Report_Bridge_Inspection_1910-002P.pdf

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

KROMA KILL BRIDGE #2

ENTRANCE ROAD OVER KROMA KILL

SARATOGA NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK

LE

STRUCTURE NO. 1910-002P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 6/18/14

Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166

Federal Highway Administration

Report prepared by: NU

MILE POINT:

KILOMETER POINT:

0.54 0.87 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 1910-002P

KROMA KILL BRIDGE #2 INSPECTION DATE: 6/18/14

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... SLAB NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 37.2 FT (11.3 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 37.2 FT (11.3 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 28.4 FT (8.7 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 24.0 FT (7.3 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 000000000000 / 3023C SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 30 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 2001 - NEW WEARING SURFACE.

LOCATION

SARATOGA NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 0.54 (KM PT 0.87)

STATE: ................................. NEW YORK LOCATION: 6.0 MILES FROM VISITOR CENTER

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ ENTRANCE ROAD

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. KROMA KILL

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete slab bridge is in fair to good condition overall, but has some problems that should be addressed to help ensure continued good service. The main structural problem is cracking, spalling, and delamination of previously repaired areas of the abutment corners, with some extended areas of delamination at the west abutment and rebar exposed in one location. The unsound concrete should be removed at these locations, and the abutments patched out to the original lines.

In addition, the channel has migrated such that the stream now flows against the east abutment, causing minor scour.

Engineered riprap should be placed to realign the channel away from the abutment.

Other problems include popouts with exposed rebar on the deck sides; spalling of the curbs, exposing rebar in some instances; and missing end caps at the north railing.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: N. JANSEN, V. VENKATASAMY

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

NATHANAEL JANSEN, FIELD TEAM LEADER 703-404-6255

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 10/29/14

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 1910-002P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

C226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

60.1,6 REPAIR SPALLING OF CONCRETE AT ABUTMENT CORNERS. 50 SF

58.6 REPLACE DAMAGED PORTION OF SOUTH RAILING. REPLACE MISSING END CAPS

ON NORTH RAILING.

20 LF

58.1,5, 60.1 CLEAN EXPOSED REBAR ON DECK SIDES, NORTHWEST AND SOUTHWEST

APPROACH CURBS, AND NORTHWEST ABUTMENT CORNER, AND COAT WITH

APPROVED PROTECTIVE SEALANT.

20 SF

60.7 CLEAR COVERED WEEP HOLE AT WEST ABUTMENT. 1 LS

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

61.1 REDIRECT CHANNEL AWAY FROM EAST ABUTMENT WITH

ENGINEERED RIPRAP.

20 CY

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ...

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that the recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 1910-002P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

N N G N N N N N G

N G

G G F F G N

N

G

G

G

58.1, 59.3 SEVERAL POPOUTS WITH EXPOSED REBAR ENDS ON DECK SIDES.

SEVERAL AREAS OF MINOR HONEYCOMBING AND EXPOSED REBAR

CHAIRS ON DECK UNDERSIDE.

58.2,3 DECK EXPANSION JOINTS HAVE BEEN PAVED OVER. MINOR

DETERIORATION OF JOINT SEALER IN CURB AND PARAPET AT

SOUTHWEST JOINT. ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE IN GOOD

CONDITION.

58.5 MODERATE SCALING AND POPOUTS THROUGHOUT CURBS AND

RUST STAINING NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT.

MINOR SPALLING ALONG TOP EDGE OF SOUTH CURB DUE TO

COLLISION DAMAGE.

MINOR SPALLS AT EAST AND WEST EXPANSION JOINTS IN NORTH

CURB. 3 EXPOSED REBARS IN NORTHWEST APPROACH CURB AND

4 EXPOSED REBARS IN SOUTHWEST APPROACH CURB.

58.6 BOTH END CAPS MISSING FROM NORTH RAILING. CENTER

SECTION OF SOUTH RAILING IS BENT DUE TO COLLISION DAMAGE.

MINOR DEBRIS BUILDUP ON TOP OF RAIL POST ANCHOR PLATES.

MODERATE SCALING AND POPOUTS ON CONCRETE END

PARAPETS.

MINOR MOSS GROWTH ON NORTH CONCRETE PARAPET AT RAIL

POSTS #3 & #4.

58.7 MINOR SOIL AND DEBRIS BUILDUP IN CURBLINES WITH MINOR

VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG CURBS MAINLY AT SOUTHEAST

APPROACH.

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS 1. F

PILE BENTS 2. N

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS 3. N

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS 4. G

FOUNDATIONS 5. N

WINGWALLS 6. G

WEEP HOLES 7. G

EXPANSION JOINTS 8. N

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 9. F

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 10. G

SLOPE PROTECTION 11. N

OTHER 12. N

PIER(S)

WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS 13. N

PILE BENTS 14. N

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS 15. N

FOUNDATIONS 16. N

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 17. N

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 18. N

OTHER 19. N

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 1910-002P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.

ALIGNMENT 1.

61. CHANNEL 6

F F N F N

LOW

SUFF

6 FT.

SILT, GRAVEL

222. APPROACHES 7

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS 7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION 5.

SURFACING 4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

RELIEF JOINTS 2.

1. APPROACH SLABS N

N N G G G G G N

223. RETAINING WALL N

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 4.

FOUNDATION 3.

WEEP HOLES 2.

1. WALL

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.

APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.

TRANSITIONS B.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1

N N N

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

60.1 PREVIOUS CONCRETE REPAIRS HAVE SPALLED OFF BOTH

CORNERS OF WEST ABUTMENT WITH EXTENDED AREAS OF

DELAMINATION PRESENT; EXPOSED REBAR AT NORTH CORNER.

DELAMINATION AND CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AT

PREVIOUS CONCRETE REPAIRS AT NORTH CORNER OF EAST

ABUTMENT; MINOR SPALLING AND CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE AT SOUTH CORNER.

MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF BOTH ABUTMENTS WITH

EFFLORESCENCE.

60.6 MINOR CRACKING AND SPALLING OF WINGWALLS AT ABUTMENT

CORNERS WITH POPOUTS ALSO PRESENT.

60.7 MINOR LEAKAGE AND EMBANKMENT LOSS THROUGH WEEP HOLES.

NORTH WEEP HOLE AT WEST ABUTMENT IS COVERED WITH SILT.

SOUTHWEST WEEP HOLE UNCOVERED IN WEST ABUTMENT.

60.9, 61.1,2 CHANNEL FLOWS AGAINST EAST ABUTMENT; MINOR SCOUR

PRESENT. MINOR EROSION OF NORTHEAST WINGWALL

EMBANKMENT.

MODERATE EROSION OF CHANNEL BANKS UPSTREAM AND

DOWNSTREAM OF STRUCTURE WITH SEVERAL TREES

UNDERMINED; CHANNEL BANKS ARE WELL VEGETATED.

61.4 SAND AND STONE BAR AGAINST WEST ABUTMENT.

SEVERAL TREES DOWN ACROSS CHANNEL UPSTREAM AND

DOWNSTREAM OF STRUCTURE. NO INTERFERENCE WITH NORMAL

FLOW, HOWEVER.

222.4,6 MINOR SETTLEMENT AT APPROACHES; MINOR TRANSVERSE

CRACKING OF ASPHALT AT WEST APPROACH.

222.7 "5523800" ON PLAQUE ON WEST ABUTMENT BREASTWALL.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 1910-002P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 24 22 41 37

HS 34 31 58 53

TYPE 3 30 27 50 45

TYPE 3S2 46 42 77 70

TYPE 3-3 58 53 96 87

DESIGN LOADING: H10 (M9)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 6/91

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: MOMENT CAPACITY OF DECK

REMARKS:

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 1910-002P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: SARATOGA NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK (1) STATE: ....................................... 362 - NEW YORK (NY)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... KROMA KILL BRIDGE #2 (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 091 - SARATOGA

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 1910-002P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 3 - NORTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 10 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... KROMA KILL

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 002P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. ENTRANCE ROAD

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 1910002P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 6.0 MILES FROM VISITOR CE

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 000000000000 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 0.54 (KM PT 0.87)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 3023C (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

1 - CONCRETE

01 - SLAB

37.2 FT (11.3 M)

37.2 FT (11.3 M)

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 1 - H10 (M9) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 34.0 TONS (31.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 58.0 TONS (53.0 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/14 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 1910-002P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 43°00'16.50" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 24.0 FT (7.3 M)

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 73°36'54.20" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 28.4 FT (8.7 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 10 MI (16 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 29.0 FT (8.8 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 18.0 FT (5.5 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 5.0 FT (1.5 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 6.0 FT (1.8 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 300 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 30 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2010 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO

(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 330 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 24.0 FT (7.3 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2030 (50) SIDEWALKS:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0 RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 2 - MOUNTED ON PARAPET

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... 1 - NAV PROTECTION NOT REQUIRED MATERIAL: .............................. 6 - ALUMINUM

DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.33 FT (0.71 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK: .............. 35 - GENERAL REHAB

(75B) WORK DONE BY: ............. 1 - CONTRACT

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

4 - Stable; action required to pro

2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

C - MODERATE

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2001 - NEW WEARING SURFACE.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 1910-002P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 1910-002P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING WEST TOWARD VISITOR CENTER

FLOW

PHOTO #2 - SOUTH (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOP SIDE OF STRUCTURE LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #4 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF STRUCTURE LOOKING

EAST

PHOTO #5 - DETERIORATION OF JOINT SEALANT IN CURB AND

PARAPET AT SOUTHWEST JOINT

PHOTO #6 - EXPOSED REBAR AT NORTH CURB OF WEST APPROACH;

ALSO NOTE SCALING AND SPALLING ALONG EDGES

PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL SCALING AND POPOUTS

THROUGHOUT CURBS, SOUTH CURB SHOWN;

ALSO NOTE SOIL ACCUMULATION AND

VEGETATION GROWTH

PHOTO #8 - MISSING END CAP AT NORTH

BRIDGE RAILING, WEST END

PHOTO #9 - COLLISION DAMAGE TO SOUTH RAILING; ALSO NOTE

VEGETATION GROWTH

PHOTO #10 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST ABUTMENT; NOTE SAND AND

SOIL ACCUMULATION ALONG BREASTWALL

PHOTO #11 - SPALLING OF CONCRETE REPAIR AT NORTH CORNER OF

WEST ABUTMENT; NOTE EXPOSED REBAR

PHOTO #12 - DELAMINATION AND SPALLING OF CONCRETE REPAIR AT

SOUTH CORNER OF WEST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #13 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST

ABUTMENT; NOTE CHANNEL FLOWS ALONG

EAST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKING OF

ABUTMENTS WITH EFFLORESCENCE, EAST

ABUTMENT SHOWN; ALSO NOTE VEGETATION

GROWTH IN WEEP HOLE

PHOTO #15 - EROSION OF DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL BANK ALONG

EAST SIDE; ALSO NOTE CRACKS WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN

WINGWALL

PHOTO #16 - TYPICAL SETTLEMENT OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT AT

APPROACHES, EASTBOUND LANE OF WEST APPROACH SHOWN;

NOTE DECK EXPANSION JOINTS HAVE BEEN PAVED OVER

PHOTO #17 - TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF

ASPHALT PAVEMENT AT WEST APPROACH

PHOTO #18 - UPSTREAM CHANNEL

PHOTO #19 - DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL