Report_Bridge_Inspection_1910-001P.pdf

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

TOUR ROAD BRIDGE

TOUR ROAD OVER ENTRANCE ROAD & KROMA KILL

SARATOGA NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK

LE

STRUCTURE NO. 1910-001P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 6/18/14

Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166

Federal Highway Administration

Report prepared by: SD

MILE POINT:

KILOMETER POINT:

6.40 10.30 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 1910-001P

TOUR ROAD BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 6/18/14

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... TEE BEAM NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 204.0 FT (62.2 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 52.0 FT (15.8 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 20.8 FT (6.3 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 16.0 FT (4.9 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... / 3020B SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 2001, 2007 - APPROACH ROADWAYS REPAVED.

LOCATION

SARATOGA NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 6.40 (KM PT 10.30)

STATE: ................................. NEW YORK LOCATION: 1.2 MILES FROM BRITISH CAMP

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ TOUR ROAD

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. ENTRANCE ROAD & KROMA KILL

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete tee beam bridge is in fair to good condition overall, but exhibits some problems that should be addressed to help ensure continue good service. These include cracking and spalling of the abutment breastwalls;

the spalls should be repaired as necessary, and the cracks should be epoxy-injected as the crack width allows.

Widespread deterioration of the wingwall parapets is also present; the unsound concrete should be removed, and fresh concrete placed to the original lines. Part of the reason for the distress in the wingwall parapets appears to be inadequate thermal expansion room for the metal railings. The ends of the railings should be cut to allow for proper expansion travel, new railing end caps should be installed.

Another problem is deterioration of the asphalt wearing surface, which allows water intrusion and can also trap moisture and exacerbate deterioration. To help extend the useful life of the structure, the existing wearing surface should be removed, and a new overlay should be installed to protect the deck and box girder from further water intrusion. At a minimum, the cracks in the existing asphalt should be sealed until the wearing surface can be replaced.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: N. JANSEN, V. VENKATASAMY

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

NATHANAEL JANSEN, FIELD TEAM LEADER 703-404-6255

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 10/29/14

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 1910-001P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

C226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

58.5,6 REPAIR SPALLING OF SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST END PARAPETS AND BOTH

CURBS. REPAIR SPALLING AT ABUTMENTS.

40 SF

60.1,6 EPOXY-INJECT CRACKS IN ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS AND WINGWALLS. 100 LF

58.3 SEAL CRACKS IN ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE UNTIL WEARING SURFACE CAN

BE REPLACED.

300 LF

58.6 MODIFY ENDS OF BRIDGE RAILS TO ALLOW SPACE FOR EXPANSION. 4 EA

58.10 REPAIR BROKEN OFF ASPHALT ALONG UNDERPASS SHOULDER; SOUTHBOUND

LANE.

1 LS

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

58.1,3 REMOVE ASPHALT PAVEMENT AND INSTALL WATERPROOFING

MEMBRANE. PLACE NEW OVERLAY.

3,270 SF

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ...

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that the recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 1910-001P

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

N NOT APPLICABLE

9 EXCELLENT CONDITION

8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

58. DECK 7

1. DECK SLAB G

2. EXPANSION JOINTS G

3. WEARING SURFACE F

4. RIDEABILITY G

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN F

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS F

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE G

8. UTILITIES N

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION G

10. OTHER

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 7

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

7. PAINT

8. FASCIA(E)

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10. ALIGNMENT

11. OTHER (ENDWALLS)

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS

2. PILE BENTS

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS

5. FOUNDATIONS

6. WINGWALLS

7. WEEP HOLES

8. EXPANSION JOINTS

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

11. SLOPE PROTECTION

12. OTHER

PIER(S)

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

14. PILE BENTS

15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

16. FOUNDATIONS

17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19. OTHER

G G N N N N N N G G G

F N F G G F F F F G N N

G N G N G G N

58.1

58.3,7

58.5

58.6

58.7

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING ON UNDERSIDE OF DECK

OVERHANGS WITH MINOR EFFLORESCENCE PRESENT.

WIDESPREAD RUST STAINS FROM EXPOSED REBAR CHAIRS.

MINOR TRANSVERSE AND RANDOM CRACKING THROUGHOUT

ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE WITH VEGETATION GROWTH IN SOME

CRACKS.

WEARING SURFACE SOUNDS HOLLOW IN SOME AREAS, MAINLY

ALONG CURBS. SURFACING ALONG CURBS IS SOMEWHAT ROUGH

AND IRREGULAR, MAY HINDER DRAINAGE SLIGHTLY.

FULL-WIDTH PATCH IN SPAN #3, APPROXIMATELY 8' LONG, SOUTH

HALF SOUNDS HOLLOW WHEN STRUCK WITH SOUNDING HAMMER.

MINOR CRACKING OF CURBS AT PARAPET EXPANSION JOINTS. 18"

LONG CORNER SPALL IN SOUTH CURB, SPAN #2. 7" LONG CORNER

SPALL IN NORTH CURB AT PIER #2.

MODERATE CRACKING OF CURB FACES OVER PIERS WITH SOME

EFFLORESCENCE; CRACKS EXTEND THROUGH PARAPETS AND

INTO WEARING SURFACE.

SMALL HOLE IN EXPANSION JOINT SEALER IN CURB AT WEST

ABUTMENT, SOUTH SIDE.

LACK OF EXPANSION ROOM BETWEEN RAILS AND END PARAPETS

AT EAST END OF BRIDGE. LARGE CORNER SPALL (9"X9"X FULL

WIDTH) AT TOP CORNER OF SOUTHEAST END PARAPET DUE TO

EXPANSION OF RAIL; RAIL IS UP AGAINST NORTHEAST END

PARAPET.

MODERATE TO SEVERE SCALING WITH AREAS OF DELAMINATION

AND SPALLING (25' LONG X 13" WIDE X UP TO 3" DEEP) ALONG TOP

OF SOUTHWEST END PARAPET.

RAILING END CAPS MISSING AT WEST END OF BRIDGE.

MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION IN CURBLINES. EVIDENCE OF

PONDING ALONG BOTH CURBS.

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.

ALIGNMENT 1.

61. CHANNEL 7

G F G G N

MED

SUFF

40 FT.

ROCK, SAND

222. APPROACHES 8

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS 7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION 5.

SURFACING 4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

RELIEF JOINTS 2.

1. APPROACH SLABS

(UNDERPASS)

N N N G G G G G F

223. RETAINING WALL N

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 4.

FOUNDATION 3.

WEEP HOLES 2.

1. WALL

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.

APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.

TRANSITIONS B.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1

N N N

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

59.1 NEOPRENE BEARING PADS AT PIERS HAVE BEEN PARTIALLY

GROUTED OVER.

59.2 MINOR CRACKING OF CONCRETE TEE BEAM, SOME

EFFLORESCENCE PRESENT.

WIDESPREAD MINOR RUST SPOTS ON UNDERSIDE FROM EXPOSED

REBAR CHAIRS.

59.11 EFFLORESCENCE FROM JOINTS BETWEEN BEAM AND ENDWALLS.

60.1 MODERATE FULL-LENGTH HORIZONTAL CRACKING AND MINOR

VERTICAL CRACKING OF BOTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS.

EFFLORESCENCE FROM HORIZONTAL CRACK AT WEST ABUTMENT.

14" X 18" AREA OF SPALLING AND DELAMINATION AT SOUTH SIDE OF

EAST ABUTMENT 3' UP FROM BOTTOM AND 1' X 3" AT SOUTH

BREASTWALL, BACKWALL AND WINGWALL JUNCTION.

DELAMINATED CONCRETE PATCH AT NORTH SIDE OF EAST

ABUTMENT.

60.1,3 EXPANSION/KEYWAY AREA AT BOTH ABUTMENTS APPEARS TO HAVE

BEEN GROUTED; THERMAL MOVEMENT HAS SINCE CAUSED

SPALLING OF PATCHES.

1' X 1' SPALLS ON KEYWAY GROUTING AT BOTH SIDES OF BEAM AT

EAST ABUTMENT.

EFFLORESCENCE FROM KEYWAY JOINT AT WEST ABUTMENT.

MINOR SPALLING AT BOTH ABUTMENT BEARING SEAT AREAS DUE

TO ROTATION OF SUPERSTRUCTURE.

60.4 MINOR SPALLING OF TOP EDGE OF EAST ABUTMENT BACKWALL

DUE TO VEHICLE TIRE ACTION.

MINOR RANDOM CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND SPALLING

OF TOP OF WEST BACKWALL.

60.6 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF ALL WINGWALLS WITH

EFFLORESCENCE.

TWO MODERATE DIAGONAL CRACKS IN NORTHWEST WINGWALL.

SEE ALSO 58.6.

60.7 MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH IN BOTH WEEP HOLES AT WEST

ABUTMENT AND SOUTH WEEP HOLE AT EAST ABUTMENT.

60.8 MINOR SPALLING OF CONCRETE ADJACENT TO ALL VERTICAL

EXPANSION JOINTS.

MINOR DETERIORATION OF JOINT FILLER IN WEST ABUTMENT

VERTICAL JOINTS; MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH IN NORTHWEST

JOINT AND WATER STAINING FROM BOTH WEST ABUTMENT JOINTS.

ADDITIONAL ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

60.9 EXPOSED FOOTINGS:

SOUTHEAST WINGWALL FOOTING UP TO 10"

NORTHWEST WINGWALL FOOTING EXPOSED UP TO 4"

MINOR EROSION PATH AT NORTHEAST WINGWALL EMBANKMENT.

MINOR EROSION IN FRONT OF EAST ABUTMENT BREASTWALL, BELOW SOUTH WEEP HOLE.

60.17 PREVIOUSLY NOTED EROSION REPAIR OF EMBANKMENT AROUND CENTER PIER APPEARS TO BE IN GOOD

CONDITION.

61.2,3 MINOR UNDERMINING OF STACKED STONE RETAINING WALLS ALONG CHANNEL.

222.4,7 MINOR SETTLEMENT AREA 20' X 6' ALONG SOUTHEAST SHOULDER.

"5523780" ON PLAQUE ON NORTH FACE OF NORTHWEST WINGWALL. NEW "LOAD LIMIT 20 TONS" SIGN AT WEST

APPROACH.

222.9 4' X 1' SECTION OF BROKEN ASPHALT ALONG UNDERPASS SHOULDER, SOUTHBOUND LANE, WITH LONGITUDINAL

CRACKING PRESENT; POTENTIAL TRAFFIC HAZARD.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 1910-001P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 14 13 22 20

HS 17 15 27 24

TYPE 3 16 15 27 24

TYPE 3S2 24 22 40 36

TYPE 3-3 30 27 50 45

DESIGN LOADING: H10 (M9)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 6/90

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: SEE REMARKS

REMARKS: ROAD IS OCCASIONALLY USED BY TOUR BUSES AND BRIDGE SHOWS NO SIGNS OF DISTRESS DUE TO THIS LOADING. RATING CONTROLLED BY MOMENT CAPACITY OF TEE-BEAM FOR INVENTORY RATING, MOMENT CAPACITY OF DECK CANTILEVER FOR OPERATING RATING.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 1910-001P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: SARATOGA NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK (1) STATE: ....................................... 362 - NEW YORK (NY)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... TOUR ROAD BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 091 - SARATOGA

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 1910-001P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 3 - NORTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 500 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... ENTRANCE ROAD & KROMA

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 001P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. TOUR ROAD

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 1910001P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 1.2 MILES FROM BRITISH CA

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 6.40 (KM PT 10.30)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 3020B (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

04 - TEE BEAM

52.0 FT (15.8 M)

204.0 FT (62.2 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 1 - H10 (M9) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... P - POSTED FOR LOAD

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 17.0 TONS (15.4 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 27.0 TONS (24.5 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/14 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 1910-001P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 43°00'20.50" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 16.0 FT (4.9 M)

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 73°37'01.50" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 20.8 FT (6.3 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 10 MI (16 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 22.0 FT (6.7 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 12.0 FT (3.7 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 02 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 5.0 FT (1.5 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 5.0 FT (1.5 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 6 - HIGHWAY-WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 90 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 0 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2010 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO

(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 100 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 16.0 FT (4.9 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2030 (50) SIDEWALKS:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0 RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 2 - MOUNTED ON PARAPET

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... 1 - NAV PROTECTION NOT REQUIRED MATERIAL: .............................. 6 - ALUMINUM

DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 7.5 FT (2.3 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.91 FT (0.89 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 16.0 FT (4.9 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 22.58 FT (6.88 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK: .............. 35 - GENERAL REHAB

(75B) WORK DONE BY: ............. 1 - CONTRACT

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

8 - Stable; scour above top of fo

2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

C - MODERATE

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2001, 2007 - APPROACH ROADWAYS REPAVED.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 1910-001P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 1910-001P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING WEST (BACK) ALONG ONE-WAY TOUR ROAD

FLOW

PHOTO #2 - NORTH (UPSTREAM SIDE)

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOP SIDE VIEW

STRUCTURE LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #4 - GENERAL VIEW OF STRUCTURE

UNDERSIDE LOOKING EAST FROM SPAN #1

PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE,

PAVEMENT IN SPAN #4 SHOWN

PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE

NEAR CURB LINE, SOUTH CURB LINE IN SPAN #4 SHOWN

PHOTO #7 - VIEW OF ASPHALT PATCH IN SPAN

#3

PHOTO #8 - DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND

VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG SOUTH CURB

LINE

PHOTO #9 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST

ABUTMENT EXPANSION JOINT; NOTE

SPALLING AT EDGE OF BACKWALL

PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF CURBS;

SOUTH CURB OVER SPANS #3 AND #4

SHOWN

PHOTO #11 - SPALL AT TOP CORNER OF SOUTHEAST END PARAPET

DUE TO LACK OF EXPANSION ROOM FOR RAIL

PHOTO #12 - SPALLING AND SCALING OF CONCRETE ALONG

SOUTHWEST APPROACH PARAPET

PHOTO #13 - SPALLING AND SCALING OF

CONCRETE ALONG NORTHWEST APPROACH

PARAPET

PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL FULL HEIGHT VERTICAL

CRACK OF APPROACH PARAPETS;

NORTHWEST PARAPET SHOWN

PHOTO #15 - TYPICAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF

STRUCTURE BELOW EAST SPAN; NOTE

WIDESPREAD STAINS FROM EXPOSED REBAR

CHAIRS

PHOTO #16 - TRANSVERSE CRACK WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON BOTTOM FLANGE OF

CONCRETE TEE BEAM AT EAST ABUTMENT

SUPPORT

PHOTO #17 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #18 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST

PHOTO #19 - SPALL IN EAST ABUTMENT

BREASTWALL ALONG KEYWAY

PHOTO #20 - DELAMINATED CONCRETE PATCH

WITH SPALL AT NORTH SIDE OF EAST

PHOTO #21 - HORIZONTAL CRACK IN EAST ABUTMENT BREAST WALL

AT MID HEIGHT

PHOTO #22 - SPALLING AT EAST ABUTMENT NEAR JOINT WITH

ENDWALL

PHOTO #23 - VERTICAL CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE IN WEST ABUTMENT

BREASTWALL; ALSO NOTE VEGETATION

GROWTH FROM VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINT

PHOTO #24 - WATER STAINING FROM

SOUTHWEST ABUTMENT VERTICAL JOINT

PHOTO #25 - EXPOSED FOOTING AT NORTHWEST WINGWALL

PHOTO #26 - EXPOSED FOOTING AT SOUTHEAST WINGWALL

PHOTO #27 - DIAGONAL CRACK IN

NORTHWEST WINGWALL

PHOTO #28 - STACKED STONE RETAINING

WALL ADJACENT TO CENTER PIER

PHOTO #29 - REPAIRED EROSION AT CENTER

PIER

PHOTO #30 - 20 TONS LOAD LIMIT SIGN AT

WEST APPROACH

PHOTO #31 - 4' X 1' SECTION OF BROKEN AND CRACKED ASPHALT

ALONG UNDERPASS SHOULDER, SOUTHBOUND LANE

PHOTO #32 - UPSTREAM CHANNEL

PHOTO #33 - DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL