Report_Culvert_Inspection_1910-005P.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Saratoga National Historical Park
- Solicitation number
- DTFH71-17-B-00016
About this file
Report_Culvert Inspection_1910-005P
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc | DOC document | |
| VETS-4212.pdf | ||
| Report_Bridge_Inspection_1910-002P.pdf | ||
| IFB_Solicitation_-_NP-SARA_BMS(1).pdf | ||
| Report_Bridge_Inspection_1910-001P.pdf | ||
| Report_NEPA.pdf | ||
| Report_Bridge_Inspection_1910-003P.pdf | ||
| FP14_Eng.pdf | ||
| Plans_-_NP-SARA_BMS(1).pdf | ||
| Synopsis_-_NP-SARA_BMS(1).doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CULVERT INSPECTION REPORT
KROMA KILL CULVERT
ENTRANCE ROAD OVER KROMA KILL
SARATOGA NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK
LE
STRUCTURE NO. 1910-005P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 6/19/14
Report prepared by: NU
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 1910-005P
KROMA KILL CULVERT INSPECTION DATE: 6/19/14
CULVERT IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ........ STEEL NO. OF BARRELS:
FOUNDATION: ....................... SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L / OTH BARREL LENGTH: ............... 60 FT (18 M)
STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ... 28.0 FT (8.5 M) SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 35 °
MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ............ 13.0 FT (4.0 M) YEAR BUILT:
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: .......... 000000000000 / NONE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A
NPS ROAD CLASS: ............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ....... 2001 - NEW PAVEMENT.
LOCATION
SARATOGA NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 0.83 (KM PT 1.34)
STATE: .................................. NEW YORK LOCATION: 1.0 MILES FROM U.S. ROUTE 4
FACILITY CARRIED: ............. ENTRANCE ROAD
FEATURE INTERSECTED: ... KROMA KILL
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This corrugated metal pipe culvert is in generally fair condition due to progressive wearing away of the galvanizing coating on the barrel floors, and the subsequent moderate rusting of the barrels.
However, the main problem requiring corrective action at this time is scour that has exposed the ends of the barrel floors to a length of up to 30 inches and is beginning to undermine the dowstream end of the west barrel. In addition, the stone masonry bank protection between the barrels at the upstream side has partially washed out. Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
It should also be noted that some minor deflection at the crown of both barrels has been observed; this condition will continue to be monitored during future inspection cycles.
INSPECTION TEAM: N. JANSEN, V. VENKATASAMY
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
NATHANAEL JANSEN, FIELD TEAM LEADER 703-404-6255
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 10/29/14
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 1910-005P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT COST
UNIT
ESTIMATE
COST
PRELIM.
62.6 REPAIR UNDERMINING AND PLACE ENGINEERED RIPRAP AT SCOURED AREAS AT
BOTH ENDS OF CULVERT.
CY
62.6 REPAIR DETERIORATED STONE MASONRY PROTECTION AT UPSTREAM SIDE
BETWEEN BARRELS.
CY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : $20,000
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST ESTIMATES
PRELIM. COST
REHAB. RECONSTR.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ...
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that the recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 1910-005P
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
N
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
STREAM BED COMPOSITION :9.
AVG. CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.
ALIGNMENT 1.
61. CHANNEL 7
F G G F
8 FT.
LOW
SUFF
N
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
62. CULVERT 6
PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS 9.
ADEQUACY OF COVER 8.
SETTLEMENT AND/OR DEFLECTION 7.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 6.
DEBRIS AND/OR SILT 5.
WINGWALLS 4.
HEADWALLS 3.
FOOTINGS 2.
BARREL(S)1.
ROADWAY SURFACE 10.
RIDEABILITY 11.
OTHER 12. (EMBANKMENT)
F N G G F F G G N G G G
222. APPROACHES 8
OTHER 9.
ALIGNMENT 8.
SIGNS 7.
SETTLEMENT 6.
EROSION 5.
SURFACING 4.
APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.
RELIEF JOINTS 2.
1. APPROACH SLABS N
N N G G G N G N
223. RETAINING WALL N
OTHER 6.
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 5.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 4.
FOUNDATION 3.
WEEP HOLES 2.
1. WALL
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.
TRANSITIONS B.
BRIDGE RAILINGSA.
APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.
N N N N
ROCK, SILT
61.1 STRUCTURE IS LOCATED JUST DOWNSTREAM FROM 90 DEGREE
BEND IN CHANNEL.
MINIMAL FLOW IN WEST BARREL.
61.4, 62.5 MINOR TO MODERATE SILT ACCUMULATION INSIDE BARRELS, SILT
ISLAND FORMING AT DOWNSTREAM END OF WEST BARREL.
MODERATE SILT BUILDUP AT UPSTREAM SIDE OF WEST BARREL IS
GRADUALLY BECOMING PART OF BANK.
MODERATE VEGETATION GROWTH IN CHANNEL.
SMALL LOG ACROSS UPSTREAM END OF WEST BARREL, BECOMING
BURIED IN CHANNEL.
62.1 STREAM FLOW HAS WORN AWAY GALVANIZING COAT FROM BARREL
FLOORS; MODERATE RUSTING WITH MINOR SECTION LOSS OF
SURFACE.
TREES GROWING ON EMBANKMENT SLOPES OVER CULVERT
BARRELS HAVE BEEN REMOVED.
62.4 MINOR EROSION AT END OF SOUTHEAST WINGWALL.
62.6 MINOR TO MODERATE SCOUR AT ENDS OF CULVERT WITH UP TO
30" OF FLOOR EXPOSED AT DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF EAST BARREL
WITH MINOR UNDERMINING AND 8" AT WEST BARREL; UP TO 8" OF
FLOOR EXPOSED ON UPSTREAM SIDE AT EAST BARREL.
MODERATE EMBANKMENT EROSION ON UPSTREAM SIDE WITH
MODERATE DETERIORATION AND SOME LOSS OF STONE MASONRY
PROTECTION BETWEEN BARRELS.
MINOR UNDERMINING (3") AT DOWNSTREAM END OF EAST BARREL.
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required. 3 OF 16
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 1910-005P
ADDITIONAL ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
62.7 MINOR DEFLECTION AT CROWN OF WEST BARREL, UPSTREAM END. MINOR DEFLECTION AT CROWN OF EAST
BARREL, BOTH ENDS.
SLIGHT DEFLECTION OF WEST SIDE OF EAST BARREL AT MIDSPAN.
222.7 "5523810" ON PLAQUE ON WEST WALL OF EAST BARREL AT NORTH END.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 1910-005P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 15 14 20 18
HS 27 24 36 33
TYPE 3 24 22 33 30
TYPE 3S2 38 34 52 47
TYPE 3-3 47 43 65 59
DESIGN LOADING: UNKNOWN (H15 ASSUMED-SEE REMARKS)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: DESIGN LOADING IS UNKNOWN; ASSUMPTION IS BASED ON STRUCTURE TYPE, LOCATION, AGE, AND
CONDITION. RATING IS BASED ON ASSUMED DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 1910-005P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: SARATOGA NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK (1) STATE: ....................................... 362 - NEW YORK (NY)
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... KROMA KILL CULVERT (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 2 - CULVERT (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 091 - SARATOGA
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 1910-005P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 3 - NORTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 10 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... KROMA KILL
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 005P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. ENTRANCE ROAD
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 1910005P0000000
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 1.0 MILES FROM U.S. ROUTE
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 000000000000 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 0.83 (KM PT 1.34)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... NONE (27) YEAR BUILT:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
3 - STEEL
19 - CULVERT
13.0 FT (4.0 M)
28.0 FT (8.5 M)
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
5 - OTHER
5 - OTHER
N - NOT APPLICABLE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. N - NOT APPLICABLE
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. N - NOT APPLICABLE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. N - NOT APPLICABLE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 27.0 TONS (24.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 36.0 TONS (33.0 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/14 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 1910-005P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 43°00'25.60" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 73°37'10.40" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 10 MI (16 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 28.0 FT (8.5 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 18.0 FT (5.5 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 5.0 FT (1.5 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 5 - HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 5.0 FT (1.5 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 300 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 35 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2010 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO
(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 330 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2030 (50) SIDEWALKS:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0 RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 0 - N/A
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... 1 - NAV PROTECTION NOT REQUIRED MATERIAL: .............................. 0 - N/A
DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 0 - N/A
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 0.00 FT (0.00 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK: ................................. N
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE: ......... N
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE: .............. N
(61) CHANNEL:
(62) CULVERT:
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... NNNN
(75A) TYPE OF WORK: .............. 35 - GENERAL REHAB
(75B) WORK DONE BY: ............. 1 - CONTRACT
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
8 - Stable; scour above top of fo
1 - MAINTENANCE
D - MINOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
2001 - NEW PAVEMENT.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 1910-005P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 1910-005P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING WEST TOWARD VISITOR CENTER
FLOW
PHOTO #2 - SOUTH (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOP SIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST
PHOTO #4 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST BARREL LOOKING UPSTREAM
PHOTO #5 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST BARREL LOOKING
DOWNSTREAM; NOTE LOW CHANNEL FLOW
PHOTO #6 - WEST BARREL NEAR DOWNSTREAM END; NOTE SOIL
DEPOSIT AND GRAVEL ACCUMULATION AT BOTTOM OF BARREL
PHOTO #7 - DOWNSTREAM END OF WEST BARREL; NOTE VEGETATION
GROWTH, SOIL DEPOSIT AND GRAVEL ACCUMULATION
PHOTO #8 - SILT BAR WITH VEGETATION GROWTH IS CONSTRICTING
CHANNEL WIDTH AT UPSTREAM END; NOTE MINIMAL FLOW IN WEST
BARREL
PHOTO #9 - SMALL LOG AND VEGETATION GROWTH ACROSS
UPSTREAM END OF WEST BARREL
PHOTO #10 - DOWNSTREAM END OF EAST BARREL; NOTE SCOUR
PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL RUSTING OF CORRUGATED METAL FLOOR OF
BARRELS
PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL RUSTING OF BARREL FLOOR; WEST BARREL AT
UPSTREAM END SHOWN
PHOTO #13 - LOSS OF EMBANKMENT SLOPE BETWEEN BARRELS;
ALSO NOTE DEFLECTION OF BARREL AT CROWN
PHOTO #14 - GENERAL VIEW OF RIPRAP AT NORTHEAST
EMBANKMENT; NOTE EROSION
PHOTO #15 - UPSTREAM CHANNEL
PHOTO #16 - DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .