Report_Culvert_Inspection_1910-005P.pdf

PDF 2 MB Posted

Attached to
Saratoga National Historical Park
Solicitation number
DTFH71-17-B-00016
Issued by

About this file

Report_Culvert Inspection_1910-005P

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc DOC document
VETS-4212.pdf PDF
Report_Bridge_Inspection_1910-002P.pdf PDF
IFB_Solicitation_-_NP-SARA_BMS(1).pdf PDF
Report_Bridge_Inspection_1910-001P.pdf PDF
Report_NEPA.pdf PDF
Report_Bridge_Inspection_1910-003P.pdf PDF
FP14_Eng.pdf PDF
Plans_-_NP-SARA_BMS(1).pdf PDF
Synopsis_-_NP-SARA_BMS(1).doc DOC document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

CULVERT INSPECTION REPORT

KROMA KILL CULVERT

ENTRANCE ROAD OVER KROMA KILL

SARATOGA NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK

LE

STRUCTURE NO. 1910-005P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 6/19/14

Report prepared by: NU

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 1910-005P

KROMA KILL CULVERT INSPECTION DATE: 6/19/14

CULVERT IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ........ STEEL NO. OF BARRELS:

FOUNDATION: ....................... SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L / OTH BARREL LENGTH: ............... 60 FT (18 M)

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ... 28.0 FT (8.5 M) SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 35 °

MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ............ 13.0 FT (4.0 M) YEAR BUILT:

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: .......... 000000000000 / NONE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

NPS ROAD CLASS: ............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ....... 2001 - NEW PAVEMENT.

LOCATION

SARATOGA NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 0.83 (KM PT 1.34)

STATE: .................................. NEW YORK LOCATION: 1.0 MILES FROM U.S. ROUTE 4

FACILITY CARRIED: ............. ENTRANCE ROAD

FEATURE INTERSECTED: ... KROMA KILL

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This corrugated metal pipe culvert is in generally fair condition due to progressive wearing away of the galvanizing coating on the barrel floors, and the subsequent moderate rusting of the barrels.

However, the main problem requiring corrective action at this time is scour that has exposed the ends of the barrel floors to a length of up to 30 inches and is beginning to undermine the dowstream end of the west barrel. In addition, the stone masonry bank protection between the barrels at the upstream side has partially washed out. Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

It should also be noted that some minor deflection at the crown of both barrels has been observed; this condition will continue to be monitored during future inspection cycles.

INSPECTION TEAM: N. JANSEN, V. VENKATASAMY

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

NATHANAEL JANSEN, FIELD TEAM LEADER 703-404-6255

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 10/29/14

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 1910-005P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

62.6 REPAIR UNDERMINING AND PLACE ENGINEERED RIPRAP AT SCOURED AREAS AT

BOTH ENDS OF CULVERT.

CY

62.6 REPAIR DETERIORATED STONE MASONRY PROTECTION AT UPSTREAM SIDE

BETWEEN BARRELS.

CY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : $20,000

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ...

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that the recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 1910-005P

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

N

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

STREAM BED COMPOSITION :9.

AVG. CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.

ALIGNMENT 1.

61. CHANNEL 7

F G G F

8 FT.

LOW

SUFF

N

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

62. CULVERT 6

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS 9.

ADEQUACY OF COVER 8.

SETTLEMENT AND/OR DEFLECTION 7.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 6.

DEBRIS AND/OR SILT 5.

WINGWALLS 4.

HEADWALLS 3.

FOOTINGS 2.

BARREL(S)1.

ROADWAY SURFACE 10.

RIDEABILITY 11.

OTHER 12. (EMBANKMENT)

F N G G F F G G N G G G

222. APPROACHES 8

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS 7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION 5.

SURFACING 4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

RELIEF JOINTS 2.

1. APPROACH SLABS N

N N G G G N G N

223. RETAINING WALL N

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 4.

FOUNDATION 3.

WEEP HOLES 2.

1. WALL

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.

TRANSITIONS B.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.

N N N N

ROCK, SILT

61.1 STRUCTURE IS LOCATED JUST DOWNSTREAM FROM 90 DEGREE

BEND IN CHANNEL.

MINIMAL FLOW IN WEST BARREL.

61.4, 62.5 MINOR TO MODERATE SILT ACCUMULATION INSIDE BARRELS, SILT

ISLAND FORMING AT DOWNSTREAM END OF WEST BARREL.

MODERATE SILT BUILDUP AT UPSTREAM SIDE OF WEST BARREL IS

GRADUALLY BECOMING PART OF BANK.

MODERATE VEGETATION GROWTH IN CHANNEL.

SMALL LOG ACROSS UPSTREAM END OF WEST BARREL, BECOMING

BURIED IN CHANNEL.

62.1 STREAM FLOW HAS WORN AWAY GALVANIZING COAT FROM BARREL

FLOORS; MODERATE RUSTING WITH MINOR SECTION LOSS OF

SURFACE.

TREES GROWING ON EMBANKMENT SLOPES OVER CULVERT

BARRELS HAVE BEEN REMOVED.

62.4 MINOR EROSION AT END OF SOUTHEAST WINGWALL.

62.6 MINOR TO MODERATE SCOUR AT ENDS OF CULVERT WITH UP TO

30" OF FLOOR EXPOSED AT DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF EAST BARREL

WITH MINOR UNDERMINING AND 8" AT WEST BARREL; UP TO 8" OF

FLOOR EXPOSED ON UPSTREAM SIDE AT EAST BARREL.

MODERATE EMBANKMENT EROSION ON UPSTREAM SIDE WITH

MODERATE DETERIORATION AND SOME LOSS OF STONE MASONRY

PROTECTION BETWEEN BARRELS.

MINOR UNDERMINING (3") AT DOWNSTREAM END OF EAST BARREL.

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required. 3 OF 16

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 1910-005P

ADDITIONAL ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

62.7 MINOR DEFLECTION AT CROWN OF WEST BARREL, UPSTREAM END. MINOR DEFLECTION AT CROWN OF EAST

BARREL, BOTH ENDS.

SLIGHT DEFLECTION OF WEST SIDE OF EAST BARREL AT MIDSPAN.

222.7 "5523810" ON PLAQUE ON WEST WALL OF EAST BARREL AT NORTH END.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 1910-005P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 15 14 20 18

HS 27 24 36 33

TYPE 3 24 22 33 30

TYPE 3S2 38 34 52 47

TYPE 3-3 47 43 65 59

DESIGN LOADING: UNKNOWN (H15 ASSUMED-SEE REMARKS)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: DESIGN LOADING IS UNKNOWN; ASSUMPTION IS BASED ON STRUCTURE TYPE, LOCATION, AGE, AND

CONDITION. RATING IS BASED ON ASSUMED DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 1910-005P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: SARATOGA NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK (1) STATE: ....................................... 362 - NEW YORK (NY)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... KROMA KILL CULVERT (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 2 - CULVERT (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 091 - SARATOGA

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 1910-005P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 3 - NORTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 10 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... KROMA KILL

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 005P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. ENTRANCE ROAD

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 1910005P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 1.0 MILES FROM U.S. ROUTE

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 000000000000 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 0.83 (KM PT 1.34)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... NONE (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

3 - STEEL

19 - CULVERT

13.0 FT (4.0 M)

28.0 FT (8.5 M)

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

5 - OTHER

5 - OTHER

N - NOT APPLICABLE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. N - NOT APPLICABLE

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. N - NOT APPLICABLE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. N - NOT APPLICABLE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 27.0 TONS (24.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 36.0 TONS (33.0 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/14 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 1910-005P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 43°00'25.60" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 73°37'10.40" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 10 MI (16 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 28.0 FT (8.5 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 18.0 FT (5.5 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 5.0 FT (1.5 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 5 - HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 5.0 FT (1.5 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 300 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 35 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2010 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO

(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 330 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2030 (50) SIDEWALKS:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0 RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 0 - N/A

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... 1 - NAV PROTECTION NOT REQUIRED MATERIAL: .............................. 0 - N/A

DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 0 - N/A

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 0.00 FT (0.00 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK: ................................. N

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE: ......... N

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE: .............. N

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT:

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... NNNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK: .............. 35 - GENERAL REHAB

(75B) WORK DONE BY: ............. 1 - CONTRACT

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

8 - Stable; scour above top of fo

1 - MAINTENANCE

D - MINOR

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2001 - NEW PAVEMENT.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 1910-005P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 1910-005P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING WEST TOWARD VISITOR CENTER

FLOW

PHOTO #2 - SOUTH (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOP SIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #4 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST BARREL LOOKING UPSTREAM

PHOTO #5 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST BARREL LOOKING

DOWNSTREAM; NOTE LOW CHANNEL FLOW

PHOTO #6 - WEST BARREL NEAR DOWNSTREAM END; NOTE SOIL

DEPOSIT AND GRAVEL ACCUMULATION AT BOTTOM OF BARREL

PHOTO #7 - DOWNSTREAM END OF WEST BARREL; NOTE VEGETATION

GROWTH, SOIL DEPOSIT AND GRAVEL ACCUMULATION

PHOTO #8 - SILT BAR WITH VEGETATION GROWTH IS CONSTRICTING

CHANNEL WIDTH AT UPSTREAM END; NOTE MINIMAL FLOW IN WEST

BARREL

PHOTO #9 - SMALL LOG AND VEGETATION GROWTH ACROSS

UPSTREAM END OF WEST BARREL

PHOTO #10 - DOWNSTREAM END OF EAST BARREL; NOTE SCOUR

PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL RUSTING OF CORRUGATED METAL FLOOR OF

BARRELS

PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL RUSTING OF BARREL FLOOR; WEST BARREL AT

UPSTREAM END SHOWN

PHOTO #13 - LOSS OF EMBANKMENT SLOPE BETWEEN BARRELS;

ALSO NOTE DEFLECTION OF BARREL AT CROWN

PHOTO #14 - GENERAL VIEW OF RIPRAP AT NORTHEAST

EMBANKMENT; NOTE EROSION

PHOTO #15 - UPSTREAM CHANNEL

PHOTO #16 - DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .