trim-Upr Metal Det Beige Neg 0

49 6/10/15 10:06 663 Basement Door Wood Det Beige Neg 0.01

50 6/10/15 10:06 663 Basement Door Casing Metal Det Beige Neg 0.01

51 6/10/15 10:08 Calibration Pos 1

52 6/10/15 10:09 Calibration Neg 0.9

53 6/10/15 10:10 Calibration Neg 0.9

54 6/11/15 8:04 1.29

55 6/11/15 8:06 Calibration Pos 1.1

56 6/11/15 8:06 Calibration Neg 0.9

57 6/11/15 8:07 Calibration Neg 0.9

58 6/11/15 8:10 663 Basement Elevator Door Metal Det Beige Neg 0

59 6/11/15 8:10 663 Basement Elevator Casing Metal Det Beige Neg 0

60 6/11/15 8:10 663 Basement Elevator Jamb Metal Det Beige Neg 0.01

61 6/11/15 8:11 663 Basement Pass Thru Jamb Metal Det Beige Neg 0

62 6/11/15 8:14 663 Basement Pipe Metal Det Beige Neg 0

63 6/11/15 8:15 663 Basement Pipe Metal Det White Pos 5.6

64 6/11/15 8:20 663 1st Wall Plaster Intact Beige Pos 1.4

65 6/11/15 8:21 663 1st Wall Wood Intact Varnish Neg 0

66 6/11/15 8:22 663 1st Ceiling Wood Intact Varnish Neg 0.01

67 6/11/15 8:23 663 1st Door Wood Intact Varnish Neg 0

68 6/11/15 8:23 663 1st Door Casing Wood Det Black Neg 0.07

69 6/11/15 8:23 663 1st Door Jamb Wood Det Black Neg 0.02

70 6/11/15 8:24 663 1st Hand Rail Metal Det Black Neg 0

71 6/11/15 8:24 663 1st Elevator Door Metal Det Black Neg 0.01

72 6/11/15 8:24 663 1st Elevator Casing Metal Det Black Neg 0.02

73 6/11/15 8:25 663 1st Elevator Jamb Metal Det Black Neg 0.01

74 6/11/15 8:26 663 1st Wall Drywall Intact Gray Pos 3.2

75 6/11/15 8:31 663 1st Wall Drywall Det Beige Neg 0

76 6/11/15 8:33 663 1st Wall Drywall Det Beige Neg 0

77 6/11/15 8:34 663 1st Window Casing Metal Det Black Neg 0

78 6/11/15 8:40 663 1st Wall Drywall Det Beige Neg 0

79 6/11/15 8:40 663 1st Window Casing Metal Det Brown Pos 4.2

80 6/11/15 8:41 663 1st Wall Concrete Det Beige Pos 3.9

81 6/11/15 8:46 663 2nd Wall Plaster Intact Beige Neg 0.02

82 6/11/15 8:47 663 2nd Door Wood Intact Varnish Neg 0

83 6/11/15 8:47 663 2nd Door Casing Wood Intact Black Neg 0.03

84 6/11/15 8:47 663 2nd Door Jamb Wood Det Black Neg 0

85 6/11/15 8:48 663 2nd Elevator Jamb Metal Det Black Neg 0

86 6/11/15 8:48 663 2nd Elevator Casing Metal Det Black Neg 0

87 6/11/15 8:48 663 2nd Elevator Door Metal Det Black Neg 0.03

88 6/11/15 8:49 663 2nd Wall Drywall Intact Beige Neg 0

89 6/11/15 8:50 663 2nd Wall Drywall Intact Gray Neg 0

90 6/11/15 8:54 663 2nd Door Wood Det Black Pos 3.3

91 6/11/15 8:54 663 2nd Door Casing Wood Det Black Pos 3.9

92 6/11/15 8:56 663 2nd Wall Concrete Det Beige Neg 0

93 6/11/15 9:03 663 2nd Wall Plaster Det White Pos 2

94 6/11/15 9:03 663 2nd Door Wood Det Brown Neg 0.03

95 6/11/15 9:03 663 2nd Door Casing Wood Det Brown Pos 3.7

96 6/11/15 9:04 663 2nd Door Jamb Wood Det Brown Pos 5.3

97 6/11/15 9:04 663 2nd Door Jamb Wood Det Black Pos 6.1

98 6/11/15 9:04 663 2nd Window Casing Metal Det Brown Pos 1.8

99 6/11/15 9:04 663 2nd Window Sill Plaster Det Brown Pos 3.6

100 6/11/15 9:05 663 2nd Hand Rail Metal Det Black Neg 0.06

101 6/11/15 9:05 663 2nd Door Transom Wood Det Brown Pos 4.3

102 6/11/15 9:17 663 1st Stairs Riser Concrete Det Black Neg 0.06

103 6/11/15 9:17 663 1st Door Threshold Metal Det Black Neg 0

104 6/11/15 9:22 Calibration Pos 1

105 6/11/15 9:23 Calibration Neg 0.9

106 6/11/15 9:23 Calibration Neg 0.9

107 6/11/15 10:11 663 Exterior Wall Concrete Intact Beige Pos 3.9

108 6/11/15 10:12 663 Exterior Stairs Railing Metal Det Black Neg 0.01

109 6/11/15 10:14 Calibration Neg 0.9

110 6/11/15 10:14 Calibration Neg 0.9

111 6/11/15 10:15 Calibration Pos 1.1