CA_FLAP_SR89(2)_OptionX_Plans_Final.pdf

OREGON • DISTI COUNTY I ROUTE POST Mil.ES

TOTAL PROJECT STATE PROJECT

ll:; I Eureka :g

Reddln9 I

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

I

!I:

i-.: :1 ~ g ~ .s l ..

.9

' ; CA FLAP SR 89(2)

~ -OPTIONX

~--~===~3•I:=====~~---

PLANS FOR PROPOSED ::.ON

CA FLAP SR 89(2) - OPTION X ' .;}..._

•'-""t-.

' ®/'-.\ Of ~. EXEC'll

.., lw.J TAHOE CITY SIDEWALK

AND BIKE TRAIL PROJECT . .... ,- .. ,

··J:"•

~. fTi'd i ,,... . ·~~-··,/L;._A-.J'UJG.:;~EnC.Y TAHOE NATIONAL FOREST ~AKll..VNA . ·-·--··· PLACER COUNTY

LENGTH 0.40 miles (Bike Path), 0.15 miles (Sidewalk) i ..i.. Th:lf plans have been reviewed and approved as required n.E • M ... r Or CALIFOifN~ TRPA Rules, Regulatlon& and Otdlnanoes only. TRPA has not revfewed and IMfl not be responsible tor any

TI'PE OF CONSTRUCTION: I elements contained In these~. I.e. stNctural, electrical, Sidewalk l and 3

CA FLAP SR 89(2)

OptionX

S~~:.w~lk ~?-~~t~:ti~~· b2ke ~~~h0c~~~tr~f~~anical; 1&tc. which a~ not ~Cl for tfWfGW under said

'•~'"'"' ....... ,,,.,,, ..... ~ •• ,,.,, T=E':'oNA't.~.'ANNi'NG AG~~f:!. 1 11· ~

U.S. CUSTOMARY DIMENSIONS:

Slopes are expressed as RISE:RUN

Ali existing disturbed areas ~nd SPECIFICATIONS: areas disturbed by construction "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUQ';T.QN,OE..~Sh~ revegetated with AND BRIDGES ON FEDERAL HIGHWAY PROJe~'t.¥P."t~ f1,;' spec'1es 1·n a,,.cordance U.S. CUSTOMARY UNITS" vegt:: a 1011 " with the TRPA handbook of best

~OllHllTllEMT TO E~CELLEl!CE management practices and .

Living With Fire, Lake Tahoe Basm, Second Edition .

t1t/frans"

Tahoe Transportation

ClSl'llC'1'

"BK1,, Line-;· CA FLAP SR B9(2) l Option X ;f\\ '-:

I I I/ "BK2" Line

CA FLAP SR 89(2)----+-~

Option X>I -~

I_ I

I w1w

"'I" 0:: ot

NOTE· Required eMPs (slope stabilization, infiltration facilities. revegatatiori, etc.) shown or.

the appro;1ed plans have been determined from

South Lake Tahoe, CA 28 miles from beginning of project representations submitted oy the spplicailt and not con!irmed by field mspection Modiiicalion of

Know Yjflat's below. the required BM?s r.ecessary tocorrect inada o 3000' 6000'

Incllne VIiiage, NV 14 miles from end of project

/ T 16N MDB&M

T 15 N MDB&M

Lighting Improvements

CA FLAP SR 89(2)

OptionX

"BK3" Line

CA FLAP SR 89(2)

OptionX

. -i~ .u.,.-

Wit-4?01;,~

c. r;,.0'Y&\

~1'".f:-)1' I ~ ..,,. ~-:

'f~{ff' No. 65808"' m1.

* A:.*'" ~~~ CfVll <:fl-~if'

SHEET

A1

"2.-A3

M·AS

AS

A7

B1·B3 B4 B6

C1-C4

01-02 03-05 06-07

El·E2 E3-E7

F1

G1 G2

K1·K2

R1·R4

T1·T6 T7-T14

T15 T16 l!

-;1';~.$°

'''''n ti'

03 I PLA I 89

TITLE SHEET

5.9/8.5 CA

INDEX TO SHEETS

DESCRIPTION

CA FLAP SR 89(2)

OPTION X

CONVENTIONAL PLAN SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS

SURVEY CONTROL

SITE~

TYPICAL SECTIONS

SU~RY OF QUANTITIES

GRADING. TOPSOIL. REMOVALS AND DRAINAGE SUM'v\i\RIES SURFACING AND SURVEYING SUtJMARIES

PAVEIV'.ENT MARKING SU~RIES

SIGN SU!vl\llARIES RETAINING WALL. LIGHTING, EOUIPPvENT AND LABOR, ~CELLAl\IEOUS SUtvlMRIES

BIKE PATH PLAN AND PROFILES

SIDEWALK LAYOUTS

GRAOING AND POINT LAYOUTS

COGO POINT TABL,.ES . -

157 EROSION CONTROL PLANS

157 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS AND SPECIALS

201 REMOVAL LAYOVf

258C.l.P. WALL LAYOUT

258 C.1.P. WALL DETAILS

400 PAVENENT EDGE TREATNENT DETAILS

500 RIGHT OF WAY LAYOUTS

602 PIPE DETAILS

604 DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY DETAILS

609 CURB AND DRIVEWAY DETAIL

615 CURB RAAP DETAILS

CONTINUED ON A2

PLANS PREPARED BY

c'12M1, ..

FOR

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

CENTRAL FEDERAL LANDS HIGHWAY DIVISION

DENVER, COLORADO

SHEET

NUMBER.I

Al

Call before you dig.

-.a1J.ai1.corn

" ~ PROJECT MANAGER LeAD DESIGNER

CH2M Hill quecies may b€ added at the time of the pre grade inspection and shall be incorporated into the TRPA permit and site plan as additional coro d111ons of approval

Scale in Feet ~~ 9/06/17

AP~f~ DATE: ~¥~bl'7

CHIEF OF ENGINEERING

CENTRAL FEDERAL LANDS HIGHWAY DrvISION

~ MATTHEW AM6ROZIAK