Att_004_-_Past_Perf_Evaluation_Survey_AO.docx
DOCX document 25 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- DU100H-13-Q-0003
About this file
Past Performance Survey
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| DU100H-13-Q-0003_Amendment_02.pdf | ||
| DU100H-13-Q-0003_Amendment_01.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT-002-QASP_DU100H-13-Q-0003.pdf | ||
| Attachment_003_-_Past_Perf_Info_Chart_AO.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| ATTACHMENT_001-AO-PWS.pdf | ||
| DU100H-13-Q-0003_Solicitation.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DU100H-13-Q-0003
ATTACHMENT 004
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE
FROM: _________________________________ TITLE: _______________________
FIRM/ORGANIZATION: ___________________________________________________________
(Reference Insert Name, title, Firm or Organization)
(1) NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR: ___________________________________________
(2) CONTRACT NUMBER OR IDENTIFIER: _________________________________________
(3) AWARD DATE: ________________ (4) COMPLETION DATE: _____________
(5) VALUE: ________________________
(6) DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES RENDERED: ____________________________
Please rate the company listed in 1 above on the contract(s) listed in 2 above. Please provide comments for ratings of excellent, poor, or unsatisfactory for your answers to be understood. See next page for performance rating guidelines. Detailed comments are the most useful in the evaluation process. Your name will not be shared with the firm evaluated, but any adverse results that they are unaware of will be provided to them for comment only.
A. QUALITY OF PRODUCTS AND SERVICES:
[ ] Excellent [ ] Good [ ] Fair [ ] Poor [ ] Unsatisfactory Comments:
B. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
[ ] Excellent [ ] Good [ ] Fair [ ] Poor [ ] Unsatisfactory
Comments:
C. BUSINESS RELATIONS:
[ ] Excellent [ ] Good [ ] Fair [ ] Poor [ ] Unsatisfactory
Comments:
D. COST CONTROL
[ ] Excellent [ ] Good [ ] Fair [ ] Poor [ ] Unsatisfactory
Comments:
E. WOULD YOU SELECT THIS FIRM AGAIN AND WHY? [ ] Yes [ ] No Preparer’s printed/Typed Name: __________________________________________________________ Signature: _______________________________________________________ Date: _____________ Preparer’s Telephone Number: ____________________
PERFORMANCE RATING GUIDELINES
If a factor is not applicable (for example, Cost Control on a Fixed-Price Contracts), then mark that factor as N/A in the comments on the rating sheet.
MEASUREMENT CATEGORIES AND APPROPRIATE CRITERIA
QUALITY OF PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
· Compliance with requirements
· Accurate reporting
· Use of appropriate personnel
· Technical excellence
TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
· Performance milestones & delivery schedules reliably met
· Responsive to technical direction
· Timely completion, including wrap-up & contract admin
· No liquidated damages
COST CONTROL
· Performance within budget/targeted costs
· Current, accurate and complete billings
· Actual costs in line with negotiated costs
· Cost efficient
· No change orders due to poor cost control
BUSINESS RELATIONS
· Effective management
· Businesslike communications
· Prompt notification of problems
· Reasonable, cooperative, flexible, pro-active
· Effective small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting
| EXCELLENT |
| There were no quality problems. |
| There were no delays. |
| There were no cost issues. |
| Responses to inquiries and technical/service issues were consistently effective and responsive. |
| GOOD |
| Nonconformance had no effect on achievement of contract requirements. |
| Delays had no effect on achievement of contract requirements. |
| Cost issues had no effect on achievement of contract requirements. |
| Responses to inquiries and technical/service issues were usually effective and responsive. |
| FAIR |
| Nonconformance required minor resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| Delays required minor resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| Cost issues required minor resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| Responses to inquiries and technical/service issues was occasionally effective and responsible. |
| POOR |
| Nonconformance required significant resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| Delays required significant resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| Cost issues required significant resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| Responses to inquiries and technical/service issues were marginally effective and responsive. |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| Nonconformance compromised achievement of contract requirements. |
| Delays compromised Compliance with contract requirements. |
| Cost issues compromised achievement of contract performance requirements. |
| Responses to inquiries and technical/service issues were consistently ineffective and unresponsive. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .